Catholic Child Rapists Preach Sexual Morality?

The whole "controversy" over the Obama administration requiring The Catholic Church, Inc. to provide health insurance with contraception coverage is something to behold.

The Church's objection, on moral grounds, to this requirement is stunning. The Catholic Church, for decades, operated as a Child Molesting Syndicate, where an orginization of pedophiles were given free and ready access to young boys to be anally raped, copulated, sodomized, blown, you name it, with the protetion and tacet approval of Church hierarchy. As soon as one particular priest pedophile was exposed or faced scrutiny, he was moved and shielded from further inquiry, usually relocated to a new parish where a whole new crop of unkowing, unsuspecting victims awaited to be exploited and ravaged.

Yet these same depraved, sexually repressed weirdos and freaks now are outraged that their bizzare "moral" objection to birth control may somehow be compromised by a rule that requires them to provide decent health insurance to employees of their coporate run business ventures.

How is it that any sane person takes these f.cking whack-jobs seriously? Some laughingly effeminate freak dressed in some over-the top, wildly flamboynat robe or skirt and garrish, mulit-colored top-hat preaches about the sanctity of church teachings, just seconds after he just got done covering up the fact that countless of his collegues and fellow leaders were raping and molesting young boys. An orginization which probably has the highest concentration of pedophiles in the history of mankind is making an issue out of this?

What a f.cking world.

There have been Priests that have molested and raped young boys, and for that , they have to suffer in the end. That is not the true Catholic teachings of the Church. They are not taught that molesting children,(whether you are a priest, a parent, a teacher, and so forth), that this is morally correct. Don't make it look like they are taught that this behaviour is ok.
This Obama administration trying to force Catholics, or any Religious group to pay for something that is directly agains Religious rights is not going to work! What's next? Telling you you have no right to post on topix?

But Planned Parenthood ignores mandated reporter rules & claims the high moral ground.

The Church protected, covered-up, and wth full knowledge, gave known pedophiles access to more victims, thus tacitly approving and encouraging that behavior.

And has anyone met a sane priest? They are, to a man, weirdos.

It was overturned anyway, so this is a wasted topic right now anyway. I am sorry you are so resentful and bitter, and dont see straight. There are plenty of good Priests out there, and they aren't all weirdos either. But, apparently, you have issues, and just like to complain. You are the type that will ignore the good and just bitch about the bad! To some, you don't sound so sane either!!! Does that mean your whole family is like you? Hope not!

Yes, it's perfectly normal for a man to go his entire life without having sex (except with young boys), and prance around in flamboyantly colored gowns and headress while taking his marching orders from an invisible superman who lives in the sky.

Imagine someone doing that who wasn't a priest. They'd put you in an insane assylum.

If you think the priests are worth complaining about according to the DoJ more cops have been arrested for doing boys in the last 5 years than any priests. Want the proof?

Truth Dig wrote:

Yes, it's perfectly normal for a man to go his entire life without having sex (except with young boys), and prance around in flamboyantly colored gowns and headress while taking his marching orders from an invisible superman who lives in the sky.
Imagine someone doing that who wasn't a priest. They'd put you in an insane assylum.

Just because some Priests went against the Church teachings, doesn't mean they all do. And just because, apparently you don't believe in God, is no reason to discriminate those that do, and falsely accuse innocent people because of a few that went bad. Do you know how many people who aren't priests do exactly what you are questioning, and are still on the streets, and not in an insane asylum?
A lot of us believe in God, and hope to meet him when we die, but, if we die, and find out there is no God, what happens? NOTHING!!!
When you die, and find out there is a God, what happens? SOMETHING! I hear it's pretty hot down there though.
Some people are willing to sacrifice more than others because of their strong faith, faith that is probably stronger than a lot of us will ever know. If you are going to judge a whole group because of a few, then you are pretty narrow minded. Come on now, you knew damn well that this was going to be a big issue , so you deliberately started this thread. Well, I dont feel like I need to say anymore about this issue, especially to a narrow minded person such as yourself, so you have fun blasting innocent people, and sleep well, my little bitter friend!!!

Energyman wrote:

<quoted text>
Just because some Priests went against the Church teachings, doesn't mean they all do. And just because, apparently you don't believe in God, is no reason to discriminate those that do, and falsely accuse innocent people because of a few that went bad. Do you know how many people who aren't priests do exactly what you are questioning, and are still on the streets, and not in an insane asylum?
A lot of us believe in God, and hope to meet him when we die, but, if we die, and find out there is no God, what happens? NOTHING!!!
When you die, and find out there is a God, what happens? SOMETHING! I hear it's pretty hot down there though.
Some people are willing to sacrifice more than others because of their strong faith, faith that is probably stronger than a lot of us will ever know. If you are going to judge a whole group because of a few, then you are pretty narrow minded. Come on now, you knew damn well that this was going to be a big issue , so you deliberately started this thread. Well, I dont feel like I need to say anymore about this issue, especially to a narrow minded person such as yourself, so you have fun blasting innocent people, and sleep well, my little bitter friend!!!

Yes, keep living in your fantasy world. An invisible man in the sky is against women using birth control. And me jerk.ng off. He told this to a bunch of sexually repressed weirdos who he put in charge of "His" church. Makes perfect sense. To a delusional whack-job.

And if you, or anyone for that matter, wants to believe in that make-believe fantasy world, good for you. What I object to is these f.cking lunatics, who spent decades tolerating and tacitly approving child rape, imposing their bizzare, in fact deranged, view of human sexuality on me or anyone else.

And spare me the "isolated incidents" bullsh.t. The systematic abuse, cover-up, and protection of pedophile priests went all the way to the top. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/25/world/europ...

These f.cking degenerate's deranged view of human sexualtity drives them to attempt to control everyone else, including women who want to have access to birth control. There are so hung-up and sexually twisted, they hate the idea that other people have perfectly normal sex lives. Hence, their obsession in trying to demonize and control it.

Truth Dig should get off the government computer in the Oval Office and have the Secret Service escort him upstairs to the family living quarters.

If the church is against contraceptives because it interferes with God's will than all religious should refuse medication because it interferes with God's will.

I'm sure invisible man in the sky "Jesus" has been sharing divine secrets with this guy....:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2005/apr/24/c...

Evidently, Invisible Jesus has been telling the Pontif "No" to contraception (or sex without intending pregnancy, or masturbation), but "Yes" to covering up and protecting child rapists, men who like to s.ck on young boy penises and anally rape them, among other lovely things.

Here's an intersting character. This guy was the Pope's adviser on pedophilia. He was an expert, of course. How so? You know the answer to that, don't you....

http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599...

You have to realize that when these cases started to surface, the Church didn't really know what to do, there were quite a few false alligations to go with the true ones. They have been working on it, and have been taking better measures to take care of the situation. And I have to agree, you do seem to tear the whole group apart because of the few, but you are the one who has to handle that. Perhaps a shrink will do!!!

It seems to be secretly about money. The church doesn't want to have the expense of covering more meds. Pro-life is a misnomer. Against abortion but don't want anyone to practice safe sex either and use contraceptives. Sure stop funding Planned Parenthood and watch the rate of abortions (legal & illegal), infections (HIV/Aids), sore. The church is against everything from co-habitation, sterilization, gays, contraception to masturbation. So all of you who have ever used a condom or had a vasectomy/tubes tied you are all going to hell. You would think churches would be empty with their archaic laws that may have applied thousands of years ago but not in today's society. One of the reasons they don't want priests to marry is because who is going to pay for their families? Less money in their pockets!

If people don't have abortions, they won't have to worry about the sores, problem solved. The idea roots from St Paul who said it is better to wait for sexual realtions for after you are married. If you choose to practice before marriage, that is the risk you yourself are willing to take, and shouldn't have to rely on other organizations to pay for your mistakes. The virtue of a sacrifice is very limited in todays society, but it is your choice. With sex being so free now, there are ten times the problems that there were 50 years ago. Not that anyone didn't have sex at that time, but it wasn't as free as now. That should tell you something.

Ok, just realized you meant soar and not sore, but even so, it could be easily avoided, either way.

Yes, soar was what I meant. Saving sexual relations for marriage would be ideal but that has become a thing of the past. Sex is not as taboo either and with that there has to be greater responsibility. These agencies help prevent pregnancies as well. Do we need to regress and hand out knitting needles because some pro-life fanatics made contraceptives and (safe)abortions unavailable? Not that I think abortions are right, especially late term, but do believe there are circumstances where it may be justified. You cannot stop abortions anymore than you can stop prostitution. The church's stand on not providing coverage for contraceptives is not entirely pro-life and in a marriage, healthy sexual relations shouldn't only be to make babies.

It isn't up to us to stop abortions, it is up to the individuals, it's all a matter of choice. You Play, you Pay, that's the way it is, or at least should be. If you want to have sex before marriage, that is your perogative, but don't look to others to get you out of a bad situation you put yourself in to begin with. (I am not speaking of non choice situations, such as rape, etc.) It is still up to the individual. Responsibility is the key word here, you are responsible for your own actions, it's really not all that hard to figure out. If you figure sex is not taboo, then go for it, but take on the responsibility yourself. Don't blame others, or expect society to pay for your mistakes, we make enough on our own.

Reality check wrote:

Yes, soar was what I meant. Saving sexual relations for marriage would be ideal but that has become a thing of the past. Sex is not as taboo either and with that there has to be greater responsibility. These agencies help prevent pregnancies as well. Do we need to regress and hand out knitting needles because some pro-life fanatics made contraceptives and (safe)abortions unavailable? Not that I think abortions are right, especially late term, but do believe there are circumstances where it may be justified. You cannot stop abortions anymore than you can stop prostitution. The church's stand on not providing coverage for contraceptives is not entirely pro-life and in a marriage, healthy sexual relations shouldn't only be to make babies.

I have to say, it was nice having this little debate with you, no name calling or maliciousness . It isn't very often in topix that happens. Have a good day and life!!:)