Comments
1 - 20 of 642 Comments Last updated Apr 9, 2013
First Prev
of 33
Next Last
anonymous california

Hillsboro, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1
Apr 20, 2011
 

Judged:

2

2

1

It is the law of our land, the United States of America, that every President must be born in one of the states of this country.

President Barack Hussein Obama claims to have been born in Hawaii.

Yet, rumor has it that he was born in Kenya, a foreign land.

That rumor is not going away anytime soon and will be a big part of the 2012 Presidential Election Campaign when the President runs for re-election unless he comes out with proof, namely a actual birth certificate, that proves he was born here. As of today, April 20, 2011, that election is only a year and a half away.

We the people, the citizens of America, have a right to demand and have a right to be told the truth in this matter.

This could turn out to be the biggest scandal ever in American politics.

This is not politically motivated. It is a call for the truth from the highest office in our land.

----------
Mr. President, we must know the truth! When you put your hand on that Bible on your inaugeration day, January 2009, you swore to uphold the laws of this land. We are waiting for your answer. Sir, even if you think you were born here, if you don't prove it, it will plague your re-election and will cast doubt in the voters. Only you can remedy this situation. As an American citizen who still has faith in the office of the presidency, I trust that you will come forward and do the right thing regarding this matter of your birth controversey.
----------

Your thoughts, please.
Roger Charles Courtney

Hazel, KY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#2
Apr 20, 2011
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Everytime I have had to submit a birth certificate I did just that. However, if i did not have one, I don't suppose I could have presented mine when I was called upon to do so. It would appear to me that if the man had a valid birth certificate, it would be no problem to present one and put the question to rest once and for all. I don't believe he has a valid birth certificate. Further, there doesn't seem to be anyone around from his past that grew up with him, attended school with him, or hung out with him, as a youngster, on the beaches of Hawaii. Can he surf? The only people we are aware of from his past are Bill Ayers and Jeremiah Wright. I believe he is a phony imposter.
Stan and Kyle

Madison, AL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#3
Apr 21, 2011
 
I was never a Birther, But I am becoming one quickly. I mean, Come on, C O M E O N. (As South Park's Jimmy would say)
anonymous california

Hillsboro, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#6
Apr 21, 2011
 

Judged:

1

1

anonymous california wrote:
It is the law of our land, the United States of America, that every President must be born in one of the states of this country.
President Barack Hussein Obama claims to have been born in Hawaii.
Yet, rumor has it that he was born in Kenya, a foreign land.
That rumor is not going away anytime soon and will be a big part of the 2012 Presidential Election Campaign when the President runs for re-election unless he comes out with proof, namely a actual birth certificate, that proves he was born here. As of today, April 20, 2011, that election is only a year and a half away.
We the people, the citizens of America, have a right to demand and have a right to be told the truth in this matter.
This could turn out to be the biggest scandal ever in American politics.
This is not politically motivated. It is a call for the truth from the highest office in our land.
----------
Mr. President, we must know the truth! When you put your hand on that Bible on your inaugeration day, January 2009, you swore to uphold the laws of this land. We are waiting for your answer. Sir, even if you think you were born here, if you don't prove it, it will plague your re-election and will cast doubt in the voters. Only you can remedy this situation. As an American citizen who still has faith in the office of the presidency, I trust that you will come forward and do the right thing regarding this matter of your birth controversey.
----------
Your thoughts, please.
If I may please clarify something in Post #1.

When I say "re-election" in that statement directed to the President himself I meant to say "re-election campaign". I don't want it to be confused with saying that he will be re-elected.
50cal

Hesperia, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#7
Apr 21, 2011
 

Judged:

1

there will not be a 2012 vote,our house guest from oversea"s will not leave yet he"s not done screwing the american people over. truth from the white house'''now thats a joke
anonymous california

Hillsboro, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#8
Apr 21, 2011
 
50cal wrote:
there will not be a 2012 vote,our house guest from oversea"s will not leave yet he"s not done screwing the american people over. truth from the white house'''now thats a joke
Not sure I understand. What do you mean there will not be a 2012 vote?
50cal

Hesperia, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#9
Apr 23, 2011
 

Judged:

1

anonymous california wrote:
<quoted text>
Not sure I understand. What do you mean there will not be a 2012 vote?
the stage has been set for Martial Law..., the stage is set for a police state takeover of our streets. The government has in place all the legislation, tools, and gendarmes it needs to implement Martial Law. It has a militarized police system armed and ready to act. It has a domestic military force trained in urban warfare. It has holding centers ready to house those who donít go along or who practice civil disobedience. The government has the capability to listen to every conversation, to track our location, to monitor all our computers and email, and can shut down our communication systems, including the Internet at will.

Given this capability, and all the problems evident in our country today, the implementation of Martial Law in my opinion is imminent! When large numbers of people in this country continue not to find work, when they donít have enough to eat, when their money wonít buy the necessities of life, when they canít afford to travel because of high fuel prices, and when they continue to lose their homes, they will become desperate. This desperation will result in civil unrest. That will be the governmentís reasoning for declaring Martial Law. I donít believe this will happen all at once nor do I think it will be immediately widespread. Like most government interventions, it will probably be incremental, beginning in the inner cities, and expanding to other areas as the ruling class sees fit....copy from AJ wed site..just part of what is coming...just my opinion..if we get to vote he is out and he know"s it...it made good reading..all facts
lastoutlaw

Studio City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10
Apr 23, 2011
 

Judged:

1

1

1

50cal wrote:
<quoted text> the stage has been set for Martial Law..., the stage is set for a police state takeover of our streets. The government has in place all the legislation, tools, and gendarmes it needs to implement Martial Law. It has a militarized police system armed and ready to act. It has a domestic military force trained in urban warfare. It has holding centers ready to house those who donít go along or who practice civil disobedience. The government has the capability to listen to every conversation, to track our location, to monitor all our computers and email, and can shut down our communication systems, including the Internet at will.
Given this capability, and all the problems evident in our country today, the implementation of Martial Law in my opinion is imminent! When large numbers of people in this country continue not to find work, when they donít have enough to eat, when their money wonít buy the necessities of life, when they canít afford to travel because of high fuel prices, and when they continue to lose their homes, they will become desperate. This desperation will result in civil unrest. That will be the governmentís reasoning for declaring Martial Law. I donít believe this will happen all at once nor do I think it will be immediately widespread. Like most government interventions, it will probably be incremental, beginning in the inner cities, and expanding to other areas as the ruling class sees fit....copy from AJ wed site..just part of what is coming...just my opinion..if we get to vote he is out and he know"s it...it made good reading..all facts
The being the case, it would seem to me that the FIRST order of business would be to shut down our borders and to remove those that a) don't belong here in the first place and b) have shown to be a drain on our resources and c) are the primary culprits of the civil unrest you speak of.
After all; our prison population contains a disproportionate amount of illegal invaders per capita than those who are citizens when compared with society in general. And with the early release programs due to overcrouding, you can be certain that there are more who should be in but aren't of both categories.
As this is not their country; as they have nothing invested in the maintenance of our democratic society; then why should they care for it?
They've nothing invested; so they've nothing to lose. They take without contribution because of their collective mindset that they are 'entitled' because of their minority status as third world 'refugees'; thus they behave in a third rate manner.
It would be interesting to know if this would be a primary aim - then stop and evaluate the results and determine if those that remain can restore the nation to prosperity; or if the plan is to continue and sweep all persons into a general category of needing Marital Law and allow the Government to micro-manage the population into a pre-determined social existence.
Can you clarify?
concerned

Claremont, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#11
Apr 23, 2011
 
GET OVER IT HE'S ALREADY THE PRESIDENT and yes i was yelling at you wieners.
paul shykora arts

Calgary, Canada

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#12
Apr 23, 2011
 

Judged:

1

1

1

concerned wrote:
GET OVER IT HE'S ALREADY THE PRESIDENT and yes i was yelling at you wieners.
...BUT..DID He.....LIE,here????...yada u..eh..
50cal

Hesperia, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#13
Apr 23, 2011
 
outlaw...the borders are open so they can control the inport of the illegal drugs to this country,(get their rake going in-and cash going out)and also help bring in THEIR PEOPLE..ie..cia opps,and out right bad people that work under cover for the good old USA...the policans need the illegal voters to keep them in office so paying out OUR tax dollars to the illegals is ok with them,and they have a big group of illegals that will hit the street when needed to carry there massage of mistreatment by the hands of white/black americans...(give then a towel)poor poor them...even tho most white americans have moved to another state(running)to try to save their kids from the gangs, bad schools,tax's,crazy cops and so on...the list is long my friend.
anonymous california

Hillsboro, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#14
Apr 26, 2011
 
Don't know who it was and what it was saying but Post #4 is gone.
Dutchess

Amarillo, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#16
Apr 26, 2011
 

Judged:

2

Roger Charles Courtney wrote:
Everytime I have had to submit a birth certificate I did just that. However, if i did not have one, I don't suppose I could have presented mine when I was called upon to do so. It would appear to me that if the man had a valid birth certificate, it would be no problem to present one and put the question to rest once and for all. I don't believe he has a valid birth certificate. Further, there doesn't seem to be anyone around from his past that grew up with him, attended school with him, or hung out with him, as a youngster, on the beaches of Hawaii. Can he surf? The only people we are aware of from his past are Bill Ayers and Jeremiah Wright. I believe he is a phony imposter.
I also think he is a phony. We got to vote in 2012, get rid of him and some of the other phony's in the white house, until then we have to put up with them.
anonymous california

Hillsboro, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#17
Apr 27, 2011
 
50cal wrote:
<quoted text> the stage has been set for Martial Law..., the stage is set for a police state takeover of our streets. The government has in place all the legislation, tools, and gendarmes it needs to implement Martial Law. It has a militarized police system armed and ready to act. It has a domestic military force trained in urban warfare. It has holding centers ready to house those who donít go along or who practice civil disobedience. The government has the capability to listen to every conversation, to track our location, to monitor all our computers and email, and can shut down our communication systems, including the Internet at will.
Given this capability, and all the problems evident in our country today, the implementation of Martial Law in my opinion is imminent! When large numbers of people in this country continue not to find work, when they donít have enough to eat, when their money wonít buy the necessities of life, when they canít afford to travel because of high fuel prices, and when they continue to lose their homes, they will become desperate. This desperation will result in civil unrest. That will be the governmentís reasoning for declaring Martial Law. I donít believe this will happen all at once nor do I think it will be immediately widespread. Like most government interventions, it will probably be incremental, beginning in the inner cities, and expanding to other areas as the ruling class sees fit....copy from AJ wed site..just part of what is coming...just my opinion..if we get to vote he is out and he know"s it...it made good reading..all facts
Wow.

So, 50cal, you really think the President will declare martial law throughout the whole country in 2012 so that he can prevent the Presidential Election from happening, and thus get an automatic 2nd term?

That is a really interesting theory you have there. And it really does sound possible.

Amazing stuff.
anonymous california

Hillsboro, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#18
Apr 27, 2011
 
Ask and you shall receive.

Of course, not taking credit for it, but one week to the date of starting this thread with a statement directly addressed at the President (see Post #1) telling him why he should, he has finally decided to come forward with his long-form birth certificate. Nah, this thread could not have been an influencing factor. Or could it? LOL.

But Donald Trump and others have been making a big deal out of what they see as a birther issue. A President of America must be born with in the United States. It's the law.

But is the issue now solved?

Here is a link to the long-form birth certificate:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2011/04/27/pre...
50cal

Hesperia, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#19
Apr 27, 2011
 
he just opened the door,will they step in and find out WHO he reaily is,not on his life... the print shop at the cia must of got paid this week...lol...lets see everything MR president,,,all your papers...please...
anonymous california

Hillsboro, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#20
Apr 27, 2011
 
Don't know who it was and what it was saying but another one is gone. Post #15.
lastoutlaw

Studio City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#21
Apr 27, 2011
 
50cal wrote:
he just opened the door,will they step in and find out WHO he reaily is,not on his life... the print shop at the cia must of got paid this week...lol...lets see everything MR president,,,all your papers...please...
The talk now is the certificate may be a government forgery. The focus is on 'race'. The term used on the long for for the father's race was 'African'. The correct term back in the early '60's was 'Negro'. There was no political correctness back then.
I'm certain they didn't mean to use 'African' as nationality; since Africa is NOT a nationality or even a nation - it's a continent. Though to call one a 'Caucasion' refers to the Caucus region of Eastern Europe - a place few white can trace their ancestries too. Most hail from Northern Europe (Sweden, Norway, Scandinavia) and can't trace much farther than that.
And the mother's nationality was never questioned, so why the difference?
Thus; did the certificate list 'African' as a race intentionally back in 1961? Highly unlikely. Or did somebody too young to realize the correct 1961 term is not the one currently in use, so they put in what is used today; thus pointing a clear shining light to what might obviously be a forgery?
Many people believe the latter. Especially since the term 'Black' followed 'Negro' in usage.'African' is more current; dating back to the late '70's.
One more point. The mother's signature puts her first name -'Stanley'- in parenthesis above the name 'Ann' almost as an afterthought.
Why would she do that, since it was the name she proudly used all her life? Seems suspicious to many conspiracy theorists.
Of which I'm not one. But I've read the rumor (which I pass on here) and I wonder. Something seems odd.
And where there's smoke, there's fire. If there wasn't anything to hide; why did it take 2 1/2 years to come to light? Seems to me that it would be such a small thing for Obama to release, considering McCain did his to dispell rumors regarding HIS eligibility (born in the Panama Canal Zone; which at the time was United States territory - which made him a native born citizen by law. Not true three years later). It wasn't a big deal to him and he proudly released to papers to dispel any doubts.
Why was Obama different?
anonymous california

Hillsboro, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#22
Apr 29, 2011
 
lastoutlaw wrote:
<quoted text>The talk now is the certificate may be a government forgery. The focus is on 'race'. The term used on the long for for the father's race was 'African'. The correct term back in the early '60's was 'Negro'. There was no political correctness back then.
I'm certain they didn't mean to use 'African' as nationality; since Africa is NOT a nationality or even a nation - it's a continent. Though to call one a 'Caucasion' refers to the Caucus region of Eastern Europe - a place few white can trace their ancestries too. Most hail from Northern Europe (Sweden, Norway, Scandinavia) and can't trace much farther than that.
And the mother's nationality was never questioned, so why the difference?
Thus; did the certificate list 'African' as a race intentionally back in 1961? Highly unlikely. Or did somebody too young to realize the correct 1961 term is not the one currently in use, so they put in what is used today; thus pointing a clear shining light to what might obviously be a forgery?
Many people believe the latter. Especially since the term 'Black' followed 'Negro' in usage.'African' is more current; dating back to the late '70's.
One more point. The mother's signature puts her first name -'Stanley'- in parenthesis above the name 'Ann' almost as an afterthought.
Why would she do that, since it was the name she proudly used all her life? Seems suspicious to many conspiracy theorists.
Of which I'm not one. But I've read the rumor (which I pass on here) and I wonder. Something seems odd.
And where there's smoke, there's fire. If there wasn't anything to hide; why did it take 2 1/2 years to come to light? Seems to me that it would be such a small thing for Obama to release, considering McCain did his to dispell rumors regarding HIS eligibility (born in the Panama Canal Zone; which at the time was United States territory - which made him a native born citizen by law. Not true three years later). It wasn't a big deal to him and he proudly released to papers to dispel any doubts.
Why was Obama different?
That is one amazing statement that you make lastoutlaw.

QUOTE
"Thus; did the certificate list 'African' as a race intentionally back in 1961? Highly unlikely. Or did somebody too young to realize the correct 1961 term is not the one currently in use, so they put in what is used today; thus pointing a clear shining light to what might obviously be a forgery?
Many people believe the latter. Especially since the term 'Black' followed 'Negro' in usage.'African' is more current; dating back to the late '70's.
One more point. The mother's signature puts her first name -'Stanley'- in parenthesis above the name 'Ann' almost as an afterthought.
Why would she do that, since it was the name she proudly used all her life?"
UNQUOTE

And the plot thickens.
Dutchess

Amarillo, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#23
Apr 30, 2011
 

Judged:

1

I don't care where he was born, I just want him out of the white house. He is not capable to make good dicissions for our country. We can do nothing about his birth, we can vote him out of office in 2012.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

First Prev
of 33
Next Last
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Other Recent West Hollywood Discussions

Search the West Hollywood Forum:
Title Updated Last By Comments
CA CA Proposition 23 - Global Warming (Oct '10) 2 hr Brian_G 7,851
CA Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex ma... (Aug '10) 2 hr Orange Cove cow licker 200,366
CA California Proposition 19: the Marijuana Legali... (Oct '10) 3 hr rain or snow to slow 15,928
CA California seeks to ban free, single-use carryo... (Jun '10) 3 hr tail pipe 4,898
CA Jury reaches verdict in Oakland BART shooting t... (Jul '10) Jul 28 snodder 2,252
CA Federal judge to issue Proposition 8 decision W... (Aug '10) Jun '14 Eric Cantor or cant 1,974
CA Who do you support for Governor in California i... (Oct '10) Jun '14 Steady as yeah goes 3,765
•••
•••

West Hollywood News Video

•••
•••

West Hollywood Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••

West Hollywood People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

West Hollywood News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in West Hollywood
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••