Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Aug 4, 2010 Full story: www.cnn.com 201,447

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Full Story

“The Topix Legend of "GS8"!”

Since: Sep 10

Yunited States, North America

#156390 Aug 26, 2012
WOW just WOW and you would vote for him knowing this?
Brian_G wrote:
Romney has pledged to nominate judges who will apply law as written instead of writing new laws to favor a mascot victim group. The election choice can't be starker; Obama's new view for America or Romney's faith in our Constitution.
R/R 2012
GoofBall

Covina, CA

#156392 Aug 26, 2012
Lets hear it again for the GS = goof ball who just posted, these people are just crazy.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#156393 Aug 26, 2012
GodSmacked wrote:
WOW just WOW and you would vote for him knowing this?
<quoted text>
I don't know if it was God, but something smacked you in the head hard!

“The Topix Legend of "GS8"!”

Since: Sep 10

Yunited States, North America

#156394 Aug 26, 2012
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't know if it was God, but something smacked you in the head hard!
You would vote for a man that public stated this in order to take the country in a nonconstitution. direction. Do you not see how this is controlling the courts? Those who are on the courts have to make decision on the Constitution. not their own convictions of faith. To me that is communistic in nature and I refuse to ever vote for anyone that would do that to this great nation of ours.

“The Topix Legend of "GS8"!”

Since: Sep 10

Yunited States, North America

#156395 Aug 26, 2012
GoofBall wrote:
Lets hear it again for the GS = goof ball who just posted, these people are just crazy.

It is crazy and how many countries like Argentina and Cuba lost all their rights yet those in this country don’t see that at all. Making these small changes leads to big changes like the loss of the ability to bear arms.
Michelle Sucks

California City, CA

#156396 Aug 26, 2012
BARACK SWALLOWS
Frank Rizzo

Union City, CA

#156397 Aug 26, 2012
Reality wrote:
<quoted text>I keep searching for the law that makes procreation a requirement in marriage, so far no luck, how about you?
That's because you are a dummy. Searching for something you know doesn't exist.
YUK!YUK!YUK! "Reality" searching for stuff he knows doesn't exist. Then he complains to us he can't find it. What a dumbass!
Frank Rizzo

Union City, CA

#156398 Aug 26, 2012
Winston Smith wrote:
<quoted text>
You're reading an angelfire shill piece, numpty. Written by someone who's PhD wasn't in the field of psychology. Get that straight, alledged straighty. His, and your, blathering about the study group are a bit rich. The year was 1957. The prevailing attitude about homosexuals was on par with yours. A hate fest steeped in... wait for it... no scientific evidence. There had been no more 'proof' that homosexuality was a mental disorder than there had been proof that blacks and women were inferior to men, or that the genuinely mentally ill were possessed by demons. However, by 1957, it was still common knowledge that blacks were inferior and women were also a bit on the intellectually challenged side. The mentally ill, in spite of having been lifted from the category of possessed by demons were (and still are) irrationally feared by the general population. You sir, are perpetuating garbage from a bygone era (or should I say error). But I digress, finding a random sampling of homosexuals in 1957 would have been about as easy as finding a viable neuron in your head. It also appears that the woman you find in contempt had difficulty finding heterosexual individuals willing to partake in the study. I wonder why!
The bottom line is that you, and your latest shill for hatred, are missing the point of the woman's study. She got a sampling of gays and heteros to fill out some basic tests, like the Rorschach, and had others look at the results. Her findings were simple, gays couldn't be distingquished from heteros based upon some tests used to determine mental illness.
Find us a study conducted on a population you won't jump up and down about that refutes her conclusions. You must avoid hate groups like the FRC and mAssResistance though. They've already been shown to be biased, repeatedly. Hooker's 'bias' was based upon her experiences over the course of the two or so decades prior to her '57 paper. Specifically, she'd known gays and had yet to find one with horns protruding from their brow.
"Numpty" YUK!YUK!YUK! Not bad Winnie, not bad.
Frank Rizzo

Union City, CA

#156399 Aug 26, 2012
GodSmacked wrote:
WOW just WOW and you would vote for him knowing this?
<quoted text>
Yes.

YUK!YUK!YUK!
Frank Rizzo

Union City, CA

#156400 Aug 26, 2012
WOW! Lotsa "Mean" "Incendiary" and "Racy"!

YUK!YUK!YUK! Racy!
Winston Smith

Silver Spring, MD

#156401 Aug 26, 2012
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Don't know what to do when gay twirl gets stopped in it's tracks by it's own tactics???
Guess ad homoan attacks is all you have left.
SMIRK.
What tactics were those? Newsflash, sparky, I haven't been hangin' on to your every word. It isn't an ad "homoan" attack to point out the idiocy of one of your comments. You need to write some new jokes too, the gay twirl and ad homoan attack schtick is old and stale.
Frank Rizzo

Union City, CA

#156402 Aug 26, 2012
Winston Smith wrote:
<quoted text>
What tactics were those? Newsflash, sparky, I haven't been hangin' on to your every word. It isn't an ad "homoan" attack to point out the idiocy of one of your comments. You need to write some new jokes too, the gay twirl and ad homoan attack schtick is old and stale.
I like the "gay twirl" one, Aw C'mon Winnie, it's funny!

YUK!YUK!YUK!

Did you copy "schtick" from me Winnie? Don't fib now! I bet no one speaks Yiddish where you come from.

YUK!YUK!YUK!
really

Woodbridge, VA

#156403 Aug 26, 2012
?

“I Luv Carbon Dioxide”

Since: Dec 08

Location hidden

#156404 Aug 26, 2012
GodSmacked wrote:
You would vote for a man that public stated this in order to take the country in a nonconstitution. direction. Do you not see how this is controlling the courts? Those who are on the courts have to make decision on the Constitution. not their own convictions of faith. To me that is communistic in nature and I refuse to ever vote for anyone that would do that to this great nation of ours.
Romney has promised to: Nominate to the U.S. Supreme Court and federal bench judges who are committed to restraint and to applying the original meaning of the Constitution, appoint an attorney general similarly committed, and thus reject the idea our Founding Fathers inserted a right to gay marriage into our Constitution

R/R 2012

“The Topix Legend of "GS8"!”

Since: Sep 10

Yunited States, North America

#156405 Aug 26, 2012
really wrote:
?
What are you questioning?
Winston Smith

Silver Spring, MD

#156406 Aug 26, 2012
Frank Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
I like the "gay twirl" one, Aw C'mon Winnie, it's funny!
YUK!YUK!YUK!
Did you copy "schtick" from me Winnie? Don't fib now! I bet no one speaks Yiddish where you come from.
YUK!YUK!YUK!
Never did see you use it, Frannie. It is a fairly common term though.

“The Topix Legend of "GS8"!”

Since: Sep 10

Yunited States, North America

#156407 Aug 26, 2012
Brian that is still manipulating the bench to his Christian values. I wonder if he will appoint those that agree with Mormon's polygamist marriages and allow his father to return to the country. Brian no one needs to vote for a man that has communistic ideology to manipulate how the bench rules. Stop and think you are in Germany and I am certain you see how that played out with gays and Jewish people. The same thing will happen here if Romney does that. Just look at how Cuba and Argentina did this and now they have no rights.
Brian_G wrote:
<quoted text>Romney has promised to: Nominate to the U.S. Supreme Court and federal bench judges who are committed to restraint and to applying the original meaning of the Constitution, appoint an attorney general similarly committed, and thus reject the idea our Founding Fathers inserted a right to gay marriage into our Constitution
R/R 2012
Winston Smith

Silver Spring, MD

#156408 Aug 26, 2012
Brian_G wrote:
<quoted text>Romney has promised to: Nominate to the U.S. Supreme Court and federal bench judges who are committed to restraint and to applying the original meaning of the Constitution, appoint an attorney general similarly committed, and thus reject the idea our Founding Fathers inserted a right to gay marriage into our Constitution
R/R 2012
Ah yes, all praise Romney. He is, after all, just like the rest of us and fully understands our predicament. Yes, we need a president who cares about employees and is honest about his church tithing. He's not at all like his father in terms of transparency. Yep, we need another lying sleaze ball in the oval office.
Frank Rizzo

Union City, CA

#156409 Aug 26, 2012
Winston Smith wrote:
<quoted text>
Never did see you use it, Frannie. It is a fairly common term though.
That'd be Frank. But Frankie is OK with me, since we're friends now and all. Frannie is a girl's name.

Winnie is not a girl's name if you think me calling you Winnie is an attempt at gay twirl. Winnie was Winston Churchill's nickname and Churchill was a great man. Be proud! I call you Winnie cause were friends and all now.

P.S. I was right, wasn't I?. They don't speak Yiddish anywhere near where you come from!

YUK!YUK!YUK! Winnie!
Frank Rizzo

Union City, CA

#156410 Aug 26, 2012
Winston Smith wrote:
<quoted text>
Ah yes, all praise Romney. He is, after all, just like the rest of us and fully understands our predicament. Yes, we need a president who cares about employees and is honest about his church tithing. He's not at all like his father in terms of transparency. Yep, we need another lying sleaze ball in the oval office.
We do? No we don't.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Wasco Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
priscilla aguilar aka tatted prissy 4 min ebk 4
priscilla aguilar aka tatted prissy 7 min ebk 2
new facility behind convalence home [ddsnf] (Sep '12) 20 min ebk 10
This Is Too Sad For Me 40 min ebk 10
Downest Sureños in Delano 54 min ebk 14
Players in Delano 1 hr ebk 12
Mariah g 1 hr babygangsta 4
Wasco Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Wasco People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 1:47 am PST