NYC gay pride march marks one year of marriage rights

Sneaky Pete wrote:

<quoted text>
Do they speak English on that angry, liberal planet you live on?

Hey fcking, Birther cretin, I quoted the buybull word for word a couple of times.

You can't pretend not to understand that; you just have to make excuses for not following it. Now you jeebus freeeks need to follow all of it. Even when it contradicts itself:

“And now I say to you who are listening to me, Love your enemies.” Luke 6:27

“Now bring me the enemies who didn’t want me to be their king. Kill them while I watch.” Luke 19:27

And since you want to lie and pretend you're not a homosexually fixated bigot, you should get to work equally taking rights away from other "unrepentant sinners," such as those who take the lawd's name in vain.

KKKafeteria KKKristains wrote:

Hey fcking, Birther cretin, I quoted the buybull Now you jeebus freeeks need to follow all of it. you're not a homosexually fixated bigot lawd's name in vain.

I ask again, do they speak English on that angry, liberal planet you live on?

"lawd's"?? WTF is a "lawd's"?? Ha-ha-ha!!!

Your personal attacks only prove how deprived you are.

shameless-li wrote:

marriage is between a man and a woman....
anything other than that is a civil union.
people can live with whom ever they choose, but to think that they should have the same rights as legally married people is wrong.
this is why society as a whole is now falling apart, with no family values anymore.
sometimes too much freedom and changing of laws is not such a good thing...

Finally.
Someone with common sense.
Thanks , Shameless.
Some of these Topix people don't know what they're
in for when their time on earth ends.
They have no concept of eternity.
So scary.(for them.)

TheLoneRanger1 wrote:

Your personal attacks only prove how deprived you are.

And you say that aobut drug addict Rush L. and Bill O'Reilly and Ann Coulter, right? Because you aren't a lying, hypocritical, stupid pos.

Sneaky Pete wrote:

<quoted text>
I ask again, do they speak English on that angry, liberal planet you live on?
"lawd's"?? WTF is a "lawd's"?? Ha-ha-ha!!!

Well stupid filth, you can understand the buybull when I quote passages from it for your benefit.

Except you can't address those buybull passages which so clearly reveal your cherry picking from the buybull of what to follow and what to ignore, according to your bigotries.

To answer you mongoloidal question, you stupid rube, "lawd" is ur jeebus. Taking the lawd's name in vain. I'm making fun of your sexually sick, Tea Bagging, jeebus screeching azz.

Nevertheless, if any of this were about "unrepentant sinners" you freeeks would be equally obsessed with those who covet or disrespect their parents or bear false witness.

You are not, since you merely suffer from the sexual disorder of homophobia. I'd be willing to bet your racist, white supremacist trash, too.

Hope that helps, Jethro!

Homosexuality is a pestilence upon mankind.

Lawd is King wrote:

Homosexuality is a pestilence upon mankind.

So's your old skank whore mother, but they let her stay around FOR NOW. I'm sure she'll be brought down in some crack house or alley any day now. But, any woman who squatted down in a parking lot and crapped YOU out would go insane if they saw YOU emerging from her nasty hole. Ass or Vagg, no one is quite sure, both stink the same.

James Fisher wrote:

<quoted text>
Finally.
Someone with common sense.
Thanks , Shameless.
Some of these Topix people don't know what they're
in for when their time on earth ends.
They have no concept of eternity.
So scary.(for them.)

Isn't it time for you to go be with Jesus yet? PLEASE? Just go, now.

How much fun you'll have, sitting around all day, staring at Him like a mental patient, waiting for Him to speak to you. Bring a couple of magazines, I hear the wait is up to 700 years.

Golly, heaven sounds REALLY REALLY boring. The thought of a place filled with tight assed self righteous prigs like you sounds like HELL to me.

Curteese wrote:

<quoted text>Isn't it time for you to go be with Jesus yet? PLEASE? Just go, now.
How much fun you'll have, sitting around all day, staring at Him like a mental patient, waiting for Him to speak to you. Bring a couple of magazines, I hear the wait is up to 700 years.
Golly, heaven sounds REALLY REALLY boring. The thought of a place filled with tight assed self righteous prigs like you sounds like HELL to me.

Yes. Theoretically, Heaven would be boring to you, because all the gays are in Hell.

TheLoneRanger1 wrote:

Your personal attacks only prove how deprived you are.

And yet you use a story about gang rape to demonize all gay people and prohibit relationships based on mutual love and respect. Additionally, you post the top 10 lies from FRC, a group well known as a religious based hate group masquerading as a research organization. And you don't see that as an attack?

All the while ignoring all of the many verses that clearly tell you to treat others the way you want to be treated and leave the judgment to God.

You are promoting needless suffering and death, rather than love.

Lawd is King wrote:

<quoted text>
Yes. Theoretically, Heaven would be boring to you, because all the gays are in Hell.

Heaven and hell ARE theoretical.... i.e. not real.

Lawd is King wrote:

<quoted text>
Yes. Theoretically, Heaven would be boring to you, because all the gays are in Hell.

Heaven, full of smug self righteous and gloating prigs. I suppose angels don't have anuses for they don't eat, but you will fit right in for that stick up your ass makes you walk like a toy soldier and you will fit right in. I can't wait, to NOT go.

Besides, they say pets aren't taken in heaven. Fcuk that. If I had to choose between spending eternity with all my long gone pets, or you, guess which would be my choice.

Curteese wrote:

<quoted text>Isn't it time for you to go be with Jesus yet? PLEASE? Just go, now.
How much fun you'll have, sitting around all day, staring at Him like a mental patient, waiting for Him to speak to you. Bring a couple of magazines, I hear the wait is up to 700 years.
Golly, heaven sounds REALLY REALLY boring. The thought of a place filled with tight assed self righteous prigs like you sounds like HELL to me.

next time a storm blows thru, i'd watch out for the lightening if i were you....

Curteese wrote:

<quoted text>Besides, they say pets aren't taken in heaven. Fcuk that. If I had to choose between spending eternity with all my long gone pets, or you, guess which would be my choice.

all your long gone pets are gone for a reason...

shameless-li wrote:

<quoted text>
all your long gone pets are gone for a reason...

Please tell me what that reason would be.

The fact that the only truly NON judgmental beings on earth are taken after only living about 14 years is a good thing to you? If I could choose, I would trade all the Topix haters for my pet's lives ANY day. This is not hyperbolic, if by some divine Godly act, I could rule the world for one day, guess which way I would choose. The world would be a much better place without THEM and my pets running free and healthy instead.

Lawd is King wrote:

Homosexuality....

Well it does appear to weigh incessantly upon your mind, you bigoted hypocrite and rube. Amen.

http://cnsnews.com/news/article/homosexual-ac...

Below is the most of Myth No. 8 from the Family Research Council´s: The Top Ten Myths of Homosexuality

For more information go to http://www.frc.org/brochure/the-top-ten-myths...

Myth No. 8:
Homosexuals are no more likely to molest children than heterosexuals.

Fact: The percentage of child sexual abuse cases in which men molest boys is many times higher than the percentage of adult males who are homosexual, and most men who molest boys self-identify as homosexual or bisexual.

If this myth were true, it would support the notion that homosexuals should be allowed to work with children as schoolteachers, Boy Scout leaders and Big Brothers or Big Sisters. However, it is not true. The research clearly shows that same sex child sexual abuse (mostly men molesting boys) occurs at rates far higher, proportionally, than adult homosexual behavior, and it strongly suggests that many of those abusers are homosexual in their adult orientation as well.

As this is perhaps the most explosive claim about homosexuals, a couple of clarifications are in order. This does not mean that all homosexuals are child molesters—no one has ever claimed that. It does not even mean that most homosexuals are child molesters—there is no evidence to support that. But there is evidence that the relative rate of child sexual abuse among homosexuals is far higher than it is among heterosexuals.

This conclusion rests on three key facts:
Pedophiles are invariably males: A report by the American Professional Society on the Abuse of Children states:“In both clinical and non-clinical samples, the vast majority of offenders are male.”The book Sexual Offending Against Children reports that only 12 of 3,000 incarcerated pedophiles in England were women.”

Significant numbers of victims are males: A study of 457 male sex offenders against children in Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy found that “approximately one-third of these sexual offenders directed their sexual activity against males.”A study in the Journal of Sex Research found that although heterosexuals outnumber homosexuals by a ratio of at least 20 to 1, homosexual pedophiles commit about one-third of the total number of child sex offenses.

Many pedophiles consider themselves to be homosexual: Many people who write about issue of pedophilia argue that most men who molest boys are merely attracted to children, not to adult males, but they do not cite any specific data to support that assertion. In fact, a study of 229 convicted child molesters in Archives of Sexual Behavior found that “eighty-six percent of offenders against males described themselves as homosexual or bisexual.”

Since almost thirty percent of child sexual abuse is committed by homosexual or bisexual men (one third male-on-male abuse times 86% identifying as homosexual or bisexual), but less than 3% of American men identify themselves as homosexual or bisexual, we can infer that homosexual or bisexual men are approximately ten times more likely to molest children than heterosexual men.

In addition to the actual data on elevated rates of homosexual child abuse, there is clearly a subculture among homosexual men that openly celebrates the idea of sexual relationships between adult men and underage boys, whether pre-pubescent or adolescent. Such relationships are referred to in some research literature using neutral sounding euphemisms such as “age-discrepant sexual relations (ADSRs)”or “intergenerational intimacy.”Lesbian writer Paula Martinac summarized this phenomenon:

[S]ome gay men still maintain that an adult who has same-sex relations with someone under the legal age of consent is on some level doing the kid a favor by helping to bring him or her “out.”...

TheLoneRanger1 wrote:

Below is the most of Myth No. 8 from the Family Research Council´s: The Top Ten Myths of Homosexuality

Hey sexually sick, lying vermin, if you want to generalize, as you do, why don't you talibangelical freeeks defame all str8 men as violent rapists of women?

The obvious data support that far more than your closet case rearch frauds, imo, at FRC do.

And by far the overwhelming percentage of child sex abuse takes place within the nuclear family. Those molesting fathers and uncles are going after daughters far more often.

TheLoneRanger1 wrote:

http://cnsnews.com/news/articl e/homosexual-activist-and-form er-member-sf-human-rights-comm ission-arrested-child-porn
Below is the most of Myth No. 8 from the Family Research Council.
Myth No. 8:
Homosexuals are no more likely to molest children than heterosexuals.

The Family Research Council?

hahahahahah
ahahahahahah
ahahahahaha

I have two words for you: George Rekers