Obviously you don't quite understand statistics.Well now we will have a 3% crime instead of a 0% crime rate and as for studies, they never tell you the complete truth.....As for train traffic and people we do not have any because the tracks have not been used for at least 25 years. So there is concern...We have had no one near us and we are not going to be totally protected by the curfew. Do think that there will be police out there all night making sure that the homeowners and their livestocks are safe? NOT!!!!!!!!!! I DON'T THINK SO! I will definitley not support Pat Northerly again. All she is looking is MONEY for the city...<quoted text>
Only 3% of the trails have crime, not that the proposed trail will have 3% more.
You have zero crime rate currently but that doesn't mean that there will be any on the proposed trail. You can't predict, but you also can't live in a shell and be fearful of everything. I guess that is the difference in being an optimist than a pessimist.
True, studies can't show you the complete story, but at least studies, if well done, can give you some idea of historical trends and proof rather than dwelling on worry and doubt.
Police are there to protect. Do they patrol your street every night? Probably not. Should they patrol the trail every night? Probably not. Will they be available if there is trouble and you call them? I'd bet on that scenario.
You can support whoever you want, but isn't the job of a politician to make the lives better for the greater good of the community, increase services and do so in an economically ethical manner? I think she has done that in this case.

78°F