|
Tom the Frog
|
Sun Reader wrote: <quoted text> You were smart ass and sarcastic in your own posts. You said people were "clueless!" and asked smart assed, smarmy questions and challenged their intelligence. Roger answered your challenge, and buried you. Dont make the challenge if your going to cry like a baby when you lose. Roger sounds like he has already considered your point, and has moved onto the next level. Perhaps you should learn how to do the same. You wanted to stop the debate cold in its tracks with the "its public info" argument. Well, that point isn't strong enough to change the course of the discussion. Deal with it. Bam ! Slam dunk.
|
|
Another Sun Reader
|
The system is set up for everyone to be innocent until proven guilty, and given due process. We don't even know if she committed a crime. Field sobriety tests are administrated by police officers, which have an obvious bias to fail whoever they can (backing up what L.L. said). Chemical tests, are inaccurate unless an actual blood sample was taken, or unless someone was way over the limit .12 or higher. Unless she registered .12 or higher on a breath test, I doubt very much she was actually over the .08 limit. Plus, was she video taped during the Field Sobriety test. The police officer(s) could be lying in their report to make her seem more impaired. Also, if she was arrested and had to wait for an excessive period of time, her reading would be higher because most alcohol is absorbed through the intestines. In other words, she could have been driving below the legal limit when pulled over, and again if the police officers really want to gather evidence for their charge, they'll find a way to make her wait. Maybe ask excessive questions, or call a tow truck service from a couple towns over. Point is, unless she was very much intoxicated and way over the limit, she could in fact be innocent of the charges.
|
|
state worker
|
Judged:
1
1
to all of you who make comments on this sistuation that she should be held resposible for her actions.one comment to you. im sure you all drink and drove at one time or another, and im sure you dont want your name and address and your salery on the front page if and when you get arrested for it.people make bad coices in life.and unfortunatly we have to live with our mistakes.
|
|
annonomouus
|
It's not surprising. She is even one that picks on others with problems but yet allows some of her staff to even abuse patients. Maybe if she laid of the boose and was more sympathetic to the needs of others.
|
|
annonomouus
|
CEO still running Tewksbury Hospital after OUI arrest back in May. For the way she treats the rest of the staff at Tewksbury as well as patients she shouldn't be in contact with any of them she is a discrace and nothing but a drunken bum whom can't even stand up straight on her own two feet even at work..
|
|
anonomous
|
Sandra Akers discriminates against other staff and denies them positions because of health problems but yet she gets to run a hospital after being arrested several times for oui, not to menttion she had been fired from Soldiers Home for stealing and god only knows what else.
|
|
anonomous
|
Sandra Akers should have to serve time in the OUI promgram that is provided at Tewksbury Hospital for her problem.
|