Judge Michael Naughton Santa Ana Court

Posted in the Santa Ana Forum

Comments (Page 16)

Showing posts 301 - 320 of501
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Court Observer

San Pedro, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#307
Apr 8, 2008
 
Practicing in OC wrote:
<quoted text>
How do you know this?
And other sources.

Child Advocate in Irvine
Los Angeles, CA Reply »
|Report Abuse |Judge it!|#184 Jan 7, 2008
Happy New Year!

I am going to wait a bit longer to make sure that everyone has said whatever they need to say about Judge Naughton and then I'll print the rest of this site and send it to him. I believe he has the right to see read what's being said about him so that he can do what he needs to do.
Court Observer

San Pedro, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#308
Apr 8, 2008
 
Larry wrote:
the things I do come with a risk.
WELCOME TO MY WORLD NUAGHTON i MAILED HIM A COPY
Larry W.Campbell
1116 Cottonwood Dr
Roseville CA 95661
4/2/2008 7:03 PM
TO: the Honorable Ted Gaines
Assembly member Forth district
State Capitol
P.O Box 942849
Sacramento. CA 94249-004
Subject Judge Michel Naughton Orange court in the court of Orange
Dear Hon. Gaines
I think this is my second request for information, normally, our Governor will respond to my request for information, however, he is busy trying to run herd over out of control law- makers
If I may, one letter would be worth twenty five thousand Votes when I was active in politics. With Blog and other means to share information letters may be worth more the twenty thousands votes, of course, all politicians want to be re – elected, I am sure you are looking forward to me sharing the request with the Voters.
Over the last 5 years Judge Naughton will the Aid of Justice Sills has been able to cloak is political contributions. I want to make sure Naughton paid full price for his Judgeship.
I request you put me in contact with the department that will aid help me tracking Naughton Political contributions and I want to be able to cross check to ensure Naughton reported all of his contributions,
I will re- stated Naugthon claim his political contribution are protected court records, I am sure there are countless other politicians that would enjoy such protections
I also request the names of the persons who serve on our state Judiciary.
I want to ensure the Voters recognize their great work on access to our courts and to end child abuse by ensuring Judges who fail to protect our children are removed from family court matters and those Judges who lack a sense of mortality, as in living in Sin with the bond of marriage.
Yours truly,
Larry W. Campbell
Welcome Judge Naughton to my world per protected speech,
Do not forget my records request in Lingan v Campbell no manufacturing court records. The order removing Pollard;s wiretap order, that one
Governor, right on the school problem, stay the course and do not trust Kings \cloaked as chief George who stated he would end gender bias
CC George, rule please
Child Advocate in Irvine
Los Angeles, CA Reply »
|Report Abuse |Judge it!|#184 Jan 7, 2008
Happy New Year!

I am going to wait a bit longer to make sure that everyone has said whatever they need to say about Judge Naughton and then I'll print the rest of this site and send it to him. I believe he has the right to see read what's being said about him so that he can do what he needs to do.
Larry

Roseville, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#309
Apr 9, 2008
 
To my friend who offered records, Please 30 days before I must file in
federal court and attack judges

POLLARD SEE RECALL POLLARD LOCAL ATTORENY

Pollard has a history while being on appear to continue to rule breaching settled law

The Person who filed the appeal, please check to se if Pollard was ruling while

Large print losing vision
Larry

Roseville, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#310
Apr 9, 2008
 
HARD COPY TO NAUGHTON
Larry W. Campbell
1116 Cottonwood Dr
Roseville CA 95661
Please forward records per my federal motions . any thing on Pollard’ and OC judges


4/9/2008 2:10 PM
Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger
State Capitol Building
Sacramento, CA 95814

I have been overwhelm with e- mail concerning Judge Naughton and now Judge Pollard > am pleased the people take the rime to speak out.
I have a suggestion, It is time to clear House at the commission which is now no more that a rubber stamp for judges.

The Honorable Freddy “ the hammer” Horn actions are suspect. Certainly concerning his attempts to protect Judge Stock on her misuse of federal funding, which was terminated. I would love to sent you a copy of Stock’ letter, yet Stock has refused to provide me a copy

Honorable Presiding Stock continues to refuse my request per her statements to glean her judge Pay, Not good
I have been informed Naughtom enjoys reading his many blog’s Good I can gain access through his Blog

Yours truly,

Larry W.Campbell CC Blog
I think Ms. Lingan should comply with the court order to take therapy for child molestation. Naughton Does not as Mr. Sills affirmed Naughton Order, fact Sills is too old and needs to retire
Larry

Roseville, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#311
Apr 10, 2008
 
Julie wrote:
<quoted text>
Arrogant? No. An excellent judge? Yes. Not to mention someone who has more than 30 years of family law experience (and was in the first group certified by the state of California as a family court practicioner). Didn't like his verdict in your case? Too bad. That doesn't make him wrong, nor does it make him "arrogant." And his age is really irrelevant. How old are you narrow-minded posters? About 12, if your baseless posts are any indication. Having a judge who is not only familiar with California law but the author of certain precedent-setting cases (such as the grandparents' rights law) should be a good thing. And it is, in my opinion. Would you rather have a judge who doesn't know anything about the law?
Have you any facts to back up the character assassinations you bitter people are flinging? I'd guess not. There's a fine line between free speech and slander, and many of you are crossing it.
I've known this judge for better than 30 years, and he deserves better than the mud you're all flinging.
Have fun in the mud puddles.
no verdicts in family court, you get a decision
Larry

Roseville, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#312
Apr 11, 2008
 
request for info, that I will check

Larry W. Campbell
1116 Cottonwood Dr
Roseville CA 95661
NEED MORE INFO ON Nuaghton , YOU PROVIDE I WILL CHECK . Dirt on Sills Please

Info on Orange Judge Lwc95661 @comcast,net, I ALSO EJOY ATTORNEY INFO

4/11/2008 3:04 PM
Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger
State Capitol Building
Sacramento, CA 95814………. I AM AN HONEST PERSON

records request per this notice Judge Pay
Dear Governor
I am not a politician, nor a Judge making me an honest person who tried to ensure judges will not steal the people money. I am blind, there are many forms of blindness in the political arena
You are an honest person and I believe the people se you as such I trust you.
Enclosure is another rejection notice by the commission
The issue is Judge Stock and Judge Naughton taking their Judge Pay without completing their work and concealing court record I need for my federal appeal. As you know Naughton has stone wall me per my request that Naughton stated his political contributions are protected court records
I am certain judge Freddy : the Hammer” Horn Orange judge wants to protect Stock, he attack me when I was tracking Stock’ misuse of federal funds, which were terminated.
1. I request you provide me a copy of the from Judges must use to glean their Judge Pay.
2. I request the code that forces Judges to submit an affidavit before they can glean their Judge Pay.
3, I request information on Justices, do they have to complete they work within 90.days
4. It has been reported on Naughton countless blogs He has or had a financial interest in a case he was hearing, the commission per the enclosure refused to look into that matter. If true, Did Naughton violate the law
It in time to remove ALL current members on the commission, the same old faces for years.
George was puling concerning another States who wanted to hold Judge accountable in Criminal court and civil court, I THINK that will pass in THIS STATE. Unless George can re- store the people faith in the Cal court systems.
To do that George must have the tools and put the law before Judges who are mentally and physical ill or plain EVIL.
In the private Sector and person who consistently screws up is fired
When you have a Judge who need reserved Parking at the appellate court there is a problem with that Judge’ skill level
We know attorneys never file for review without the cause having merit other wise they would be vexatious
We know attorney will never file motions that lack merit, that too would be vexatious.
We know ex- pate hearing are for emergencies, not to order the sale of a home
We know children at a certain age have a legal right to speak in court.
Yours truly,
Larry W.Campbell Stock Naughton George, CC Blog
NAughton do not forget my request on your interest in that credit union
Hammer, Commission
N California

Oldsmar, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#313
Apr 11, 2008
 
Larry wrote:
<quoted text>
no verdicts in family court, you get a decision
Judge Naughton in Orange County: Ignores a 730 placed to protect the children and mother in September of 2002 the ex husband attends no mediation her ex husband has been arrested on 273a 2 times in less than 3 months and the judge says well it must not have been a big deal the bail was low. I have seen the pictures of her son and have them in my care also I have taken this to a much higher court. I have also seen the pictures of this woman in July of 2004 when the same offender was arrested the bail at that time was set at 50,000 the man still did not spend 48 hours in jail, this was a hurtful sight to a compasionate family man as myself. I am moving forward to help this family, and I intend to exploite every single motion granted in this court. I am free of charge to her and her children. This is a sick sick injustice, and since I have the time and knowledge I am glad to be of service! She may be afraid but I myself am not, this will prove to be a landmark case in my career also.
N California

Oldsmar, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#314
Apr 11, 2008
 
Larry are you currently working on a case?
N California

Oldsmar, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#315
Apr 11, 2008
 
Practicing in OC wrote:
<quoted text>
How do you know this?
I was personally told.
N California

Oldsmar, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#316
Apr 11, 2008
 
Naughton Fan wrote:
According to your statement that you have a sneaking hunch that You are one of the Child Abusers is just another of your well-known criminal acts. When you're caught, your only recourse is to falsely accuse good parents of "Child Abuse". And since you brought it up, on how many occasions did you and your Judge falsely accuse parents of child abuse? Don't tell me, those cases are under federal seal in the Superior Court and/or missing in the event there may be a formal inquiry by an outsider. At least you are admitting your guilt. <quoted text>
I have just fully read a compete transcript from C63 and I have told this lovely woman I will help her and exploite this judge for all the punches, police reports and evidence he ignored and put her children in danger. She has unlimited legal at this point.
Practicing in OC

Irvine, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#317
Apr 11, 2008
 
N California wrote:
<quoted text>
I have just fully read a compete transcript from C63 and I have told this lovely woman I will help her and exploite this judge for all the punches, police reports and evidence he ignored and put her children in danger. She has unlimited legal at this point.
It usually is "lovely" women that Naughton mercilessly harms in his courtroom. I believe he is a pathological mysoginist. The pretty young women get it the worst in his courtroom. He will "punish" her for his own personal hatred & bitterness, his own personal "affliction".
Practicing in OC

Irvine, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#318
Apr 11, 2008
 
Questions for everyone wrote:
What if the evidence presented to the appeals court is Naughtons words stating there is evidence in a matter This would be presented in the manner of a transcripts. Now, how would this be denied?
Due process is "denied" when the transcripts are ignored (ie never read) by the appellate court! When a case has voluminous transcripts (boxes & boxes) and the appellate panel is lazy, the transcripts won't even get read!!

The appellant panel won't even check to see if there is ANY actual "evidence" that Naughton says there is!

So, Naughton's words are relied on as 100% "true" without any verification or corroboration from the record (ie transcripts). A lazy appellate panel will just call Naughton's words the "facts" and/or "substantial evidence". Then they can just stamp the appeal "affirmed" and call it a day.

Cuts down on that bothersome stuff called "work", not well received by a lazy elitist panel. From what I've seen, it's only a couple of male appellate justices that do this. Sills & Rylaarsdam are the worst offenders.
Larry

Roseville, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#320
Apr 12, 2008
 

RECORDS PLEASE
Larry W. Campbell
1116 Cottonwood Dr
Roseville CA 95661

4/12/2008 2:08 AM
Hon Mr, David Sills .
925 N. SPURGEON STREET
P.O Box 22055
Santa Ana CA 92702
ROECORDS REQUEST MR.. SILLS

Dear Mr. Sills Justice
From vexatious Larry W.Campbell

Per your last ruling I will try and not overwork you per this request in consideration of your age and long years of service to the court

1, Please provide you true birthday date.

I notice you cloak the names of Judges who have been on review by this court on your Site. I am sure we can correct that oversight.

I request the Number of time the Great Honorable Judge Michael Naughton has been on review by this court

I request the same per the above for the great judge Nancy Pollard.

I welcome the opportunity to pay cost for a computer search

I have a dream, when all persons review the number of times a judges has been on review and checks the Judge’s profile before allowing that judge to hear their cause of action, it certainly work well in the court of Placer, per ccp 170.6

Interesting I can check on how any law- maker voted on any issue, yet the voters are deprived of knowing how many times a judge has been on review

One could assume a judge who has been on review many times may well be unfit to remain on the bench, that is called the merit system used in the private sector

Feel free to visit Naughton Blog per this request

Yours truly,

Larry W.Campbell
Practicing in OC

Irvine, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#321
Apr 12, 2008
 
Larry wrote:
RECORDS PLEASE
Larry W. Campbell
1116 Cottonwood Dr
Roseville CA 95661
4/12/2008 2:08 AM
Hon Mr, David Sills .
925 N. SPURGEON STREET
P.O Box 22055
Santa Ana CA 92702
ROECORDS REQUEST MR.. SILLS
Dear Mr. Sills Justice
From vexatious Larry W.Campbell
Per your last ruling I will try and not overwork you per this request in consideration of your age and long years of service to the court
1, Please provide you true birthday date.
I notice you cloak the names of Judges who have been on review by this court on your Site. I am sure we can correct that oversight.
I request the Number of time the Great Honorable Judge Michael Naughton has been on review by this court
I request the same per the above for the great judge Nancy Pollard.
I welcome the opportunity to pay cost for a computer search
I have a dream, when all persons review the number of times a judges has been on review and checks the Judge’s profile before allowing that judge to hear their cause of action, it certainly work well in the court of Placer, per ccp 170.6
Interesting I can check on how any law- maker voted on any issue, yet the voters are deprived of knowing how many times a judge has been on review
One could assume a judge who has been on review many times may well be unfit to remain on the bench, that is called the merit system used in the private sector
Feel free to visit Naughton Blog per this request
Yours truly,
Larry W.Campbell
The "merit system" does not apply to our courts in Orange County apparently. In my opinion, Naughton is an out of control nutjob whose rulings have nothing to do with the actual evidence submitted at trial, or the applicable law. Just his own biases and justifications therefore.

What's worse, is that Sills - who should be an esteemed appellate court justice - has sullied his own reputation by letting Naughton coast through the appellate process without oversight. Sills has become too old and tired today to verify the veracity of what Naughton concludes in his rulings. In my opinion, the Sills of today only applies himself when it's a case that will garner him some notoriety in the press and where the record is not so big that he'd actually have to "work" to review it. He's just resting on his laurels at this point in his career and his reputation as a conscientious legal mind (which it used to be) has diminished in the legal community as a result.

For the sake of the preserving the integrity of the appellate court in Orange County, what Sills should know is that a lot of attorneys feel that he should either get off his butt and do his job, or retire.

In my opinion, Naughton's too far gone, just completely "out to lunch" mentally. There's no redemption for him as he has never been a great legal thinker. He needs to just plain retire before more damage is done.
Practicing in OC

Irvine, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#322
Apr 12, 2008
 
Court Observer wrote:
<quoted text>
Child Advocate in Irvine
Los Angeles, CA Reply »
|Report Abuse |Judge it!|#184 Jan 7, 2008
Happy New Year!
I am going to wait a bit longer to make sure that everyone has said whatever they need to say about Judge Naughton and then I'll print the rest of this site and send it to him. I believe he has the right to see read what's being said about him so that he can do what he needs to do.
This "printing out" everything and sending it to Naughton crusade was posted some time ago by a guy initially calling himself "Naughton's Fan". Who then hijacked other poster's screen names, like this one he used here: "Child Advocate in Irvine". That used to be my screen name. Just note for future reference that this fraud's location states that he's in "Los Angeles". I'm in Irvine.
Larry

Roseville, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#323
Apr 12, 2008
 
Release Date: December 22, 2003 Release Number: 86
----------
Supreme Court Amends Ethics Code for State Judges
Action Affects Rules on Speech of Judicial Candidates, Ownership of Bonds, and Sexual Harassment
San Francisco - The California Supreme Court today announced that it adopted amendments to the Code of Judicial Ethics, which governs the conduct of state judges, at the court’s administrative conference held last week.
The amendments concern (1) whether ownership of a bond constitutes a financial interest for purposes of judicial disqualification; (2) the effect, if any, of Republican Party of Minnesota v. White (2002) 536 U.S. 765 on the canons affecting campaign speech by candidates for judicial office in California; and (3) sexual harassment.
The amendments were proposed to the court by the Supreme Court Advisory Committee on the Code of Judicial Ethics, chaired by Administrative Presiding Justice Charles S. Vogel, of the Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District.
The committee assists the court by reviewing issues referred to it by the court and making recommendations to the court concerning whether amendments or modifications to the Code of Judicial Ethics should be adopted. The California Constitution confers on the Supreme Court responsibility for adopting a Code of Judicial Ethics to guide the conduct of judges on and off the bench, as well as the conduct of judicial candidates.(Cal. Const., Art. VI,§ 18(m).)
The Advisory Committee made its recommendations to the court after circulating proposed drafts of possible amendments for public comment. Following this process, the court adopted the following changes to the code.
I. Ownership of Corporate Bonds
New Canon 3E(4) and related commentary
Canon 3E(4), a newly adopted provision, sets forth a judicial officer’s duty to disqualify him- or herself from hearing a case, based upon ownership of bonds. The new canon makes clear that ownership of a corporate bond valued in excess of $1,500 is disqualifying. Ownership of government bonds is considered disqualifying only if the outcome of the proceeding involved could substantially affect the value of the judge’s bond.
The limitations adopted were drawn from the definition of “financial interest” applied to judicial disqualifications and found in Code of Civil Procedure section 170.1 et seq. and Canon 3E (3)(iii)(d).
II. Judicial Candidates
Application of Republican Party of Minnesota v. White (Canon 5B)
more no more space
Larry

Roseville, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#324
Apr 12, 2008
 
State of California
Commission on Judicial Performance



CODE OF JUDICIAL ETHICS

The Constitution requires the Supreme Court to make rules "for the conduct of judge, both on and off the bench, and for
judicial candidates in the conduct of their campaigns," to be referred to as the "Code of Judicial Ethics."

The "Code" consists of broad declarations called Canons, as follows:

Canon 1 A judge shall uphold the integrity and independence of the judiciary.

Canon 2 A judge shall avoid impropriety and the appearance of impropriety in all of the judge's activities.

Canon 3 A judge shall perform the duties of judicial office impartially and diligently.

Canon 4 A judge shall so conduct the judge's quasi-judicial and extra-judicial activities as to minimize the risk of conflict
with judicial obligations.

Canon 5 A judge or judicial candidate shall refrain from inappropriate political activity.

Canon 6 Compliance with the Code of Judicial Ethics.



For more detailed information, see [ Code of Judicial Ethics ].

[ Home ][ Up ][ California Constitution ][ Commission Rules ][ Code of Judicial Ethics ][ Policy Declarations ][ Government Code ][ Code of Civil Procedure ][ Rules of Court ]
Larry

Roseville, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#325
Apr 12, 2008
 
TOOLS USE THEM

For purposes of this Code, the judge who is the subject of a complaint, an investigation, or formal proceedings before the commission shall be referred to as the “subject judge.”

6.1 Recusal

(1) A commission member shall recuse himself or herself if:

(a) The member does not think he or she is able to act fairly and impartially in a matter;

(b) The member or an immediate family member is the subject of the investigation;

(c) The member served as a lawyer in any proceedings that are the subject of the investigation;

(d) The member has a case pending before the subject judge either as a litigant or in the member’s capacity as a lawyer;

(e) A lawyer with whom the member practices is involved in the complaint;

(f) The member has a bias or prejudice for or against the subject judge; or

(g) A reasonable person aware of the facts would entertain a substantial doubt that the member would be able to be impartial.

(2) If a member determines to recuse himself or herself:

(a) The member shall recuse himself or herself promptly;

(b) The recused member may, but is not required to, state the reason(s) for his or her recusal;

(c) The recused member shall leave the room, not comment further or otherwise participate in the commission’s consideration of the matter from which the member is recused; and

(d) The recused member shall not receive further written materials on the matter from which the member is recused.

6.2
Larry

Roseville, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#326
Apr 13, 2008
 
readers i need to make a records, i hope that id ok with you folks blind

Larry W. Campbell
1116 Cottonwood Dr
Roseville CA 95661

4/13/2008 2:05 AM
The California Supreme court
GEORGE THE ADA LEADER
300 Mc Allister Street
San Francisco, CA 94103

No I cannot sleep due to my concern for my little girl thank you for asking

In the great court of the honorable Mr. presiding justice David Sill, Mr. Sills has an interesting legal theory. The state Legislature per the vexatious law wants my child to be at risk by denying me access to ex- parte hearing unless I can afford an attorney
Other matters, thank to our Governor Fair housing filed a complaint and Named the Great Honorable presiding Judge Nancy Stock, Judge Naughton and Judge Pollard.
Hon Stock and Naughton are still ruling in Lingan v Campbell.
Mr. Sills statements he was concerned P J Stock would be overwork if she had to comb through the files cannot be squared with common sense Stock has an army of clerks.
Yours truly, Larry W.Campbell
PS don’t forget to visit Naughton Blog, it is growing CC Names above
Larry

Roseville, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#327
Apr 13, 2008
 
RULES OF COURT
Larry W. Campbell
1116 Cottonwood Dr
Roseville CA 95661
.
4/13/2008 6:28 PM

The California Supreme court
GEORGE THE ADA LEADER
300 Mc Allister Street
San Francisco, CA 94103

It has been brought to my attention certain judges in the superior court of Orange are refusing to apply the rules of court per a person using a recorder for notes.

Yours truly,

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 301 - 320 of501
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

6 Users are viewing the Santa Ana Forum right now

Search the Santa Ana Forum:
Topic Updated Last By Comments
CA Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex ma... (Aug '10) 2 hr Interesting 199,077
CA California Proposition 19: the Marijuana Legali... (Oct '10) 8 hr Activity 15,657
Vietnamese Community Rises Up Against Democrat&... Wed KMT Chinese Nationalist 5
Some Damage After 5.1 Quake Tue Amused Observer 2
CA California seeks to ban free, single-use carryo... (Jun '10) Tue Bag itts 4,551
CA CA Proposition 23 - Global Warming (Oct '10) Apr 15 lug heads 7,298
American Muslim Men And The Search For Love Apr 15 Ray 3
•••
•••

Santa Ana News Video

•••
•••

Santa Ana Jobs

•••
•••
•••

Santa Ana People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••