Who do you support for Governor in Tennessee in 2010?

Dee Lay wrote:

<quoted text>Obama has had 3.5 years to fix the Bush policies that hurt the economy. Guess what? Bush didn't have any. Bush sent up the red flags about the housing market beginning in 03. What do you think caused this whole dam mess?
You libs simply can't stomach the fact that all the lies about Bush's policies causing this economic mess is just that... LIES!
You libs, especially the "Glory Hound" Obama are trying to take credit for Saving GM & Chrysler... Wall Street... Saving us from the worst economy since the great depression.
OBAMA DIDN'T DO ANY OF THAT!
George Bush did! You see libs the facts are on my side. Bush went to Pelosi/Reid controlled congress and asked for money for the car companies.
THEY SAID NO!
They didn't give a shit if a million people lost their jobs as long as they got their boy ("The Glory Hound") elected.
Here's what really happened. When Bush got the TARP funds the first thing he did was bailout GM & Chrysler, and then Wall Street.
You libs always bring up NAFTA and blame the republicans for voting for it. You never mention Clinton's role in bringing China into the WTO. The BULLSHIT promises that would lead America to even greater prosperity. Have you see the trade deficit lately? How about the millions of jobs that disappeared.
You see libs... The Buck stops with the president.

Judged:

1

1

1

Dee Lay wrote:

<quoted text>Your so full of Obama's crapp your eyes have turned brown........lol

Dunlapian wrote:

<quoted text>BhM, as I mentioned several months ago a friend of mine down in Fl. already has ponds in place next to a power plant and is taking CO2 from the stacks and is producing algae, drying it and ending up with sweet crude.......just like it was produced 300 million years ago. He is still perfecting the process.
About 4-5 years ago Exxon-Mobile bought out one of his competitors. So you are right about our President and big oil.......they know where the future is.

Judged:

2

1

1

Dee Lay wrote:

In our “Red Tape Rising: Obama-Era Regulation at the Three Year Mark” report, James Gattuso and Diane Katz detail how the Obama Administration has imposed new regulations costing $46 billion annually, with nearly $11 billion more in one-time implementation costs. That is about five times the cost of regulations imposed during the first three years of President George W. Bush’s administration, but the burden is even higher. The red tape of the past three years helps explain why the economic recovery has been so slow and job creation so anemic.
Don’t take our word for it, but those of President Obama himself. In January 2011, he said that “rules have gotten out of balance” and “have a chilling effect on growth and jobs.” And he’s right. Where the President breaks with reality is his pledge for a get-tough policy on overregulation and a comprehensive review of regulations imposed by Washington. In fact, to hear President Obama tell the story, you would think he’s a champion of slashing red tape and that his Administration has set its sights on slashing overregulation.

Judged:

1

1

1

Really Sassy wrote:

<quoted text>
Well, I don't know. My Great-Grandmother was half-Cherokee, so I'm told, & I'm so White, you could hide me in the snow & Nobody would ever find me. Lol!

Belmont hill Mitt wrote:

<quoted text>
that sounds promising.....
especially for air/ship or train fuel.
wasnt virgin atlantic's richard branson developing this fuel??

Judged:

1

1

1

Timbuk2 wrote:

This is not a rhetorical question. I'd like some answers.
If Obama were to announce tomorrow that he is a communist, would you still vote for him?

Judged:

1

1

1

puff of logic wrote:

Puff was proud when the President Obama administration stopped defending the discriminatory “Defense of Marriage Act”(DOMA) after the Justice Department concluded that the law was unconstitutional. It is imperative that all Americans receive equal protection under the law -- that including your LGBT men and women in uniform and their spouses.
After President Obama refused to defend the discriminatory “Defense of Marriage Act,” monsieur John Boehner and House Republicans intervened. They’ve hired a team of lawyers who could rack up a bill of up to $1.5 million that will go straight to the taxpayers.
That's why puff was shocked to hear that Speaker John Boehner decided to use your tax dollars to intervene and stand up for DOMA to deny LGBT Americans the rights they deserve.
This is discrimination -- plain and simple.
Even worse, they’re using DOMA to try to deny benefits to the spouses of gay and lesbian veterans and active duty soldiers. No one who risks their lives for their country should have to return home to face prejudice from your nation’s elected leaders.
monsieur Boehner and monsieur Cantor should Stop spending (wasting) millions of taxpayer dollars defending the discriminatory "Defense of Marriage Act.

Judged:

1

1

1

Overtaxed wrote:

Hey Dee, it's primary day for Dems in your state. Do you have a prediction on who will face off against your hero Walker in the recall election ?

Judged:

1

1

1

Dunlapian wrote:

Bernie Sanders warns Republicans that Sarkozy fate will soon be theirs. BTW, for myself I just wish he would not of let the cat out of the bag.
http://www.politicususa.com/bernie-sanders-wa...

Judged:

1

1

Belmont hill Mitt wrote:

<quoted text>
no but, he is not going to do that.

Judged:

1

1

1

Timbuk2 wrote:

"This is not a rhetorical question. I'd like some answers.
If Obama were to announce tomorrow that he is a communist, would you still vote for him?"
<quoted text>
We have one no. Anyone else?