|
Reality Check
Burlingame, CA
|
BJ, as a 'student of law' do you not understand that a parole violation gets you sent back to jail? He was not released, he was paroled. You want to stay out, you follow the rules. LOL that his ex 'girlfriend' ratted him out.
|
|
Donny B
Fairfax, VA
|
Becky Johnson wrote: XANTHIPPE WRITES: "Also wondering what Chuck Blanford has to say, although I suspect he sees what he wants to see. I'm very happy that Schmidt is once again behind bars."
BECKY: Folks. WHAT "crime" has he committed? the article doesn't say. It CLEARLY doesn't say that he molested or hurt another child. In fact, it IMPLIES that he may have been AROUND a minor of unknown age.
BECKY: So XANTHIPPE, what about innocent until proven guilty? You don't even know WHAT "crime" he was supposed to have committed yet you're "glad" he's locked up? Screw the law, right? Just "get" him because....?????
YOu sound like ARIADNE SYMONS! Your ignorance is showing yet again BJ. As it has already been told to you, violation of the terms of parole will bet you sent back to jail. One of the terms for DS to be released from jail was that he STAY AWAY from minors. third grader can understand this concept. WHY CAN'T YOU? BTW, that's a rhetorical question. The readers on Topix already know the answer.
|
|
Becky the Godess
Santa Cruz, CA
|
Xanthippe wrote: Well, Johnson, how do you explain this news?
A rehabilitated man does not violate the conditions of his release nor lie to his probation officer.
It took 6 months. The child was in no danger from Donald since the house had no indoor plumbing for Donald to drown the child in. You can not drown a child in a outhouse. Donald is an innocent victim of circumstance.
|
|
Buzz
San Francisco, CA
|
Becky No Soap on a Rope Johnson wrote: XANTHIPPE WRITES: "Also wondering what Chuck Blanford has to say, although I suspect he sees what he wants to see. I'm very happy that Schmidt is once again behind bars."
BECKY: Folks. WHAT "crime" has he committed? the article doesn't say. It CLEARLY doesn't say that he molested or hurt another child. In fact, it IMPLIES that he may have been AROUND a minor of unknown age.
HERE IS WHAT CHUCK BLANFORD IS SAYING: As I've said before I have been a mentor and friend to Donald for over 12 years. the information in the article has several discrepancies. He never resided in Riverside and as far as dating a woman with a kid, how could he when incarcerated? I've been close contact with Don since his release and pretty much know what doing. I have been in contact with his PO and it was indicated that his arrest had nothing to do with any criminal activity. Apparently Don has no clue of this at the preset as I talk to him daily. Lets not convict based an hearsay folks. Let's be fair.
I appreciate your view Corky but very few individuals know Don like I do. I have spent more time with Don over the last 12 years then his councilors. I have visited Don weekly over that time. I'm in constant contact and knew of his crime in detail from the beginning both from the original organization I belonged to and from Don's ow words. I verified what Don told me in the beginning by reviewing his case from the start. I'll still stand by him because some of the allegations couldn't have occurred and I know that for a fact. I also believe he is innocent until proven guilty.
BECKY: So XANTHIPPE, what about innocent until proven guilty? You don't even know WHAT "crime" he was supposed to have committed yet you're "glad" he's locked up? Screw the law, right? Just "get" him because....?????
YOu sound like ARIADNE SYMONS! Will you be the same bellicose self-destructive argumentative blowhard when you come before Judge Symons wearing an orange muuu-muuu?
|
|
“Pearls before swine”
Since: Mar 08
Santa Cruz, CA.
|
Please wait...
DBS WRITES: "he got caught lying to his parole officer about his activities. So he got sent back to jail." BECKY: You mean an ex-girlfriend (suspect axe to grind) made a report that CHUCK BLANFORD says he "knows for a fact parts of it could not be true" should not be the cause for celebration. It's never a cause for celebration when an innocent person is jailed, even if you don't like them. It is a blow against our whole justice system. MANY of you INSISTED that you KNEW he would "molest" or "hurt" a child after being released. Well. THAT has not happened. Own up to that at least.
|
|
DBS
San Jose, CA
|
Sure thing Whackjob. But you still haven't told us why the "Positive Change" meters are "Unconstitutional" Which article or amendment to the Constitution makes reference to a Pacific Ave parking meter? You must know, after all, you're "Academically ahead of" a Juris Doctorate of Constitutional Law!!
|
|
DBS
San Jose, CA
|
Or did one of the many SCPD horses whisper it to you, so you can't give away a "secret"?
|
|
Since: May 08
Santa Cruz, CA
|
Please wait...
Thanks, Becky, I'll take that comparison to Symons as a compliment. DS has to abide by the conditions of his release, and apparently has not done so. Not particularly surprising that an antisocial criminal misfit would have trouble outside of prison, is it? I love how predictable you are. No matter what, you're defending DS. What is wrong with you, anyway?
|
|
|
“Pearls before swine”
Since: Mar 08
Santa Cruz, CA.
|
Please wait...
XANTHIPPE WRITES: "Thanks, Becky, I'll take that comparison to Symons as a compliment." BECKY: If you think that "getting" those you don't like whether they broke the law or not is the way to go, then you're definitely Ari's kind of person. XANTHIPPE WRITES: "DS has to abide by the conditions of his release, and apparently has not done so. Not particularly surprising that an antisocial criminal misfit would have trouble outside of prison, is it?" BECKY: But we don't know that he's done ANYTHING which violates his terms of probation. A claim by a disgruntled ex-gf is usually not taken as truth UNLESS they just want to jail him for ANYTHING at all. THat could be what is really happening. Even YOU don't believe that he molested a child. And you don't care if he didn't. You want him jailed anyway. You've said so many times. Personally, in a civilized society we have rules and they apply to everyone---not just against the poor with the rich getting away with everything. But you, XANTHIPPE, don't hold the law in high regard. YOu think the law can be twisted, or ignored, or selectively enforced as long as the people you don't like wind up punished. I wouldn't brag about this tendency if I were you.
|
|
Donny B
Fairfax, VA
|
Becky the Fraud Johnson wrote: XANTHIPPE WRITES: "Thanks, Becky, I'll take that comparison to Symons as a compliment."
BECKY: If you think that "getting" those you don't like whether they broke the law or not is the way to go, then you're definitely Ari's kind of person.
XANTHIPPE WRITES: "DS has to abide by the conditions of his release, and apparently has not done so. Not particularly surprising that an antisocial criminal misfit would have trouble outside of prison, is it?"
BECKY: But we don't know that he's done ANYTHING which violates his terms of probation. A claim by a disgruntled ex-gf is usually not taken as truth UNLESS they just want to jail him for ANYTHING at all. THat could be what is really happening.
Even YOU don't believe that he molested a child. And you don't care if he didn't. You want him jailed anyway. You've said so many times.
Personally, in a civilized society we have rules and they apply to everyone---not just against the poor with the rich getting away with everything. But you, XANTHIPPE, don't hold the law in high regard. YOu think the law can be twisted, or ignored, or selectively enforced as long as the people you don't like wind up punished. I wouldn't brag about this tendency if I were you. WRONG again, BJ!!! Your reference to DS "molesting" a child as being the basis for his being back in jail is WRONG!!! Is this yet another example of your reading comprehension problem??? DS was forbidden to be around children. THAT was one of the conditions for his probation. BTW, when are you going to cease making the fraudulent claim that you are a National Merit Scholar???
|
|
Since: May 08
Santa Cruz, CA
|
Please wait...
Becky Johnson wrote: XANTHIPPE WRITES: "Thanks, Becky, I'll take that comparison to Symons as a compliment."
BECKY: If you think that "getting" those you don't like whether they broke the law or not is the way to go, then you're definitely Ari's kind of person.
XANTHIPPE WRITES: "DS has to abide by the conditions of his release, and apparently has not done so. Not particularly surprising that an antisocial criminal misfit would have trouble outside of prison, is it?"
BECKY: But we don't know that he's done ANYTHING which violates his terms of probation. A claim by a disgruntled ex-gf is usually not taken as truth UNLESS they just want to jail him for ANYTHING at all. THat could be what is really happening.
Even YOU don't believe that he molested a child. And you don't care if he didn't. You want him jailed anyway. You've said so many times.
Personally, in a civilized society we have rules and they apply to everyone---not just against the poor with the rich getting away with everything. But you, XANTHIPPE, don't hold the law in high regard. YOu think the law can be twisted, or ignored, or selectively enforced as long as the people you don't like wind up punished. I wouldn't brag about this tendency if I were you. He can violate the terms of his release far short of molesting a child. Merely associating with a woman with a child is enough to violate the terms of his release. He also needs to wear a GPS device, attend counseling and abstain from drugs, alcohol and porn. If he doesn't do one of those things, he is violating the terms of his release. If justice were served in this case, DS would never get out. That you continually go to bat for this guy demonstrates your lack of moral bearing. You defend the indefensible. Of all of the problems in this world, why do you choose this case in particular to defend? Again, what is wrong with you?
|
|
Buzz
San Francisco, CA
|
Becky braying Johnson wrote: XANTHIPPE WRITES: "Thanks, Becky, I'll take that comparison to Symons as a compliment."
BECKY: If you think that "getting" those you don't like whether they broke the law or not is the way to go, then you're definitely Ari's kind of person.
XANTHIPPE WRITES: "DS has to abide by the conditions of his release, and apparently has not done so. Not particularly surprising that an antisocial criminal misfit would have trouble outside of prison, is it?"
BECKY: But we don't know that he's done ANYTHING which violates his terms of probation. A claim by a disgruntled ex-gf is usually not taken as truth UNLESS they just want to jail him for ANYTHING at all. THat could be what is really happening.
Even YOU don't believe that he molested a child. And you don't care if he didn't. You want him jailed anyway. You've said so many times.
Personally, in a civilized society we have rules and they apply to everyone---not just against the poor with the rich getting away with everything. But you, XANTHIPPE, don't hold the law in high regard. YOu think the law can be twisted, or ignored, or selectively enforced as long as the people you don't like wind up punished. I wouldn't brag about this tendency if I were you. Methinks you protest too much. It's likely you in a dope-fueled delusional state transferred your obsession from Ryan to DS and in a jealous rage tattled on him. Anyone dumb enough to post pictures of themselves engaged in criminal acts will do anything.
|
|
Becky The Liar
Aptos, CA
|
Wow Becky; just wow. You've really gone that far into your fantasy construct? -It can't have happened because some guy named Chuck said it didn't happen? Chuck's words outweigh those of a P.O. and another witness? -You assume the P.O. is lying, with no basis of fact to do so other than...? Your usual conspiracy mindset? -You assume the woman is lying because she's an "ex-girlfriend"?(Cur ious how that could be when he's been locked up for decade, but I digress). Just...wow. And on a sidebar to that wow? Pretty sad statment to your support of women in general. You throw the woman who reported it under the bus with no evidence, just a snide insinuation that as an ex-girlfriend, she's a liar. And you put a child at risk, with no evidence of your own and refutiation of claims by two people who are there? Protecting your own viewpoint and defending a child molester with the tactic of discrediting a woman by claiming she's lying because obviously any woman lies when a man dumps her, right? Just....wow. You get viler by the post.
|
|
Becky The Liar
Aptos, CA
|
Sorry, got carried away and forgot my originally intended statement: Becky is lying, again. -She has no evidence that the women who reported Schmidt is his ex-girlfriend. -She has no evidence that the woman, even if an ex-girlfriend, is disgruntled. -She has no evidence that this Chuck Blanford has any "facts" to support his claim.(And I note that Chuck is studiously avoiding answering any specific questions on this issue on the Sentinel website). In summation, Becky is lying, as usual.
|
|
Reality Check
Burlingame, CA
|
Becky The Liar wrote: ...Protecting your own viewpoint and defending a child molester with the tactic of discrediting a woman by claiming she's lying because obviously any woman lies when a man dumps her, right? Just....wow. You get viler by the post. Remember though, he was "only" trying to rape her, not kill her. That part was an accident.
|
|
Bobby
Oakland, CA
|
Well, he is back in. Truth is he admitted he wanted to torture women to death, he still had the urge. Is it true that Becky offered up her kids to her lovers? Maybe she likes the thrill of not knowing if these types will rape you to death or just another lost cause she picked up. I have seen her in the community for years, but this board has shown me that liberals can be nuts too. Who in their right mind, legal or not, would let a sexual sadist out who still wants to kill women and children. Some people should not be let out. Even convicts have their laws, and they shank child rapist first when riots break out, snitches, child rapists.
|
|
Craig
Brooklyn, NY
|
Judged:
1
Bobby wrote: Well, he is back in. Truth is he admitted he wanted to torture women to death, he still had the urge. Interesting. Where did you get this information?
|
|
Do tell Bobby
Aptos, CA
|
I recall that his case was on the docket for Friday. Did he get sent back to prison?
|
|
DBS
San Jose, CA
|
Becky Johnson wrote: XANTHIPPE WRITES: "Thanks, Becky, I'll take that comparison to Symons as a compliment."
BECKY: If you think that "getting" those you don't like whether they broke the law or not is the way to go, then you're definitely Ari's kind of person.
XANTHIPPE WRITES: "DS has to abide by the conditions of his release, and apparently has not done so. Not particularly surprising that an antisocial criminal misfit would have trouble outside of prison, is it?"
BECKY: But we don't know that he's done ANYTHING which violates his terms of probation. A claim by a disgruntled ex-gf is usually not taken as truth UNLESS they just want to jail him for ANYTHING at all. THat could be what is really happening.
Even YOU don't believe that he molested a child. And you don't care if he didn't. You want him jailed anyway. You've said so many times.
Personally, in a civilized society we have rules and they apply to everyone---not just against the poor with the rich getting away with everything. But you, XANTHIPPE, don't hold the law in high regard. YOu think the law can be twisted, or ignored, or selectively enforced as long as the people you don't like wind up punished. I wouldn't brag about this tendency if I were you. Hey BJ, the baby-raping murderer you're so fond of defending is back in jail until June of 2013. Yup, chalk up another "Big Win" for the flabby fraud from Detroit!!!
|
|
Buzz
San Francisco, CA
|
DBS wrote: <quoted text>
Hey BJ, the baby-raping murderer you're so fond of defending is back in jail until June of 2013.
Yup, chalk up another "Big Win" for the flabby fraud from Detroit!!! Yup, Pancake's POS is back in the can. Maybe she will request a cell next to his after her felony conviction and try to get "lucky".
|
|
Tell me when this thread is updated:
(Registration is not required)
Add to my Tracker
Send me an email
|
Leo