We desperately NEED Sarah Palin to run for president!!

Bodhisatva wrote:

<quoted text>You are too funny. Thanks for being soooo specific about my errors, it makes it really easy to dispute what you say.
You use the term "trickle up poverty" and in the same post you call Me? Ignorant???? WOW!!!!
The Conservative movement is Dead!
I have had recent Bowel Movements with more life!(and they smelled better)

Yes, Penis Leech is certainly a piece of work. His ever evident identity crisis (he's constantly changing his moniker, even taking the names of those for whom he has homoerotic romantic longing, such as Gleck), utter incoherrence, and deranged hatred of Obama is equal parts sad, hilarious, sick, and repulsive. I feel sorry for his mother. She's his SSI representive payee and has to regulate his meds. And wash his underwear after he "blows his nose" on them after reading "International Male" fashion magazine.

Ben Gleck wrote:

No, you are wrong! There are 1.9 MILLION less jobs then when Obama took office. Trickle up poverty is the obama mantra.
More people then ever counted among those in poverty and that number increases daily.
Please enlighten me how I tell you the Obama economic policy of trickle up poverty and that makes you less ignorant?
Can you type english or are you writing in the code of idiots.
<quoted text>

I think you meant 1.9 Million FEWER jobs THAN when Obama took office.(speaking of typing english).

Do you know where the Poverty numbers are derived from? The Census. Do you know how often the Census is conducted? Every 10 Years.

Our poverty level did not just GO UP in the past 2 years Brainiac.

I think your Job Numbers are Bogus.

But we have lost 1/2 Million Government Jobs since 2009 thanks to Republican Governors across the Country.

Do you know what a newspaper is?
Below is headline from USA today:

Number of people in poverty reaches highest level in 51 years

Bodhisatva wrote:

<quoted text>I think you meant 1.9 Million FEWER jobs THAN when Obama took office.(speaking of typing english).
Do you know where the Poverty numbers are derived from? The Census. Do you know how often the Census is conducted? Every 10 Years.
Our poverty level did not just GO UP in the past 2 years Brainiac.
I think your Job Numbers are Bogus.
But we have lost 1/2 Million Government Jobs since 2009 thanks to Republican Governors across the Country.

From the NY times.
WASHINGTON — Another 2.6 million people slipped into poverty in the United States last year, the Census Bureau reported Tuesday, and the number of Americans living below the official poverty line, 46.2 million people, was the highest number in the 52 years the bureau has been publishing figures on it.

Do you really want to continue to post your stupidity when the facts contiue to prove you are ignorant?

Bodhisatva wrote:

<quoted text>I think you meant 1.9 Million FEWER jobs THAN when Obama took office.(speaking of typing english).
Do you know where the Poverty numbers are derived from? The Census. Do you know how often the Census is conducted? Every 10 Years.
Our poverty level did not just GO UP in the past 2 years Brainiac.
I think your Job Numbers are Bogus.
But we have lost 1/2 Million Government Jobs since 2009 thanks to Republican Governors across the Country.

That is great about the government job loses. Double that a couple more times and we will be making real progress.

Bodhisatva wrote:

<quoted text>I think you meant 1.9 Million FEWER jobs THAN when Obama took office.(speaking of typing english).
Do you know where the Poverty numbers are derived from? The Census. Do you know how often the Census is conducted? Every 10 Years.
Our poverty level did not just GO UP in the past 2 years Brainiac.
I think your Job Numbers are Bogus.
But we have lost 1/2 Million Government Jobs since 2009 thanks to Republican Governors across the Country.

Mpre facts that prove your posts are full of lies. Private job loss has been at least 6 times that of government. Any more lies to post?

The federal government laid off or fired 0.55 percent of its workforce, according to USA Today – about one sixth of the firing/layoff rate in the private sector. A pair of agencies, the Federal Trade Commission and the Federal Communications Commission, did not fire or lay off a single worker in the budget year that ended September 30, despite employing roughly 3,000 workers between them

Bodhisatva wrote:

<quoted text>I think you meant 1.9 Million FEWER jobs THAN when Obama took office.(speaking of typing english).
Do you know where the Poverty numbers are derived from? The Census. Do you know how often the Census is conducted? Every 10 Years.
Our poverty level did not just GO UP in the past 2 years Brainiac.
I think your Job Numbers are Bogus.
But we have lost 1/2 Million Government Jobs since 2009 thanks to Republican Governors across the Country.

Boob have you ever posted a fact? Do you even know what facts are?

USA TODAY found that nearly 60% of firings occur in the first two years of employment, mostly workers on probation and outside the federal job protection system. Blue-collar workers are twice as likely to be fired as white-collar employees. The federal government’s 12,700 food preparation workers had the highest rate of getting fired last year — 2.5%.

White-collar federal workers have almost total job security after a few years on the job. Last year, the government fired none of its 3,000 meteorologists, 2,500 health insurance administrators, 1,000 optometrists, 800 historians or 500 industrial property managers.

The nearly half-million federal employees earning $100,000 or more enjoyed a 99.82% job security rate in 2010. Only 27 of 35,000 federal attorneys were fired last year. None was laid off. Death claimed 33

Ben Gleck wrote:

Mpre facts that prove your posts are full of lies. Private job loss has been at least 6 times that of government. Any more lies to post?
The federal government laid off or fired 0.55 percent of its workforce, according to USA Today – about one sixth of the firing/layoff rate in the private sector. A pair of agencies, the Federal Trade Commission and the Federal Communications Commission, did not fire or lay off a single worker in the budget year that ended September 30, despite employing roughly 3,000 workers between them
<quoted text>

Hey dim whit, you know State and County and City workers are Government Employees too right? Police, Teachers, Firemen, all NON FEDERAL Government Employees. Nice Statistical Cherry Picking,
Typical Conservative D- Bag tactic.

Ben Gleck wrote:

Boob have you ever posted a fact? Do you even know what facts are?
USA TODAY found that nearly 60% of firings occur in the first two years of employment, mostly workers on probation and outside the federal job protection system. Blue-collar workers are twice as likely to be fired as white-collar employees. The federal government’s 12,700 food preparation workers had the highest rate of getting fired last year — 2.5%.
White-collar federal workers have almost total job security after a few years on the job. Last year, the government fired none of its 3,000 meteorologists, 2,500 health insurance administrators, 1,000 optometrists, 800 historians or 500 industrial property managers.
The nearly half-million federal employees earning $100,000 or more enjoyed a 99.82% job security rate in 2010. Only 27 of 35,000 federal attorneys were fired last year. None was laid off. Death claimed 33

So what are you saying? The best work force we can hope for, is one with No Job Security, Low wages and a level of desperation that requires them to be thankful for the Crap jack asses like YOU decide they are "lucky" enough to have "given" to them?

Just because "firings" are at low levels, that doesn't mean cut backs didn't cause layoffs.

What stupid goose stepping Conservatives can't get their tiny brains wrapped around is, Cut Backs and "smaller government" are not a zero sum game. They translate into fewer Jobs. Those are Conservative Ideas, and they are antithetical to rebuilding our economy.

Are we only on the road to prosperity if we are constantly adding more to the unemployment rolls? Do you see how sick and twisted that is? No, of course you don't, because you are a sick and twisted evil Conservative Ass Hat.

Ben Gleck wrote:

Boob have you ever posted a fact? Do you even know what facts are?
USA TODAY found that nearly 60% of firings occur in the first two years of employment, mostly workers on probation and outside the federal job protection system. Blue-collar workers are twice as likely to be fired as white-collar employees. The federal government’s 12,700 food preparation workers had the highest rate of getting fired last year — 2.5%.
White-collar federal workers have almost total job security after a few years on the job. Last year, the government fired none of its 3,000 meteorologists, 2,500 health insurance administrators, 1,000 optometrists, 800 historians or 500 industrial property managers.
The nearly half-million federal employees earning $100,000 or more enjoyed a 99.82% job security rate in 2010. Only 27 of 35,000 federal attorneys were fired last year. None was laid off. Death claimed 33

Yes I post facts quite often, here's one, The facts and figures in your posts, have no bearing on the discussing at hand. And you are an ignoramus.

Oblacky wrote:

<quoted text> i would vote for my DOG over that black garbage , what a JOKE . If we keep the welfare blacks from voting , then he will LOOSE like he should have before , they THOUGHT they were getting free rims or chicken if he won haha SEE even the blacks run from eachother

are you a tard? blacks are only 13% of the US population and even less of the voting population ( so many are either in jail/prison, have felony records or just haven't registered)
If you think they are the major reason for winning elections, then how the hell does ANY Republican ever win? how do you explain Reagan, Bush Sr. and Dumbya winning?

What is she waiting for?? Only Sarah can stop Romney and beat Obama.

Run,Sara,run!!

LOL. It's too late. She can't even get on the remaining ballots to contest the nomination.

You people are stuck with Romney. Good luck with that.

Truth Dig wrote:

LOL. It's too late. She can't even get on the remaining ballots to contest the nomination.
You people are stuck with Romney. Good luck with that.

Gingrich, Romney or Palin.

Fat, Rich or Stupid. Lousy choices.

Boob,
So we have Gingrich, Romney or Palin running against Fat, Rich or Stupid Dummycrap? First I understand Obama being rich and stupid but I miss the fat? Are you refering to Hillary?

I'll take any of the first three over Stupid Obama

I guess Bill Clinton is the only acceptable overweight President? Apparently to a liberal loon being an over weight woman abuser qualifies you to be President?

She should run for president and Mr Trump for vice pres. Hooooohoooooo haaaaahaaaa!!!!!!!

Boob,
So we have Gingrich, Romney or Palin running against Fat, Rich or Stupid Dummycrap? First I understand Obama being rich and stupid but I miss the fat? Are you refering to Hillary?

I'll take any of the first three over Stupid Obama

I guess Bill Clinton is the only acceptable overweight President? Apparently to a liberal loon being an over weight woman abuser qualifies you to be President?

Bodhisatva wrote:

<quoted text>Gingrich, Romney or Palin.
Fat, Rich or Stupid. Lousy choices.

If Failin' Palin runs, Obama can safely start planning his reinaugeration dinner and party.

AND, why would that be? Is it that Obama's doing a good ? Or that Obama thinks there are 57 states? Why would anyone vote for Obama?

Ex Marine Grill Sargeant wrote:

If Failin' Palin runs, Obama can safely start planning his reinaugeration dinner and party.