Who do you support for U.S. Senate in Massachusetts in 2010?

Correction: your interest.

Brown will win re-election in a landslide. The mental state of the other candidate is in question. Watch her. Listen to her. End of story.

Thats good wrote:

<quoted text>This is how it should be and it's right. Why should I give up half my earned money so that Lynch and Gomez can sit in his moms basement eating Doritos and playing hackey sack on my dime?
We get a tax refund every year but that just says the Government is taking from our household more than they need. This is income we could have spent to small business but nope we have to wait for a refund while the store down the street goes out of bussiness.

If you actually read the links, you'll see that quote should have said that many people get MORE than they put in. They're not talking about people getting refunds. Some of those people are your Lynch's and Gomez's.

I'm voting for Brown Warren will vote party and fabricate to the people to cover for Obummer and other bums Another bunch who talk out of both sides of their mouth To tell us we need to be more like China takes the prize China has a ban on how many kids women can have Talk about Govt control Yet Obummer has no ban on illegals and allows the illegals to feed off our economy Tin Lizzy will support that too

If good American's don't vote Obama out and keep idiots like Warren out of Washington this ountry is in trouble.

I don't get how she is one of the new sheriffs of Wall st if she is raking in big bucks from Hollywood celebs just like Obama and these people have more money than Romney could ever have they pay the same tax rate as Romney You don't hear Obama complainig about the rich celebs who donate to him or hold fundraisers Notice lately that all the fake hype about Bain has died down especially since the unemployment rate increased this country is already in trouble

Just the idea that Romneys short tenure with Bains broke the nations economy is ridiculous. It's just the Dems grasping for straws.

Thats good wrote:

<quoted text>This is how it should be and it's right. Why should I give up half my earned money so that Lynch and Gomez can sit in his moms basement eating Doritos and playing hackey sack on my dime?
We get a tax refund every year but that just says the Government is taking from our household more than they need. This is income we could have spent to small business but nope we have to wait for a refund while the store down the street goes out of bussiness.

You need to stop drinking the water in Leominster...it is messing up your brain. You are paying higher taxes so Lynch and others like him can take from the system. If you are receiving a large tax refund each year, readjust your W-2 so you have the proper amount of tax withdrawn.

Elect Liz, she'll fight for the middle class that's getting hammered. Come to think of it, if she gets elected I'll get hammered!

John K wrote:

Elect Liz, she'll fight for the middle class that's getting hammered. Come to think of it, if she gets elected I'll get hammered!

I'm pretty sure you're hammered right now.

You want to elect someone who lied to get her job at Harvard Law school?

pretty sure wrote:

<quoted text>
I'm pretty sure you're hammered right now.
You want to elect someone who lied to get her job at Harvard Law school?

WRONG! When did she lie? SHe is part Cherokee, there is no lie. She also did not get any special treatment for her heritage it's was a box on a form idiot!

You'll believe anything, anything you're told.

Hey Swiss Mitt I'm with American Mitt How much taxes do you think barbara Striesand pays? Doesn't Obama pay the same tax rate as Romney? What about Warren what's her tax rate What's her job application at Harvard say? And why did she list the dead Cherokee Auntie as White? How do you know she is part Cherokee? She's a bigger part liar. And if she was in she would vote Democratic party and not for the people She should call herself a loyalist

Swiss Mitt wrote:

<quoted text>
WRONG! When did she lie? SHe is part Cherokee, there is no lie. She also did not get any special treatment for her heritage it's was a box on a form idiot!
You'll believe anything, anything you're told.

No YOU believe everything you're told. She has zero proof she 's a.Cherokee but she keeps saying it. If she checked a box (which she apparently did at Univ of Penn) saying she is, she most certainly would get special treatment -especially in academia.
just bother to look instead of just believing everything you're told!

I believe in cherokee Liz Warren is translated as 'stands up loud and tell lie'

Swiss Mitt wrote:

<quoted text>
WRONG! When did she lie? SHe is part Cherokee, there is no lie. She also did not get any special treatment for her heritage it's was a box on a form idiot!
You'll believe anything, anything you're told.

Facts are stubborn things my friend,
you can ignore them if you choose, but they don't go away.

1)Harvard Law was facing two separate affirmative action lawsuits, and being investigated by the Feds for not having one single minority faculty member prior to hiring Elizabeth Warren.

2)Elizabeth Warren had herself listed Association of American Law Schools desk book directories for NINE YEARS (1986-1996) prior to being hired by Harvard Law.
-FWIW, this directory DID NOT list which minority she was,
only her credentials, and that she was a minority looking for a professor's position.

3)Upon hiring E.W., Harvard Law was very vocal in their publications about having a Female Native American Faculty member.

4)Upon hiring E.W., Harvard Law was quick to list her as the minority she claimed to be in their Affirmative Action reports to the Feds,
quelling those investigations

5) She was even touted as "Harvard Law's First Woman of Color"
in the Fordham Law review for 1997

6)Upon being hired by Harvard Law,
Elizabeth Warren removed her name from the minority directory listing.

7)Elizibeth Warren's claim for using the directory was to meet others with similar heritage.
As mentioned before, the directory did not mention what that heritage was,
only that she was a minority.

8)Her official explanation for removing her name from the directory within a year of landing a Prized Harvard Law Faculty job was that the directory did not work.

9)Even without any proof whatsoever,
if you took her claims of Indian Heritage at face value,
she still would not meet anyone's minimum criteria to be considered a Tribe Member.

10)You foolishly picked sides already,
and would believe everything the Democratic party tells you,
despite the fact.
Donkey.

This is all you really had to say;

pretty sure wrote:

<quoted text>
10)You foolishly picked sides already,
and would believe everything the Democratic party tells you,
despite the fact.
Donkey.

http://bostonherald.com/news/politics/view/20...

“I listed myself in the directory in the hopes that it might mean that I would be invited to a luncheon, a group something that might happen with people who are like I am. Nothing like that ever happened, that was clearly not the use for it and so I stopped checking it off,” said Warren.

“Being Native American has been part of my story I guess since the day I was born,” said Warren, who never mentioned her Native American heritage on the campaign trail even as she detailed much of her personal history to voters in speeches, statements and a video.

Obvious lie is obvious.

"Doesn't Obama pay the same tax rate as Romney?"

Nope, Obama 26%, Swiss Mitt, 14%

Swiss Mitt wrote:

"Doesn't Obama pay the same tax rate as Romney?"
Nope, Obama 26%, Swiss Mitt, 14%

The 14% tax rate is on capital gains....not on initial income...big difference. You're reaching again. Typical class envy spin! When are you going to pay attention and make the clear distinction between a successful businessman and a Community Agitator.

The reason for the light capital gains and dividend tax is that corporations pay up to a 35% tax on their profits before a dime of it is passed on to shareholders. The real tax rate on corporate income paid to individuals through capital gains and dividends is not 15%. It is closer to 45% once you count the tax on corporate profits. If the dividend tax rises to 20% next year from 15% today, then the total tax on dividends paid to shareholders would be closer to 50%, and that doesn't include state and local taxes.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142405311...

Here's another detail that you militant progressives won't want to focus on.
The Tax documents showed Romney and his wife contributed $7 million in charity over the two years, much of it going to his Mormon church. So between taxes and charity, the Romney's paid $13.2 million since 2010 -- roughly one-third of their income. How do you like those numbers? Remember these... http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2010/04/16/cal...

In addition to his taxes, Romney gave 16.4 percent of his income over the past two years to charity through his family charity, the Tyler Foundation. In addition to donations to the Mormon church, here’s where else Romney and his wife Ann donated money: the Boys and Girls Club of Boston, the Center for the Treatment of Pediatric MS, the Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Homes for Our Troops, and the Inner-City Scholarship Fund, among many others.

I. Still think if Obamma opposed the tax rate that the rich have he should have already done something about it these past 3+ years. I do not believe that Romney has broken any law and paid all taxes required of him.