12 ladies grin and bare it to help animals

Although for a good cause, very poor taste. What wife wants one of these calendars in the house and what man wants one either? Who's idea was this? Looks like it may be about 30 years too late.

In my opinion I don't think it is done in bad taste. The women aren't showing anything vulgar. It's not like they are popping a boob out for everyone to see.

As a general rule I would not purchase a calendar with middle-aged scantily clothed women and their pets on them. It's for a great cause, but for marketing purposes I would more likely purchase one that had only the notable business women's pets on them. I don't see the addition of nudity no matter how tasteful as a selling point in this situation. The elderly ladies in Randolph Co. who made one was humorous and I saw how that would be funny enough for people to want to have, but this isn't the same as that one. These women in the 40
and 50 year old age posing with their pets appeals
to few in my opinion. I really would want to display a this calendar in my home or office.

to correct my above comment, I WOULD NOT want to display this calendar in my home or office!!!!!!!

Lady T66610 wrote:

In my opinion I don't think it is done in bad taste. The women aren't showing anything vulgar. It's not like they are popping a boob out for everyone to see.

Will YOU pose nude for me? I will for you!

On My Mind:

Lady T66610 wrote:

People who think they know everything but who's education doesn't take them past the funny pages.

You might want to get and education so that you can figure out the difference between whose and who's. LMAO

and/an

Perhaps those spelling scholars on this forum should worry more about staying on topic than correcting spelling errors. I agree with the above person about this. (YOU Are Arrogant) are indeed that.

you are arrogant wrote:

On My Mind:
<quoted text>
You might want to get and education so that you can figure out the difference between whose and who's. LMAO

Well who ever you are that wrote a reply to ONE of my posts...I am glad you have the time to critique everyone's posts. That must mean you do not have a job.?? Hmm well good for you. Are you living off the government? Plus you moron what does my spelling have to do with this topic we are on right now? EXPLAIN. Waiting.... Yep I didn't think so. Must be a moron who wants to get attention by starting stuff with people because he/she hasn't gotten their hug today.:)

you are arrogant wrote:

and/an

What you couldn't figure out which word goes in that sentence?????

Stop responding to the spellgn (ha ha ha) police, this is what sends a topic "OFF Topic"

I am for the cause, the calendar with women my age -- well - I don't think so, not for me or my wall sorry. My first vocal reaction to the picture on Pal-item.com was rude and vulgar; I will try to refrain as best I can.

A picture of a naked person with any animal is perverse no matter the cause.

Put your clothing back on and take a picture of you walking the dog or bathing the dog in a bucket, i.e. things a society can stomach.

Lady T66610 wrote:

<quoted text>
Well who ever you are that wrote a reply to ONE of my posts...I am glad you have the time to critique everyone's posts. That must mean you do not have a job.?? Hmm well good for you. Are you living off the government? Plus you moron what does my spelling have to do with this topic we are on right now? EXPLAIN. Waiting.... Yep I didn't think so. Must be a moron who wants to get attention by starting stuff with people because he/she hasn't gotten their hug today.:)

I went to your main page and that is where I read you denigrating people with education. Obviously, you aren't as bright as you think you are or being cheeky couldn't backfire on you. Dumbass.

I will buy one if cpowell is in it

You need a picture of a man?

I agree with Sandra. Anything but seeing middle aged women baring it. It is distasteful- Ruined the great photograph of the dogs.

you are arrogant wrote:

<quoted text>
I went to your main page and that is where I read you denigrating people with education. Obviously, you aren't as bright as you think you are or being cheeky couldn't backfire on you. Dumbass.

Dumbass? LMAO Whatever douche bag. Again I ask what does my spelling have to do with THIS topic? Plus why did you go to my home page on here? Because you couldn't find anything wrong with my post and wanted to start something? Well good for you with wanting to fill your time. Anyway I am done with your being a smart ass. I wrote a comment on this subject and that was that. I didn't write on here because I need to fight with arrogant morons who have too much time on their hands and want to argue with people. So if you must proceed with fighting then know I wont be reading it. Bash all you want because sooner or later nobody will even read your posts.:)

you are arrogant wrote:

<quoted text>
I went to your main page and that is where I read you denigrating people with education. Obviously, you aren't as bright as you think you are or being cheeky couldn't backfire on you. Dumbass.

Do you think the moderator changed the judgments again?

Truth wrote:

<quoted text>
Do you think the moderator changed the judgments again?

The moderator probably can't even change his dirty shorts.

"Mom, will you get you dumb ass down here and help me put on some clean underwear? I've soiled mine again."

Hee hee hee wrote:

<quoted text>
The moderator probably can't even change his dirty shorts.
" will you get you dumb ass down here"

You're an illiterate.

Truth wrote:

<quoted text>
You're an illiterate.

Whatever, dumbass shitpants.