Erwin Cain seeks Dist. 3 Seat from Homer

Judged:

1

1

1

watch out wrote:

Cain broke the law constantly in his last race against Scott McDowell. He had to have the police remove him from the early voting place more than once. I expect the same thing when running against Homer. IMO Homer has tried to do more for this area than anyone we've had in my memory.

Judged:

5

4

2

watch out wrote:

Cain broke the law constantly in his last race against Scott McDowell. He had to have the police remove him from the early voting place more than once. I expect the same thing when running against Homer. IMO Homer has tried to do more for this area than anyone we've had in my memory.

Judged:

1

1

1

watch out wrote:

IMO Homer has tried to do more for this area than anyone we've had in my memory.

Judged:

1

ootb wrote:

<quoted text>...and the mudslinging begins, and by which Candidate's supporter? Hmmmm, a sign of things to come, I'm sure.

Ima Dorkfish wrote:

<quoted text>
http://www.youtube.com/...
If I remember right, he knew about eminent domain, and I agree with his stand on that. I agree with his belief on the healthcare situation.

Judged:

1

watch out wrote:

Cain broke the law constantly in his last race against Scott McDowell. He had to have the police remove him from the early voting place more than once. I expect the same thing when running against Homer. IMO Homer has tried to do more for this area than anyone we've had in my memory.

Judged:

1

1

1

Inky wrote:

<quoted text>And just ,what has he done besides sell hamburgers , not return phone calls and "LIE" and call Austin and help keep his big contributors officials out of trouble with the law??? If you want the facts, they can be produced?????

Wheeee wrote:

Cain gets my vote also. Have never met him, but would rather have anyone than what we have. Homer is not the man for the job. He needs to go back to fixing hamburgers. He does not represent us all.

Judged:

1

1

1

Dorkfish wrote:

I am hopeful that this election can be decided on issues, merit and a plan for the improvement of District 3.
If Homer can show he has a better plan for the future, he deserves to win, if Cain can he deserves to win. For me it is all about the future, not the past.

Judged:

1

1

Past important wrote:

<quoted text>
Unfortunately, when an incumbent is running, you have to look at their past to see if they have been good for the district or not. Homer has not been good for the district as a whole. Just keeping your name in the paper in your hometown doesn't speak too well.
When things have happened in the past, it would be nice for the guilty one to try to get everyone to look to the future instead of the past. But if we want them to repeat past mistakes they made in office, I guess voting blindly would help the incumbent. I will vote intelligently not forgetting the past due to the possibility the incumbent sees it as a sign that it was okay what he did. Running to Oklahoma did not sit well with most people and I will not put on my blinders when it comes to that. Cain for me.

get real wrote:

<quoted text>
Ok Mr. Inky, start producing and stop running your mouth like you know something. You are just like Homer, talk a lot and no production. Put up or shut up, both of you.

Inky wrote:

<quoted text>O.K. get real, get real and wake up. If you stay on top of things ,you should be able to figure it out for yourself. And how about "YOU", do you really know what is going on or did you vote for obammy too?

Judged:

1

1

Dorkfish wrote:

I am hopeful that this election can be decided on issues, merit and a plan for the improvement of District 3.
If Homer can show he has a better plan for the future, he deserves to win, if Cain can he deserves to win. For me it is all about the future, not the past.