Trio charged with stealing clothes from Macy's

why didn't they just get a job there and get the clothes at the employees discount?

becuase the five finger discount is cheaper than 10%

Mrs White wrote:

<quoted text>
Because Blacks don't like to work.

Neither do illegals. That's why we need to D.EPORT EVERY LAST ILLEGAL IN THE USA

Jaquan- That name will get you far in life. Let me see, what else can I steal from whitey !

Another example of what is ruining our country- ENTITLEMENT.

its called an ORC ring orginized retail crime they do this for a living

LOSERS!!!

StinkingIllegals wrote:

<quoted text>Neither do illegals. That's why we need to D.EPORT EVERY LAST ILLEGAL IN THE USA

Not sure if you read the article, but it's about shoplifting.

USA wrote:

Jaquan- That name will get you far in life. Let me see, what else can I steal from whitey !

Barack-Well that name went "mighty" far in life. Whata loser YOU are !!!

StinkingIllegals wrote:

<quoted text>Neither do illegals. That's why we need to D.EPORT EVERY LAST ILLEGAL IN THE USA

I don't like illegals draining our economy but most of them do work pretty hard, thats why they came here, to work and make money. only difference is they dont pay taxes and they shank each other at the bars. still funny how they will work 12 hours a day for low pay just to put food on the table , and these thieves from this article who should have an easier time getting legal high paying jobs because they are americans, and instead they chose to steal. they got lazy once sla-very ended and never looked back

lol

I think I attended Yale with Jaquan?

Manuel Labor wrote:

I think I attended Yale with Jaquan?

I think you never attended Yale, but I get your point

Surprise Surprise, What do you expect from the BROWNS? Drain on society.

What a suprise they were not from Danbury,it seems like most crime in town is from out of towners.

"Police said they did this while store security officers had them under surveillance."

Has everyone missed this part? According to this story, store security is watching in the dressing rooms too. Hmm... And if store security was NOT watching in the dressing rooms, then that means that at one point security lost sight of what was happening - a big No-No for security. The rules are if security does not see the incident in its entirety, from start to finish, then security may not make the apprehension. Even a few moments loss of visual contact prohibits making the 'grab'.

So, Macy's shoppers - either you're being watched in the dressing rooms, where you would (naturally) assume you have privacy, or overzealous security is jumping to conclusions and making half informed grabs. Either way shoppers, it could spell bad news! Or a nice lawsuit against Macy's. Hey, security got lucky this time. There are people out there that exploit this rule, loss of visual contact, and can use it to cause the store a lot of trouble by pretending a crime and making a major fuss when they are later detained, with no stolen merchandise at all.

I know one store I won't be trying clothes on in!!!

hahahahah i was working on the register when that happen

haha wrote:

hahahahah i was working on the register when that happen

actually you weren't because the Bus doesn't go that far, numbnutz

Exasperated wrote:

"Police said they did this while store security officers had them under surveillance."
Has everyone missed this part? According to this story, store security is watching in the dressing rooms too. Hmm... And if store security was NOT watching in the dressing rooms, then that means that at one point security lost sight of what was happening - a big No-No for security. The rules are if security does not see the incident in its entirety, from start to finish, then security may not make the apprehension. Even a few moments loss of visual contact prohibits making the 'grab'.
So, Macy's shoppers - either you're being watched in the dressing rooms, where you would (naturally) assume you have privacy, or overzealous security is jumping to conclusions and making half informed grabs. Either way shoppers, it could spell bad news! Or a nice lawsuit against Macy's. Hey, security got lucky this time. There are people out there that exploit this rule, loss of visual contact, and can use it to cause the store a lot of trouble by pretending a crime and making a major fuss when they are later detained, with no stolen merchandise at all.
I know one store I won't be trying clothes on in!!!

they were "under surveillance" meaning that they were being watch, not by a camera in the dressing room