Local News: Wilsons Mills, NC 

 | 

Sign Up

 | 

Sign In

Who do you support for U.S. Senate in North Carolina in 2010?

Posted in the Wilsons Mills Forum

Read

38,682 Comments

More Wilsons Mills Discussions »

Comments (Page 493)

Showing posts 9,841 - 9,860 of38,682
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:

Since: May 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10280
May 8, 2012
 
Arnold-Ziffel wrote:
<quoted text>
Gail, you're such a wonderful person to know. God bless your pointed little head.
The sex was great.
The Truth

AOL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10281
May 8, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

Robert Stowe wrote:
<quoted text>So Obama has had no corporate backers. He received far more coporate money in 2008 than did McCain. Let me ask you three questions. Why do people invest in a business? What is a corporation and what are its major purposes?
Robert,

Please do not confuse "SS" with facts. He can only exist in the delusional world he has created and WCU has expanded.

Note to forum: Anyone considering WCU should read "SS"'s posts for an vision of their future.
The Truth

AOL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10282
May 8, 2012
 
Arnie,

With all the excitement you have been going through the last few days, you forgot to address one of my nagging questions.

When you love a child molester, do you do so conditionally or without judgment?

I have been unable to get past my disgust with their actions. It intrigues me to no end how you say you are able to unconditionally love them. As I said before, I am a work in progress.

“Anasasis Xenophontis.”

Since: Dec 08

over there.

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10283
May 8, 2012
 
The Truth wrote:
<quoted text>
Robert,
Please do not confuse "SS" with facts. He can only exist in the delusional world he has created and WCU has expanded.
Note to forum: Anyone considering WCU should read "SS"'s posts for an vision of their future.
how irrelevant and childish. thank god people dont take you seriously.

“Anasasis Xenophontis.”

Since: Dec 08

over there.

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10284
May 8, 2012
 
Robert Stowe wrote:
<quoted text>So Obama has had no corporate backers. He received far more coporate money in 2008 than did McCain. Let me ask you three questions. Why do people invest in a business? What is a corporation and what are its major purposes?
a corporation is run under state law as a human entity passed down among its shareholders and the like. But in this age there are these things called mega corps. mega corps lead the way in monopolizing an industry: verizon, cellular...walmart, wholesale and so on. i could name hundreds actually. ex of why corporations are bad-lowes moved in on Marion in 05 i think, and i watched a couple small time hardware businesses go down within the year...there was an article in the newspaper about it i think.
in point, when you increase shareholder values(or try to) you put at risk peoples businesses, livelihoods, and whole small town economies.
We need a new corporate model that increases shareholder values, but with a fking conscience which i think a lot of ceo's dont have. it goes back to when Ford tried to shut down the Dodge brothers.
The Truth

AOL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10285
May 8, 2012
 

Judged:

1

sevenSecrets wrote:
<quoted text>
how irrelevant and childish. thank god people dont take you seriously.
I thought you gave us your word you would neither read nor respond to anymore of my posts.

This shows us how little your word is worth!

Yes, "SS", the sound you are now hearing in your head IS the famous:

Ba da Bing, Ba da BOOM!!!

“Anasasis Xenophontis.”

Since: Dec 08

over there.

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10286
May 8, 2012
 
The Truth wrote:
<quoted text>
I thought you gave us your word you would neither read nor respond to anymore of my posts.
This shows us how little your word is worth!
Yes, "SS", the sound you are now hearing in your head IS the famous:
Ba da Bing, Ba da BOOM!!!
how old are you?

again..

how irrelevant, childish, and immature you are.

i hope to God you dont have kids.(i can get personal as well.)

Since: May 09

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10287
May 8, 2012
 

Judged:

1

sevenSecrets wrote:
<quoted text>
a corporation is run under state law as a human entity passed down among its shareholders and the like. But in this age there are these things called mega corps. mega corps lead the way in monopolizing an industry: verizon, cellular...walmart, wholesale and so on. i could name hundreds actually. ex of why corporations are bad-lowes moved in on Marion in 05 i think, and i watched a couple small time hardware businesses go down within the year...there was an article in the newspaper about it i think.
in point, when you increase shareholder values(or try to) you put at risk peoples businesses, livelihoods, and whole small town economies.
We need a new corporate model that increases shareholder values, but with a fking conscience which i think a lot of ceo's dont have. it goes back to when Ford tried to shut down the Dodge brothers.
You are so naive! A corporate CEO has a fiduciary responsibilty to maximize shareholder value through every legal means. Corporations have no conscience on their own, only by consensus of the shareholders. You just don't like free enterprise.
The Truth

AOL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10288
May 8, 2012
 
sevenSecrets wrote:
<quoted text>
how old are you?
again..
how irrelevant, childish, and immature you are.
i hope to God you dont have kids.(i can get personal as well.)
So your word does mean nothing?

You are obviously a very conflicted young man. However, life will teach you a hard lesson in that if you continue to say things and not follow through on them people will lose all confidence in you as a person.

Please think before you post. It will help give you the appearance of higher intellect. Your "shoot from the hip" style is giving away your juvenile level of maturity.
The Truth

AOL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10289
May 8, 2012
 
Robert Stowe wrote:
<quoted text>You are so naive! A corporate CEO has a fiduciary responsibilty to maximize shareholder value through every legal means. Corporations have no conscience on their own, only by consensus of the shareholders. You just don't like free enterprise.
Most socialistic idealogues do not.

They have the sweet and innocent idea that one makes money by just turning on the printing presses. Obama would be proud!

“Anasasis Xenophontis.”

Since: Dec 08

over there.

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10290
May 8, 2012
 
The Truth wrote:
<quoted text>
Most socialistic idealogues do not.
They have the sweet and innocent idea that one makes money by just turning on the printing presses. Obama would be proud!
i do not have that idea.
and free enterprise is great, but not when you create these top heavy conglomerates that outsource our jobs, give very limited wealth to its workers(not to mention very low benefits) and dehumanize our workplaces.
thank god for the limited liability act.

“Anasasis Xenophontis.”

Since: Dec 08

over there.

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10291
May 8, 2012
 
The Truth wrote:
<quoted text>
So your word does mean nothing?
You are obviously a very conflicted young man. However, life will teach you a hard lesson in that if you continue to say things and not follow through on them people will lose all confidence in you as a person.
Please think before you post. It will help give you the appearance of higher intellect. Your "shoot from the hip" style is giving away your juvenile level of maturity.
life apparently has not taught you any lessons
quit this childish argument.

“Anasasis Xenophontis.”

Since: Dec 08

over there.

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10292
May 8, 2012
 
Robert Stowe wrote:
<quoted text>You are so naive! A corporate CEO has a fiduciary responsibilty to maximize shareholder value through every legal means. Corporations have no conscience on their own, only by consensus of the shareholders. You just don't like free enterprise.
i dont like goldmaN sachs.
again thank god for the limited liability.
The Truth

Knoxville, TN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10293
May 8, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

sevenSecrets wrote:
<quoted text>
i do not have that idea.
and free enterprise is great, but not when you create these top heavy conglomerates that outsource our jobs, give very limited wealth to its workers(not to mention very low benefits) and dehumanize our workplaces.
thank god for the limited liability act.
Wow!!!

The arrogance and utter vanity you show. I was directing it at the socialists. You have made it clear you are not a socialist. Why don't you grow up and understand everything does NOT revolve around you, college-boy.
waco1954

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10294
May 8, 2012
 
ArnoId-ZiffeI wrote:
<quoted text>
The sex was great.
Hence...our love child...

Since: May 09

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10295
May 8, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

sevenSecrets wrote:
<quoted text>
i dont like goldmaN sachs.
again thank god for the limited liability.
What in hell do you know about Goldman Sachs except what you have heard from the media?

“Anasasis Xenophontis.”

Since: Dec 08

over there.

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10296
May 8, 2012
 
Robert Stowe wrote:
<quoted text>What in hell do you know about Goldman Sachs except what you have heard from the media?
quick test: what have YOU heard about goldman sachs that was good?

“Anasasis Xenophontis.”

Since: Dec 08

over there.

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10297
May 8, 2012
 
so now our conservative brethren have passed more legislation on the already banned gay marriage issue. now they have, just need, to get more and more into the lives of any non-christian, non-white, and non-hetero people.

and i thought you guys were all about getting gov out of peoples lives...tisk

christian conservative write amendments about already banned gay marriage so they can seem more christian. im starting to actually believe that.
waco1954

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10298
May 9, 2012
 
Entropy ,seven.

“Anasasis Xenophontis.”

Since: Dec 08

over there.

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10299
May 9, 2012
 
waco1954 wrote:
Entropy ,seven.
the actual argument for the definition is that NC is not "equipped" to handle legally gay married couples from other states.
what fallacy, we should be opening doors to all peoples, actively increasing consumer and property values. but we do it the dixie way and slam the door in the faces of anyone that isnt christian.
passing legislation based on perverse religious moralities is wrong.
Jim Crowe comeback.
This is no different than passing state law that you can only read the qur'an because the state only recognizes the qur'an.
conservative backstabbing fools, get YOUR government out of peoples lives.

Tell me when this thread is updated:
(Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker

Send me an email

Showing posts 9,841 - 9,860 of38,682
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Other Recent Wilsons Mills Discussions

Search the Wilsons Mills Forum:
Topic Updated Last By Comments
Wendell Walmart approval up in the air May 6 Tammy Morales 1
Review: Advanced Spine & Pain Center May 1 Dwight Johnson 1
Amy Shirley? (Jun '12) Apr 29 guest 16
First &#x93;legal&#x94; brewery opens in Johnst... Apr 22 ddog 1
Misplaced Souls Mc Goldsboro Chapter (Dec '09) Apr 17 Tone 89
Two charged in wake of Waffle House shootout in... Apr 17 Stephanie 1
Clayton woman found in towed car died of head a... Apr '13 brick 1
Jobs from Indeed
Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

Wilsons Mills People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Wilsons Mills News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Wilsons Mills

Daily Horoscope for May 18

Virgo

Matters of the heart take an unexpected turn today. You might be strongly attracted to someone you've never looked at twice until now, or you could fall for someone who's much older or younger than you. If you're already involved in a relationship, either you or your partner will want to make it more exciting and spontaneous. Is this a suggestion that will go down well?

Get your Horoscope »