Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

URJudged wrote:

<quoted text>
And what about your prior sex acts with tranny's that you've admitted to? Are you now going to whack your own pee pee as a punishment? What a flaming hypocrite you are!

Why do you guys care so much about each others sex lives? It seems to me when people obsess over what other people do sexually, it's because they themselves don't have of a sex life. That's sad.

Boogle Eyed wrote:

<quoted text>
Never mentioned homosexual sex.
Be pretty tough to say I "promoted" it now wouldn't it liar.
You can't even argue without getting off track...LOL!!!!

Honestly, Boogle, every time the conversation turns to what homosexuals do in bed you get real skittish.

Now you tell us you promote homosexuals but not homosexual sex.

When are you going to stop being so squeamish and make the connection between the two, fella?

TrueAtheist wrote:

<quoted text>
Why do you guys care so much about each others sex lives? It seems to me when people obsess over what other people do sexually, it's because they themselves don't have of a sex life. That's sad.

and probably true!!

More thn enough has been posd here to lead me to believe that the majority of the hate posters are just plain crazy!

Prof Marvel wrote:

<quoted text>
<quoted text>
Huh ...?
Here's a short list of some of the GAY RUN organizations and agencies credited in The Little Black Book. Incidentally, the Massacusetts Department of Public Health is run by a gay director who lives with his partner.
Now, Boogle, as I've tried to explain to your pudding head, gays aren't repulsed by the sex acts in the booklet the way you and I are. That being the way things are, why do you continue to insist those agencies credited in the booklet didn't "endorse" it?
Honestly, dude, you're not making much sense.
==========
Massachusetts Department of Public Health
Boston Public Health Commission
Gay City Health Project,Seattle
Stop AIDS Project, San Francisco
San Francisco City Clinic
Fenway Community Health, Bolton
==========

I'm making sense alright. It's just not registering in your mind.

Whomever supposedly put this book together might have been against gays in the first place only to plant that gem given I haven't seen one gay here, there or anywhere lay claim to it jerkwad.

Added to that just because the little pamphlet which came out before little Suzy's seventh birthday had someone's name in it as an endorsement doesn't mean it's so MORON.

Don't you consider it odd that you have this little pamphlet yet no where else is their mention or claim of it.

Smells like BULLSHIT to me Ace and you're gullible enough or lame enough (take your pick) to run with it.

Get lost...you've got nothing.

dON'

Prof Marvel wrote:

<quoted text>
Honestly, Boogle, every time the conversation turns to what homosexuals do in bed you get real skittish.
Now you tell us you promote homosexuals but not homosexual sex.
When are you going to stop being so squeamish and make the connection between the two, fella?

Shit you're a mind reader too???

How come you didn't mention that before?

---You're a freak. And obviously freaks have a tough time dating so you MIGHT want to stop this bizarre nonsense you've been doing in here and develop some social skills.

RiccardoFire wrote:

<quoted text>Where and When did I mention that anyone will still vote for obama because of his stance on gay marriage? Plz go back and back up your mouth again..and again...

Like I said....sorry I asked a simpleton.

LOL!!!

Prof Marvel wrote:

<quoted text>
Boogle didn't know what you do sexually until I told him. Now that he knows he finds it disgusting and degrading.
In at least three comments he's arguing gays couldn't possibly endorse the sex acts described in your Little Black Book.
Honestly, what more needs to be said about the ignoramus?

Actually it was you I found to be disgusting and degrading.

Scratch that career as a mind reader Professor...LOL!!!

Prof Marvel wrote:

<quoted text>
<quoted text>
Huh ...?
Here's a short list of some of the GAY RUN organizations and agencies credited in The Little Black Book. Incidentally, the Massacusetts Department of Public Health is run by a gay director who lives with his partner.
Now, Boogle, as I've tried to explain to your pudding head, gays aren't repulsed by the sex acts in the booklet the way you and I are. That being the way things are, why do you continue to insist those agencies credited in the booklet didn't "endorse" it?
Honestly, dude, you're not making much sense.
==========
Massachusetts Department of Public Health
Boston Public Health Commission
Gay City Health Project,Seattle
Stop AIDS Project, San Francisco
San Francisco City Clinic
Fenway Community Health, Bolton
==========

Tell you what...

...man up and give me your real name. I'll call your uncle and get instructions on how to screw chickens up their egg popping hole for those rural folk whom like you can't seem to land a date even if they hit the SuperLotto given even hookers with self esteem equivalent to a slug wouldn't be caught dead with sorry losers like you. I'll hit Kinko's and put this thing together with a nice binder and some instructional visuals providing your uncle can draw.

Then I'll slap your name on these beauties as an endorsement and sneak them into University Hills Elementary School's library at night and WHOO DOG we'll get to watch the fireworks and find you hunkered down in your basement even deeper than you are now and then you'll get a first hand taste on how this little black book you're so fukkin proud of could be nothing but an ill played out hoax 7 years ago by those against gays.

Real name?

LOL!!!

Prof Marvel wrote:

<quoted text>
<quoted text>
Huh ...?

I know...

...the world can be a confusing place to those like you whom it takes 4 tries before they figure out it's a counterclockwise spin on the lid to retrieve your favorite Vlasic pickle from the jar to how you don't get gays are none of your business but take it one day at a time and remember no more shampoos with Nair and drying the poodle off in the microwave and you just might make it yet another day.

Nothing else says it better than, this topic is a joke.

Boogle Eyed wrote:

<quoted text>
I'm making sense alright. It's just not registering in your mind.
Whomever supposedly put this book together might have been against gays in the first place only to plant that gem given I haven't seen one gay here, there or anywhere lay claim to it jerkwad.
Added to that just because the little pamphlet which came out before little Suzy's seventh birthday had someone's name in it as an endorsement doesn't mean it's so MORON.
Don't you consider it odd that you have this little pamphlet yet no where else is their mention or claim of it.
Smells like BULLSHIT to me Ace and you're gullible enough or lame enough (take your pick) to run with it.
Get lost...you've got nothing.
dON'

Bah ... ha ...ha ...hah...

First of all thanks are in order, Boogle, for illustrating so graphically how any rational heterosexual responds to the filth found in The Little Black Book.

What you don't know, however -- despite my efforts hammer it into your dumb head -- this booklet was defended and championed by the gays in this forum as illustrative of the safe, normal, and wholesome sex practices gays engage in.

Please go back a month or two to get up to speed on that discussion.

Your impassioned disbelief that your gay pals would have anything to do with such degrading filth turns their defense of the LBB on its head.

You see, you perfect moron, your gay pals readily conceded the booklet was put out by Massachusetts public health gays and thought nothing in the least untoward with that -- or handing the booklet out to children -- which it was.

Indeed! This kiddie porn pamphlet was given to every underage boy who entered Youth on Fire, the Cambridge youth drop in center for runaway boys. To verify this, you may go to the website below and call and ask when did they stop giving runaways The Little Black Book, as I did last year.

http://www.ccaa.org/youth_on_fire.html

But to repeat -- almost to a man each of your gay pals passionately argued -- right here in this very thread!-- the booklet was a safe-sex manual all kids should have. Once again, go back in this thread's archive to confirm this.

So, it would appear your idea of filth and your gay pals's idea of filth are at odds, Boogle.

How do you like them apples?

insult
Definition
in·sultVERB
in·sult·ed past and past participle
in·sult·ing present participle
in·sults 3rd person present singular

1. transitive and intransitive verb be offensive to somebody: to say or do something rude or insensitive that offends somebody
2. transitive verb show contempt for somebody or something: to say or do something that suggests a low opinion of somebody or something
"Don't insult me by offering me pity."
NOUN
in·sults plural

1. offensive words or action: a remark or action that offends somebody, usually because it is rude or insensitive
2. something showing contempt: a remark or action that suggests a low opinion of somebody or something
"The article is an insult to the intelligence of the reader."
"The fee they offered was an insult."
3. medicine injury or cause of injury: an injury or trauma to the body, or something that causes such harm
[ Mid-16th century. Via French < Latin insultare, literally "keep jumping on" < salire "to jump" ]
in·sult·er NOUN
Word Usage
InsultsEnglish has insulting words for most races and cultures with which its speakers have come into extended contact, and for so-called minority groups within English-speaking societies, even though such groups can and do constitute demographic majorities in many regions. When the people insulted are English speakers, the insulting words can and often do become part of their own vocabulary. Those insulted will generally avoid using these terms in interaction with their insulters, since to do so would be to endorse the insulters' view of them. However, among themselves they may well deliberately adopt an insult in order to subvert it or rob it of its power. For instance, Australian Aboriginals reportedly are not averse to using terms like Abo and blackfella when talking with one another, even though they are highly offensive when applied to them by non-Aboriginals. Similarly, other groups may defy their detractors by adopting the insults directed at them: gay people may refer to themselves, polemically, as queer, as in Queer Nation; and some feminists have struck back against ageist putdowns by reclaiming crone and making it their own.
Thesaurus
NOUN
Synonyms: affront, slight, slur, rudeness, offense
VERB
Synonyms: affront, offend, abuse, upset, slur, slight
VERB
Antonyms: praise
Translations

Boogle Eyed wrote:

<quoted text>
Like I said....sorry I asked a simpleton.
LOL!!!

You are just sorry because you got caught in making more lies. I see you can't find the post?

Prof Marvel wrote:

<quoted text>
Bah ... ha ...ha ...hah...
First of all thanks are in order, Boogle, for illustrating so graphically how any rational heterosexual responds to the filth found in The Little Black Book.
What you don't know, however -- despite my efforts hammer it into your dumb head -- this booklet was defended and championed by the gays in this forum as illustrative of the safe, normal, and wholesome sex practices gays engage in.
Please go back a month or two to get up to speed on that discussion.
Your impassioned disbelief that your gay pals would have anything to do with such degrading filth turns their defense of the LBB on its head.
You see, you perfect moron, your gay pals readily conceded the booklet was put out by Massachusetts public health gays and thought nothing in the least untoward with that -- or handing the booklet out to children -- which it was.
Indeed! This kiddie porn pamphlet was given to every underage boy who entered Youth on Fire, the Cambridge youth drop in center for runaway boys. To verify this, you may go to the website below and call and ask when did they stop giving runaways The Little Black Book, as I did last year.
http://www.ccaa.org/youth_on_fire.html
But to repeat -- almost to a man each of your gay pals passionately argued -- right here in this very thread!-- the booklet was a safe-sex manual all kids should have. Once again, go back in this thread's archive to confirm this.
So, it would appear your idea of filth and your gay pals's idea of filth are at odds, Boogle.
How do you like them apples?

You don't have any apples.

You don't have any apples, you don't have any peaches and you sure as HELL don't have any proof.

That "Youth On Fire" website made no mention of a little black book. Nice ploy..."call them"...at 7:20 PM Eastern Standard Time.

Listen you sack of shit....if you make claims you better have something better than this as proof because I for one am not buying it and I doubt you'll obtain a fan club over this ignorant idea which might generate membership of three nationwide.

Pack it up...you've been laid to rest.

Bill Of Rights wrote:

<quoted text>
Hey just because you have to get out the microscope and the tweezers for your little 1/2 inch nub to do your wife don't take it out on Rose Mr. MENSA member,HEY! LOL

You are peeping in the wrong windo you queer. That was your dad

RnL2008 wrote:

<quoted text>
Really, a turkey baster is a penis like device? I guess it's a good thing there isn't one in my house then..........I suggest that if you need an education on why the turkey baster is used......watch a movie called, "If these walls could talk" part 2.
Sorry, not getting pregnant at my age......I have all that I can handle raising my grandchild:-)

You are the one who said use a turkey baster to shoot little spermies!! didn't you? or are you going to lie again?... lesbians need the penis like device no matte how you look at it.
Do you star in the movie?

Spray or roll on wrote:

This topic has turned into another arm-pit of a topic.
Same people, same dangerous comments being posted!

Yet you enjoy sitting in ...

Bill Of Rights wrote:

<quoted text>
Better watch out,I see that Doctor Douche in in the house again! Spreading his particular flavor of lie's and bull shyte! LOL,Can you believe the ignorance of Gayry? I guess he's bitter because he loves those drag queens and it pisses him off that he does! Did you hear he just got out of the joint again and is wearing an ankle monitor to protect us from his psychotic,ignorant rants! LOL,Now if we could get Doctor Douche to wear one so we could skedaddle when he starts his verbal pollution and raises his ugly head! It was nice talking to you tonight my dear! ;)

You are such a smelly nut sack ...

RiccardoFire wrote:

<quoted text>Because you keep bringing up Bush, and this is not about Bush, Time to move on past Bush, can you? If I think Obama is corrupt? LOL...There is no debating it, just look at eric holder and his cronies in the news, all the paybacks and fake bailouts that only supported the rich. Come out to Oakland next time they have a OWS rally. Why are u doom and gloom with Romney? Why do u want to reward the naked Marxist? We know what Obama is. Just look at the man's history. Take a look at the man's background. Better still, take a look at the man's foreground, such as the man's current advisers and czars.
Obama is a naked Marxist in plain sight.
(deleted for space)

I keep bringing up Bush? Hilarious. I've mentioned him a time or two and you turn it into every other word. Wow! I'll do the same for you then, why are you always mentioning Reagan? This isn't about Reagan.

I will give you credit for calling Obama a Marxist. That is friggin' hilarious. I was talking to some Brits the other day and they find it absurd that we refer to left and right over here as most, if not all of our politicians are to the right as far as they can see.

You can blather on and on about Obama's cronies all you wish. Mitt will bring in his own. As I mentioned, we're better off with Obama in light of the fact that Congress is able to stall him out. Romney, OTOH, will see carte blanche. I find your outrage over the deficit to be amusing as well.

I can recall discussions with a conservative relative over the matter with the post Clinton administration (I won't mention it because I don't want you blowing a gasket...BUSH! ooops, slipped ridght out). Remember Clinton - am I permitted to bring him up or will you have a calf on that one too) Clinton managed to bring the deficit down from the Reagan/Bush I era - I won't say he left with a surplus as there was intergovernmental debt present upon his departure. Then, under Bush II it rose significantly. As this was happening my conservative brother in law mentioned debt wasn't a problem. "They'll cover it, they always do." Now, under a democrat/marxist (rolleyes smilie) it becomes a criminal act.

Face it, much of our debt is war related (about 1/5). This should have been covered by tax increases rather than debt. War should never be bankrolled by generations yet to come. Had that been a precursor for war we'd never have gone. We can part with our children more readily than we can part with our cash. Oh, hell yeah, we'll just part with our children's cash. News Flash for you. I credit Obama with this too. I digress... It is amusing how criticisms against one party are acceptable behaviors with the other one. This cuts both ways and we're seeing it now with Obama getting a pass for continuing Bush's war. Not from me in spite of what you think.

Sooo, here it is as I see it...
Under a second term with Obama we get the same ol' useless Obama. He'll be blocked by Congress. There will be a shift in the make up of Congress after a few more years of the lack of progress and by that time Republicans can have the oval office back and place a pinhead of their own in the driver's seat. The opposite of progress is congress, and as long as the man in the big chair faces opposition from the legislature we all benefit. Regardless of your party affiliation.