Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

elise in burque wrote:

<quoted text>The birth of a fetus can mean any fetus, even a dead one, even one that wasn't intended to be alive. It doesn't matter how much you nag and bluster about it. Let it go.
You are arguing for the sake of arguing, as usual. That's what you do, always. You claim that your arguments here always pertain to your righteous fight against abortion. How is nitpicking in minutia helping you?

"You are arguing for the sake of arguing, as usual. That's what you do, always. You claim that your arguments here always pertain to your righteous fight against abortion. How is nitpicking in minutia helping you?"

Projection again, toots.

We were talking about "delivery" of a fetus to treat eclampsia. I said delivery, either vaginally or by c-section. Petey said an LTA is necessary for a pregnant woman with eclampsia, because a c-section would kill her. That's where this began, and "delivery" for eclampsia is NOT considered an LTA. So you're the one arguing for the sake of arguing and that's all you do. You never know wth you're talking about when you argue something, just like Katie and Foo.

lil Lily wrote:

<quoted text>
You need to pay attention or you're going to keep making a fool of yourself.
This is what I had said when Ignorant Petey claimed "Delivery can also refer to LTA", because we were talking about eclampsia and how that's treated. He said by LTA, I said by delivery. Now tell me, are you going to suggest that "delivery" in this context would mean an LTA, Elise?
lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
~Oh NOW you admit that eclampsia is treated by delivery and not abortion? LOL. I never said c-section was the only way to treast eclampsia, fraud.
No way you've been in the medical field, let alone for 14 years, fraud. You said awhile back that abortion was the only way to save a pregnant woman with eclampsia from dying, when the facts are delivery is how women with eclampsia are prevented from dying from eclampsia.~
An LTA is NOT considered a "delivery" in the context of what Petey was replying to, bonehead. You're a nursing student as much as Petey's in the medical field. BOTH of you know less than a 5th grader about this stuff.

I am not talking about one tiny little reference, babe. You make a statement and I answer if I feel like it. You don't like my comment? Scroll past it. I'm not sure you can do that, given your intense need to explain yourself, no matter to whom or how trivial the matter. You must be exhausted. Please, try to pick your battles according to relevance and importance. You will feel much better and you might be a little less angry.

"The birth of a fetus can mean any fetus, even a dead one, even one that wasn't intended to be alive. It doesn't matter how much you nag and bluster about it. Let it go."

Since we were talking about a fetus of a woman with eclampsia, we weren't talking about delivering a dead fetus, so why don't you let it go. You don't even know the context of the topic you're arguing with me about.

elise in burque wrote:

<quoted text>It's very dangerous to drive tired. You could kill a baby.

You really have no purpose here except to display what amuses small-minded fools.

lil Lily wrote:

<quoted text>
Projection, Toots.
Both you and Petey were wrong in your posts directed to me. I wasn't wrong, so there's no wrong for me to admit.

There you go, again, just like clockwork. You crack me up; don't ever change!

lil Lily wrote:

"The birth of a fetus can mean any fetus, even a dead one, even one that wasn't intended to be alive. It doesn't matter how much you nag and bluster about it. Let it go."
Since we were talking about a fetus of a woman with eclampsia, we weren't talking about delivering a dead fetus, so why don't you let it go. You don't even know the context of the topic you're arguing with me about.

You can't stop, can you? I think you love me. Admit it. Muah.

pupsilicious wrote:

Saint Michael the Archangel,
defend us in battle.
Be our protection against the wickedness and snares of the devil.
May God rebuke him, we humbly pray;
and do Thou, O Prince of the Heavenly Host -
by the Divine Power of God -
cast into hell, satan and all the evil spirits,
who roam throughout the world seeking the ruin of souls.
Amen.

Apparently you must be used to being the resident laughing stock.

http://www.topix.com/forum/religion/pagan-wic...

elise in burque wrote:

<quoted text>I am not talking about one tiny little reference, babe. You make a statement and I answer if I feel like it. You don't like my comment? Scroll past it. I'm not sure you can do that, given your intense need to explain yourself, no matter to whom or how trivial the matter. You must be exhausted. Please, try to pick your battles according to relevance and importance. You will feel much better and you might be a little less angry.

I will not scroll past an opportunity to point out your mind-boggling ignorance and double standards. Are you kidding me? lol.

I don't care what (you're) talking about. If you're going to direct a comment to me, it had better be about what I'm talking about, or you will be raked over the coals for being such an idiot. Don't like it, don't post on what you think I'm talking about because you've been way off in left field, by yourself, every single time.

lil Lily wrote:

<quoted text>
You really have no purpose here except to display what amuses small-minded fools.

You say that like it's a bad thing. Why can't you stop posting to me? Oh, it's that projection thingy you love so much. Gotcha...carry on, love.

Elise thinks I'm "angry". What a bonehead.

None of them warrants anger, only pity. I can't even imagine going through life clueless like they all do.

elise in burque wrote:

<quoted text>You can't stop, can you? I think you love me. Admit it. Muah.

Elise? Here's a little pointer to show you why what you post is projection.

I haven't posted a thing to you first.
Only posted in reply to what you posted to me.
See, you've posted to me when I hadn't said a word to you or about anything you've posted before you made posts to me or about things I posted. I then replied to your stupidity about my arguments,
So reality is, it's you who can't stop. Think about it, bonehead.

"I am knit and pray and I am not sick."

http://www.topix.com/forum/religion/catholic/...

LMAO!!

elise in burque wrote:

<quoted text>You say that like it's a bad thing. Why can't you stop posting to me? Oh, it's that projection thingy you love so much. Gotcha...carry on, love.

You're still posting to me, Bonehead? Why can't you stop?

lil Lily wrote:

<quoted text>
I will not scroll past an opportunity to point out your mind-boggling ignorance and double standards. Are you kidding me? lol.
I don't care what (you're) talking about. If you're going to direct a comment to me, it had better be about what I'm talking about, or you will be raked over the coals for being such an idiot. Don't like it, don't post on what you think I'm talking about because you've been way off in left field, by yourself, every single time.

I love to talk to you and you obviously love to talk to me. Don't fight it, love. Any excuse to post to me is snatched up by you like the last snack at a business meeting.

You can't control yourself. You have this frantic need of yours to always be understood, even by people you claim to disdain and unworthy of serious consideration. That's interesting. You must not have been listened to and taken seriously when you were a little girl. It's not that we disagree with you that incenses you so violently; it's your belief that we don't understand you that drives you over the edge. Verrry interesting, indeed!

lil Lily wrote:

Elise thinks I'm "angry". What a bonehead.
None of them warrants anger, only pity. I can't even imagine going through life clueless like they all do.

I'm flattered that I incite any emotion in you at all. You love me, see?

;-D

realkatie wrote:

<quoted text>
The referenced September deadline is following the initial conversation where you both mistakenly asserted I called Doc a liar (even without using those exact words according to both of you). The initial conversation asking Doc if he at times accidentally or purposefully left off "right" in regard to Bitner's stance took place in Spring or Summer of 2011, not in September which is what you've provided above.
...

lol. Doesn't matter what was following what. You claimed to me that you only "asked" Doc about leaving out the word "right", and I asserted that you stated flat out that he didn't use the word "right", but said Bitner "supported abortion". Which was a lie. Then, you claimed to me that you didn't say that, but only "asked" him, which was another lie.

NOW, you're trying to state that when you flat out said Doc didn't use the word "right" in his posts about Bitner, and that you could prove it,(which you haven't yet), it somehow magically doesn't count, because it wasn't stated in the timeline YOU claim this supposedly all took place? No, neither of us was mistaken in you accusing him of lying about never leaving off the word 'right" when making statements about Bitner's position.

Also, you still have yet to "(follow rules of decency... without your handy dandy proof nearby)"

You haven't proved what you said in the posts telling Doc he left out the word "right" and did so in so many posts it'd be easy for you to bring up proof.

lil Lily wrote:

<quoted text>
Elise? Here's a little pointer to show you why what you post is projection.
I haven't posted a thing to you first.
Only posted in reply to what you posted to me.
See, you've posted to me when I hadn't said a word to you or about anything you've posted before you made posts to me or about things I posted. I then replied to your stupidity about my arguments,
So reality is, it's you who can't stop. Think about it, bonehead.

I post to you because you amuse me. You post to me because, in your mind, you are misunderstood. That is one thing you have never been able to walk away from. You will continue to post to me because you are incapable of allowing someone else an opinion of you of which you do not approve. Add to that, your insistence on having the last word, always, and I am assured that our relationship will be a very long one. I'm thrilled, aren't you?

lil Lily wrote:

<quoted text>
You're still posting to me, Bonehead? Why can't you stop?

Because I love you.

Long Night Moon wrote:

"I am knit and pray and I am not sick."
http://www.topix.com/forum/religion/catholic/...
LMAO!!

LOL, that's funny. How goes it LNM? Did you go to early Mass today? I did, because I needed water for my holy water facial. It's the newest thing with the trendies, you know.

elise in burque wrote:

<quoted text>I'm flattered that I incite any emotion in you at all. You love me, see?
;-D

Elise, you are going to drive her over the brink of sanity. I hope you know what you are doing because personally I think she's fragile. If she wasn't so darn obnoxious 24/7, I would feel a wee bit sorry for her.

Wait. She really is a thoroughly obnoxious person - carry on!

Obnoxious:

1 archaic: exposed to something unpleasant or harmful —used with to

2 archaic: deserving of censure

3 : odiously or disgustingly objectionable : highly offensive

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/obn...

**********
Odious works as well as objectionable and offensive. Or unpleasant or harmful. I like "deserving of censure" but of course that would have to be tempered with pity. I do tend to pity her some of the time.