Five Reasons Why Obama Is A Good President

Judged:

5

5

3

DapperDave wrote:

<quoted text>
Who do you think benefits from an illegal, low wage workforce?
Wealthy farmers, who are, of course, Republicans.
Wealthy hoteliers, who are, of course, Republicans.
Small business owners, who are, for the most part, Republicans.
Construction company owners, who are, of course, Republicans.
Wealthy users of nannies and housekeepers, who are, for the most part, Republicans.
Landscaping comapny owners, who are, for the most part, Republicans.
So, who do you think has fought the hardest against cracking down on illegal immigration? Republicans, of course, for the most part!

Judged:

1

1

1

Jimmy C wrote:

Not everyone can be wealthy. That's just how our society works. Even if every working man in the country had a Harvard MBA, there would still have to be a chain of command everywhere, and there would still be a bottom. If you try to do away with entitlement programs, you condemn invariably the bottom of that pyramid.
Does that seem fair to you? That the greater part of humans should always have to suffer so a few good men can amass riches to which their divine gifts of leadership have rightfully entitled them? If you do read the bible, you're doing it wrong.
You also shouldn't assume all people on welfare don't work. In selected instances, yes it has been abused, but understand that you can work ten hours a day six days a week and still qualify for government aid programs.

Judged:

1

1

1

lighteredknot wrote:

<quoted text>
Where did you acquire the mindset that others should work for others less fortunate than them? Those that choose to do this are performing acts of charity which is commendable. For someone to forceably take from a person to give to another is a criminal act. Just because the government is behind the gun that robs the worker to give to another person doesn't diminish the criminal intent or act. Charity is better than stealing in order to help someone. In its simplist form: Charity is good, stealing is bad, got it? Teaching our children to give rather than take is the way it was and should be today.

Judged:

1

lighteredknot wrote:

<quoted text>
Where did you acquire the mindset that others should work for others less fortunate than them? Those that choose to do this are performing acts of charity which is commendable. For someone to forceably take from a person to give to another is a criminal act. Just because the government is behind the gun that robs the worker to give to another person doesn't diminish the criminal intent or act. Charity is better than stealing in order to
help someone. In its simplist form: Charity is good, stealing is bad, got it? Teaching our children to
give rather than take is the way it was and should be today.

Griffin D wrote:

<quoted text>
Oh yes, because Obama was the one who shut down the mills..... LOL at you friend.

General Robert E Lee wrote:

<quoted text>
False assumption on your part.

dapper dude too wrote:

<quoted text>
Serious case of wealth envy you got there dapper.

DapperDave wrote:

<quoted text>Oh really?

I have no doubt that, relative to you, I am the wealthy one.

I'm confident the pecking order where you an I are concerned would find YOU washing MY car, mowing MY lawn, carrying MY luggage, cleaning MY golf clubs, acting as MY chauffer, waiting on ME.

In short, I'm positive my net worth is significantly higher than yours. It's a certainty that a person as illiterate, stupid and uniformed as you are is relegated to some type of menial, low-wage job, hence your bitterness and envy.

TheLukeTheory wrote:

<quoted text>
Hey chill out there Bill Gates. So you're a man of wealth. Congratulations! Whats that? You're b*tching because Obama's socialist plans support a percentage of your money being taken away? Maybe this will help you feel like people who aren't as fortunate. Have an open mind, will you? I am in no way a socialist. But let's face it--the idea doesn't seem to bad at the moment.

DapperDave wrote:

<quoted text>
Oh really?
I have no doubt that, relative to you, I am the wealthy one.
I'm confident the pecking order where you an I are concerned would find YOU washing MY car, mowing MY lawn, carrying MY luggage, cleaning MY golf clubs, acting as MY chauffer, waiting on ME.
In short, I'm positive my net worth is significantly higher than yours. It's a certainty that a person as illiterate, stupid and uniformed as you are is relegated to some type of menial, low-wage job, hence your bitterness and envy.

dapper dude too wrote:

<quoted text>
Not likely. You'd be quite surprised.

DapperDave wrote:

<quoted text>
I'd only be surprised if I encountered you in an office building and you weren't sweeping and mopping flors, emptying garbage cans or cleaning toilets.
Such is life for people of your limited education, diminished mental capacities and woefully inadequate social skills.

Jimmy C wrote:

<quoted text>
Did you understand a word I said? Clearly not. Clearly the argument went way over your head. You're a complete moron, not even worth the effort it would expend just to think up a somewhat creative insult. You're just dumb. It's a good thing you're not in charge of anything.

Griffin D wrote:

<quoted text>
But then that means welfare, social security, and unemployment are all "criminal acts". That's a little drastic don't you think? I agree, charity is better than stealing, but regardless of how much charity is given, there will still be stealing. That's just life. You can't expect everyone to obey all of the laws. That's why we have them. I feel like the republican viewpoint has reverted to a Victorian-European social law. Then, they believed the poor of society were barbaric in nature. They left them to their slums, to die of disease and foster crime. Is that what we want? Is that what America is? America is the nation for everyone. A nation of equal opportunity. I think Americans forget how well of we are. WE ARE THE GREATEST COUNTRY ON THIS PLANET. If you think otherwise, you have no pride or no intelligence, or an absence of both. It's time that you, and other republicans realize that all of us, millionaires or bums, are Americans, and, as Americans, we have a duty to one-another to look after each other. It's how America, civilization, and humanity as a whole succeeds.

lighteredknot wrote:

<quoted text>
Thanks for allowing everyone to know I irritated you with the truth. Your response was typical of socialist who blame the successful people for the problems of the poor.

Judged:

2

1

1

lighteredknot wrote:

<quoted text>
We are made to pay into SS and Medicare or didn't you know it? I consider them illegal democratic socialist programs which have been depleated of funds by allowing those who have not paid into them to benefit from them.
Bless his little heart.

Judged:

1

DapperDave wrote:

Intelligent, educated, informed people know there is more than one cause of the Social Security Fund being in the shape - a) thieving, lying politicians - from both parties - borrowed from (looted) the Social Security fund to pay for other pet programs and b) payments to undeserving freeloaders who contributed little, if anything, into the fund to being with.
http://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/letters/...
"The whole truth is always superior to a partial truth".- THe Book of Dave, 4:2