Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Aug 4, 2010 Full story: www.cnn.com 201,434

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Full Story

“IT'S TIME TO ELIMINATE”

Since: Mar 11

PROP 8 AND DOMA!!!

#142743 May 26, 2012
Here Is One wrote:
<quoted text>
Oslama violated the constitution in oslamacare......LOL
The patriot act
The food safety act.
Oslama says he can tell a state if they can have raw dairy, medical marijuana or even certain guns..........ROTFLMAO
And Yes Mitt could and will if necessary ban at the federal level SSM......
Isn't that why his health care is being challenged.....and he didn't sign an Executive Order to mandate it.

The UNCONSTITUTIONAL Patriot Act was ORIGINALLY signed by George Bush, NOT President Obama, though he did resign it.....nevertheless, it was Bush who put that Illegal act in place....with a few other illegal acts like wire-tapping!!!

Sorry, but the President simply DOESN'T have that kind of power......and therefore by doing it....it would be challenge at SCOTUS and it would lose.....and then you might have something you really don't want......and that's one of the reasons Romney wouldn't do it....but before Romney can do anything.....He has to win.....and that might not happen!!!

“Facts”

Since: May 08

Mexico

#142744 May 26, 2012
lides wrote:
<quoted text>
What’s the matter? Ill equipped to provide a rational rebuttal?
<quoted text>
Well, in part because you seem to lack the ability to provide any reputable proof of your assertion, and in part because it is utterly irrelevant to the constitutional guarantee of equal protection.
<quoted text>
Feel free to offer proof from a reputable medical, scientific, or academic organization to that effect that will make you look less foolish. Right now you have offered an assertion which you cannot remotely prove, and which ultimately has no relevance whatsoever to the topic at hand.
Way to make yourself look incompetent.
<quoted text>
It is irrelevant whether it is a choice or defect (although my challenge stands to substantiate your drunken boast), as it has no bearing upon the constitutional guarantee of equal protection. If they are persons within a state’s jurisdiction, then they are entitled to equal protection of the laws.
Do you delight in making yourself look foolish? Because you seem to do so with great regularity.
<quoted text>
Actually, when addressing equal protections, it specifically says that states must provide ALL PERSONS within their jurisdiction, not all citizens, equal protection of the laws.
However, even if your assertion WERE true, and the 14th Amendment only applied to citizens, it would STILL be applicable to homosexuals who were citizens.
Your other argument about reinstating slavery is both inept and irrelevant.
I think it is nothing more than a perversion........Period...... ....LOL

It is the gay community that say they are born that way and can't help it.......

If that is the case then by definition they are born abnormal or with a defect......

“No Headline available”

Since: Jan 08

Defiance, Ohio

#142745 May 26, 2012
Here Is One wrote:
I think it is nothing more than a perversion........Period...... ....LOL
I didn't ask for your personal opinion. I asked for scientific proof. This response tends to indicate that you lack the capacity to provide such proof of your assertion.
Here Is One wrote:
It is the gay community that say they are born that way and can't help it.......
Here, you are the one making the claim that homosexuality is a choice, ergo it is incumbent upon you to prove your assertion, and it appears that you lack the competence to do so.
Here Is One wrote:
If that is the case then by definition they are born abnormal or with a defect......
Feel free to prove it. I don't think you are able.

“Facts”

Since: May 08

Mexico

#142746 May 26, 2012
lides wrote:
<quoted text>
I didn't ask for your personal opinion. I asked for scientific proof. This response tends to indicate that you lack the capacity to provide such proof of your assertion.
<quoted text>
Here, you are the one making the claim that homosexuality is a choice, ergo it is incumbent upon you to prove your assertion, and it appears that you lack the competence to do so.
<quoted text>
Feel free to prove it. I don't think you are able.
I don't care what you asked for....LOL

The point is and you would know this if you could follow a conversation was that I have said there is no proof that being gay is not a choice.......

But if we ever do find out that there is a "gay" gene it will be called a defect.........Period.....
As by definition it is not normal..........ROTFLMAO

“No Headline available”

Since: Jan 08

Defiance, Ohio

#142748 May 26, 2012
Here Is One wrote:
I don't care what you asked for....LOL
And, clearly, you do not care about making an intelligent or factually support argument. If you cannot defend your child-like argument, that is hardly my problem.
Here Is One wrote:
The point is and you would know this if you could follow a conversation was that I have said there is no proof that being gay is not a choice.......
Of course whether or not being gay is inherent or a choice is irrelevant to the constitutional guarantee of equal protection of the laws. This argument is nothing more than a half-baked rationalization.
Here Is One wrote:
But if we ever do find out that there is a "gay" gene it will be called a defect.........Period.....
Science thus far has disagreed with you, a fact which is reinforced by your inability to offer the support of any reputable medical, scientific, or academic institution to support your position. http://www.apa.org/helpcenter/sexual-orientat...
http://www.ama-assn.org/ama/pub/about-ama/our...
Here Is One wrote:
As by definition it is not normal..........ROTFLMAO
Nowhere does the constitution require normalcy to receive equal protection of the laws. In fact it goes so far as to ensure that ALL PERSONS within a state’s jurisdiction are guaranteed such equal protection.

This rationalization is particularly pathetic.

Since: Jan 12

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

#142750 May 26, 2012
akpilot wrote:
Why? So Obama can continue to do nothing for you?
You mean like repealing Don't Ask Don't Tell. How is that "nothing?"
Green Fairy

Laguna Niguel, CA

#142751 May 26, 2012
lides wrote:
<quoted text>
And, clearly, you do not care about making an intelligent or factually support argument. If you cannot defend your child-like argument, that is hardly my problem.
<quoted text>
Of course whether or not being gay is inherent or a choice is irrelevant to the constitutional guarantee of equal protection of the laws. This argument is nothing more than a half-baked rationalization.
<quoted text>
Science thus far has disagreed with you, a fact which is reinforced by your inability to offer the support of any reputable medical, scientific, or academic institution to support your position. http://www.apa.org/helpcenter/sexual-orientat...
http://www.ama-assn.org/ama/pub/about-ama/our...
<quoted text>
Nowhere does the constitution require normalcy to receive equal protection of the laws. In fact it goes so far as to ensure that ALL PERSONS within a state’s jurisdiction are guaranteed such equal protection.
This rationalization is particularly pathetic.
What do you expect from severely sexually frustrated and emotionally stinted loser like him to say.

Since: Jan 12

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

#142752 May 26, 2012
_Reality Speaks_ wrote:
I AM BLACK. I know more black people than you do, and I know what the black people I know are saying and I know my culture. Black people have not changed their stance on this issue, and those polls are misleading. How many people were samples, and where and when? Everyone who has read those polls says the same thing: SKEWED BY THE GAY ADVOCATES.
If there is so much support, then lets continue putting this gay marriage thing to a vote in the states. What will happen is that 80% or more blacks will vote against it, and at least 30% of whites and 30% of Hispanics will vote against it.
Gay marriage has NEVER been voted for in any state in the United States. Blacks have consistently shown by their voting record on this issue that they do not support it. Homosexuality itself is not supported by blacks or Asians or most Hispanics. Its a fact, and your poll is ridiculous.
Give these figures:
How many people sampled? Where were they sampled? Posting that reveals it to be a sham.
BTW, I am not a Christian or Muslim or part of any organized religion.
you are a ignorant homophobic bigot. Not every single black person is a homophobic bigot like you. obama has changed a lot of people's minds on the issue of marriage equality. In fact more black people support gay marriage than white people. Deal with it.

http://blogs.villagevoice.com/runninscared/20...

Notably among groups, 59 percent of African-Americans in this survey express support for gay marriage - up from 41 percent in combined ABC/Post polls this spring and last summer. Likewise, 65 percent support Obama's new position on the issue. The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People announced its support for gay marriage last weekend.

Fewer whites, 46 percent, approve of Obama's announcement, and 50 percent support gay marriage - numerically (albeit not statistically significantly) the fewest since 2010.
RiccardoFire

Sacramento, CA

#142755 May 26, 2012
Mona Lott wrote:
<quoted text>
Gee.... what a strange way to spend your time..... it sounds like you have issues with gay men. Hmmmmmm.......
is dan gay? he claims he is not. but i agree, he most likely is.

“Facts”

Since: May 08

Mexico

#142756 May 26, 2012
lides wrote:
<quoted text>
And, clearly, you do not care about making an intelligent or factually support argument. If you cannot defend your child-like argument, that is hardly my problem.
<quoted text>
Of course whether or not being gay is inherent or a choice is irrelevant to the constitutional guarantee of equal protection of the laws. This argument is nothing more than a half-baked rationalization.
<quoted text>
Science thus far has disagreed with you, a fact which is reinforced by your inability to offer the support of any reputable medical, scientific, or academic institution to support your position. http://www.apa.org/helpcenter/sexual-orientat...
http://www.ama-assn.org/ama/pub/about-ama/our...
<quoted text>
Nowhere does the constitution require normalcy to receive equal protection of the laws. In fact it goes so far as to ensure that ALL PERSONS within a state’s jurisdiction are guaranteed such equal protection.
This rationalization is particularly pathetic.
There is no proof that you are just not a pervert......

There is no proof that you were born that way......

But if proof is ever found by definition it will be a defect in your brain........

Then we can treat it........
Green Fairy

Laguna Niguel, CA

#142759 May 26, 2012
Here Is One wrote:
<quoted text>
There is no proof that you are just not a pervert......
There is no proof that you were born that way......
But if proof is ever found by definition it will be a defect in your brain........
Then we can treat it........
So by your logic you choose to be "straight" if you were so secure with yourself then you would care less about who sleeps with whom unless if not with consenting adults.
Green Fairy

Laguna Niguel, CA

#142760 May 26, 2012
Rational Adult wrote:
<quoted text>So, Rose, you are still have anal butt sex with your dad. Rose, you have said that you are only with that fat slob waterwaste because she has a husky dog you have sex with and you continue to have sex with your dad even after he died.
Looks like you can't get laid

Since: Jan 12

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

#142761 May 26, 2012
Rational Adult wrote:
Yes, most blacks will not vote for Obama. The CAAP or Coalition of African American Pastors has said that the fools in the NAACP and Obama have been sucking too much cock. It is the CAAP who marched with MLK and they say that MLK would have told gays to go pound sand.
59% of blacks support marriage equality for gay couples. You failed. Black people don't care what a bunch of pastors have to say.
Rational Adult wrote:
It is such a lie anyway and all of us are seeing right through it.
There is no discrimination and hate toward people who have CHOSEN to be gay,
So when did you CHOOSE to be straight?

“Facts”

Since: May 08

Mexico

#142763 May 26, 2012
Green Fairy wrote:
<quoted text>
So by your logic you choose to be "straight" if you were so secure with yourself then you would care less about who sleeps with whom unless if not with consenting adults.
Wrong again.......LOL
I have a big problem with you perverts preying on young children......

Two consenting adults can do what ever they want in their own bedroom with the door closed.....

What I will not allow is perverts to change the meaning of the word marriage.......
Green Fairy

Laguna Niguel, CA

#142764 May 26, 2012
Here Is One wrote:
<quoted text>
I see we agree 100% on what you have said......
But let me say this.
I have no problem giving them equal rights under any name they wish to pick except the word marriage....
So why not call yours a civil union?
My position is only to stop the changing of the meaning of the word marriage....
Now I dod believe it is a choice they make to be perverts and fudge packers......
You see it in how they defend the two maggots that were exposing themselves to children on the cruise ship......
You see how they defend the maggot jennings and his gay porn books for children...
Both of those are signs of truly sick people.....And I have dealt with plenty of these sick perverts....
They are filthy disgusting pigs and should be shot on site......
For the last 15 years I have spent a lot of time in chat rooms searching for these perverts that seek to molest children....
So you equate gay with pedophiles even the majority are straight.
I was involved in a sting that was filmed and it took place in Sonoma county california...
We only lost one case and that involved a doctor with lots of coin for his defense and they defense was able to convince the jury that the screen shots that we shaped on every chat may have been altered....
We now have lap tops that the feds have installed a key logging system so we will never let another of these perverts walk again......
Google to catch a predator........
I wanted to call it to catch a pervert but Dateline said no way........LOL
That counts as entrapment
Green Fairy

Laguna Niguel, CA

#142765 May 26, 2012
Here Is One wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong again.......LOL
I have a big problem with you perverts preying on young children......
Two consenting adults can do what ever they want in their own bedroom with the door closed.....
What I will not allow is perverts to change the meaning of the word marriage.......
The word marriage has change many it used be 1 man and many women so quit complaining.

“Yellow Brick Road”

Since: Mar 12

The Land of OZ

#142768 May 26, 2012
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
No, asshat, you are the one who claims the judicial branch can change the Constitution without the consent of the States.
Wrong dipshit. I asked if Texas could remove the right to vote or women. I asked if Mississippi could bring back slavery. I asked if Utah could declare Mormonism as its state religion, and then require all residents to be Mormon. You call ME stupid and said YES they could. Now pull you head from you ass and learn how to flucking read MORON.
Flucking asshat
Green Fairy

Laguna Niguel, CA

#142771 May 26, 2012
Silent Assassinat wrote:
<quoted text>You just don't know what to do with your private parts, the word marriage still means only 1 man and 1 woman, despite your dad telling you something different when you were 5.
According to your book of fairytales,your opinion There are other countries that allow gay marriage but nothing bad happens after that.
Green Fairy

Laguna Niguel, CA

#142772 May 26, 2012
Silent Assassinat wrote:
<quoted text>No, liar, 100% of white, blacks, hispanics, asians and even gays support traditional marriages. You failed, even gays do not want you having sex with children and that means no same sex marriage.
Get it straight, freak of nature, you chose to be gay when you chose to have sex with children and animals.
So, when did you choose to have sex with dogs and pigs?
So did you choose to be straight? Rights of a minority can't be trampled on just because of you fear of them.
Green Fairy

Laguna Niguel, CA

#142773 May 26, 2012
Silent Assassinat wrote:
<quoted text>Because our is a marriage, while yours is like a dog having sex with a dog, which is not a marriage.
Funny, how you try to claim that the majority of pedophiles are straight, since the majority of people are straight. However, gayride. the majority of pedophile acts are by gays, despite being out number by just a few.
So why so concerned of other people's sex lives for,unless you can't get any?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Studio-City Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Hope Chapel parishoners sue ex-pastor, church f... (Sep '09) 12 hr Isaiah 335
3 Wounded In Canoga Park Gang-Related Shooting (Feb '07) Tue WEST END CPA 427
'Storage Wars' controversy, Jeff Jarred and his... (Jun '12) Mar 2 Mile High Flea 8
Text me I'm horny (Apr '12) Mar 1 Namu Myoho Renge Kyo 31
Stalker case leads to lawsuit against St. Bruno... (Feb '13) Mar 1 Mister Bruno 1,319
UTLA must be disbanded (Feb '12) Feb 27 billsmith 2
LA, Long Beach Ports At 'Breaking Point' Feb 14 Ronald 1

Studio-City News Video

Studio-City Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Studio-City People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 12:29 pm PST