Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Prof Marvel wrote:

<quoted text>
You're welcome to continue living in your world of make-believe but I would remind you had the Catholic Church erred on the side of caution thousands of young men would not be scarred by the ordeal of homosexual child molestation.
The fact is, you people have a history of throwing caution to the wind. You did it 30 years ago when you were warned using bathhouses as floating orgies was a bad idea. Now you're doing it with your insistence homosexuals like Larry Brinkin are completely harmless and should be allowed to become Boy Scout leaders.
Oh, wait a minute, I forgot ...
Long-time San Francisco homosexual activist Larry Brinkin can no longer be classified as a homosexual because he's a pedophile.
Yeah, right.

Gary, you still miss the boat. 77% of all pedophiles are religious married heterosexuals.

Boy scouts and religion, a match made in depravity.

Child Abuse Cover-Up Costs Mormon Church $3 Million



Church Continues to Deny Responsibility Despite Ten Prior Warnings to Church

Officials and 1983 Excommunication of Priest for Molesting Boys



At Least 20 Other Victims Have Been Identified
http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/child...

You fine god fearing christians just love to diddle the little ones don't ya.

Hell Gary you think its ok to go after 14,15 and 16 year old girls. Why can't you wait untill they grow up? Does god make you do these things?

The reality is, your living in a cave or under a rock!

Reality wrote:

<quoted text>Gary, you still miss the boat. 77% of all pedophiles are religious married heterosexuals.
Boy scouts and religion, a match made in depravity.
Child Abuse Cover-Up Costs Mormon Church $3 Million
Church Continues to Deny Responsibility Despite Ten Prior Warnings to Church
Officials and 1983 Excommunication of Priest for Molesting Boys
At Least 20 Other Victims Have Been Identified
http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/child...
You fine god fearing christians just love to diddle the little ones don't ya.
Hell Gary you think its ok to go after 14,15 and 16 year old girls. Why can't you wait untill they grow up? Does god make you do these things?

Totally incoherent post that even fouls up the formatting.

Can't you do anything right, fella?

And now a couple of points: any male who engages in male-to-male sex is homosexual. The age of the victim is irrelevant. If he goes in back of a hospital and pulls a male fetus out of the dumpster than has sex with it, he's a homosexual.

You people want us to believe in the history of Christiandom no homosexual has ever molested a boy -- and the amazing thing is, straight morons out there who support same-sex marriage actually believe this.

Moreover, when explained to the roaring success of man-boy websites like rent-a-boy you change the subject. These sex-trafficking sites emphasize the boyish looks of their prostitutes because that's what their gay clients want -- males who look underage.

But don't take it from me -- go to the site yourself and report back if you saw one half-nude model who looked older than 16.

You fellows go hog wild when given full access to boys -- Catholic priests and Larry Sandusky are proof enough of that.

And this is not to say gays have a higher propensity for pedophilia than straights because they don't. But to continue to scrub every case of homosexual pedophilia that hits the news into something other than hat it actuall is, is almost as despicable as the act itself.

I can't go down to the local adoption agency and adopt a little girl, but somehow gay males can go down and adopt all the little boys they can stand.

You want us to believe this makes perfect sense -- well, it doesn't.

If a rule was passed today barring gay males from adopting little boys, you'd never see a gay male at an adoption agency again.

Make of this what you will.

RiccardoFire wrote:

<quoted text>Wow, thanks Hey Rittardo, I hope this fulfills her life long dreams of winning here on topix. Hey Rittardo, I didn't know this was war. Wow you are stupid.

Oh, Rittardo! You slay me!!!

Talk about someone who epitimizes the inability to see the forest for the trees!

And a war? If you can declare there's a war on X-mas, then we can declare there's a war on Stupidity and Ingnorance (That would be your side--Which I will get into in response to your other brilliant post from last night).

And I love how you kept addressing yourself, Rittardo.

You lose!

Try another game that your better at.

RiccardoFire wrote:

<quoted text>It's actually hate in reverse to those that believe the Bible. Believe in the Bible = hate crime. Wake up America! We are not very far removed geographically from Canada and some of our very own government officials have such a twisted view of our own First Amendment that they believe religious freedom should take a back seat to “equality.” We would be naive to believe that what just happened in Canada will not find its way into our own system of law. Especially considering the penchant some of our courts have for looking to international law to justify their decisions.

Tell ya what, Rittardo: When that law passes, I'll by you your chicken sandwich--Hell! I'll buy you two.[Anything to shut you up...]

Okay! Let's give you a civics lesson:

Canada is not the United States.

Canada does not have the same Constitution as the United States.

The U.S. Constitution includes a "Bill of Rights".

Among those rights there is the First Ammendment.

Within that Ammendment, you are guaranteed your right to free speech and to exercise your religion as you see fit (as long as that worship has no physical harm on any other person and/or animal, i.e. no cruel sacrifices).

Now! Should such a law pass, then you would have the right to plead your case all the way up to the Supreme Court. Don't worry, they'll rule on your side.

When they do so, then to reinstate the law, the nation would need to overturn the First Ammendment.

But don't worry, even if you could get the 2/3rds of the nation to support overturning it (Hell! Make that number 99%), some tea-bagger will hold the proposed ammendment hostage in Congress with a filibuster, and like with any other legislation that had majority support over the last 3 years, it'll never come to a vote.

There! I've helped in ending the war on Stupidity and Ignorance. Thank you for throwing out the first volley, that I could fire back with Truth and Reason.

You're Welcome!

Goooood morning

Prof Marvel wrote:

Does anyone doubt that if we put hetero men in charge of 14,15,and 16 year-old girls there'd be a lot of hanky-panky going on in the tents at night?

Not every MAN is attracted to young girls or boys......but your asinine question tells an awful lot about the mind of someone like you......which is sadly pathetic.
I would NO MORE expect or believe that a Gay man in charge of young Boy Scouts would Molest them, ANYMORE than I would expect or believe that a Straight man in Charge of Senior Girl Scouts would Molest them.........besides, NO MAN IS ALLOWED TO BE LEFT ALONE WITH GIRLS IN GIRL SCOUTS........that is to protect EVERYONE from false accusations!!!

Prof Marvel wrote:

I can't go down to the local adoption agency and adopt a little girl, but somehow gay males can go down and adopt all the little boys they can stand.

Why couldn't you go down to the adoption agency and adopt a little girl? Are you a convicted Child Molester? Because unless you have something in your background that would prevent you from adopting......you should be able to adopt a child regardless of gender.......so, why are you lying here?

RnL2008 wrote:

<quoted text>
Not every MAN is attracted to young girls or boys......but your asinine question tells an awful lot about the mind of someone like you......which is sadly pathetic.
I would NO MORE expect or believe that a Gay man in charge of young Boy Scouts would Molest them, ANYMORE than I would expect or believe that a Straight man in Charge of Senior Girl Scouts would Molest them.........besides, NO MAN IS ALLOWED TO BE LEFT ALONE WITH GIRLS IN GIRL SCOUTS........that is to protect EVERYONE from false accusations!!!

Simple question: would you allow a Catholic priest to be a Boy Scout leader?

Prof Marvel wrote:

<quoted text>
Simple question: would you allow a Catholic priest to be a Boy Scout leader?

Sure, because again....NOT ALL CATHOLIC PRIESTS ARE CHILD MOLESTERS OR PEDOPHILES!!!

Under your thought process, if a straight man molests a girl......then ALL straight men will molest girls, is that what you are implying?

Prof Marvel wrote:

<quoted text>
Simple question: would you allow a Catholic priest to be a Boy Scout leader?

Why couldn't you go down to the adoption agency and adopt a little girl? Are you a convicted Child Molester? Because unless you have something in your background that would prevent you from adopting......you should be able to adopt a child regardless of gender.......so, why are you lying here?

Prof Marvel wrote:

<quoted text>
Simple question: would you allow a Catholic priest to be a Boy Scout leader?

Oh....Do go on.....

BTW: You might want to contact these people and let them know what you think:

http://www.bishop-accountability.org/news5/20...

And please let us know how they respond and how it turns out for ya.'Kay?

RnL2008 wrote:

<quoted text>
Sure, because again....NOT ALL CATHOLIC PRIESTS ARE CHILD MOLESTERS OR PEDOPHILES!!!
Under your thought process, if a straight man molests a girl......then ALL straight men will molest girls, is that what you are implying?

I see.

And what about blood donation.

Currently gay man are not allowed to donate blood.

Would you change that too?

Prof Marvel wrote:

<quoted text>
I see.
And what about blood donation.
Currently gay man are not allowed to donate blood.
Would you change that too?

Did you make the Red cross aware that you have had sex with a man? If not you should have, for you are also banned. BTW did you make them aware of your drug addiction?

A bunch of Jack-of-all-trades must have been posting here?

Reality wrote:

<quoted text>Did you make the Red cross aware that you have had sex with a man? If not you should have, for you are also banned. BTW did you make them aware of your drug addiction?

Stop dodging the question:

What about blood donation -- would you allow gay males to donate blood?

URJudged wrote:

<quoted text>
Your ignorance knows NO bounds! Everything you just stated is utter and total bull shyte! Kind of like your soul! How the hell do you make it through the day being so damn ignorant and plain old stupidity? LOLOLOL

How the hell do you make it through the day knowing you have AIDS?

ELH wrote:

<quoted text>
Figured that out all on your own did you?

No, I knew it all along, but you queers keep insisting it is something you're born with...which is complete & utter bullshit

URJudged wrote:

<quoted text>
Your ignorance knows NO bounds! Everything you just stated is utter and total bull shyte! Kind of like your soul! How the hell do you make it through the day being so damn ignorant and plain old stupidity? LOLOLOL

So queers aren't desprate, depraved people, who lack social skills for communicating with the opposite sex? And 3rd wave Feminists aren't angry lesbians because no man wants to be around them?

LOL Gee, how "ignorant" of me

/sarcasm