2 charged with marketing pierced 'gothic kittens'

Let's think about this for a minute. We cut the genitals out of puppies, we clip their ears and tail, oh and need I mention that we pierce the ears of little babies and cut the foreskin off some of our males for the sake of health and religous reasons. Why are we wasting tax payer money on charging Ms Crawford with this bull**** charge. With the SPCA always begging for donations and closing centers her and there I would think we could find other ways to spend a limited source of funds.

Bull wrote:

Let's think about this for a minute. We cut the genitals out of puppies, we clip their ears and tail, oh and need I mention that we pierce the ears of little babies and cut the foreskin off some of our males for the sake of health and religous reasons. Why are we wasting tax payer money on charging Ms Crawford with this bull**** charge. With the SPCA always begging for donations and closing centers her and there I would think we could find other ways to spend a limited source of funds.

Because it's the law. If you don't like the law have it changed, but it's still the law.

well I guess It wasnt any more cruel than piercing a babies ears.

Wanna complain about tagging livestock, Tagging research animals, or even the people who pierce their 6 month old babys ears too. who cares. At least she wasn't selling them as food.Don't forget, PETA (who tipped off the humane society) is the same group that suggested Ben 'n' Jerrys use human breast milk in their ice cream because drinking cows milk is unnatural. P.S. This comment was not intended to defend People Eating Tasty Animals decision.

This is yet another example of how desperately the gene pool needs more chlorine.

I can only hope that these charges prevent her from ever being licensed in another business involving animals. She's clearly too stupid to be around them without supervision.

Smokin Joe wrote:

<quoted text>
Because it's the law. If you don't like the law have it changed, but it's still the law.

Joe please enlighten me as to which law you are speaking about!! My knowledge of the law is not as extensive as yours.

Louise wrote:

well I guess It wasnt any more cruel than piercing a babies ears.

Louise you seem to be the only one getting my point!! Thank you

Pauly wrote:

Wanna complain about tagging livestock, Tagging research animals, or even the people who pierce their 6 month old babys ears too. who cares. At least she wasn't selling them as food.Don't forget, PETA (who tipped off the humane society) is the same group that suggested Ben 'n' Jerrys use human breast milk in their ice cream because drinking cows milk is unnatural. P.S. This comment was not intended to defend People Eating Tasty Animals decision.

Pauly, I see we need to get together for a good steak!!

Bull wrote:

<quoted text>
Joe please enlighten me as to which law you are speaking about!! My knowledge of the law is not as extensive as yours.

Are you just acting stupid ?

Cruelty to animals:
cruelty to animals Willful or wanton infliction of pain, suffering, or death upon an animal or the intentional or malicious neglect of an animal.

Phil Lowery wrote:

<quoted text>
Are you just acting stupid ?
Cruelty to animals:
cruelty to animals Willful or wanton infliction of pain, suffering, or death upon an animal or the intentional or malicious neglect of an animal.

Phil, If you aren't a vegetarian I think you should be charged as well. Put that on your grill and cook it.

Bull wrote:

<quoted text>
Phil, If you aren't a vegetarian I think you should be charged as well. Put that on your grill and cook it.

So your just going to change the subject. Interesting.

Phil Lowery wrote:

<quoted text>
So your just going to change the subject. Interesting.

Don't get me wrong Phil I love animal usually with mash potato's and gravy and a side of vegetables

how about all the activist nut jobs google this. PETA employees charged with animal cruelty

Bull wrote:

<quoted text>
Don't get me wrong Phil I love animal usually with mash potato's and gravy and a side of vegetables

It's obvious you have no intellect.

I would love to meet Ms. Crawford, and I love to protect those that can't protect themselves. Maybe piercing Ms. Crawford's eyelid would be a nice start.

The article states the cats were pierced with a 14 gauge piercing. What is a 14 gauge piercing?

As alf said i never met a cat I didn't like. I agree that meat goes good with potatos and gravy.

The Dude wrote:

The article states the cats were pierced with a 14 gauge piercing. What is a 14 gauge piercing?

If you have to ask it just shows your lack on intelligence.

Disgusted by idiots wrote:

This is yet another example of how desperately the gene pool needs more chlorine.
I can only hope that these charges prevent her from ever being licensed in another business involving animals. She's clearly too stupid to be around them without supervision.

No we just need to spay and neuter more than the animals.

Leave her alone. How many of you people that are complaining have had yours declawed or even tattood? Peircing can't be any worse than that and I bet you all think that is ok. If the animal is fine and the humane society should be able to tell or not - then leave her alone. Besides, maybe they just might like a tattoo or peircing like we do.