Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Aug 4, 2010 Full story: www.cnn.com 200,976

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Full Story
Mona Lott

Hoboken, NJ

#144113 Jun 2, 2012
hahahahahahahah

stupid

hahahahahahahahah
Bruno

Westminster, CA

#144114 Jun 2, 2012
RnL2008 wrote:
<quoted text>
Oooooo, I so love that story.....Adam and Eve, with their sons Cain, Abel, Seth and the other 49 children who didn't matter enough to make the story......lol!!!
It means that in spite of me having a bad day or insensitive day or screaming at the top of my lungs because of idiots like you who make stupid azz comments......she still wants to share her life with me and still loves me in spite of my faults......was that simple enough for you to grasp?
You come into these threads stomping your feet and making rude azz knuckle dragging comments, claim or blame it on how you have been treated, and then act like because it has been a certain way in society.....it MUST remain that way......and I'm sorry to inform of this.....BUT THINGS DO CHANGE.....Gays and Lesbians have the right to fight to have their relationships be something more than some dirty little secret because it makes BIG MASCULINE MEN like yourself feel insecure!!!
Now, don't you have flying penguins to go watch!!!
Please comprehend befor getting your boxers in a bunch. We are talking about the BEGINING OF TIME that means Adam and Eve NOT the rest of the clan that followed you moron. Please Please pay attention, this is why all the rude remarks from you homos come up with because you change what is being said to suit yourselves. I don't feel insecure at all moron and you can have the same relationships as we normal people do. As far as you faults you left your comment very open to many different senarios. If it's temper tantrums you are reffering to, we all have those so calm down missy ... and how more stupid can my remarks be than your constan old stale penquine rants you homos have nothing more to keep you amused? LMAO penquins seem to be getting more attention these days more so than the homo demands for the same rights we all have, lol that is how mixed up you queer folk are.
Bruno

Westminster, CA

#144115 Jun 2, 2012
Don't upset the apple cart, everything is just fine the way it is . . .. ...
Stu

Philadelphia, PA

#144116 Jun 2, 2012
I think the Federal government should get out of marriage. No more spousal benefits FOR ANYONE. The next President is going to name two Supreme Court justices. White people who hate Romney will have to hold their noses and vote for him anyway, because we are heading the way of South Africa.

“Facts”

Since: May 08

Mexico

#144117 Jun 2, 2012
Mona Lott wrote:
<quoted text>Vote all you like. I can wait for SCOTUS to rule.

You have a serious problem with exaggeration and hyperbole. When did I ever say I hate the majority. I hate stupyid people like you. You aren't the majority. You're just some ex-pat scum with a chip on your shoulder.
the SCOTUS will vote 5 to 4 in our favor and this is easy to check by looking at their records on things like states rights
GRANDPA NICOLAI

Chico, CA

#144119 Jun 2, 2012
Mona Lott wrote:
<quoted text>
Vote all you like. I can wait for SCOTUS to rule.
You have a serious problem with exaggeration and hyperbole. When did I ever say I hate the majority. I hate stupyid people like you. You aren't the majority. You're just some ex-pat scum with a chip on your shoulder.
>
>
All that he is and more, HERE IS ONE also gets his news from the comics section of the newspapers, he must be very informed because once he posted that he reads 500 newspapers per day, that is on top of spending all day posting his mindless trash all over TOPIX...

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#144120 Jun 2, 2012
Cheyenne277 wrote:
<quoted text>
Where does it stop.
Here.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#144121 Jun 2, 2012
Cheyenne277 wrote:
<quoted text>
If you
claim rights and benefits can only be acquired
by a imposition on marriage, then you as a heterosexual in
a marriage should be just fine with your rights and benefits
being taken away.
Really? Those rights were acquired over time by proving specific needs that applied to heterosexual couples. Many involved mothers who stayed at home to take care of biological children.

I would suggest a far more logical and just solution.

Get your own rights.

“Facts”

Since: May 08

Mexico

#144122 Jun 2, 2012
GRANDPA NICOLAI wrote:
<quoted text>>
>
All that he is and more, HERE IS ONE also gets his news from the comics section of the newspapers, he must be very informed because once he posted that he reads 500 newspapers per day, that is on top of spending all day posting his mindless trash all over TOPIX...
once more you are caught in a lie

Please back up your claim or your silence on the subject proves you are a liar

“IT'S TIME TO ELIMINATE”

Since: Mar 11

PROP 8 AND DOMA!!!

#144125 Jun 2, 2012
[QUOTE who="Here Is One. "]<quoted text>
only in your dreams
It will be a 5 to 4 win for us and maybe a 6 to 3 win
And we can still amend the federal constitution like we have done in more than 30 states[/QUOTE]
Well, no one truly knows how SCOTUS will rule......it will more than likely be a 5-4 ruling and depending on the question presented to them.....will depend on whether or not they will have Justice Kennedy......and obviously if the 4 more conservative Justices are certain that Kennedy will be on their side.....they are probably not likely to take a case until they have weighted on the options.

As for your other delusion about a Federal Constitutional Amendment......IT CAN'T HAPPEN JUST BECAUSE THERE ARE ENOUGH STATES INDIVIDUALLY WHO HAVE THEIR OWN DOMA'S!!!

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#144126 Jun 2, 2012
Cheyenne277 wrote:
<quoted text>
If you
equate the diversity of two genders
with the redundancy of same genders then you ignore the
diversity of same sex couples in a world of opposite sex
couples.
You do remember we were talking about the make-up of a marriage, right?

Two people becoming one.

Or in your suggestion;

Two becoming one, twice.

You really need to be ashamed of such silly stupid responses.

I would be embarrassed if I had to stoop to such idiotic indignities to try to defend a lie.

“Facts”

Since: May 08

Mexico

#144129 Jun 2, 2012
RnL2008 wrote:
[QUOTE who="Here Is One. "]<quoted text>
only in your dreams
It will be a 5 to 4 win for us and maybe a 6 to 3 win
And we can still amend the federal constitution like we have done in more than 30 states"

Well, no one truly knows how SCOTUS will rule......it will more than likely be a 5-4 ruling and depending on the question presented to them.....will depend on whether or not they will have Justice Kennedy......and obviously if the 4 more conservative Justices are certain that Kennedy will be on their side.....they are probably not likely to take a case until they have weighted on the options.

As for your other delusion about a Federal Constitutional Amendment......IT CAN'T HAPPEN JUST BECAUSE THERE ARE ENOUGH STATES INDIVIDUALLY WHO HAVE THEIR OWN DOMA'S!!!
31 states does not mean we have the numbers but it does show that we are aging numbers

And we have people like the rose ho that are working at a feverish rate to get us the votes we need

“Facts”

Since: May 08

Mexico

#144131 Jun 2, 2012
Incest Lesbo wrote:
<quoted text>In the US, same sex marriage has less chance of surviving than incest marriage. Unfortunately, you do have the numbers. Right now , you have 31 states but a total of 44 states where we can't get married as same sex incest couples.

I was just wondering, if the ban on same sex marriage was overturned in California, how come same sex mom and child can't get married? What better adoption model, than two females, a mom and a daughter?
the numbers are growing every day and very soon we will have the numbers
Frank Rizzo

Union City, CA

#144133 Jun 2, 2012
Mona Lott wrote:
hahahahahahahah
stupid
hahahahahahahahah
YUK!YUK!YUK!

Since: Oct 11

Beggs, OK

#144134 Jun 2, 2012
Phelan Phag wrote:
Hi guys. We're here, we're queer, get used to us. We're not going anywhere.
Joanne??? Is that you? It's Patrick.

Since: Oct 11

Beggs, OK

#144135 Jun 2, 2012
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Here.
Good then stop being an elitist that demands we come up with words for things we already have words for.

Since: Oct 11

Beggs, OK

#144136 Jun 2, 2012
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Really? Those rights were acquired over time by proving specific needs that applied to heterosexual couples. Many involved mothers who stayed at home to take care of biological children.
I would suggest a far more logical and just solution.
Get your own rights.
Sorry to break this to you, but those who aren't so selfish as to insist on biological children and instead would like to adopt some of the world's 4 plus million orphans are much more worthy of assistance.

Since: Oct 11

Beggs, OK

#144137 Jun 2, 2012
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
You do remember we were talking about the make-up of a marriage, right?
Two people becoming one.
Or in your suggestion;
Two becoming one, twice.
You really need to be ashamed of such silly stupid responses.
I would be embarrassed if I had to stoop to such idiotic indignities to try to defend a lie.
What? Two people becoming one twice??? Please explain what you mean.
Here Is One

Mexico

#144138 Jun 2, 2012
Incest Lesbo wrote:
<quoted text>In the US, you already have the numbers. The gays made a mistake by not including same sex incest.
LOL

They made many mistakes and the big one was not accepting equal rights instead of fighting over a name
GRANDPA NICOLAI

Chico, CA

#144139 Jun 2, 2012
Here Is One wrote:
<quoted text>
once more you are caught in a lie
Please back up your claim or your silence on the subject proves you are a liar
>
>
Are you denying now that you said you read 500 newspapers per day and that you read about people laughing about President OBAMA in the comics section....?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

San Marcos Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
CA California seeks to ban free, single-use carryo... (Jun '10) 3 hr free for all 5,081
Scabies Patient Released? 5 hr Adana 7
CA CA Proposition 23 - Global Warming (Oct '10) 15 hr surfs up 7,955
CA Jury reaches verdict in Oakland BART shooting t... (Jul '10) Fri scoop 2,273
CA California Proposition 19: the Marijuana Legali... (Oct '10) Sep 18 Pizza 16,000
Lack of representation spurred Diaz to politics Sep 18 Escondido resident 1
Men like Elliot Rodger are not owed anyone or a... Sep 17 Zxcvb34 44
•••
•••
•••

San Marcos Jobs

•••
•••
•••

San Marcos People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

San Marcos News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in San Marcos
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••