Who do you support for U.S. Senate in Missouri in 2010?

DNC Deranged Nut Cases wrote:

<quoted text>
You're wrong again. Wikipedia is not a reliable source as has been proven when false articles have had to be removed. You are aware that it can be edited anonymously (but if you want to use that source, it says that Fred Phelps is a Democrat too). It just so happens that I have friends who are Mormon. Joseph Smith did found the Mormon Church, but polygamy was not brought in until they migrated to Utah. Joseph Smith was killed and is buried in Illinois. Mormon's adore Joseph Smith. The more conservative Mormons loathe Brigham Young, who replaced Smith after Smith was killed.

One thing about it.......Joseph Smith and Brigham Young are still in their graves.

CHEERS!

DNC Deranged Nut Cases wrote:

<quoted text>
Not really, considering Obama's support amongst women has dropped. Incidently, here's a censored quote from the late George Carlin, a Conservative by the way.
"Have you ever noticed that the only women who are for abortion are the ones you wouldn't want to go to bed with anyway?"

1. You state, "... Obama's support amongst women has dropped."

Really? A Fox News poll of 1,100 registered voters, conducted Feb. 6-9 before Obama's Friday announcement, found 61% of Americans say employer health plans should be required to cover birth control for women, while 34% disagreed. Among women, two-thirds approved of the requirement.

http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/story...

2. You state, "Carlin was a Conservative." Really? The last time Carlin voted was in 1972. He voted for Democrat George McGovern who ran for President against Republican Richard Nixon.

In an interview, Carlin said, "If you dropped me from an airplane, I would come down left of center, because I believe more in humans than I do in property."

http://althouse.blogspot.com/2004/11/george-c...

3. Do you have any MORE "Urban Legends" to give to us?(Or would you prefer "Republican propaganda"?)

Republican FreeDUMB wrote:

<quoted text>
Norton ...Here is some GOP Evangelical Problems for you to think about ...
You know thinking...A brain activity ...Norton that may be a new sensation for you....So give it a shot, even if it hurts your head.
Question #1
Do Mormons believe in the Trinity?
Answer:
NO ...Mormons do not believe in Trinity.
The problem is that Mormons believe in a "Godhead," and then they try to use that to lie and say they believe in the trinity.
Mormons believe Jesus is separate from the Father(Elohim). And they also give Joseph Smith high status, even though he was a polygamist and a racist
Question #2
Catholics when they pray to Mary, isn't that an Idol?
Answer:
YES... Praying to Mary is Idolatry and Forbidden by God.
stop with your mislead bullshit Norton...and quit trying to force your SATANIC inspired ( Like Christine ODonnell) and this EVIL Conservative agenda on this God Fearing Land of America.
Norton a vote for a Republican ... is a vote for SATAN!
Just ask Rexella...after you cut her a check!
God Bless President Obama, and keep us safe from these lying murdering conservative thieves!
GOD BLESS
CHEERS

Wait a minute! I think you are a little mixed up. Mormonism is a cult. They are not christian. Yes, praying to Mary is wrong. She can't do anything for anybody. She is dead. The Van Impe's are christians. So, what's your beef with them? You're the one that is not telling the truth. Yes, I hope God keeps blessing this country regardless of the idiots. FYI, I do intend to vote Republican. Will it make a diffence....I hope so!

CHEERS!

Drunken Old Conservative wrote:

<quoted text>Just what I said. You gotta watch the information Dorothy from Dexter posts. It is 40% bullshit, 15% nonsense, 3% factual and 42% bullshit.

I am willing to accept that Dorothy is from Dexter. Maybe.

Yellow Dawg Democrat wrote:

<quoted text>
I fear that we are going to have to wait for "The Rapture."

Sooo, you admit there will be a Rapture? Glad to hear you say that. That 'catching away' could be any day, you know.

CHEERS!

Norton wrote:

<quoted text>
Well said! It is time for Americans to wake up out of their comas. They just aren't paying to attention to how serious this is....

Don't worry about it, "Norton." You are about to be "Raptured," anyway!

Norton wrote:

<quoted text>
One thing about it ....... Joseph Smith and Brigham Young are still in their graves....

So is Jesse James. And Jesus.

After the nasty way that Pilate treated Jesus, Jesus fled to the region of Srinagar, Kashmir, India, where he lived out the rest of his life as a teacher and prophet. Jesus was known in India as Yuz Asaf.(Think "Joseph" or "Jesus" here.)

You can still visit the final resting place of Jesus in Kashmir.

Photos of paintings of Jesus fleeing to Kashmir:

http://www.jesus-kashmir-tomb.com/PicturesofJ...

Tomb of Jesus Website. Some photos and videos. A carving of the feet of Jesus shows that He had scars on both his feet:

http://www.tombofjesus.com/

Wouldn't you like to see the actual final tomb of Jesus?

Norton wrote:

<quoted text>
Sooo, you admit there will be a Rapture? Glad to hear you say that. That 'catching away' could be any day, you know....

I admit that YOU are going to be "caught up" in "The Rapture," assuming that you haven't been already.

(I have trouble keeping up with when exactly the "Last Days" and "The Rapture" are going to be. And that doesn't count the numerous comets which come by looking for people to take to Heaven.)

The Red States need to start pulling themselves up by their bootstraps instead of taking all of the government's money.

Support for Republican candidates, who generally promise to cut government spending, has increased since 1980 in states where the federal government spends more than it collects. The greater the dependence, the greater the support for Republican candidates.

Conversely, states that pay more in taxes than they receive in benefits tend to support Democratic candidates. And Professor Lacy found that the pattern could not be explained by demographics or social issues.

http://firedoglake.com/2012/02/13/cognitive-d...

Norton wrote:

<quoted text>
Wait a minute! I think you are a little mixed up. Mormonism is a cult. They are not christian. Yes, praying to Mary is wrong. She can't do anything for anybody. She is dead. The Van Impe's are christians. So, what's your beef with them? You're the one that is not telling the truth. Yes, I hope God keeps blessing this country regardless of the idiots. FYI, I do intend to vote Republican. Will it make a diffence....I hope so!
CHEERS!

Well you are mixed up Norton...I know that "Brain" thing (Thinking) is hard for you...you probably had to sit down after this to give it a rest...hahahahahaha

Let's try this one more tiome for you:
Romney is a Mormon = Cult (not Christian)
Newt and Santorium are Catholic = Idolitors

plus Newt is a hypocritical adulterer

So Norton where is your moral superiority???...I'm just pointing out your flawed judgments to you.

None of the GOP Candidates are biblical Christians ...so why do you support them, and then worse make wild claims that GOD does...what the hell is wrong with you? They are just misuing you ...

like I've always said Norton, you are a misinformed and mislead TOOL of SATAN. "You truely do not know what you do"

To vote Republican ...is a Vote For SATAN!

God Bless
CHEERS!

Wait a few more hours then it's time for this to go

Greece is already a "labor wasteland" where jobs are near impossible to find and when they materialize they are more likely to be "black", uninsured, well below the poverty threshold.Yet the new loan deals mandate among other things:

The dismantling of collective bargaining and the annulment of the current collective agreement. "Labor law" in Greece will not be a meaningful subject any more

Across the board cuts in nearly all of private sector wages and salaries to the tune of 22%. This includes the minimum wage (which will be now around 580 euros net, and under 500 euros if you are a new entrant into the job market). This affects all sort of benefits i.e. the unemployment benefit which is reduced to 369 from 461 euros. This in a country where the cost of living in its capital is still higher than that of Berlin

Immediate elimination of rent subsidies for the poorer, cuts in pensions, mass privatization at fire sale prices (including the Athens and Thessaloniki water companies, and the lottery/football pool company, whose market price right now is at two years profits) etc. This on top of galloping social destruction, a health system that is going to the dogs (the decay of which is producing even stronger superbugs) and public services being destroyed or annihilated.

At the same time whatever debt will remain - and it will be huge and unsustainable anyway - will now be under English law, and not Greek law, meaning that the terms of the loans will be draconian.

http://www.eurotrib.com/story/2012/2/12/8913/...

1Watt Hermit wrote:

The Red States need to start pulling themselves up by their bootstraps instead of taking all of the government's money.
Support for Republican candidates, who generally promise to cut government spending, has increased since 1980 in states where the federal government spends more than it collects. The greater the dependence, the greater the support for Republican candidates.
Conversely, states that pay more in taxes than they receive in benefits tend to support Democratic candidates. And Professor Lacy found that the pattern could not be explained by demographics or social issues.
http://firedoglake.com/2012/02/13/cognitive-d...

Agreed... starting FRIST with Mitch McConnells and Rand Pauls Kentucky...Excellent Asskicking Post!

Game Point!

Republican FreeDUMB wrote:

<quoted text>
Looks Like Republicans have shot themselves in the foot AGAIN with women voters on this one...since most Catholics DO USE Birth control...
infact you're one of the best reasons on Topix TO USE Birth Control!
Bside the RNC, who does this really hurt...ROMNEY!!!!
Hahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!!!!

That's not the issue and you know it. The issue is that he is trying to force it down the throats of religious institutions therefore violating their 1st Amendment Rights.

Here's something to consider: I'm a member of the Church of Christ (No, not Mormon) We do not believe in dancing except with our own spouse in the privacy of our own home. A few years back a dance class came to the school that my kids attended and it was required for them to take it as a part of music apreciation. My wife and I both stepped in and told them that our children would not be participating in this class due to religious conflict. It turned into a battle royal, but we ended up winning and permission slips were sent out to parents and students who did not return these slips would not be required to take the class. What's my point here? Forcing religious institutions to include contraception and abortion in their Insurance policies is like forcing students to participate in a class activity that goes against their religious beliefs. Both violate the 1st Amendment.

Strong Proud Conservative wrote:

<quoted text>
That's not the issue and you know it. The issue is that he is trying to force it down the throats of religious institutions therefore violating their 1st Amendment Rights.
Here's something to consider: I'm a member of the Church of Christ (No, not Mormon) We do not believe in dancing except with our own spouse in the privacy of our own home. A few years back a dance class came to the school that my kids attended and it was required for them to take it as a part of music apreciation. My wife and I both stepped in and told them that our children would not be participating in this class due to religious conflict. It turned into a battle royal, but we ended up winning and permission slips were sent out to parents and students who did not return these slips would not be required to take the class. What's my point here? Forcing religious institutions to include contraception and abortion in their Insurance policies is like forcing students to participate in a class activity that goes against their religious beliefs. Both violate the 1st Amendment.

Nothing in that proposal requires anyone to take contraceptives or get abortions. It allows those that work at the businesses run by churches to get coverage. Just like the school didn't cancel the dancing classes, it allowed you to deprive your kids of music appreciation and social interactions with others. No one loses but your kids, just like the catholics can keep having multitudes.

Strong Proud Conservative wrote:

<quoted text>
That's not the issue and you know it. The issue is that he is trying to force it down the throats of religious institutions therefore violating their 1st Amendment Rights.
Here's something to consider: I'm a member of the Church of Christ (No, not Mormon) We do not believe in dancing except with our own spouse in the privacy of our own home. A few years back a dance class came to the school that my kids attended and it was required for them to take it as a part of music apreciation. My wife and I both stepped in and told them that our children would not be participating in this class due to religious conflict. It turned into a battle royal, but we ended up winning and permission slips were sent out to parents and students who did not return these slips would not be required to take the class. What's my point here? Forcing religious institutions to include contraception and abortion in their Insurance policies is like forcing students to participate in a class activity that goes against their religious beliefs. Both violate the 1st Amendment.

WHAT the Hell... OMG You Don't Believe in DANCING??????

Isn't that a bit like the Taliban...

If people like you had their way ...schools would still be teaching the world was flat...

SPCA you just gave us the best evidence yet of of BAT SHIT David Koresh CRAZY you are!... I don't need to hear anymore from you thnak you!!!!

There is nothing worse than a Religious nut...like you... no matter the religion!

I have to wonder, what is wrong with your wife????

She must be living in HELL with you...she must be emotionally abused, and afraid of you?????

SPCA = David Koresh

1Watt Hermit wrote:

<quoted text>
Nothing in that proposal requires anyone to take contraceptives or get abortions. It allows those that work at the businesses run by churches to get coverage. Just like the school didn't cancel the dancing classes, it allowed you to deprive your kids of music appreciation and social interactions with others. No one loses but your kids, just like the catholics can keep having multitudes.

It forces the institutions to include it in their insurance when it clearly violates their beliefs. It was the same issue with the school. They're my kids, they tried to force them to take a dance class despite the fact it violated their religious belifs. It's the same thing.

Republican FreeDUMB wrote:

<quoted text>
WHAT the Hell... OMG You Don't Believe in DANCING??????
Isn't that a bit like the Taliban...
If people like you had their way ...schools would still be teaching the world was flat...
SPCA you just gave us the best evidence yet of of BAT SHIT David Koresh CRAZY you are!... I don't need to hear anymore from you thnak you!!!!
There is nothing worse than a Religious nut...like you... no matter the religion!
I have to wonder, what is wrong with your wife????
She must be living in HELL with you...she must be emotionally abused, and afraid of you?????
SPCA = David Koresh

You didn't read the whole thing. We don't believe in dancing unless it is with our own spouse in the privacy of our own home. The reason for that is that it promotes lust and can lead to premarital sex which then leads to unwanted pregnancies. We believe that the best way to prevent unwanted pregnancies is to not perform the act that leads to them to begin with. Dancing with my wife in my home is completely different. It doesn't matter if our bodies are rubbing up against each other promotig desire because we're married and the sex is perfectly justified.

Strong Proud Conservative wrote:

<quoted text>
It forces the institutions to include it in their insurance when it clearly violates their beliefs. It was the same issue with the school. They're my kids, they tried to force them to take a dance class despite the fact it violated their religious belifs. It's the same thing.

SPC = David Koresh

Strong Proud Conservative wrote:

<quoted text>
You didn't read the whole thing. We don't believe in dancing unless it is with our own spouse in the privacy of our own home. The reason for that is that it promotes lust and can lead to premarital sex which then leads to unwanted pregnancies. We believe that the best way to prevent unwanted pregnancies is to not perform the act that leads to them to begin with. Dancing with my wife in my home is completely different. It doesn't matter if our bodies are rubbing up against each other promotig desire because we're married and the sex is perfectly justified.

You know son, I am trying to wrap my head around this issue and I can't say that I disagree with you logic. Keeping the state out of church business and church out of state business is key to our liberty in this country. If I read the news right, you are saying that just having this available in the insurance benefits of church employees is a First Amendment violoation by the government?

I do disagree with you about the dancing thing. That is just an opinion or your church. I recall dances I went to as a young feller and mostly it was the girls to one and the boys to the other. Occassional one of us would screw up the courage to dance with a girl we was sweet on. I gaurantee you no one was lusted on at these events. Don't know how old your kids are but were you honestly worried they would be having sex from a class like that?