Barack Obama, our next President

carol wrote:

<quoted text>
Fox did send the memo that the surplus of our oil is being sent overseas.

Its being sold. You know, sold on the open market. You know, increasing exports, improving the balance of trade. You know ... free market stuff. You make it sound like something you found in the litter box.

carol wrote:

<quoted text>
It's amazing how much you know about these things!

I dominate when it comes to useless information.

leosnana wrote:

<quoted text>Are you really, really that dumb? I am married...pms fantasies include watching O'Keefe sodomized by buffed up bubbas in prison where he belongs.

First lily fantasizes about anal probes, now you? Wtf is wrong with you loony lefties?

RealDave wrote:

<quoted text>
Rock is no problem.

Not anymore, but when he was alive, he was leathal.

lily boca raton fl wrote:

<quoted text>
Oh great, the swine woke up

i have a life, you don't. now get ready to post into the evening.

lily boca raton fl wrote:

<quoted text>
That's not the point. If a person drinks lots of soda and eats sugary cereal, they are usually fat; it's ignorance of nutrition and laziness, I don't single out the poor on foodstamps. I have a thing about fat people; although I would never say anything to a person, but am revolted to see a person who seems to be around 40-50 years old who is so fat that he/she has to use those motorized wagons to shop.

Easy now Lily, you are hitting a little too close to homer.

lily boca raton fl wrote:

<quoted text>
There are problems everywhere, especially when it's summer and there are no jobs for young people. A woman had her purse snatched while loading groceries at Whole Foods; they caught the kid.

yes, that kid would have been a model citizen if not for the unemployment rate.

carol wrote:

<quoted text>
Guess he just fell for the political correct madness in between switching parties.

This isn't pc goober. Did you get nothing from my earlier post? Its about MONEY. Fat people cost MONEY. They use more resources, they are less productive, doctors are now telling people if you have a choice between smoking and being fat ... smoke.

Eman wrote:

<quoted text>
First lily fantasizes about anal probes, now you? Wtf is wrong with you loony lefties?

it's the only light at the end of Looney Lily's tunnel. no mystery there.

shinningelectr0n wrote:

<quoted text>
"depending where you live" is the clincher. Not a "One Size Fits All" technology. If you're living on a rock, not so good. Open Loop/Closed Loop, etc.
A Geo-HVAC in Gnome, Alaska, Rocky Mountains, New Hampshire - the Granite State or in the Sonoma may be problematical. Louisiana? San Fransisco?

I have three wells. One intake and two returns. They are about 37 feet deep. I can tell you the savings is well worth the cost. Drilling through rock may be a little more costly but not hard to do.

Later!

Jane Says wrote:

<quoted text>i have a life, you don't. now get ready to post into the evening.

Yeah sure thing Little Miss Sunshine, and you be sure to keep track of me!!

leosnana wrote:

<quoted text>Are you really, really that dumb? I am married...pms fantasies include watching O'Keefe sodomized by buffed up bubbas in prison where he belongs.

Being married to an Indonesian dog to be closer to the One doesn't count.

shinningelectr0n wrote:

<quoted text>
According to Wiki, replacing a NG system with Geo takes about 13 years for payback w/o subsidy in Canada. Not really that attractive.
We can't spend those billions here because the Kenyan Snake won't allow it.
You are lying through your missing teeth, doody. Sitting on our butts? Where do you come up with these lies? From the thin air inside your head, probably. Carbon sequestering technology and Clean Coal is an ongoing business-government-subsidized effort. ITER has been in process for decades. Safer Nuclear is being explored further. Even CERN's LHC is a step in that direction. Solar Electricity Panel technology is ever-increasing in efficiency and decreasing in assembly cost. Use of Quantum Dots, is driving it all in a new direction. So is Carbon Nano.
Doesn't sound to me like humanity is sitting on its butt.
When the nice Policeman comes to talk in your classroom, don't listen to him talk about National Energy Policy. He's just a cop and not a scientist or capitalist.

You really need to make up your mind. Are you for government subsidies of alternative fuels or are you going to bitch about them.

As for geothermal, I brought it up in light of an alternative to heating oil. It does take longer for payback against natural gas - depending on the availability of the NG option.

Keep in mind geothermal also provides dirt cheap A/C.

Tenzing wrote:

<quoted text>
Its being sold. You know, sold on the open market. You know, increasing exports, improving the balance of trade. You know ... free market stuff. You make it sound like something you found in the litter box.

I am willing to sell the contents of my cat's litter box. Anyone? Anyone?

flack wrote:

<quoted text> I have three wells. One intake and two returns. They are about 37 feet deep. I can tell you the savings is well worth the cost. Drilling through rock may be a little more costly but not hard to do.
Later!

Bush heats and cools his Crawford ranch with geothermal energy. Al Gore has a cole fired generator in his carriage house.

Or coal (note to self, read before hitting send)

Tenzing wrote:

<quoted text>
No, you been saying "even though the Republicans broke it I'm sure they can fix it".

No not really, pretty much been saying the federal government is more of a problem than a solution and they need to get the hell out of the way. Now, neither party is will to do that, so it something of a moot point.

Homer wrote:

<quoted text>Who would put semen on a card? New line for Hallmark?

You thinking one of those pop up cards?

Tenzing wrote:

<quoted text>
This isn't pc goober. Did you get nothing from my earlier post? Its about MONEY. Fat people cost MONEY. They use more resources, they are less productive, doctors are now telling people if you have a choice between smoking and being fat ... smoke.

So you favor social engineering?

dem wrote:

<quoted text>
oh great!
Another stupid azz tea bagger spreading their stupidity.

OH SH*T, another idiot that thinks everyone that doesn't worship lord Obama must be a tea party member, or even a republican.

WRONG....I'm a registered democrat and I voted for Obama last go around. OH CRAP, now what....you can't even use the o'l reliable racist accusation now!

I'm just "disenchanted" with what has become of my country under the charge of the "uniter", for any example of my disenchantment please refer to about any discussion on Topix or any news outlet of your choice. Nothing but hate and seperation coming from a party that I have been in agreement with all my voting age life. Obama cannot run on his record so this is alread a hateful ugly election season and it's only going to get worse from the democrats the more desperate they get and all of the ugliness will be a welcome stradegy by the president and likely most of it will include (as has already happened) our "suppose to be bipartisan DOJ!

So trash on, it is the answer to you and your types that think it's either "agree with me or you are racist, un-American, a tea party member, or you hate women, children, and grandma".

Obama is so worried about new votes he doen't even seem to realize the ever increasing number of those like myself that he has totally disenchanted from his party all together! That's ok, he'll hear from us in November!