Who do you support for Governor in Pennsylvania in 2010?

Posted in the Thomasville Forum

Comments (Page 1,120)

Showing posts 22,381 - 22,400 of51,292
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Ted

Johnstown, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#23672
May 23, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Dan the Man wrote:
<quoted text>
There's no need to assume anything. You know how to use Google. Paste the title and read the article.
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
See, danny BOY, an honest person provides the link to sources that are copied and pasted and doesn't leave it to the reader to confirm the accuracy of quoted text.

For that matter, danny BOY, why copy and paste another's words? Just comment about them and provide the link.

But a dishonest person, like you danny BOY, obscures, obfuscates and edits source information. You have a history of plagiarism and editing the source text you've copied and pasted. I understand your interest in leaving the door open for your sleazy habit.

Remember, as a recent example, posts 23449 and 23450? Your posts consisted ENTIRELY of text you plagiarized. There was NO comment that was your own and NO citation of the source of your thievery. THAT'S why you, more than anyone, should include source links. You've proven you can't be trusted with honestly citing links to words you use.

danny BOY, the pathologically lying plagiarist.
Dan the Man

Chambersburg, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#23673
May 23, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Ted wrote:
<quoted text>
See, danny BOY, an honest person provides the link to sources that are copied and pasted and doesn't leave it to the reader to confirm the accuracy of quoted text.
For that matter, danny BOY, why copy and paste another's words? Just comment about them and provide the link.
But a dishonest person, like you danny BOY, obscures, obfuscates and edits source information. You have a history of plagiarism and editing the source text you've copied and pasted. I understand your interest in leaving the door open for your sleazy habit.
Remember, as a recent example, posts 23449 and 23450? Your posts consisted ENTIRELY of text you plagiarized. There was NO comment that was your own and NO citation of the source of your thievery. THAT'S why you, more than anyone, should include source links. You've proven you can't be trusted with honestly citing links to words you use.
danny BOY, the pathologically lying plagiarist.
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
BobbieTeabag

Cumberland, MD

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#23674
May 23, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Dan the Man wrote:
<quoted text>
You know how to use Google. Paste the title.
Here is my new policy on posting relevant news articles and opinion pieces to Topix: I default to NOT posting links.
On a case by case, as it seems relevant to me, I may post them, but generally I will not. I will not capitulate to the irrational demands of a deranged stalker.
BTW - your escalating shrillness is distressing to the wolves. PETA would like you to stop abusing the wildlife. LOL!
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
Your links get removed because of all the bashing.

Maybe we should start notifying the partys you steal from and wait for Topix to remove ass.
Ted

Johnstown, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#23675
May 23, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Dan the Man wrote:
<quoted text>
You know how to use Google. Paste the title.
Here is my new policy on posting relevant news articles and opinion pieces to Topix: I default to NOT posting links.
On a case by case, as it seems relevant to me, I may post them, but generally I will not. I will not capitulate to the irrational demands of a deranged stalker.
BTW - your escalating shrillness is distressing to the wolves. PETA would like you to stop abusing the wildlife. LOL!
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
STUNNING, danny BOY!!! You are quite the slimy dog.

You efforts to provide cover for your plagiarism is pathetically transparent. What you refer to as "irrational demands" are standard procedures in citing quoted sources.

Rather than defaulting to standard, ethical procedure in citing source links, YOU, danny BOY, are defaulting to the criminal's path of NOT citing sources for quoted--stolen--text! You are quite a sociopath.

Don't you dare have the nerve to ever again claim to be an advocate of ethics or morality. You are the antithesis of an ethical and moral person.

danny BOY, you are a filthy plagiarist. Refusing to cite sources only confirms it.
Dan the Man

Chambersburg, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#23676
May 23, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Ted wrote:
<quoted text>
STUNNING, danny BOY!!! You are quite the slimy dog.
You efforts to provide cover for your plagiarism is pathetically transparent. What you refer to as "irrational demands" are standard procedures in citing quoted sources.
Rather than defaulting to standard, ethical procedure in citing source links, YOU, danny BOY, are defaulting to the criminal's path of NOT citing sources for quoted--stolen--text! You are quite a sociopath.
Don't you dare have the nerve to ever again claim to be an advocate of ethics or morality. You are the antithesis of an ethical and moral person.
danny BOY, you are a filthy plagiarist. Refusing to cite sources only confirms it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
Ted

Johnstown, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#23677
May 23, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Dan the Man wrote:
That's it, danny BOY? No defense or squirming? Just a link to a howling wolf because you are tired of being confronted with your plagiarism?

We both know, danny BOY, that's all you can do because there is no defense of stealing others' words.

You are such a dishonest weasel.
TaxNoMore

West Hollywood, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#23678
May 23, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

Dan the Man
Carlisle, PA

sez

We're not talking about getting it right all the time. We're talking about a systematic, persistent bias.

And we're not talking about posters on Topix. We're talking about a national polling firm.

I say up-front that I have a liberal perspective when I post my opinions.

I'm not claiming that what I post is accurate, reliable, neutral statistical data.

You are choosing to rely on information that has been proven to be inaccurate and biased but is being presented as reliable and accurate.

I don't understand why you'd want to do that, but to each his own.

Just don't expect anyone to take you seriously when you base your political opinions on false and misleading information.
TaxNoMore

West Hollywood, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#23679
May 23, 2012
 

Judged:

1

I, I, I, I, I'm, I'm a warrior for the middle class.

I'm happy to fight for the middle class,"

“First Gay President”

With A Little Rainbow Halo Over His Head.

Aaaaaaaaa Haaaaaaaaaaaaaa, ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha, ha,ha,ha
Ted

Johnstown, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#23680
May 23, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Dan the Man wrote:
<quoted text>
We're talking about those with power and those without power.
Racism = prejudice + power.
Those without power can be prejudiced, but they can't be racist.
You are wrong, danny BOY.

You've been indoctrinated as a racist in swallowing the extreme-left's REdefinition of the term 'racism': "Racism = prejudice + power".

Previously you've said minorities can't be racist. Now you are saying those without power can't be racist. But both are wrong, danny BOY, because both rely on a ridiculous, hijacked definition of racism.

ANYone, danny BOY, can be racist. Until you accept that you will be a racist in accusing ALL whites in the United States of racism and proselytizing the racist philosophy of 'white privilege'.

Your hyperbole thwarts honest discussion and perpetuates the very racism you pretend to champion.
did-u-c-that

Chambersburg, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#23681
May 23, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Dan the Man wrote:
<quoted text>
Go watch the Maddow interview. The mayor is perfectly capable of expressing his own point of view.
I heard his point of view on "Meet the Press". I actually thought that it was about time that someone step up to the plate from the Dem side and tell us how they really feel instead of reiterating the talking points from the democratic playbook.
As for watching the Maddow interview, I don't think so. I would rather listen to fingernails being drug across a chalk board for half an hour, than to listen to her.
Why Booker chose to go on her show is beyond me. If he really wanted to back track on what he said, he should have chosen a different news outlet, not MSNBC. Who watches MSNBC?
Dan the Man

Chambersburg, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#23682
May 23, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Ted wrote:
<quoted text>
That's it, danny BOY? No defense or squirming? Just a link to a howling wolf because you are tired of being confronted with your plagiarism?
We both know, danny BOY, that's all you can do because there is no defense of stealing others' words.
You are such a dishonest weasel.
http://www.youtube.com/watch...

The lying psycho is so shrill only dogs can hear him anymore.
TaxNoMore

West Hollywood, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#23683
May 23, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Dan the Man wrote:
..........

blowhard

someone who talks a big game for the sole pleasure of instigating an

argument without rational back-up to his/her point(s).
Dan the Man

Chambersburg, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#23684
May 23, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

The core of Mitt Romney's argument that he should be President is his business career.

But, according to a new WaPo poll, the nation isn't really buying it.

----------

Q: Is Romney's work buying and restructuring companies before he went into politics a major reason you to (support) that candidate, a major reason you to (oppose) that candidate, or not a major factor in your vote?

Major reason to support 21%
Major reason to oppose 21%
Not a major factor 54%
No opinion 4%

----------

Among those who care, it's a total wash. It simply isn't a factor.

So what else can Romney run on?

What other accomplishments or skills can he use to convince America that he should be President?

Anyone?

Anyone?

LMAO!
Dan the Man

Chambersburg, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#23685
May 23, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

did-u-c-that wrote:
<quoted text>
I heard his point of view on "Meet the Press". I actually thought that it was about time that someone step up to the plate from the Dem side and tell us how they really feel instead of reiterating the talking points from the democratic playbook.
As for watching the Maddow interview, I don't think so. I would rather listen to fingernails being drug across a chalk board for half an hour, than to listen to her.
Why Booker chose to go on her show is beyond me. If he really wanted to back track on what he said, he should have chosen a different news outlet, not MSNBC. Who watches MSNBC?
Willful ignorance.

That's par for the course on the right.
TaxNoMore

West Hollywood, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#23686
May 23, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Dan the Man wrote:
The core of Mitt Romney's argument that he should be President is his business career.
But, according to a new WaPo poll, the nation isn't really buying it.
----------
Q: Is Romney's work buying and restructuring companies before he went into politics a major reason you to (support) that candidate, a major reason you to (oppose) that candidate, or not a major factor in your vote?
Major reason to support 21%
Major reason to oppose 21%
Not a major factor 54%
No opinion 4%
----------
Among those who care, it's a total wash. It simply isn't a factor.
So what else can Romney run on?
What other accomplishments or skills can he use to convince America that he should be President?
Anyone?
Anyone?
LMAO!
..........

Will you believe the poll on Nov 7 2012?
TaxNoMore

West Hollywood, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#23687
May 23, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Dan the Man wrote:
<quoted text>
Willful ignorance.
That's par for the course on the right.
..........

egotist

an extremely boastful, self-righteous person.

One who comes off as a friendly person until he gets into a position of power, whereupon the abuse of such power follows.

He declares his actions as always being the right ones; never admits wrongdoing, even when evidence suggests the latter.

When he is punished for his actions, the "blame-game" will ultimately be implemented, whereupon he will become extremely defensive of himself and disrespectful to others.
Dan the Man

Chambersburg, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#23688
May 23, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Ted wrote:
<quoted text>
You are wrong, danny BOY.
You've been indoctrinated as a racist in swallowing the extreme-left's REdefinition of the term 'racism': "Racism = prejudice + power".
Previously you've said minorities can't be racist. Now you are saying those without power can't be racist. But both are wrong, danny BOY, because both rely on a ridiculous, hijacked definition of racism.
ANYone, danny BOY, can be racist. Until you accept that you will be a racist in accusing ALL whites in the United States of racism and proselytizing the racist philosophy of 'white privilege'.
Your hyperbole thwarts honest discussion and perpetuates the very racism you pretend to champion.
In America, minorities don't have institutional power. And since racism is prejudice plus power, they can't be racist.

Obviously, the key factor is power, as anyone capable of clear, rational thought understands.

And I'm not just NOW saying this. This is what I've ALWAYS said. Just because you're too stupid to comprehend what you read doesn't make this new information.

Your irrationally passionate resistance to this commonly accepted understanding of racism and white privilege reveals your deep, deep terror of being honest with yourself.

Every post you make like this confirms the obvious...
You are a fearful little boy, sticking your fingers in your ears and shrieking hateful personal attacks to avoid any chance that you might accidentally be self-reflective for a second and discover that you harbor prejudice and receive advantage due to your whiteness.

You don't have to be this way. It's your choice. When you're ready to grow up, let me know. Despite your irrational hatefulness toward me, I'm still willing to help you become a less repulsive little shit.
Dan the Man

Chambersburg, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#23689
May 23, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

did-u-c-that wrote:
<quoted text>
I heard his point of view on "Meet the Press". I actually thought that it was about time that someone step up to the plate from the Dem side and tell us how they really feel instead of reiterating the talking points from the democratic playbook.
As for watching the Maddow interview, I don't think so. I would rather listen to fingernails being drug across a chalk board for half an hour, than to listen to her.
Why Booker chose to go on her show is beyond me. If he really wanted to back track on what he said, he should have chosen a different news outlet, not MSNBC. Who watches MSNBC?
And ... ummmm ... you do know that MSNBC owns "Meet the Press" right?

LMAO!
TaxNoMore

West Hollywood, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#23690
May 23, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Dan the Man
Hanover, PA

sez

Really?

It's fair that they pay 10% to 15% while the rest of us pay 30%?

Maybe you don't know the meaning of the word

"fair."

LOL!

..........

c'mon danny boy debate

..........

..........

Federal Income Taxes on Middle-Income Families Remain Near Historic Lows

By Chuck Marr

Updated April 2, 2012

Federal taxes on middle-income Americans are near historic lows,[1] according to the latest available data.

That’s true both for federal income taxes and total federal taxes.[2]

Income taxes:

A family of four in the exact middle of the income spectrum will pay only 5.6 percent of its 2011 income in federal income taxes, according to a new analysis by the Urban Institute-Brookings Institution Tax Policy Center.[3]

Average income tax rates for these typical families have been lower during the Bush and Obama Administrations than at any time since the 1950s, as Figure 1 shows.

(As discussed below, 2009 and 2010 were particularly low because of the temporary Making Work Pay Tax Credit.)

Overall federal taxes:

Overall federal taxes — which include income as well as payroll and excise taxes — on middle-income households are near their lowest levels in decades, according to the latest data from the Congressional Budget Office (CBO).

http://www.cbpp.org/cms/index.cfm ...

DEMOCRAT SCUM

Socialist,Communist,Utopian,Ma rxist

Dan the Man

SCUM-bagger

..........

c'mon danny boy debate
Ted

Johnstown, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#23691
May 23, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Dan the Man wrote:
<quoted text>
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
The lying psycho is so shrill only dogs can hear him anymore.
No, danny BOY, providing a link to a howling wolf does NOT provide cover for your frequent and confirmed plagiarism.

It is you, danny BOY, who is the liar in denying it.

So what's new.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 22,381 - 22,400 of51,292
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••
•••
•••

Thomasville Jobs

•••
•••
•••

Thomasville People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••