Obama promises more than 600,000 stimulus jobs

okboston wrote:

<quoted text>
Is that all you have to say about it?

Teddy R wrote:

<quoted text>
Benefits of global warming - planting Zones are moving North!

Teddy R wrote:

So, why is BOBO spiking the ball so vigorouly on the OBL hit?
Doesn't he know it's all about the economy, stupid?
He should be out there showing Americans what great job he's done on turning the economy and unemployment around, and ... oh, dear - look at this:
"Gross domestic product expanded at a 2.2 percent annual rate, the Commerce Department said on Friday in its advance estimate, moderating from the fourth quarter's 3 percent rate.... below economists' expectations for a 2.5 percent pace ..."
http://www.cnbc.com/id/47202822
Say hello to double-dip recession.
I guess making us all sick of hearing BS stories of his heroism in pushing the button on OBL is all this mob has left. It's gonna be a long campaign for them - we're not even to May yet. Still a long way to fall.

Teddy R wrote:

So, why is BOBO spiking the ball so vigorouly on the OBL hit?
Doesn't he know it's all about the economy, stupid?
He should be out there showing Americans what great job he's done on turning the economy and unemployment around, and ... oh, dear - look at this:
"Gross domestic product expanded at a 2.2 percent annual rate, the Commerce Department said on Friday in its advance estimate, moderating from the fourth quarter's 3 percent rate.... below economists' expectations for a 2.5 percent pace ..."
http://www.cnbc.com/id/47202822
Say hello to double-dip recession.
I guess making us all sick of hearing BS stories of his heroism in pushing the button on OBL is all this mob has left. It's gonna be a long campaign for them - we're not even to May yet. Still a long way to fall.

icu_ wrote:

<quoted text>WHenI minored in Economics I found that there were two types of Economics degrees. One was Mathematically drivenwitha heavy weighting of calculus. The other was a sociological one that was based upon various theories that created a buch of what if type of questions that the professors would usually roll their eyes and laugh at.
I can see what camp you came out of so there is no point in even adressing your post because you woulnt understand any of it anyway

okboston wrote:

<quoted text>
He is. He uses Wisconsin to illustrate the Republican plan. While the US has been gaining jobs Wisconsin has been shedding them.
Nice of Governor Walker to demonstrate the Republican austerity plan and its ability to create jobs........or not.

Judged:

1

1

1

okboston wrote:

<quoted text>
Yes, the Republican double dip. Obama said we needed more stimulus. The Republicans said no. Kind of shows that electing Republicans in November will allow the US to follow Wisconsin.

exceptionally kkklueless unit wrote:

eku the racist eedjit wants race to determine who becomes president. Reject the despicable racist eku and vote for competence in 2012!

stimulus jobs wrote:

http://abcnews.go.com/WNT/vide o/us-bridges-roads-built-chine se-firms-14594513?tab=9482931% C2%A7ion=4765066
Way to go barry, stimulus jobs going overseas.

787 BILLION dollars wrote:

Obama promises are simply BS!!!!!
I voted for that coward...wow I do regret it
I will cast my vote towards Romney in NOV

okboston wrote:

<quoted text>
Yes, the Republican double dip. Obama said we needed more stimulus. The Republicans said no. Kind of shows that electing Republicans in November will allow the US to follow Wisconsin.

nac wrote:

<quoted text>
You're right that Obama has been a failure to the American people, but you should do your homework before giving your vote to Romney.
They are owned by the very same people and have the very same agenda.
Ron Paul is in favor of fiscal responsibility, against perpetual war, in favor of the Constitution, and a champion of Liberty.
Before you write him off as unelectable, consider... If everyone who believes in Liberty but doesn't think Paul can win... votes for him......... he will win. America CAN win. America WILL win, its just a matter of how we'll win.
If Obama or Romney win the election, We The People will probably have to do it ourselves... the old fashioned way. And we will. But I hope we can avoid that by exercising some common sense and electing a true patriot like Dr. Paul.

nac wrote:

<quoted text>
Now I get it... you're a liberal parody poster.
No one who is serious would blame the economic situation on those who refused to back the failed policy that has kept us in peril.
I apologize for cringing at your posts, I should have been laughing.

Teddy R wrote:

<quoted text>
I have much sympathy with Dr. Paul's politics, as I think you know.
However, as a purely pragmatic matter I cannot support your suggested course of action.
Certainly, I hope to see the Paul forces exert maximum leverage on the GOP convention and hopefully secure every concessions they can from the Party and the Romney campaign in the way of platform planks and positions in the future Romney admnistration that WILL take office next January, etc. I hope other true fiscal and constitutional conservative forces like the TEA Party can as well.
But I think that's the best we can hope for.
Ironically, the leverage the Paul people have to exert on the GOP and the Romney camp springs from the same political reality that makes it impossible for me to vote for him. Up until the closing gavel of the GOP Convention, I'm perfectly happy to act the total Paul-bot to press the kind of fiscal and constitutional conservative agenda the nation needs, to the max. But after that point, my vote goes to Romney as the GOP nominee, for the simple and harsh reality that A VOTE FOR RON PAUL IS A VOTE FOR OBAMA. And a second Obama term, as far as I'm concerned, would be an unmitigated national disaster.
The Obama campign knows this very well, and the BOBOns can be counted on to serve as Ron Paul's biggest and most vocal fan club (covertly, of course). The BOBOns completely wet themselves with ecstasy at the mere thought of Ron Paul running as an independent.
Again, though - don't take this wrongly - I completely agree with you in all save means. You say, " ... its just a matter of how we'll win. If Obama or Romney win the election, We The People will probably have to do it ourselves ... the old fashioned way. And we will. But I hope we can avoid that."
I agree - but I've already moved beyond this, recognizing the pooch is already well and truly screwed, and yes, We The People ARE going to have to do it ourselves ... the old fashioned way. Ron Paul's campaign, the rise of the TEA Party, etc. are just preliminary skirmishes in what is going to be a long, long battle to wrest America back out of the grip of the professional political classes in Washington who have hijacked the federal government. We need to take the long view. It means we're going to have to start a quiet revolution, STARTING with getting involved hands-on at the LOCAL level, taking over local GOP party committees and the apparatus of party power, then moving to change the party's course at the State and then National levels.
It's happened before the same way - we can make it happen again.
Can I get a HOOH?

okboston wrote:

<quoted text>
Why spending must be cut and taxes must be raised:
"Bowles, a Democrat, then laid on the crowd some pretty simple, but devastating, arithmetic. He explained that 100 percent of the tax revenue that entered the Treasury in 2011 went out the door to pay for mandatory spending -- such as Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security -- and to pay the interest on our staggering $15.6 trillion national debt."
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-04-29/u-s-...

Teddy R wrote:

<quoted text>
Yeah, we've plowed all this ground under already:
1) Liquidate SSI altogether and end the program. Replace with private retirement insurance/funds
2) Get the federal government out of the welfare and medical insurance business. Repeal ObamaScare. End Medicaid/Medicare, and turn it bac over to the States and prvate insurors, where it belongs.