No more than 1 rooster per house, says city

OhYeah wrote:

This is a joke? Right? No modern, civilized city in the developed world would stand for this nonsense. Hey, but Greg Smith's too bush defying the watering rules - he's a real rebel, ha ha. Yeah, I can see this catching on in Toronto, London, and New York City. Los Angeles is the laughing stock of the civilized world with the new 1896 poultry law.

I think it's a good idea to maybe grow some veggies and put in an Avo tree or similar. A couple pigs and a rooster might be a bad idea. There's something about a virus mutating as a result of people living in close proximity with barnyard animals.

Richard wrote:

<quoted text>
I think it's a good idea to maybe grow some veggies and put in an Avo tree or similar. A couple pigs and a rooster might be a bad idea. There's something about a virus mutating as a result of people living in close proximity with barnyard animals.

Its white mans plan to infect the Latinos with the bird flu, uh, if there were white men in LA.

Karl wrote:

<quoted text>
Its white mans plan to infect the Latinos with the bird flu, uh, if there were white men in LA.

The Latinos in L.A. are Too smart. They'd figure it out in a flash! At least half of 'em have PhD's in Microbiology.

The rooster ordinance is just another way of generating revenue from a certain class of people (rooster owners). So to all the rooster owners, welcome to the club. The club of having to pay fines for minor violations. Like parking on the wrong side of the street during street sweeper hours or watering your lawn on the wrong day. How about not having a license for your dog...the city needs all the money it can find, and the benefit of this decision is that law enforcement will have another tool to access your property. So it's a win win. City gets new revenue, police get a new tool and citizens get a little more peace in the neighborhood. Wonder whats next in line for generating new revenues.

Losing wrote:

The rooster ordinance is just another way of generating revenue from a certain class of people (rooster owners). So to all the rooster owners, welcome to the club. The club of having to pay fines for minor violations. Like parking on the wrong side of the street during street sweeper hours or watering your lawn on the wrong day. How about not having a license for your dog...the city needs all the money it can find, and the benefit of this decision is that law enforcement will have another tool to access your property. So it's a win win. City gets new revenue, police get a new tool and citizens get a little more peace in the neighborhood. Wonder whats next in line for generating new revenues.

Yeah. License fees from owners of Mr. Bauk Bauk will sure bring in a load of money for the city. What a crock of ****.

lagrits wrote:

<quoted text>
I thought you were a bleeding heart liberal who did human rights stuff. Why a post like this one?

spare us, it is obvious you don't think...you respond....the trouble with you wing nuts is you think everyone fits one mold..like yourselves...the rest of us, the vast majority, just wish the illegals would leave, but know they won't. My question is neither liberal or any thing else...wherever Mexicans live, either in LA, El Centro, Mexico City, garbage in the streets accumulates...I see it as a cultural thing...maybe the see it a way to create jobs...you see what you want to see and that is determined by talk radio and tv....sorry...

redpandabear wrote:

with one rooster amd 20 hen and 6 pot belly pigs , It's not so third world feeling any more in the valley now,,,,

When did LA change from a desert to a farm....