U.S. reviving '86 amnesty program

I don't have a problem with that.
If they have been here since 1986 AND can prove it. Sure.

I've always said if they've been here since 12/30/95 give them a chance to become legal.

All others need to leave now.

Well Attorney Gibbs I find it of interest the other attorneys and "organizations" aren't mentioned. Want to clarify this detail?

Is that all you have to say? Nothing like copying and pasting the same stupid sentence.

Glory wrote:

Is that all you have to say? Nothing like copying and pasting the same stupid sentence.

Glory: Are you talking to me? I don't copy and paste anything.

Darlene wrote:

<quoted text> Glory: Are you talking to me? I don't copy and paste anything.

NO she was talking to the clown that got booted,notice the missing post #.

Indyeast wrote:

<quoted text>
NO she was talking to the clown that got booted,notice the missing post #.

Oh I didn't but I do now. TY

Ok folks let's talk about this.
Isn't this what some of the pros keep talking about?
"some illegals have been here for years,let them stay".
So what do ya think about letting the ones who've been here since say 1995 attain legal status?

Indyeast wrote:

I don't have a problem with that.
If they have been here since 1986 AND can prove it. Sure.
I've always said if they've been here since 12/30/95 give them a chance to become legal.
All others need to leave now.

Totally unfair. They have been here violating the law for a long time. Educating their kids at the taxpayers expense, and most probably abusing the system. They already had the chace to be here for many years, and under no circumstances they should be rewarded. Doesn't matter if they are here for 20 years, ILLEGAL IS ILLEGAL, they BROKE THE LAW, and anyone who brakes one law, can break all of them. All of them should go back to where they came from, and come back if they wish, THE RIGHT WAY, AND THAT IS ABIDEN BY THE LAW.

Indyeast wrote:

Ok folks let's talk about this.
Isn't this what some of the pros keep talking about?
"some illegals have been here for years,let them stay".
So what do ya think about letting the ones who've been here since say 1995 attain legal status?

every time we give an inch.....

ok,we have two that are not willing to consider a compromise.

I am an avid anti-illegal and consider the reconquistas my sworn enemy since they promote taking over my country on an ethnic basis.

Many of the reconquistas are dual citizens;what then folks?.

I'd rather give decent folks a chance and jail for sedition the dual citizens/immigrants/illegal invaders which are the ones actually causing all the damage.

Indyeast wrote:

ok,we have two that are not willing to consider a compromise.
I am an avid anti-illegal and consider the reconquistas my sworn enemy since they promote taking over my country on an ethnic basis.
Many of the reconquistas are dual citizens;what then folks?.
I'd rather give decent folks a chance and jail for sedition the dual citizens/immigrants/illegal invaders which are the ones actually causing all the damage.

i'd have been willing to compromise had they kept their promise after the last "last" amnesty and they could have proven a legitimate need for more workers.with the attempt to force passage of the last bill they chose instead to defy the will of the people, as well as hiding 2nd amendment legislation in in there too. i have no faith in our leaders or their justification for another amnesty for anyone. they obviously can't handle the 2 million legal immigrants and the other million or so guests we allow annually so i'm not budging this time. they need to learn something about dealing in good faith.

Darlene wrote:

<quoted text> Glory: Are you talking to me? I don't copy and paste anything.

No Darlene, it was the poster in between our posts. It is just a stupid troll whom I've noticed follows Indy around.

Indyeast wrote:

Ok folks let's talk about this.
Isn't this what some of the pros keep talking about?
"some illegals have been here for years,let them stay".
So what do ya think about letting the ones who've been here since say 1995 attain legal status?

Ok. What do we use for limits? Length of stay?
Money earned in that amount of time? Free government resources ($$$) used in that amount of time?
How about making them pay the $$$ back? How much do they pay back? A percentage or all of it?
Do you allow them to pay it over time? How much time do you allow?

time limitation has run out what in the monkey but* are they doing? continue to anger the TAX PAYERS without consulation to from the people's who PAY TAXES

Everything wrong with Pelosi. I will absolutely lose all respect for this woman if she gets in the way of law enforcement to do their job and an amensty bill comes into affect allowing people who broke the law by entering this country illegally full citizenship. This would be like spitting in the faces of people who came here abiding by the rules. For those whom gone through the process legally know the struggle one faces.

Truth be known wrote:

Everything wrong with Pelosi. I will absolutely lose all respect for this woman if she gets in the way of law enforcement

it's not if, but when.

Just go ahead and give amnesty to all illegal immigrants just make sure they follow the rules and are law abiding! Deport all criminal illegal immigrants period!

Indyeast wrote:

I don't have a problem with that.
If they have been here since 1986 AND can prove it. Sure.
I've always said if they've been here since 12/30/95 give them a chance to become legal.
All others need to leave now.

Illegal is illegal Indy,they all need to go back to their own country an apply like everyone else.One amnesty per 100 years is enough! What's American citizenship worth,wading across a river in the middle of the night? 20 years from now America will have another 12-20 million illegal aliens wanting amnesty!

joeblue wrote:

Just go ahead and give amnesty to all illegal immigrants just make sure they follow the rules and are law abiding! Deport all criminal illegal immigrants period!

Is that all you think American citizenship is worth? Wading across a river in the middle of the night! What happen to waiting in your own country and entering here the legal way?

Truth be known wrote:

Everything wrong with Pelosi. I will absolutely lose all respect for this woman if she gets in the way of law enforcement to do their job and an amensty bill comes into affect allowing people who broke the law by entering this country illegally full citizenship. This would be like spitting in the faces of people who came here abiding by the rules. For those whom gone through the process legally know the struggle one faces.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi

EDINBURG, Texas (AP)— House Speaker Nancy Pelosi called a plan to build fencing along parts of the Mexico border a "terrible idea" that overlooks local communities.

Pelosi made the comments during her trip to the Rio Grande Valley for the annual Hispanic Engineering, Science & Technology Week conference at the University of Texas-Pan American.

"I have been against the fence, I thought it's a bad idea even when it was just a matter of discussion," said Pelosi, D-Calif. "These are communities where you have a border going through them, they are not communities where you have a fence splitting them."

Last year, President Bush signed the Secure Fence Act requiring the construction of fencing along the 2,000-mile border. The plans call for about 370 miles of fence and 200 miles of vehicle barriers, including concrete barriers, by the end of 2008.

Pelosi also touted legislation known as the DREAM Act that would make it easier for some illegal immigrants to receive higher education benefits. She spoke at a conference that drew more than 5,000 students for activities designed to inspire careers in science and technology.