Judged:
1
1
1
Aug 18, 2007 | Posted by: kutv.com
Comments
|
Judged:
1
1
1 |
||||
|
Judged:
1
1
1 I totally Agree on this! Stop making him look like a bad person! how many people get into car accidents everyday and someone dies? ITS A FREAKIN YEAR LATER! If it really was that big of a deal you should of tooken care of it a year ago when it happened! Alot of people die everyday in car accidents why are you making a big deal about this one? STOP USING HIM AS A POSTER BOY JUST SO YOU CAN PASS A NEW LAW! Thanks! God Bless Reggie Shaw! |
||||
|
Judged:
2
2 |
||||
|
Judged:
1
1
1 |
||||
|
Judged:
1
1 |
||||
|
Judged:
2
2
2 |
||||
|
Judged:
2
1
1 What happened that night was a tragic accident. And I am sure Reggie, as well as the families and friends of those who lost their lives have suffered a great amount. However, running around and trying to find someone to blame isn't going to make it any better. You say that "Finding out that your loved one is dead because someone was too busy texting to watch the road is the most shocking and painful thing I think I've ever had to go through. He needs to be a man and admit what he did is wrong." If that is TRULY what happened, then yes an ommission of guilt would be in order followed by a very large apology. But the fact of the matter is that it hasn't been proven that he was in fact text messaging while he was driving. In fact, it has been over a year and a half and they still can't even get enough evidence to get this to trial, let alone convict him. So as far as the Justice Department is concerned - and therefore you and I should be concerned - Reggie is innocent. No matter how you feel about him or this case personally, those are the facts. |
||||
|
Judged:
2
1
1 I think that Shaw Going on a mission or out of the state was a mistake. A vacation for two years? The right to a speedy trial is every body's right in this case for the family's sake for the absent father. |
||||
|
Judged:
1
1
1 As far as you should be concerned, sir, he didn't kill anyone. Once again, I feel I must bring up the crucial point that people are innocent until proven guilty. Do you have the proof to convict him? Cause I mean, I'm sure the prosecutors who haven't been able to get this to trial would love you if you did. If not, you probably should stop saying he's guilty cause you really have no idea, do you? A vacation? You seem to seriously underestimate the sacrifice that those who are on missions make. I can assure you that leaving friends and family that you love for two years, especially after having gone through such a horrible ordeal, is no picnic. But that is completely irrelevant. And as for the right to a speedy trial, that is a right of the defendent, not the prosecutor. But for EVERYONE involved, lets hope if this goes to fiasco of a court case goes to trial that it will be speedy. Not just for those involved in this mess that should have never happened, but for the tax payers that are having to foot the bill for the prosection trying to prey on and make an example of a good guy. |
||||
|
Judged:
1
1
1 |
||||
|
Judged:
2
1
1 And I also don't understand how you can say that he "didn't seem a bit fazed." Do you honestly think that someone can witness the death of two people and not be fazed by the situation? You have ABSOLUTELY NO IDEA the effect that this had on him and it is horrible of you - or your friend, even if he is a Highway Patrolman - to make any assumptions about it. And you are right, so what if Reggie is a great person? He is, but that is beside the point. The fact of the matter is that this hasn't gone to trial, and Reggie hasn't been convicted of anything. So who are you, then, to automatically assume that he "caused the death's of two innocent people?" You are right about one thing: great people can do wrong things and use bad judgement. I'm sure you are a great person, but the only wrongful act and use of bad judgement here is you condemning someone you don't even know for a situation that you know nothing about. It is a "stupid, convoluted way of thinking" to assume that because you heard some opinions from a cop that you have any idea about what happened and are justified in and worthy to offer commentary. |
||||
|
Judged:
1
1 You need to know that my neighbor the UHP Trooper was present at a huge meeting where this case and others like it were discussed amongst law officers, traffic officers, court officials, etc. This is where he got the information about the Shaw case. The dangers of text-driving were being addressed at the meeting, and the attending officers gave THEIR view of what happened at the scene. THEY gave the report of Shaw's behavior, and all the information was disseminated, the whole point of calling the meeting in the first place. True, I wasn't at the accident scene---neither were you. Actually, no matter what Shaw was doing, while doing it, he lost control of his car, crossed the center line and 'caused the death' of two people. If it was someone else's name here instead of Shaw, could you then admit the tragedy of the whole thing? What if your father had been killed--then would the driver have done anything wrong? As I said, this should be a huge wake-up call for everyone. No one is attacking Shaw, people can have an opinion without passing judgment on him. We ARE entitled to our opinions, and because of freedom of speech, we can voice it in public forums such as this one. |
||||
|
Judged:
2
1
1 You are entitled to your own opinion, but maybe you should seek to learn ALL sides of the story before you formulate one. Remember that just because someone is in a position of authority doesn't mean that they know everything and are completely unbiased about the situation. You are right, he did lose control of his car and cross the center line, which is something that he is going to have to deal with for the rest of his life, but he claims that he hydroplained on the road. Which clearly makes this a tragic ACCIDENT. He was not the cause of the accident, he was merely another victim involved. He may not have lost his life, but he also lost enough. You can dispute why he crossed the line, but the fact of the matter is that he is innocent until proven guilty. Which means until (and if) a jury comes back and says he is guilty, his story is the one you should be listening to. As someone who believes in the ideals of the American Constitution - you clearly do judging by your statements about freedom of speech - you should have no problem presuming Reggie's innocence in the accident until that point in time, should it occur. You ask if I would feel the same way if it wasn't Reggie that had been in the accident or it had been my father involved..absolutely! As a future lawyer, I firmly believe in the principles that our legal system was founded on. Innocent until proven guilty. And as a person who was raised through family and religion to be sympathetic towards all people who have been a victim to tragic circumstance, I would hope that I would have sympathy for everyone involved in the accident, not just for those that lost their lives. I would feel the same if it was my worst enemy who had crossed the center line. As I have stated on many occasions, what happened that day was a tragic ACCIDENT. All involved were victims. Whatever your opinion on the matter may be, I hope we can all at least agree on that. |
||||
|
i am proud of you
we love you, Uncle Atzmon |
||||
|
Judged:
1
1 |
||||
|
Judged:
1 Like you said, I hope - for the sake of EVERYONE involved - that this mess gets resolved soon. Dragging it out like this isn't helping anyone. |
||||
|
Judged:
1 Bottom line is, I just hope this all gets cleared up quickly. It's not helping anyone to dwell on this. |
||||
|
Judged:
2
2
1 I agree with you. Reggie Shaw should not be allowed one more day of freedom. He is guilty and should be punished for his sin. He ruined at least two families and has blemished the church and Christ Jesus. He needs to pay for his sins like a man. Everybody love Jesus and have a safe weekend. |
||||
|
Judged:
2
1
1 And whoever this "interested" person is, the only person I can see blemishing the Church of Jesus Christ is you. Whether you think he is guilty or not, you shouldn't be condeming him. Read your own doctrine.."He who is without sin, let him cast the first stone." Don't be hypocritical. |
||||
|
Judged:
1 |
||||
|
||||
Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.
| Topic | Updated | Last By | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| Armed robber caught in Tremonton | Dec 10 | John | 1 |
| LDS to push marriage amendment (May '06) | Nov '09 | Pahoran | 746 |
| Juggalos: Family or gang? | Oct '09 | XxxToxicXJug... | 12 |
| garland ordinances | Oct '09 | Lynn | 1 |
| judge christianson is out of control (Dec '08) | Sep '09 | STEP DOWN | 6 |
| Honeyville man recounts rescue | Sep '09 | Quiet_Dave | 1 |
| Teen Saves Girl from Drowning after Car Crash -... | Sep '09 | Grafted Devil | 2 |