I guess you forgot about the differences I noted before;
believe denying marriage to a relationship
will prevent love then you should be okay with your
heterosexual marriage being outlawed.
demand any committed relationship
has to be called marriage, then you're a hypocrite
if you think your heterosexual marriage is the only
one entitled to be called marrage.
claim rights and benefits can only be acquired
by a imposition on marriage, then you as a heterosexual in
a marriage should be just fine with your rights and benefits
being taken away.
equate the diversity of two genders
with the redundancy of same genders then you ignore the
diversity of same sex couples in a world of opposite sex
desecrate the sacred tradition of all major religions
and violate the historic practice of every single culture in history
then you disagree with incest and polygamy.
believe a fundamental change to the building block of society
will have absolutely no effect you should consider the benefit
of adopting couples in a world with 4 plus million orphans.
think a law can change
the reality of crucial distinctions in relationships
then you shouldn't be banning and redefining marriages.
pretend duplicating sexuality
is the same as blending masculinity and femininity then
you ignore the fact that hermphoridites are born every day as well
as people with over 20 different conditions that give them the PHYSICAL
characteristics of both genders and have a mind too tiny to imagine
that 5% of the population may in fact be attracted to only the same
condemn some children to parents of only one gender
and deliberately deny some children one natural parent
then you should be working to ban single parents from adopting
as they do in every state in the Union.
ignore the design of sexual union
to manipulate a harmful act, then you should ask yourself if
every sexual attempt that doesn't result in procreation is a
harmful act as the bible describes.
violate evolution's law of reproduction
to equate a genetic dead end, then you should ask yourself why
it is that infertile heterosexuals continue to be born.
risk the healthiest human relationship
to include one of the unhealthiest, then you should ask yourself
why, since according to the CDC, as of 2005, they knew of not one single case
of le$bain to le$bian transmitted HIV and well over 200,000 cases of women who
contracted HIV through heterosexual $ex, you aren't suggesting that all straight
women turn le$bian for the sake of their health and lives. Why the double standard???
parallel the sole birthplace of every other relationship
with one that can reproduce none, you should congratulate yourself that you
aren't so selfish as to have to biologically reproduce in a world with over 4
dilute all these things
down to just 'a committed relationship of two people', then you've defined
marriage accurately, two people making a commitment to spend their lives together.
Then, and only then, can you equate same-sex unions with marriage.
AND WE DO.