Nassau County Court and Family Court judges

Carnell Foskey has no idea of the meaning of the word family. He is an overbearing irrational moron who thrives on control and holding power over people. He does not make decisions but merely threats and continues cases until they are finally given to a competent judge to decide on. He is against fathers, mothers and children. He forgets he is deciding the fate of human beings, emotional well being of entire families and treats them just as a file number. We are people Mr. Foskey and we will not agree to pay your salary while you destroy our next generation.

Any one with experience as a Mother/Father in This judge's court?
Studying decisions of a few Family court Judges. The Family court decisions need to be challanged in case of a few judges.
And, yes, anyone with Judge Julienne Eiseman's court?

No to Foskey wrote:

Carnell Foskey has no idea of the meaning of the word family. He is an overbearing irrational moron who thrives on control and holding power over people. He does not make decisions but merely threats and continues cases until they are finally given to a competent judge to decide on. He is against fathers, mothers and children. He forgets he is deciding the fate of human beings, emotional well being of entire families and treats them just as a file number. We are people Mr. Foskey and we will not agree to pay your salary while you destroy our next generation.

Have been to Nassau family Court several times, and luckily been safe so far as a "Battered" Husband. Reason I say Battered is because
1) I am
2) Wife always threatened an OP whenebver I asked her directly for a Divorce. She got the Police to the house on numerous occasions asking me to be evicted, and failure after failure made her get a 3rd OP recently. When I went to a Male Judge recently, with facts/evidences, he was quick to deny an OP.

Lost all faith in Family Courts, and hopefully will seek a Concurrent/Referral Jurisdiction in Supreme court, where I have seen Judges do a much better job.

Men are treated like un wanted Cattle in Nassau Family court. I will even explore digging cases of the recent past, and open up a whole new case under article 78, for re trial of cases with persons similarly situated as myself.

Anyone else, with a arbitary/biased verdict from Nassau Family court, please write in details

No to Foskey wrote:

Carnell Foskey has no idea of the meaning of the word family. He is an overbearing irrational moron who thrives on control and holding power over people. He does not make decisions but merely threats and continues cases until they are finally given to a competent judge to decide on. He is against fathers, mothers and children. He forgets he is deciding the fate of human beings, emotional well being of entire families and treats them just as a file number. We are people Mr. Foskey and we will not agree to pay your salary while you destroy our next generation.

Unfortunately, Most Family Judges are the same..MORONS and some Super Morons !!

I have tasted it first hand as a Husband. AM sure Wife/s may say the same, but the wrong place for a husband to be dragged..

new york ny wrote:

Any one with experience as a Mother/Father in This judge's court?
Studying decisions of a few Family court Judges. The Family court decisions need to be challanged in case of a few judges.
And, yes, anyone with Judge Julienne Eiseman's court?

Yes Indeed...I have been before your honrable Eiseman about twenty times !!!! My synopsis is that she is a fair person and looks at the entire picture rather than just whats in the complaint.....however if you have a case in the supreme court in nassau ( divorce pending) you may want to keep all your business there.....because in the end the supreme court will just call her and change every you worked for in family court.......shes fair and just...just make sure you have all your info intact and witnesses if you have them....

Norman St. George.......Very fair but very judgemental as well.......but i guess thats what judges job is !!!

The only problem with Mr. St. George is that he is endorsed by Paterson and Suozzi.
Two of the most untrusted polititians in the State.
Mr. St George will be well advised to stay away from those two.

You all may laugh, but if Judge Judy was in the NC family court system, it would be "cleaned" up...

I know someone that appeared before her in NYC. She takes no garbage from ANYONE, especially lawyers that try to use the system to avoid their fiduciary responsibilities...

A friend of mine appeared before Hearing Examiner Kahlon. My friend has paid his child support for 18 years My friend who is divorced and visited his child as much as he was entitled to under law the child was then wrongfully poisoned. My friend gave this child everything possible above and beyond the support. The Mother filed a petition with the Nassau County Family Court stating that the Father owed back Medical Arrears in the amount of $7,000 There was an agreement in their divorce decree that the Mother was responsible for 55% of the Medical and my friend the Father was responsible for 44% of the Medical for the child who now is an adult. The Mother waited until the child no longer wanted to see the Father and pursued for back Medical arrears for a 7 year period. My friend the Father requested to the Hearing Examiner Kahlon for the Mother to show proof that she paid her end and the my friend's end of the Medical in order to be entitled to reimbursement. Lets say the Mother had to show proof she paid approximately $15,000.00 in Medical for the child who is now an adult in order for her to be legally entitled to this money. The Mother has not showed she even paid one cent for Medical over a 7 year radius. Hearing Examiner Kahlon I am under the information and belief wrongfully awarded the Mother in the amount of $6,800.00 without having the Mother show proof and I am under the information and belief that is extortion. My friends rights have been totally violated. The funny thing about all this Hearing Examiner Kahlon I am under the information and belief does not practice what he preaches because he himself sued in 2002 for a violation of his civil rights. The Case that he was involved in that I am under the information and belief is Kahlon v Southwest Airlines and sued for $60 million dollars because twice he was denied a plane seat because he would not remove his Turban post 911. The case settled for an undisclosed sum and if anyone is interested they can find this article in the Newsday, October 22, 2002 at A17. Meanwhile it is ok for Kahlon to sue because his rights were violated then he goes ahead and violates a friend of mines rights for his x-wife to not show proof of what the medical expenses were and he just orders it to be paid. I am under the information and belief and for my friends sake Kahlon should be prosecuted to the fullest extent allowable by law and then some. For anyone who is interested my friends case no at the Nassau County Family Court is F-2131-01/06C, F-2131-01/08G, and F-2131-01/09I. The reason being for all of those Docket Numbers I am under the information and belief that the x-wife of my friend is a chronic petitioner.

new york ny wrote:

Any one with experience as a Mother/Father in This judge's court?
Studying decisions of a few Family court Judges. The Family court decisions need to be challanged in case of a few judges.
And, yes, anyone with Judge Julienne Eiseman's court?

Judge Eisman is a very fair and reasoned jurist. I have had experiences with about 12 family court judges in the past and Eisman is by far the best judge I experienced. She is thorough, reasoned, follows the correct civil procedure, and she does not shoot from the hip like many family court judges. I don't always agree with her decisions, but I respect he judgments. She is not predisposed to rule against fathers like many judges in the family courts and if you lay out your case logically she does not seem to bias her decisions even when you represent yourself pro se. Having said that, you better know generally what you are about if you represent yourself especially if you are opposed by an attorney.

The only area that I might be critical of Judge Eisman is her reliance on the recommendations of the Law Guardian. This is a common problem in the family courts. The Law Guardian is a court-appointed attorney representing the interests of the child. Many Law Guardians routinely exceed their mandates in the family courts and become very biased, often in favor of the mother. This can influence not so much the critical decisions of the court, but the procedural decisions on such things as costly forensics and investigations and reports (I&Rs). The courts in general take up a lot of time to make decisions and this can impact visitations by the non-custodial parent in a very negative way.

I can tell you first hand that many decisions made
by family court judges are SUBJECTIVE. The judgements have 1. No Measure or scale what so ever. 2. No consistant flow chart to their decision making. All subjective. To cover their butts the following statement is always applied:
Decisions are on a case by case basis. Many organizations can provide a flow to decision
making. Family Courts Judges can not because their method to a decision is flaky and inconsistant. When it comes to a decision the outcome is dependent on what they ate for breakfast for many of them and how they feel.