Obama's true colors: Black, white ... or neither?

Patriot AKA Bozo wrote:

<quoted text>
First, define czar. I find no problem with the President acquiring advisers. No one man is able to field all complexities of our society and needs all the help that he can get.
So called czars generally don't have budget control or other real authority. They are nothing new. GWB had a cadre of so called czars about equal to what President Obama has. Why didn't the RWers whine about that? Oh, I know, they were all good conservative Americans who had the common good of all citizens at heart. Right.
http://www.time.com/time/politics/article/0,8...

Patriot AKA Bozo wrote:

<quoted text>
Oh my goodness, more commies behind every bush. This is just another RW ploy to condemn anything that is not part of their agenda of corporatism.

itsME wrote:

To Bozo,
You wrote:
"First, define czar. I find no problem with the President acquiring advisers. No one man is able to field all complexities of our society and needs all the help that he can get.
So called czars generally don't have budget control or other real authority. They are nothing new. GWB had a cadre of so called czars about equal to what President Obama has. Why didn't the RWers whine about that? Oh, I know, they were all good conservative Americans who had the common good of all citizens at heart. Right.
http://www.time.com/time/politics/article/0,8... ;
When Pres. Bush had a lot of "Czars," not many people I know liked it at all.
BUT the number of czars Obama or Bush has or had is not the point of the comments that were made, and you full well know that.
Your comments were a feeble attempt at changing the conversation from just how radical Obama's czars are known to be, to the number of czars that served in both administrations.
You try to persuade me that someone like Kevin Jennings, a militant gay activitist, won't have any authority to influence the unsuspecting children in the Public School system throughout this country.
I'm telling you now if you support and defend the appointment of these social radicals,(GO BACK AND READ THE ENTIRE COMMENTS I POSTED) you will be held accountable by God Almighty on judgement day.
You know how I feel about your so-called Christianity, but I assure you, there will be an eternal price for you to pay.
You go down the line and compare Bush's Czars to Obama's Czars and tell me which one's had radical views about freedom and and the american people.
Van Jones, Kevin Jennings, John Holden, Chai Feldblum, who endorses polygamy, and Jeffrey S. Crowley, and at least 60 "LGBT leaders have secured spots in the Obama administration.
Add to that list, Patrick Gaspard, officially the "director of the office of political affairs," but whom critics call "ACORN's man in the White House." And defense policy adviser Rosa Brooks, a George-Soros-trained ideologue and anti-military radical who urged the prosecution of President George W. Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney for "war crimes." And FCC diversity czar Mark Lloyd, who believes the so-called "Fairness Doctrine" – unanimously repealed by the FCC in 1987 – was never repealed, wants to destroy conservative talk radio, and described Marxist dictator Hugo Chavez's rise to power in Venezuela as "an incredible revolution."
ARE THESE THE PEOPLE YOU WANT INFLUENCING THE PRESIDENT OF THE USA? Are you shyttin' me?
Have you totally lost your mind?

itsME wrote:

To yo-yo Bozo,
Good Gawd! How many times are you going to continue saying the USA is a Democratic Republic?
You wrote:
",(I know you will divert the point by saying it is a Republic, but it is a Democratic Republic, a form of democracy.) and it works because it protects the few from the many"
You have been told over and over and over again anbd again, we live in a Republic, with a representative form of government, governed by laws. The only thing democratic about our country is in the way we vote people into office and how our representatives vote in the legislature.
You are forever trying to impress people with you intellect, but every time - EVERY TIME - you make that statement, you sounnd like a total idiot.
Here's an illustration of a true democracy:
Five people survive a ship wreck and wind up on a deserted island. There are three men and two women.
By democratic vote in a true democracy those three men can hold a vote to see if it's legal to vote on a social issue. That passes 3 to 2.
Now they decide to hold a vote to determine whether rape will be considered legal.
That little piece of legislature passes, 3 votes YES, and 2 vote NO!
DIM-WIT that is a true democracy.
In a true democracy the FEW are never protected from the many.
We live in a REPRRESENTATIVE REPUBLIC governed by laws.
PLEASE get this correct in the future, other wise you look stupid.

Toni wrote:

<quoted text>
At least they were not radicals, Communists, Homosexuals who think nothings wrong with messing with kids, eugenics freaks, Chavez lovers, Maoists admirers. Obama's play card is full of these creeps. You apparently have no problem with these crazed far left degenerates.

independent voter Joliet wrote:

Not a Republican but lets face it in OBAMA's case WHITE don't sell.. he's like a used car salesman.. look at the outside not what's running it.. dumb sheep

Judged:

1

independent voter Joliet wrote:

Not a Republican but lets face it in OBAMA's case WHITE don't sell.. he's like a used car salesman.. look at the outside not what's running it.. dumb sheep

earlpittsamurican wrote:

Woops. My pooter held a handle from a different forum.

Dark Truth wrote:

Tipical white republican racist garbage.

Patriot AKA Bozo wrote:

<quoted text>
Sure, they were all nice people. Ask Valery Plame.

Judged:

1

1

Toni wrote:

<quoted text>
If we could I am sure with her former history she would be appalled and concerned as well about his choices in advisors. They are anti-American, radicals, Communists. She wouldn't give them the time of day!

Judged:

1

1

1

fedupwiththemess wrote:

obama is black and wonderful!

Judged:

1

1

1

Patriot AKA Bozo wrote:

<quoted text>
I doubt that they are all anti American. Of course anyone who does not buy the radical RW stuff is both a radical and a commie. We needed a swing the other direction. THe neocons failed us.

Judged:

1

Patriot AKA Bozo wrote:

<quoted text>
That's your problem. You are simply looking at the color and do not understand that there is a sound engine and transmission inside. No matter who is President, we are looking at probably five years of unemployment problems. Problems that were brought forwards, not caused by this administration. Get used to it. It is time to go forwards. Blame gets nothing done. I don't know how old you are, but bad things happen. They always have. It is how we handle them that is important, not who or what caused it.

Toni wrote:

<quoted text>
You don't seem to mean those words when it pertains to Bush. Obama is given carte blanche. This is his economy, his unemployment numbers, his failing foreign policy, his war Bonjo...you get over it partisan!

Judged:

1

1

1

Patriot AKA Bozo wrote:

<quoted text>
We have moved forwards by electing new President. Yes, they are President Obama's problems and he is working on them. Give him a few years. It took a lot of years to bring things to this point. It will take several to fix them. If you remember, the country was behind GWB after 9/11. It was after he used this as a means to promote an agenda that the country began to reject his policies.
Get over the fact that the neocon agenda was rejected by the people of the united states. The Republicans will never regain their position until they move to moderation. The radical RW mouths are good at stirring people up but are not helping to build a respectable party.