Cops protest UMass forum with ex-radicals

Eric Stratton III wrote:

<quoted text>
Nice try to get the SOA in the topic, the school has been blamed for everything from HIV to Crack to all the Coupes in C. and S. America. The guy was a Marxist, he would have protested anything the US did, period. While we did some unsavory things in the Cold War period it was in fact a struggle for survival and this guy would have done whatever he could have done to help the other side, ie; the Soviets. While I agree with your comments about free speech, to compare what he did with accusations, none proved and most are conspiracy theories, on the SOA is just silly and ill informed. Moral Relativism is not a good concept to embrace, let that go, it only seeks to justify evil actions.
PS-the Crazy Marxist still thinks it is a great philosophy! lol An Un-repentant terrorist in the US!? Wow! Shocker! lol So many hate it here so much that they do not want to live any other place! lol! Typical
"Communism, despite a 100 million dead we are still popular!"-Unkonwn

umassole wrote:

the only fool here is YOU. I work here and most of your esteemed phd holding acid heads are byproducts of the 60's, their time has passed.
free speech is one thing and i am exercising my right to it here but coddling murderous radicals goes too far. i bet you wish were at WACO or RUBY RIDGE to stand along side those fanatics. Your the type to excuse bin laden as a product of a corrupt capitalist society. why dont you do the world a favor and move to china. they know how to deal with radicals like you. ONE ROUND OF 11.5mm TO THE BACK OF THE HEAD.
<quoted text>

Susan wrote:

Playing into his hands so to speak by not letting him come and speak. Is there not anyone at the university to question this man's actions of the past. My question to him would be - How do you justify your actions of killing people?
And then I would ask him to respond to this scenario. Would you still do it again if the person being killed was your grandchild instead of the police officer?

Tewksbury Dad wrote:

<quoted text>
It's Hooked on Phonics you bone head, maybe you should try it.

Enough Government wrote:

Seriously, what is a terrorist, murdrer that's unrepentant going teach the students about? Once again, the liberal, anti-Americam mindset needs to be squashed on these campuses. Blowing up county courthouses is nothing to be proud of nor should that mentality be taught on our State College campuses. Shame on any faculty that supported the lecture.

kevin wrote:

The guy advocated murder as a method of political change and tries to portray it as free speech. The world would be a much better place if his mother aborted him. The same is true for those that invited him to make the speech.
In the spirit of Free Speech who are the names of those who invited him and what are thier phone numbers and email address. I think it would be appropriate if they got a little free speech.

Lowellian Standard wrote:

<quoted text>
Vietnam was a struggle for survival?
Korea was a struggle for survival?
Buying into that debunked government line is an excuse not to think. Look out! There's a commie under the bed! One in the closet! Your best friend could be a commie! AHHHH! COMMIES EVERYWHERE!
I thought they were conflicts on the other side of the world in other peoples' backyards that had little strategic value...
Boy did you set me straight!

Obviously wrote:

<quoted text>
Who's the one talking about putting a bullet into my head simply on the basis that I disagree with you? SOUNDS RADICAL TO ME!
Those "esteemed phd holding acid heads are byproducts of the 60's, their time has passed" is a youthful and ignorant opinion that completely devalues their experience...something which you sorely lack.
Do I detect a bit of jealousy because they have phds and you do not? Are you a maintenance guy or something?

Chairman Mao wrote:

<quoted text>
Our leaders have been applying the same strategies since the creation of the Republic. Ok, right, war is not murder per se. Instead it's the attempted eradication of a political nation-state. The "collateral damage" would be otherwise known as murder in civilian language. But I digress. Free speech does not give one the right right to harrass and persecute another because of his or her beliefs either. Try using persuasive arguments in a public forum. Or have you learned from our government that threats are an effective tool of suppression?

Taxpayer1946 wrote:

How do you think these Amherst types would react if Glenn Beck were scheduled to speak? Would they support his free speech?

dogpound6b wrote:

Dennis is so-so silly boy-boy!