Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Judged:

6

6

6

Prof Marvel wrote:

<quoted text>
Up until quite recently boys as young as 14 were handed "The Little Black Book" at Massachusetts runaway centers like "Youth on Fire Drop-in Center."

Prof Marvel wrote:

<quoted text>
I called up to verify this and was told the reason for it was "these boys are having sex anyway -- we want to make sure it's safe-sex."

Prof Marvel wrote:

<quoted text>
In other words, under the banner of "safe-sex" the gay males who now run most of these youth agencies think exposing young boys to homosexual practices like "fisting, rimming, anal sex, pee play" makes perfect sense.

Prof Marvel wrote:

<quoted text>
The problem of course is these gay men are doing things people in youth agencies shouldn't be doing; namely, sexualizing everything.

Judged:

6

6

6

Prof Marvel wrote:

You lie, misrepresent, twist, distort, design and manufacture any claim you think will get you what you want.

Judged:

6

6

6

Prof Marvel wrote:

<quoted text>
The Little Black Book is not just a sex education manual, it is a recruitment tract for young boys. The imagery, language, rescources are all directed to this goal -- teaching teenage boys homosexual sex is "cool."

Prof Marvel wrote:

<quoted text>
The last section of the book is the gay bar resource section. It describes the local gay bar scence with phrases like "Hot young gay crowd into leather."

Prof Marvel wrote:

<quoted text>
In aother section it describes "Coming Out" as if it's an AWESOME ritual all young men go through.

Prof Marvel wrote:

<quoted text>
Defenders of The Little Black Book" claim it was only given to "gay youth" but if that's so, why was it given to every boy who entered these youth drop in centers?

Judged:

6

6

6

Prof Marvel wrote:

<quoted text>
Kids get confused

Judged:

6

5

5

thisGuy wrote:

<quoted text>
"It's amazing how you manage to walk and chew gum.......I hope you don't make asinine comments like this in the real world......someone's liable to kick your azz."
-Is that a death threat mad'dam?
"So, you're an engineering student, right? Probably in your 20's, right? "
-Yes I am an engineering major.
"Reading Comprehension is an area you need some help in and you basically judge people by who they are or how you perceive them......that's really a shame!!!"
-LOL And you don't judge people too? LOL Don't make me laugh
"My wife ISN'T a man, nor looks like one."
-LIAR. I know you're lying because you have gotten pissed off at everyone who questions why so many lesbians date chicks who look like men---it's obvious your girlfriend is a woman who LOOK & ACTS like a man.
"obviously you missed the picture of us on our wedding day when I had it as my avatar."
-Actually, I didn't. I saw your avatar. Your partner was obviously dressed like a man & you both are clearly fat. Quit lying about yourself.
"I am not a man"
-Man you're retarded. Where in my post did I state you were a man, stupid?
"all woman and have no desire to be a man"
-Your dyke "wife" would disagree...seeing how she looks like a man LOLOLOL
"though I do have a more masculine appearance."
-So now you're saying do LOOK like a man? Or are just speaking for your penis-envy dyke "partner"? LOL Make up your mind, you stupid bitch.
"that's just the way I was created."
-No, you weren't created that way. There is no such thing as a "gay gene". You CHOSE to make yourself what you are because lacked a mother. Just like all homosexuals, you grew up in a broken family & you chose a path of deception & lies. You chose a path of perversion, DEAL WITH IT! Hmm...now why I have heard so much about lesbians being "man-haters"?/sarcas m
"it doesn't mean I am any less of a woman."
-Actually, it does, because real women aren't queers.
"There are PLENTY of Gay men who could and would kick your sorry pathetic azz because you called them a sissy"
-LOL And once again the "tolerant" homo shows her true stride of tolerance by using intolerance.
"be careful of making stereotypical comments like that!!!"
-Is that a death threat, mad'am?
"People are Bisexual for the same reason that others are Straight, Gay or Lesbian."
-Uhhh...NO...you either like boys or you like girls, not both. Bisexuals are what they are because they can't make up their minds & because they are greedy sexual perverts, that's why the porn industry is flooded with them. Also I heard bisexuality is common in the Gay & Lesbian community.
"IT'S INNATE and has NOTHING to do with daddy issues!!!"
-O Rly? So why is it so many porn stars & strippers have BPS (borderline personality disorder)? Why is it so many of are bisexual? I recently read a book written by a former bouncer, & he said bisexuality & lesbianism is common in strip clubs & many of them have admitted to lacking father figures in their lives...sure sounds like alot of daddy issues if you ask me.
"Why are you so damn sure that Lesbians use dildo's to please each other?"
-Why are you so damn sure that Lesbians are attracted to other women who look & act like men?/sarcasm
"Are you that insecure knowing that you don't have what it takes to please a woman?"
-Bitch please...you obviously love cock...you're "wife" uses a strap-on (which is basically a PENIS SUBSTITUTE) & she uses her tongue on your wet pussy...& you think that as a man I can't do the same? LOL Don't make me laugh.
"You do know that some women use dildo's on their husbands......it tickles their prostate gland!!!!"
-Yeah a very small amount

Judged:

5

5

5

MsMerlin wrote:

very happy news.

Judged:

6

6

6

Prof Dingleberry wrote:

More of Gary's desperation and stupidity on display (!).....
<quoted text>
Nonsense. Firstly its not a sex manual, that's already been disproven Gary Lloyd, lyer.

[QUOTE]

I'm not going to get in an argument over sematics with you, fella.

The booklet gives specifics instructions and that makes it a sex manual. It discusses whether to swallow "cum," notes that "mutual jerking off is hot fun!," ... rimming is ok when both parties have washed and got squeaky clean, etc.

You're calling it a "safe sex" manual because safe-sex is just another one of the banners you people hide your sexualization under just like how you call carrying man-boy ads "an education resource for sex industry workers."

Just like how you call making the degrading spectacles you make of yourselves during gay pride parades "pride."

George Orwell wrote about using language as a tool to deceive and misdirect in 1984. All the tricks you people play with language are in the book -- none of you have ever read it, that's why you think what you're doing is so clever.

[QUOTE]

Secondly, the the tract is quite noticably intended for people who already identify as gay Gary, and it's intended for gay men over 18. But don't let facts get in the way of your ridiculous rhetoric shill~!!!!

Thirdly, not one heterosexual person has ever been "taught" homosexual sex is cool. Nor has any gay person been "taught" that heterosexual sex is cool.....despite the fact that this is the ONLY materials ever given to gay teenagers. As you know, it doesn't work that way. But since you are a pathetic lying piece of shit, you have to keep pretending otherwise! Nothing demonstrates the desperateness of your cause more than this!!!!

Shocker!! A bar guide that describes its clientelle. Oh my!! I bet straight bars never do that!!!!!! I mean, I bet if a straight person googled "city name, bar, hottest women, bikinis or wet t-shirt" that absolutely NOTHING would come up!!!!!!
Wow Gary.....please do continue, you get more desperate by the minute!!

Judged:

6

6

5

Prof Marvel wrote:

<quoted text>
The tract was given to every kid who entered the Cambridge "Youth on Fire" drop-in center. I know this because I called and verified it. It was also given to any number of high school students at high school youth conferences until the publishers were busted.
And what is a "gay youth"? We never used that term before you people came along. Where do you get off calling kids "gay youth"? Under what authority do you do that, then hand them booklets showing them how to rim, fist, pee play?
You're not supposed to be doing that with our kids. You're sexualizing children. You're telling kids as young as 14 years old they're homosexual. That's child molestation only you're too stupid to realize.
Where do you live?
Someone needs to report you.
<quoted text>
Of course it works that way -- which is why the predators who run these Massachusetts youth agencies were handing teenage boys -- All boys!-- The Little Black Book.
They were'n't educating these kids about safe-sex; that wasn't the purpose. The purpose was recruitment for man-boy sex.
In other words, your "only homosexual boys have homosexual sex" thesis is a pile of crap. There's certainly no science backing it up. The APA certainly doesn't make this claim; in fact, it's only pedo predators who do and they do it to gain unfettered access to young boys, just like the predators at "Youth on Fire" were doing.
<quoted text>
Gay bar guides have no business in a sex education manual. And I don't expect you to grasp this because you people are so screwed-up in the head you can't grasp fundamental concepts like this anymore.
It's like your gay pride parades. You still don't grasp what's wrong with a half-nude man in a g-string being led down the street on a dog leash by his "top." You think that's as wholesome as mom's apple pie.
And you DO, don't you, fella?

Judged:

6

6

6

Michelle Sucks wrote:

BARACK SWALLOWS

Judged:

6

6

6

Prof Marvel wrote:

<quoted text>
I'm not going to get in an argument over sematics with you, fella.

Prof Marvel wrote:

<quoted text>
The booklet gives specifics instructions and that makes it a sex manual.

Prof Marvel wrote:

<quoted text>
It discusses whether to swallow "cum,"

Prof Marvel wrote:

<quoted text>
notes that "mutual jerking off is hot fun!,

Prof Marvel wrote:

<quoted text>
" ... rimming is ok when both parties have washed and got squeaky clean, etc. "

Prof Marvel wrote:

<quoted text>
You're calling it a "safe sex" manual because safe-sex is just another one of the banners you people hide your sexualization under just like how you call carrying man-boy ads "an education resource for sex industry workers."\
No, I call it a safe sex manual, because of the information it contains and because of who funded the it. Unlike you, I call it what it is based upon the facts of what it actually says.

[QUOTE who="Prof Marvel"]<quoted text>
Just like how you call making the degrading spectacles you make of yourselves during gay pride parades "pride."

Prof Marvel wrote:

<quoted text>
George Orwell wrote about using language as a tool to deceive and misdirect in 1984. All the tricks you people play with language are in the book -- none of you have ever read it, that's why you think what you're doing is so clever.

Judged:

5

5

5

Prof Marvel wrote:

<quoted text>
The tract was given to every kid who entered the Cambridge "Youth on Fire" drop-in center. I know this because I called and verified it. It was also given to any number of high school students at high school youth conferences until the publishers were busted.

Prof Marvel wrote:

<quoted text>
And what is a "gay youth"? We never used that term before you people came along. Where do you get off calling kids "gay youth"? Under what authority do you do that, then hand them booklets showing them how to rim, fist, pee play?

Prof Marvel wrote:

<quoted text>
You're not supposed to be doing that with our kids.

Prof Marvel wrote:

<quoted text>
You're sexualizing children.

Prof Marvel wrote:

<quoted text>
You're telling kids as young as 14 years old they're homosexual.

Judged:

6

6

6

Quest wrote:

<quoted text>
Do you even know what a transvestite is?

Judged:

7

7

7

Prof Marvel wrote:

<quoted text>
And now Winston's idea of clever -- mimicry!
Mimicry is not clever, Winston, which is why you get nothing but brownie points for parroting the LGBT agenda word for word.
And this begs the question are you actually heterosexual as you claim? Mind you, there are heterosexual morons who support same sex marriage -- but for most of them that's where they draw the line.
They're not for all the other things you're for such as:
1. Transvestite school teachers.
2. The Little Black Book.
3. Gay bathhouses.
4. Gays in the military.
5. Free Bradley Manning.
6. Anal sex is safe, normal, and as wholesome as mom's apple pie.
7. Gay pride parades are wholesome family fare.
8. Gay adoption.
9. Homosexual-affirmative curriculum in the schools.
10. The CDC lies.
That's just a short list of the things you're for, Winston. If there's something in it you aren't for let us know. Barring that, these are the things you continue to support 110%.
But why on earth would a heterosexual support all these screwball ideas? Even most homosexuals don't -- yet you do.
Why, Winston ...?
What's your motivation? It can't be "equality" because half the things on the list have nothing to do with equality -- so why?

Judged:

6

6

6

Prof Marvel wrote:

<quoted text>

I called up to verify this and was told the reason for it was "these boys are having sex anyway -- we want to make sure it's safe-sex."