Trayvon Martin Shooting Death Sparks Outrage on Social Media

HANK wrote:

<quoted text>
Speaking of comprehension problems.
His "environment" was indeed poor. He was from a broken family, daddy had a girlfriend in another city,hard to watch the boy from there. He was evidentally selling marijuana and "borrowing" other people's jewelry.
That kind of poor environment dummy is not just the money you know.
IE a poor environment to raise a child in.

You tell him, that Zazz character has more than a problem with comprehension, being a Zimmerman hater. He doesn't understand reality, that Martin was a dope head street thug. Typical of ghetto rats.

With Martin gone, society is better off.

Yeah wrote:

<quoted text>lol! If you had bothered to read and comprehend, you'd understand it was Dershowitz being discussed.
Then again, you have a regular habit of changing the subject when your idiocy is exposed.... which is normal son.

Yet nothing you posted, gramps, changes the fact that Dershowitz says the affidavit of probable cause is very weak and unethical.He is not the only lawyer who pointed that fact out.

barefoot2626 wrote:

<quoted text>
Zimmerman is in jail right now.
How's that work out for you?

You mean he was convicted of 2nd degree murder or is he in jail for other reasons?

barefoot2626 wrote:

<quoted text>
Moe-ron: jurors don't have to be ignorant of the case, what planet are you from?

Talking about being a moron, reading comprehension doesn't seem to be one of your strong points. Let me repeat what I wrote and read it slowly so you won't be blinded by the light when it eventually turns on. Of course many people are familiar with the case which is irrelevant to what I posted.

Here I edited it to cut through your bozone. Bozone is the substance surrounding stupid people that stops bright ideas from penetrating.

"on the assumption that they may be the only humans left on the face of the planet that haven't already DECIDED on the guilt or innocence of the shooter.."

Maybe your bulb is burnt out.

barefoot2626 wrote:

<quoted text>
Let's see: Martin was a 17 year old who has never been arrested for so much as a jaywalking ticket and your thug Zimmerman a criminal with an arrest record and a history of domestic violence.
He was a cop wannabe WHO FLUNKED OUT OF COMMUNITY COLLEGE.
His only interest in Martin was the color of his skin.
And now we know not only is the thug Zimmerman a criminal with a record, he is a liar.

Yet he was caught in school with unexplained women's jewelry and a burglary tool, caught writing a vulgarity on school lockers, was suspended three times from school and his cousin alluded to him punching out a bus driver.He told his friend in social media that he should have killed the guy that lied to him and he died with tracers of an illegal drug in his system.

downhill246 wrote:

<quoted text>
Yet nothing you posted, gramps, changes the fact that Dershowitz says the affidavit of probable cause is very weak and unethical.He is not the only lawyer who pointed that fact out.

lol! True. But then, it also shows how you support terrorist as well son.... historical evidence.

zazz wrote:

<quoted text>
Zimmerman didn't tell Trayvon he was part of the NW. Zimmerman didn't ask him a polite question, he began with threats. He ended with killing Trayvon. His ass is now in jail awaiting trial, charged with second degree murder.

Why did Martin confront Zimmerman if he was so scared and had ample opportunity to get safely away?
We both know he won't be found guilty of 2nd degree murder.

shouldn`t have gone out and stole those skittles and pepsi,and this all would have never happened

downhill246 wrote:

<quoted text>
Why did Martin confront Zimmerman if he was so scared and had ample opportunity to get safely away?
We both know he won't be found guilty of 2nd degree murder.

lol! Actually it was Zimmerman who confronted Martin.

Zimmerman was in his vehicle safe when Martin left.

Zimmerman then stalked him with a loaded gun.

Facts, son.

And justice for all wrote:

<quoted text>
Frank Taafe's was arrested for violating a restraining order his ex had him arrested. Not only did she have one on him, but so did his grown kids whom he harassed. Who cares what he has to say. He is a wife beater!

So does that fact make the black perps suddenly become white?

Yeah wrote:

<quoted text>lol! Actually it was Zimmerman who confronted Martin.
Zimmerman was in his vehicle safe when Martin left.
Zimmerman then stalked him with a loaded gun.
Facts, son.

Well, gramps, Martin ran, Zimmerman tried to follow him, lost sight of him, finished his 911 call, was heading back to his vehicle when Martin confronted him. Martin physically attacked Zimmerman and broke his nose meaning he committed a forcible felony. His second mistake was reaching for Zimmerman's exposed firearm in a hip holster which cost him his life.

Yeah wrote:

<quoted text>lol! True. But then, it also shows how you support terrorist as well son.... historical evidence.

You mean like Barack Obama does?

He has three terrorist friends that I know of.

William Ayers, Bernadine Dorhn and former PLO operative Rashid Khalidi.

At the end of William Ayers book, "Fugitive Days" he writes that he is "Guilty as hell, free as a bird—it’s a great country."

downhill246 wrote:

<quoted text>
Well, gramps, Martin ran, Zimmerman tried to follow him, lost sight of him, finished his 911 call, was heading back to his vehicle when Martin confronted him. Martin physically attacked Zimmerman and broke his nose meaning he committed a forcible felony. His second mistake was reaching for Zimmerman's exposed firearm in a hip holster which cost him his life.

lol! Yep son! The "scared" Zimmerman went chasing down Martin with a weapon. Facts.

As for the confrontation, that's YOU'RE speculation.

Yeah wrote:

<quoted text>lol! Actually it was Zimmerman who confronted Martin.
Zimmerman was in his vehicle safe when Martin left.
Zimmerman then stalked him with a loaded gun.
Facts, son.

Actually it was Martin that eventually stalked Zimmerman.

Zimmerman wanted to know the whereabouts of the person he thought was acting suspiciously and since young black males liked to rip off homes in the Retreat it seemed to him that he could be another likely candidate.

As to #3, never carry an unloaded gun. If you had to use it, yelling "Bang ,bang ,bang," really doesn't work too well.

Yeah wrote:

<quoted text>lol! Yep son! The "scared" Zimmerman went chasing down Martin with a weapon. Facts.
As for the confrontation, that's YOU'RE speculation.

No its Zimmerman's statement. Any other scenario is pure speculation.

downhill246 wrote:

<quoted text>
Well, gramps, Martin ran, Zimmerman tried to follow him, lost sight of him, finished his 911 call, was heading back to his vehicle when Martin confronted him. Martin physically attacked Zimmerman and broke his nose meaning he committed a forcible felony. His second mistake was reaching for Zimmerman's exposed firearm in a hip holster which cost him his life.

These are once again simply your opinion, and your opinion is based on what the shooter says.

We'll all see when this goes to trial - and despite what you think, it will go to trial.

Yeah wrote:

<quoted text>lol! Yep son! The "scared" Zimmerman went chasing down Martin with a weapon. Facts.
As for the confrontation, that's YOU'RE speculation.

You'll never convince these idiots - it's not worth responding to anymore.

We'll all come back after this goes to trial, and see who was wrong.

downhill246 wrote:

<quoted text>
Actually it was Martin that eventually stalked Zimmerman.
Zimmerman wanted to know the whereabouts of the person he thought was acting suspiciously and since young black males liked to rip off homes in the Retreat it seemed to him that he could be another likely candidate.
As to #3, never carry an unloaded gun. If you had to use it, yelling "Bang ,bang ,bang," really doesn't work too well.

lol! Going back to your "logic" son, if Zimmerman had just stayed put, no one would have been hurt.

I have no problems with Zimmerman watching out for his neighborhood. I have a problem with an untrained idiot goes against the rules and does it with a gun.

downhill246 wrote:

<quoted text>
No its Zimmerman's statement. Any other scenario is pure speculation.

lol! Speculation.... so is Zimmerman's statement son.

Or rather... suspect

TonyT1961 wrote:

<quoted text>
You'll never convince these idiots - it's not worth responding to anymore.
We'll all come back after this goes to trial, and see who was wrong.

lol! I know. But it's fun to show how their limited views are just so stupid.

They just do it to themselves, so I can't help but "assist" them!