Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Judged:

8

7

7

Dan wrote:

<quoted text>
The argument I follow is that which adult you marry be it the opposite or same sexed said individual would constitute a basic civil right and we don't vote those freedoms from American citizens.

Judged:

6

6

5

Dan wrote:

<quoted text>
Err....
...never said anything about dandelions hooking up. What I did say (dumbing it down for you speacial man) is that telling someone who to marry is akin to telling someone what flowers to plant in that what strangers do is theirt own affair and should be none of your concern coupled with the fact it is none of your business.
Help??
You're STILL dumber than a bag of wet hair...LOL!!!!
Geeeeezus....

Judged:

6

5

5

Here Is One wrote:

<quoted text>
Wrong again.........LOL
More than 30 states have indeed voted you back to the closet.....
And we will NEVER allow you to change the meaning of the word marriage to include the few abnormals......
If it takes amending the constitution we can and will do that.........
Just a few years ago we had one liberal state vote to ban SSM and today we have more than 30....
Thanks to people like the rose ho America has woke up and let its mind be heard.....
We will not allow the tiny minority of the abnormals change the meaning of the word marriage and there is nothing you can do about it.....
But you could help me out again by defending the actions of the two perverts on the cruise ship that were exposing themselves to children.........LOL
Or would you please defend the gay porn for school children as that really got the voters out voting.....

Judged:

6

5

5

Dan wrote:

<quoted text>
The argument I follow is that which adult you marry be it the opposite or same sexed said individual would constitute a basic civil right and we don't vote those freedoms from American citizens.

Judged:

6

5

5

Frank Rizzo wrote:

<quoted text>
You have a real comprehension problem tough guy. I have never said a bad word about gays here or anywhere. My neighbors are a gay married couple we hang out at each others houses all the time. I danced at my niece's wedding to her girlfriend last month in NY. I love them both. I support their marriage. I think it's a fine thing if two people find each other and it makes me happy. None of these gay people ever beat me up so I don't know where or why you want me to find gays that will.
Listen up real careful here dipsh!t. I support marriage equality. Got it? We're on the same side in that. Otherwise you're a real jerk and with that temper I bet you're headed to big problems. Relax.

Judged:

7

7

6

GRANDPA NICOLAI wrote:

<quoted text>
>
>
>
This is another pronouncement from the same idiot expat who claims President OBAMA wants to teach little school kids how to be raped by men...

Judged:

5

5

5

Here Is One wrote:

Wrong again.........LOL
More than 30 states have indeed voted you back to the closet.....

Here Is One wrote:

And we will NEVER allow you to change the meaning of the word marriage to include the few abnormals......

Here Is One wrote:

If it takes amending the constitution we can and will do that.........

Here Is One wrote:

Just a few years ago we had one liberal state vote to ban SSM and today we have more than 30....

Here Is One wrote:

<irrelevant inflammatory blather truncated>

Judged:

5

5

5

Dan wrote:

<quoted text>
Temper???
ROFL!!!!!
I'm laughing probably 96.58% of the time I'm in here jackass.
If I was 'headed' for trouble I'd have already arrived at that destination a loooooong time ago.
I think you're full of bullshit. I remember you as talking nonsense against gays in the past but if you've switched gears then right on.
To answer the rest of your dipshit post I have to ask what's your point of being in here. Is it just because you don't like little ol' me and feel the desperate need to lay out your distaste for Dan in here????
Gaaaaaawd DAMN!!!!
LOL!!!

Judged:

5

5

5

RiccardoFire wrote:

<quoted text>Like I said, read what you write, you are a freaking idiot. In most neighborhoods and cities, there are rules about what you can do or can't do with your yard. Do you leave your garbage container out in the street because it's nobody's business? Sorry loser, we live in a society not a nut house.

Judged:

5

5

5

Dan wrote:

<quoted text>
Temper???
ROFL!!!!!
I'm laughing probably 96.58% of the time I'm in here jackass.

LOL!!!

Judged:

4

4

4

Frank Rizzo wrote:

<quoted text>
Yeah temper. That's what causes you to stupidly threaten me. Or do you consider threatening people with violence part of that 96.58% "laughter"?
You're too volatile Dan. Calm down, we're trying to talk marriage equality here, a good thing, not cause for beating anyone up.

Judged:

5

5

5

Frank Rizzo wrote:

<quoted text>
I am not a fundie.
You have a huge chip on your shoulder that just aggravates any discrimination you suffer because of your homosexuality. You also have no sense of humor. And you lie, you are not really married to a man.
I support your right to be really married to a man. Not because I like you, I certainly don't, but because it's the right thing to do.
Even little pissant sniveling malcontents like you deserve equal rights.

Judged:

5

5

5

RiccardoFire wrote:

<quoted text>So nobody should really take you serious, you are just here to get off and laugh at the dumb one liners you write. Sounds kind of sick that you are not able to enjoy society and laugh at every day life. That you need to come here and write stupid nonsense and then laugh. Thanks for saying that, now we know why you are here, how sad.

Judged:

6

6

6

lides wrote:

<quoted text>
Marriage has been held to be a fundamental right by the US Supreme Court on 14 separate occasions.
The US Supreme Court has held that “One's right to life, liberty, and property, to free speech, a free press, freedom of worship and assembly, and other fundamental rights may not be submitted to vote; they depend on the outcome of no elections.” West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette, 319 U.S. 624 (1943)
Furthermore, the 14th Amendment expressly prohibits states from making laws abridging the rights of US citizens, and mandates that states provide all persons within their jurisdiction equal protection of the laws.
The US Supreme Court has held that constitutional rights, like equal protection of the law may be infringed when doing so serves a compelling state interest.
The mere existence of a law does not make that law inherently constitutional. Which is to say the legislation and state constitutional amendments banning same sex marriage expressly abridge the rights of US citizens and deny homosexual couples equal protection of the laws. The bans are patently unconstitutional.
<quoted text>
This fails to rise to the level of even so much as a rational basis for denying same sex couples the right to marry. Inclusion of same sex couples in no way impacts tradition marriage whether existing or yet to be performed. Ultimately there is no impact whatsoever on anyone who would not marry someone of the same sex.
<quoted text>
Well, you would first have to repeal the 14th Amendment, which would be both amazingly stupid and inherently dangerous. Doing so leaves any right subject to the will of the majority, which means that any subset of people could be denied any number of rights. Do you really think that the government would not eventually infringe upon a right that you DO care about if given such broad authority to act?
<quoted text>
Feel free to come up with that compelling state interest that would make the existing bans constitutional. I don’t think you can.
<quoted text>

Judged:

6

6

6

Dan wrote:

<quoted text>
Right.
I think you're talking about homeowners associations.
Hate burst your world but HOAs are only in a minority of neighborhoods such as townhome communities genius.
And here's another tidbit...if I chose too I could leave my garbage container at the curb all God damned WEEK!
LOL!!!
Explore the world someday friend. I know it's got to be a small place right now given your feedback in here...LOL!!!

Judged:

6

6

6

Dan wrote:

<quoted text>
Your opinion.
As it is I find this debating with bigots like you funny as hell. You morons have about as much common sense as a group of lemmings 2 feet away from a cliff whom are about to work on their aerodynamic skills...LOL!!!!

Judged:

5

5

5

Frank Rizzo wrote:

<quoted text>
You have a real comprehension problem tough guy. I have never said a bad word about gays here or anywhere.

Judged:

5

5

5

Jonah1 wrote:

<quoted text>
Anyone suprised by this? Anyone?

Judged:

5

5

5

Here Is One wrote:

<quoted text>
Once again you can prove nothing of what I said wrong so your only recourse is to revert to childish school yard rants.........LOL
And you are telling another of your lies.........LOL
Why can't you post where I have ever said that????
I did say that oslama put the pervert jennings in as school czar and jennings along with glsen did have gay porn books as recommended reading material for children as young as 5 years old....
Would you like a link again to the porn???