Deborah Kitay and Denise Bonfilio

MizzC wrote:

<quoted text>
Probably Denise or Deborah or Stephanie

Alert wrote:

<quoted text>
I do not think it is D or D. They would try to remove it. I think it might be the other one.

Stephanie Romeo wrote:

you all need to NOT mention my name anymore - I am not amused -perhaps the blog was removed because of posting plate numbers - asking to post Social security numbers --- perhpaps the posting of birthdates....could be something you all have done - face it some of you (not all - NOT ALL) are more for vigilante justice than American Justice --
One other point - never did I defend any of their actions - not once - you just want someone to blame -- your behavior is sometimes questionable - and
since you have seen fit to post my name - why not tell us who you all are --- full names --- come one what at you all afraid of? Let's see who you all are ---- come on????? I wonder what that would show?
Again I have not defended - only mentioned things that did not sit right with me ---
If I could have removed this blog - I would have - a long time ago - I have been forwarding it to my attorney ever since your slanderous comments towards me - but not try again not me

Stephanie Romeo wrote:

you all need to NOT mention my name anymore - I am not amused -perhaps the blog was removed because of posting plate numbers - asking to post Social security numbers --- perhpaps the posting of birthdates....could be something you all have done - face it some of you (not all - NOT ALL) are more for vigilante justice than American Justice --
One other point - never did I defend any of their actions - not once - you just want someone to blame -- your behavior is sometimes questionable - and
since you have seen fit to post my name - why not tell us who you all are --- full names --- come one what at you all afraid of? Let's see who you all are ---- come on????? I wonder what that would show?
Again I have not defended - only mentioned things that did not sit right with me ---
If I could have removed this blog - I would have - a long time ago - I have been forwarding it to my attorney ever since your slanderous comments towards me - but not try again not me

Surprised in LA wrote:

<quoted text>
Stephanie-
You said some time ago that you do not have the experiences that we on this blog have had. You have not been harmed financially, so you have no idea what we have been through, yet you post on here in a very antagonistic way and presume to judge us. This blog is none of your business. Ifyou don't like what's posted here, don't read it. BTW, it is not slander to call someone a jerk.

Surprised in LA wrote:

<quoted text>
Stephanie-
You said some time ago that you do not have the experiences that we on this blog have had. You have not been harmed financially, so you have no idea what we have been through, yet you post on here in a very antagonistic way and presume to judge us. This blog is none of your business. Ifyou don't like what's posted here, don't read it. BTW, it is not slander to call someone a jerk.

Judged:

1

Alert wrote:

<quoted text>
Stephanie, I do not know who you are, but you are the one that entered your name and last name into this blog. Of course people recognized you and started entering comments. You have no one to blame but yourself.

Judged:

1

new england queenie wrote:

It will be a better world for all when these two are off the streets of Sewickley and in jail where they belong!

Judged:

1

1

1

question wrote:

<quoted text>
My name was mentioned because JACK - decided to mention and malign me --- not with the word jerk - with other words that I will not repeat - Jack even apologized twice for it -- as for 'my business'- My opinions are as valid as yours free speech and all - well that covers me too -- and if you are going to say that only those ' financially hurt' can participate - well you don't know me or my story - and if you had wanted a closed forum - you all should not have begun a blog - because blogs are open forums to all.....you may think I present as antagonistic but I feel I have been signaled out and spoken ill of without any of you knowing me.....now as for Jack - do you all know who Jack really is? Do you think Jack has been financially hurt from any nefarious actions on the part of the dynamic duo? Well I can tell you no - that is not the case -- However I will not spill that story now - What I feel is this - if someone disagrees with this forum - the crowd attacks -- I find that upsetting - when facts have been invented or embellished - I have spoken up....and I am attacked for it -- when information that should not be presented is - I speak up and guess what? yup attacked - I am told to SHIT UP - I AM A JERK --- do you call that antagonistic? Mean? Rude? nope no one says that.... again I must remind you am allowed to say whatever I want. Now if I was to play the same game as Jack (for one name) I would tell the world what Jacks problem really is (with DK and DB)and it has nothing to do with criminal activity---- but there are honest folks in this - those legitimately defraud - I am so sorry for them - I really feel for them - And me - I am interested and concerned - I care and I am allowed to despite popular opinion - I have know DK for many many years and as I have said not like this EVER and feel terrible for this situation - as I have said many times this does not mean that anyone should avoid having to face the results of their actions --- I believe in the courts and as well as the rules of karma and the rules of humanity - they will face the music....so to speak....
I have never defended the actions of DK or DB - I have made that quite clear---- so as I said unless all of you will tell the world your full name then don't mention mine again. thank you.

In Sewickley wrote:

It may be time that this forum goes back to the mission that was intended. This began as a way for people to inform others and share their unfortunate experiences with DK and DB along with updating interested parties on the public records and the status of their prosecution. Unfortunately it has degraded to much less than that. I still believe that we have a duty to let other people know of the illegal activities and fraudulent business practices of DK and DB. I also think that we can help others who have not been as unfortunate as some of us and prevent more wrong doing by DK and DB. This is not a place to discuss child rearing practices, post license plate numbers or ask for birthdates and SS numbers. All of the above have lead to the removal of the blog and with it much useful information that was also posted. Name calling and threats of litigation are best left to the likes of DK and DB and have no useful place in this forum. Please continue to post information that will inform and help prevent further atrocities along with any updates on the status of the civil and criminal court proceedings.

Judged:

1

1

1

Alert wrote:

Sorry pretrial motions for DK are due on August 5th. Denise on October 5th.