How the gangstalking went down and Why

Part One:

Attorney showed masked fury when my son returned in December of 2005 with updated PA ID.(Dad died September 2005)Attorney wanted him out of there so he could have me removed as well (I owed 2 mo. probation in PA back then.)

Son had been told to leave and never come back. He did not follow their orders as he and his girlfriend broke up and he thought the orders rather odd....

Also, Doug Werner- a realtor- had told us that the Russians who were to purchase our home could not afford it and would be returning to Russia. That calmed us as we had decided NOT TO SELL and had told the attorney that.

If he had stayed in PA- attorney would have had me arrested and extradited back to PA- and he would have "Will" there to withdraw the money coming in from my dad's various accounts.

Once we were gone, he could use Walter's old friend who used to be manager at the Bank of America, Sedgewick Avenue, Darien.

This was where Will Desantos- who fit the description the gangstalkers gave to Walter in Spokane- could easily withdraw everything from my late fathers' account. So the Bank of America was in collusion with the corrupt attorney.

The attorney had craftily tested out whether Will would be able to get the money out, about 3 weeks after my Dad died. Attorney had a slip in his office showing that someone had withdrawn $700 and then immediately replaced $700 into the account. At the top was written "Will".

The attorney acted angry with Walter and asked if he had anything to do with it. He did NOT.
After that day, however, Will was transferred to a Bank of America somewhere near NYC. When Walter called him a few months later, he freaked and hung up after saying never to call him again.

(Now, the gangstalkers out west had a description of Walt which matched a description of Will identically.
Even one of the gangstalkers questioned the description.)

When Walt tried to initially purchase the Nissan before we went on our trip, he was initially called an "imposter" despite having more than enough ID and money in the bank.

The car salesman was very friendly and told my son it was probably some glitch in the Bank of America....Walt had to return to CT with no car and learn he was considered an imposter- no reason given. Obvious LIE.

He was sent back the following week (by B of A)to purchase the vehicle.Told a Friday would be perfect. Bank officials acted odd and uncomfortable, and when he got to the dealership, even the receptionist would not speak to him. The salesman was friendly but clearly nervous.

I believe that in the week before my son went down alone to buy the car in PA, the attorney sent some of his 3-pieced goons to inform the dealership that Walter and I were terrorists or whatever, and that they would be sending a crew to put monitors in the car.

Probably flashed fake FBI badges. It explains the difference in the attitudes of the people working at the dealership...(doylestown?) from the first visit to the second.

While filling out paperwork, hispanic young men surrounded the new car. That is when the gps and other monitors were installed.

I see a possible collusion between judicial(attorney),white wealthy professional looking people (those with the so called criminal dossiers) and then the lower rungs- the hispanic group implanting the monitors on command.

When Walt came back with the new car and picked me up from a motel, and we were ready to leave, we went to the bank.

One of the tellers walked away from her post and came outside,lit a cigarette, and asked Walt if she could see the new car. He knew something was odd and lied and said it was parked elsewhere. Interestingly, this teller appeared to be Russian, as were the apparently sham buyers of the home.

a bit more detail:
Both of my parents died while driving, with me as the passenger. Mom passed away November 2004 leaving from the dialysis unit where my father was starting treatment, and Dad died September 2005 on his way from Roton Point Rowayton to the grocery store- we were chatting about what to purchase. Suddenly, his head tipped to one side, the car drove up the hill in front of the Rowayton UCC, and my beloved father was dead. Mom died her first time trying to drive home from the hospital. I sat in back so as not to make her more anxious than she already was. She drove straight across Rt 1 without stopping- I was begging her to pull over. She said nothing. She careened to the right on an overpass of 95, I pleaded with her to pull over- no response- finally, the car ran off the side of the road near Reed Street and was stopped by a small pine tree- still bent to this day.

The medics arrived. Mom's foot was still on the accelerator. They said she had been dead since leaving the hospital area....I was brokenhearted, and had to tell my father and summon my son and his fiancee and my daughter.....
----------
I was naive. Mom had trusted the probate attorney. Dad had been taken advantage of same. Prior to starting dialysis, while he sometimes thought WW2 was raging and often slept 11 hours a day, he signed his last will.This will was different than any of the other wills my parents had signed over the years.

THIS WILL HAD A LONG SECTION TACKED ON THE END SAYING THAT THE PROBATE ATTORNEY COULD NOT BE CHARGED BY ANYONE AT ANYTIME AT ANY PLACE.

Dad never really looked at the will. Once his mind cleared on dialysis, he never bothered with it. The attorney told my son Walter that my Dad was not competent when he signed his last will, but that "it was his will." SURE IT WAS- EXCEPT FOR THE ADDITION.

Now, the fact that that addition is ONLY on the last copy of the will suggests to me---and to many others who have read it---preplanning. Why was he worried about being taken to court now, when he never was before???
----------
----------

In the period of mourning and depression that followed Dad's death, my son and I agreed with the attorney to sell the home which was willed to both of us.

However, as time passed we changed our minds and no longer wished to sell the home. The attorney became very angry and aggressive. He did not honor my parents' wishes nor ours.

He had a pair of maintenance men who worked in his building- 2 Russians- to whom he wanted to sell the home.

The realtor Doug Werner told us not to worry because the Russians did not have the money to buy the home and would soon be returning to Russia. That calmed our nerves a bit.

When I called the Russian's attorney- he had been told we were recalcitrant tenants, not heirs. I believe he dropped the case right then and there.
The Russian realtor from Stamford was also told we were tenants.

Eventually we hired another attorney and gave up. The attorney we had was DETERMINED to take our home away from us. HE EVEN SAID THAT HE WOULD HAVE US EVICTED.

MY PARENTS LEFT THE HOME TO ME AND TO MY SON. WHY WOULD ANY ATTORNEY IN GOOD STANDING, WITH A SENSE OF MORALITY, IGNORE MY PARENTS' WISHES AND ACT AGAINST WHAT THEY HAD CAREFULLY SET FORWARD IN THEIR LAST WILL....

(MORE TO COME.)