Former Azusa mayor accuses Duarte officials of misusing public funds

Full story: San Gabriel Valley Tribune

The former mayor of Azusa is alleging that the city of Duarte misused public funds in an effort to advocate against an Azusa Rock Quarry mining project.

Comments (Page 13)

Showing posts 241 - 260 of340
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
We the people

Azusa, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#243
Dec 3, 2010
 
All those glossy fliers. That fancy office with all the expensive posters and campaign signs. All that money Vulcan is spending. They're doing it so they can restrict themselves? Ha, who do you think you're fooling? Let's VOTE NO on Measure A and stop Vulcan's Canyon City Alliance from expanding mining operations in our mountains!

Since: Feb 10

Azusa, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#244
Dec 3, 2010
 
Yes on A all the way wrote:
<quoted text>
No kidding? That is why we are voting YES on Measure A. It PHASES OUT mining for good and ends in 2038. If you vote No it will allow Vulcan to keep mining as usual.
Please get informed.
Yes, do get informed!

Development Agreement (MEASURE A)

Section 6.1:
Term and Termination:
"This Agreement shall commence upon the effective date, and continue in full force and effect until December 31, 2038 UNLESS EXTENDED or terminated earlier as provided herein. Upon expiration of terms of this Agreement, this agreement MAY BE EXTENDED under such terms and conditions as the parties hereto may mutually agree."

Since: Feb 10

Azusa, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#245
Dec 3, 2010
 
Measure A allows the mining agreement to be EXTENDED.

It does NOT phase it out "for good" what so ever.

And I'm accused of twisting facts....
AtoZ

West Covina, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#246
Dec 4, 2010
 
Duarte Citizen wrote:
AtoZ... the reason you dont post facts or proof of ANYTHING is because you dont have anything to backup your lies! Youre a loaner, unliked, ugly person who only cares about saving your own financial interest off other peoples back. If you really cared about peoples health and way of living, you would fight the destruction of another mountain. Instead, all you care about is the promise to reclaim the hillside nearest to your house and to stop the mining from going towards you. Thats all you care about, you dont care about the schools in Azusa and Duarte that will be effected by this expansion. You dont care about anyone or anything except YOU! Youre a selfish B!
Save your children from Vulcan and its dangerous airborne silica
Save your way of living
Stand up to greed and say NO to Vulcan
Let your voice be heard now or forever regret not stopping the destruction of what no man will ever be able to restore to its natural beauty... YOUR MOUNTAINS!
Dont let Vulcan fool you into believing they can duplicate Gods creation and natural beauty of these mountains. Money talks and they will lie their hearts out to make you believe they can do better or just as good in bringing these mountains back to their original beauty!
Vote NO on Measure A
You define hypocrisy!...and where are your facts about peoples health, dirtbag!...The EIR for mining the west shows no "air quality" risks! The SCAQMD has also found that Vulcan does
not contribute negatively to the air quality!

On the contrary, if mining continues east, the Azusa residents have no luxury of an EIR like you Duarte residents do!

But you could care less...! Both AAME and Duarte residents like yourself are content with keeping the mining on the east, thereby destroying the "east" mountain and risking the safety of Azusa residents.

So in fact, it is you who should look in the mirror and find yourself ugly and unliked...
AtoZ

West Covina, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#247
Dec 4, 2010
 
JeriV wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, do get informed!
Development Agreement (MEASURE A)
Section 6.1:
Term and Termination:
"This Agreement shall commence upon the effective date, and continue in full force and effect until December 31, 2038 UNLESS EXTENDED or terminated earlier as provided herein. Upon expiration of terms of this Agreement, this agreement MAY BE EXTENDED under such terms and conditions as the parties hereto may mutually agree."
JeriV wrote:
Measure A allows the mining agreement to be EXTENDED.
It does NOT phase it out "for good" what so ever.
And I'm accused of twisting facts....
But the most important point about the end date of 2038 that you hide is the fact that Vulcan is giving up their rights to the mining after 2038...

Development Agreement
Section 2.15 Termination of Mining in 2038.

...Vulcan represents and warrants that Vulcan shall cease all mining operations and activities in the City of Azusa on or before December 31, 2038...
Azusa Resident

Azusa, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#248
Dec 4, 2010
 
AAME quotes from the DA and Vulcan's "Canyon City Alliance(AtoZ)" spouts a sales pitch. Vulcan's lackeys go so far as pretend to fight themselves. Vulcan is NOT going to restrict itself. Only our NO vote on Measure A will stop the mining expansion.
AtoZ

West Covina, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#249
Dec 4, 2010
 
Azusa Resident wrote:
AAME quotes from the DA and Vulcan's "Canyon City Alliance(AtoZ)" spouts a sales pitch. Vulcan's lackeys go so far as pretend to fight themselves. Vulcan is NOT going to restrict itself. Only our NO vote on Measure A will stop the mining expansion.
Hey dum bass, look above at my post again...it is quoted from the DA!
Azusa Resident

Azusa, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#250
Dec 5, 2010
 
It may be so, but it is incomplete in its statement. You may the dumbest bass in the school, if not the most donation gorged.

Since: Feb 10

Azusa, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#251
Dec 5, 2010
 
AtoZ wrote:
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
But the most important point about the end date of 2038 that you hide is the fact that Vulcan is giving up their rights to the mining after 2038...
Development Agreement
Section 2.15 Termination of Mining in 2038.
...Vulcan represents and warrants that Vulcan shall cease all mining operations and activities in the City of Azusa on or before December 31, 2038...
You have failed to quote the entire paragraph.

Development Agreement

Section 2.15 Termination of Mining in 2038.
NOT WITHSTANDING ANYTHING CONTRARY SET FORTH HEREIN, in consideration of the City entering into this agreement and the rights granted hereunder, Vulcan represents and warrants that Vulcan shall cease all mining operations and activities in the City of Azusa on or before December 31, 2038, however that this requirement shall not apply to operations regarding the Reliance facility.

Something is contrary set forth herein. This clause:

Development Agreement (MEASURE A)

Section 6.1:
Term and Termination:
"This Agreement shall commence upon the effective date, and continue in full force and effect until December 31, 2038 UNLESS EXTENDED or terminated earlier as provided herein. Upon expiration of terms of this Agreement, this agreement MAY BE EXTENDED under such terms and conditions as the parties hereto may mutually agree."

How's that for "hiding facts"?

Since: Feb 10

Azusa, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#252
Dec 5, 2010
 
AtoZ wrote:
<quoted text>
Hey dum bass, look above at my post again...it is quoted from the DA!
But, not quoted in it's entirety. Just enough to suit your cause, just enough to mislead, just enough to twist the meaning to propagate misinformation, as usual.
Azusa Resident

Azusa, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#253
Dec 5, 2010
 
So, there might be an end to the mining in 2038, "...unless the two sides agree" otherwise.
What two sides? The "two sides" are on the same side against the wishes of the residents that live around the mine. How in the hell are these "sides" going to regulate themselves? The only way to stop the expansion of the mining is to vote NO on Measure A. Say NO to Vulcan's Canyon City Alliance. Not only NO, but HELL NO.

Since: Feb 10

Azusa, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#254
Dec 5, 2010
 
So, best possible scenario is that the wording is contradictory, it can be interpreted many ways, thus the courts can interpret it many ways.

The clause ALLOWING extension of the mining should have been DELETED from the Agreement PRIOR to it being approved.

The Development Agreement is BADLY WRITTEN and should NEVER have been approved.

BUT, that can be easily remedied by the Citizens of Azusa not approving it at the ballot box by voting NO on MEASURE A.
AtoZ

La Puente, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#255
Dec 5, 2010
 
You are twisting the facts once again...!!!
The extension, if awarded, will be by the city of Azusa...and does not in any way mean Vulcan can self-extend their contract... especially considering that Vulcan has recognized that it will cease mining after 2038...
AtoZ

La Puente, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#256
Dec 5, 2010
 
Majority of the naysayers that are knit-picking the DA now for the possibility of an extension after 2038 are merely Vulcan haters...

Therein that hate makes 'em not see the reality or other positive reasons for what they might be!

The possibilty of an extension is clearly in the hands of the city of Azusa and can prove effective, for example, to force Vulcan to finish off or correct any reclamation that city of Azusa finds unsatisfactory...

Since: Feb 10

Azusa, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#257
Dec 6, 2010
 
AtoZ wrote:
The possibilty of an extension is clearly in the hands of the city of Azusa and can prove effective, for example, to force Vulcan to finish off or correct any reclamation that city of Azusa finds unsatisfactory...
What if it's geologically impossible for them to do so, they pay their fine and continue as usual after submitting a much less grand reclamation plan, as they are allowed to do in Measure A?

In 2038, will the mining Company then come up with a new "magical" reclamation technique and say they only way they can afford to use it is by extending their mining date past 2038?

And will the City then say, "We need this new technique to restore our mountains, we have to let them extend it, but THIS time we will FIGHT the mining Company and DEMAND a better reclamation and an ABSOLUTE end date to the mining!"

Since: Feb 10

Azusa, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#258
Dec 6, 2010
 
Oh and if anyone wants to see what a collapsed mine and landslide looks like, go to Corona and look at the gravel mine there. Get off the I15 @ Magnolia Ave and look to the left. It all was Mayan Steps (I guess they were reclaiming the area) until the end of last week. Friday there was no structure whatsoever, just a slide of rocks.

Since: Aug 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#259
Dec 6, 2010
 
I pitty you AtoZ. You're obviously a very sad, lonely ugly duckling. You talk down to people and use unnecessary language just to make yourself feel better, youve reached the bottom of the barrel.

Since: Aug 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#260
Dec 6, 2010
 
AtoZ, I noticed you have two locations under the name AtoZ. One under West Covina and another under Monrovia. Are you trying to make multiple accounts so that it looks like theres more of you supporting Measure A? It would be wise to at least change the name so it wouldnt be so obvious or maybe you forgot to do so huh? ooops!
wild idea

Azusa, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#261
Dec 6, 2010
 
JeriV wrote:
Oh and if anyone wants to see what a collapsed mine and landslide looks like, go to Corona and look at the gravel mine there. Get off the I15 @ Magnolia Ave and look to the left. It all was Mayan Steps (I guess they were reclaiming the area) until the end of last week. Friday there was no structure whatsoever, just a slide of rocks.
Maybe it's a new type of reclamation like microbenching? The Landslide Reclamation Technique.
No Mining Expansion

Azusa, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#262
Dec 7, 2010
 
Voting No on Measure A will stop the mining expansion.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 241 - 260 of340
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Other Recent San Gabriel Discussions

Search the San Gabriel Forum:
Topic Updated Last By Comments
CA Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex ma... (Aug '10) 27 min BleedOheart 199,071
7 arrested in Arcadia on suspicion of Glendora ... (Jun '10) 9 hr Home defense 19
CA California seeks to ban free, single-use carryo... (Jun '10) 11 hr Bag itts 4,551
UCLA FOOTBALL NOTEBOOK: Neuheisel says Prince w... (Sep '10) 13 hr usc steve 26,071
CA CA Proposition 23 - Global Warming (Oct '10) 19 hr lug heads 7,298
Council rejects Kare offer (Sep '08) 21 hr Riv 217
Pomona girl shot dead while walking home (Mar '10) Mon Elaine 56
•••
•••

San Gabriel News Video

•••
•••

San Gabriel Jobs

•••
•••
•••

San Gabriel People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••