Barack Obama, our next President

Judged:

9

9

9

RealDave wrote:

<quoted text>
100 sqft of brush on the wall
100 square feet of brush
Cut it down, haul it away
another 100 square feet of brush on the wall.
I guess that was more fun that being concerned about terrorism.
Lets make up lies & invade Iraq. We have plenty ff soldiers to spare.
Wow, a round of golf every two weeks.
How pitiful that you find this something to complain about.

Judged:

9

9

9

the westerner wrote:

<quoted text>
What is true and needs no correcting is that Brokeback Barak is a murderer of innocents with his illegal drone attacks and dolts like you look the other way.

Judged:

8

8

8

RealDave wrote:

<quoted text>
For one, Obamacare is paid for.
Ever notice that you right wingers can never really fund a particular fault with Obamacare.
Other than the mandate, which aspects does Romney disagree with?
How do you fix preexisting Conditions without a mandate?

Judged:

7

7

6

sonicfilter wrote:

<quoted text>
4 years sure is a long time to take to vet a POTUS candidate who's already been elected.
You wingnuts aren't very good at it eh? And why you insist on advertising your failures is beyond everyone.

Judged:

7

7

7

sonicfilter wrote:

<quoted text>
Really? Try this on for size.....
http://www.iraqbodycount.org/
An issue that is totally ignored by anyone who voted for Bush.
Much like many others.

Judged:

7

7

7

RealDave wrote:

<quoted text>
Tax cuts that favor the wealthy is handing out money. An example is a 25% cut in Capital Gains for long term investments.
A tax break for a particular industry is a subsidy.

Judged:

7

7

6

RealDave wrote:

<quoted text>
I know its tough but read the entire article next time instead of the Fox News report.
The amount claimed by Democrats represented the years 2010 to 2019.
This newer report represents 2012 to 2022.
Taking away two years with little expense & replacing them with two years of much higher costs after everything is implemented.
So there is no great increase from the 2010 report. Just looking at different years.
But hey. I did Google this on Fact Check.
"But there is less to this than meets the eye. First of all, the new estimate is based on a different budget window — and it is an 11-year number, not a 10-year number like the original estimate. So the two estimates are not comparable."
Note: Different budget years
Note: 11 years instead of 10
The CBO report said not only were there higher estimates for costs but also higher estimates for revenue.
That CBO report also did not consider Medicare savings & other tax revenue targeted to pay for this bill.
In Fact, Fact Check gave YOUR post two Pinocchios!
So Peppy, who be the dumbass here??? You with the pinocchios?
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/fact-chec...

Judged:

6

6

5

RealDave wrote:

<quoted text>
You bitch & bitch about sh*t you obviously know nothing about.
What a pathetic POS.

Judged:

6

6

5

bozo3341 wrote:

it's not about the man's race it's about his inability to lead address & fix economy jobs illegal immigration size and cost of gov. Lies about open honest government.
We can't keep doing what we have been doing for the past 50 years, we are going broke trying, europe also.
The people in office today at every level have guided us to where we are today as a state & country. time for all new faces, ideas,Leadership.
cause we we got now just isn't working we can't keep electing the same lame old bozos to office and expect different results.

Judged:

5

5

5

sonicfilter wrote:

<quoted text>
Really? Try this on for size.....
http://www.iraqbodycount.org/
An issue that is totally ignored by anyone who voted for Bush.
Much like many others.

Judged:

5

5

5

RealDave wrote:

<quoted text>
I don't complain about the rich. I think its great that they have money.
I complain about dumbasses like you who keep wanting to hand them more money in hopes they toss a few coins your way.
FloriDUH. Rick Scott called. He says you are to no longer use the name Florida as it makes people think everyone in his state is as f*cking stupid as you are.

Judged:

6

6

5

RealDave wrote:

<quoted text>
I love the way you right wingers think.
There is such a big difference between a 10% discount & a 10% rebate.
Both give you extra money you would not have with them.
Another dumbass right winger. Is there a limit???

Judged:

5

5

5

Peppy wrote:

<quoted text>
The kool aid drinkers are far beyond naive. Obamacare like social security before it, will be a financial albatross and burden on future generations. That reality is certain. I don't know how he even keeps a straight face when he claims the plan pays for itself. Just plain dumb I guess.

Judged:

8

8

8

RealDave wrote:

<quoted text>
When stockholders invest in a company, they take their chances. Anyone stuck holding GM stock just weren't too bright.
If GM would have totally failed, the Government would be responsible for a good chunk of their pension along with unemployment benefits for the no longer employed.
Gm is recovering. Whether you like it or not.

Judged:

6

6

6

RealDave wrote:

<quoted text>
But the Fox News drones will keep posting it forever.

Judged:

6

6

6

sonicfilter wrote:

<quoted text>
4 years sure is a long time to take to vet a POTUS candidate who's already been elected.
You wingnuts aren't very good at it eh? And why you insist on advertising your failures is beyond everyone.

Judged:

6

6

6

RealDave wrote:

<quoted text>
There was no trashing of the Constitution.
Law enforcement on all levels decide which laws they will concentrate enforcing & which they will let slide. There are not unlimited resources.
If police cars were racing to a bank robbery, you would have them stop & write a jaywalking ticket.