'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Senate Debate

whitehair wrote:

<quoted text>
My personal opinion is that the Party(democratic) has left the people(workers) and the people are so ingrained for generations thinking the Party (democratic) was all for them they have not yet come to realize this party is now a socialistic,communistic group run by a narcissistic President.The good people may never learn.

The Republican Party is owned by Huge Corporations and anyone who thinks they are Republican are stupid sheep.

Aristocles son of Ariston wrote:

<quoted text>
I agre that the learning curve is very s...l...o...w on the upward arc; never the less, they are learning even though there is only ONE network which actually promotes American values...FOX NEWS! and all the rest of Lame-Stream-Media still is still towing the Liberal Line!
America is finding out slowly but surely Obamanomics is financial suicide, Democrats cannot turn unemployment benefits into a life-long entitlement. The gravy train runs out of track...then they have to get off and walk...and find a job or make one!

Faux News is a bigoted anti American propaganda machine.

wtf wrote:

<quoted text>The Republican Party is owned by Huge Corporations and anyone who thinks they are Republican are stupid sheep.

More made up BS from stank ho.

wtf sux wrote:

<quoted text>
More made up BS from stank ho.

The stank ho is your Mom you little wuss.

Hey wrote:

<quoted text>With whatever fictional number we see fit, Clinton had a 16.5 billion dollar deficit, He couldn't steal enough from the other Government programs to cover his ass, Obama's probably guilty of the same shit there Frankie...

As all you friggen wingnuz do, you are confusing the difference between the federal deficit and the federal debt. Even if you remove Social Security from the equation, there was a surplus of $1.9 billion in fiscal 1999 and $86.4 billion in fiscal 2000. So any way you cut it, the federal budget was balanced and the deficit was erased – if only for a while. Not only that, but based on Clinton’s economic and budget projections the US would have reduced the National Debt to a manageable level within a decade – and along comes a new President and with it one disaster after another. To quote Clinton:
“The United States can eliminate its publicly held debt by 2010. The next Administration and Congress will need to decide what priorities to address: eliminate the public debt by 2010 and still use part of the surplus for responsible tax cuts, prescription drug benefits for Medicare recipients, and investments in key priorities like education and health care.”

Obama buys a new automatic Jaguar XKR Sport.
He drives the car perfectly well during the day, but at night, the car just won't move at all.

After trying to drive the car at night for a week (but without any luck), he furiously calls the Jaguar dealers and they send out a technician to the White House.

The technician examines the car and finds nothing wrong with it. So he turns to Obama and asks: "Mr. President, are you sure you are using the right gears?"

Full of anger, Obama replies: "You fool, you idiot, how on earth you could ask such a question? I'm not stupid you know! Of course I am using the right gears; I use D during the day and N at night."

Now I understand why they can't find his college transcripts.

Teleshifter wrote:

Obama buys a new automatic Jaguar XKR Sport.
He drives the car perfectly well during the day, but at night, the car just won't move at all.
After trying to drive the car at night for a week (but without any luck), he furiously calls the Jaguar dealers and they send out a technician to the White House.
The technician examines the car and finds nothing wrong with it. So he turns to Obama and asks: "Mr. President, are you sure you are using the right gears?"
Full of anger, Obama replies: "You fool, you idiot, how on earth you could ask such a question? I'm not stupid you know! Of course I am using the right gears; I use D during the day and N at night."
Now I understand why they can't find his college transcripts.

Did you think that up all on your own dumbass, or did some other idiot help you?

CaptainObvious2U wrote:

<quoted text>
On what educational background do you base your economic commentary?
Do you possess a degree in economics? Business Administration?
What great mind of economic theory do you claim to follow?

Captain Fagulous has been to Business College!

Lmfao

wtf wrote:

<quoted text>Captain Fagulous has been to Business College!
Lmfao

You never answered this question. What grade are you in?

DBWriter wrote:

<quoted text>
You never answered this question. What grade are you in?

Why are you not drilling in the Persian Gulf Today you gd Liar?

DBWriter wrote:

<quoted text>
You never answered this question. What grade are you in?

What do you care, I can suck off every mule from here to Frankfort if I want.

frank wrote:

<quoted text>
As all you friggen wingnuz do, you are confusing the difference between the federal deficit and the federal debt. Even if you remove Social Security from the equation, there was a surplus of $1.9 billion in fiscal 1999 and $86.4 billion in fiscal 2000. So any way you cut it, the federal budget was balanced and the deficit was erased – if only for a while. Not only that, but based on Clinton’s economic and budget projections the US would have reduced the National Debt to a manageable level within a decade – and along comes a new President and with it one disaster after another. To quote Clinton:
“The United States can eliminate its publicly held debt by 2010. The next Administration and Congress will need to decide what priorities to address: eliminate the public debt by 2010 and still use part of the surplus for responsible tax cuts, prescription drug benefits for Medicare recipients, and investments in key priorities like education and health care.”

If you were in a coma in 2001, there was the dot-com bust and the Arabs started a global war against the United States.
... goddam idiots.

By the way, why don't you look into the dot-com bust and tell us how the economy recovered after that?
... willfully ignorant dupes.:-/

Do you guys ever listen to yourselves? all of you sound like immature idiots....everyday its the same thing...grow up and get a life....i ck this site every week or so and its always the same people bitching about the same thing...step out into the real world for a change and try to make a positive change!!

WarriorForever wrote:

Do you guys ever listen to yourselves? all of you sound like immature idiots....everyday its the same thing...grow up and get a life....i ck this site every week or so and its always the same people bitching about the same thing...step out into the real world for a change and try to make a positive change!!

I'm curious....

ABO, or O?
Or undecided.
If undecided, what is not understood?

what is not understood is why grown adults get on here and make asses of themselves. Sure, some comments are valid but most are just people arguing over who is "smarter" ......

I hate racists and white people!

lmfao

Job creation 101
The gap between the wealthiest Americans and middle- and working-class Americans has more than tripled in the past three decades. After-tax income for the top 1% grew by 275%, but rose by just 40% for the middle class, the bottom 20% reaped just 5 % of after-tax income. If income growth had been shared equally among all income groups, the families at the bottom would have $6,000 per year more than they do now, and the middle would have $13,000 more. The job creators are the middle class, that great giant buying machine, spending their income creating demand and thereby creating jobs. It’s not the rich, no matter how much income is added to their wealth they don’t go out and buy a thousand family cars they buy three because that is all the cars they need, just exactly like any other family. To sum it all up, as long as most of the income goes to a small group on the top instead of a more even income distribution feeding into the “great giant buying machine” known as the middle class, the economy has no chance of growing – it will stagnate as we all know by now!
http://zfacts.com/node/320

WarriorForever wrote:

what is not understood is why grown adults get on here and make asses of themselves. Sure, some comments are valid but most are just people arguing over who is "smarter" ......

I have to agree with that. You have to wade through the swamp to get to dry land a lot.
What concerns you... other than the drama posted?

frank wrote:

Job creation 101
The gap between the wealthiest Americans and middle- and working-class Americans has more than tripled in the past three decades. After-tax income for the top 1% grew by 275%, but rose by just 40% for the middle class, the bottom 20% reaped just 5 % of after-tax income. If income growth had been shared equally among all income groups, the families at the bottom would have $6,000 per year more than they do now, and the middle would have $13,000 more. The job creators are the middle class, that great giant buying machine, spending their income creating demand and thereby creating jobs. It’s not the rich, no matter how much income is added to their wealth they don’t go out and buy a thousand family cars they buy three because that is all the cars they need, just exactly like any other family. To sum it all up, as long as most of the income goes to a small group on the top instead of a more even income distribution feeding into the “great giant buying machine” known as the middle class, the economy has no chance of growing – it will stagnate as we all know by now!
http://zfacts.com/node/320

Do you think that's related to our declining level of education and our disastrous excuse for an education system?

It's well documented that the more educated countries have a more even distribution of wealth.
The wealth has never been, is not, and will never be distributed equally in any society that has ever existed in the history of civilization.
If you want a more even distribution of wealth, develop a more educated population. Your only other alernative is to steal wealth from those who have it and give it to those who do not. In the United States, you have to steal it mostly from those who sacrificed and worked and took the risks and give it to those who refused to take advantage of the opportunities that are available to everyone who is here.

frank wrote:

Job creation 101
The gap between the wealthiest Americans and middle- and working-class Americans has more than tripled in the past three decades. After-tax income for the top 1% grew by 275%, but rose by just 40% for the middle class, the bottom 20% reaped just 5 % of after-tax income. If income growth had been shared equally among all income groups, the families at the bottom would have $6,000 per year more than they do now, and the middle would have $13,000 more. The job creators are the middle class, that great giant buying machine, spending their income creating demand and thereby creating jobs. It’s not the rich, no matter how much income is added to their wealth they don’t go out and buy a thousand family cars they buy three because that is all the cars they need, just exactly like any other family. To sum it all up, as long as most of the income goes to a small group on the top instead of a more even income distribution feeding into the “great giant buying machine” known as the middle class, the economy has no chance of growing – it will stagnate as we all know by now!
http://zfacts.com/node/320

Are the rich you speak of buying Chevys,Fords and Chryslers?(NO),They are buying Bentleys,Austin Martins and Audi R8 spyders at $200,000.00 x3= over half a mil....You honestly haven't got a clue do you???