Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Ronald wrote:

<quoted text>
Rose_NoHo.
The reason I love my Homosexual friends and the lesbians so is because they do not evade the issues under consideration. Why must you?
Ronald

Speaking of evasion, why didn't you deal with my question?
Why are so many fundies, including you, racists? Don't you believe god created us all?

Rose_NoHo wrote:

<quoted text>
Most people who engage in sodomy are straight.

was it sodomy when you tried to give AIDS back to the apes for most of the 90s

Gods shoeshine wrote:

<quoted text>
no in a christan view since the world would be 6000 yrs old

Gods shoeshine.

Well, of course the Bible says no such thing, although it may well be true that God did create the earth no more than 6,000 years ago. You are hanging your hat on Bishop Usher's genealogical record as recorded in the Bible to determine the date when Adam was created.

According to Usher's calculation, Adam was created in 4,004 B.C.*(including his 4 year mathematical calculation error)* in accordance with the Biblical genealogical record. The KJV translated that God created various episodes in periods of "days", when a more accurate translation would read "eons" or "periods". The inspired Word of the living God does not reveal how long those periods were as measured by time that God had created.

Recent scientific discoveries indicate that c has actually decayed to be as much as one millions times slower than it was at the time of creation. This would seem to conform to "The Big Bang Theory" whereby God's creation expanded outward at speeds unbelievably greater than the speed of light. Therefore, it is entirely possible that God created the earth 6000 years ago in terms of the 24 hour day as we know it today, even were one to make the unscientific observation that c is constant throughout time. The fact is though, that even in historical times, following Romer measuring the time it took for light to arrive at earth after being reflected off one of Jupiter's moons in 1675 through subsequent measurements, light has been scientifically proven to be slowing. Its an unimportant point. Any resolution of this matter can - of necessity - be mere conjecture on our part. As René Descartes noted long ago:

"I think, therefore I am".

Source: http://tinyurl.com/644svj

Ronald

jacques renault wrote:

<quoted text>
was it sodomy when you tried to give AIDS back to the apes for most of the 90s

?

Frank Rizzo wrote:

Here's an interesting read on citizenship as it relates to persons with "duel citizenship".
What makes it interesting is the many ways the courts have determined who is a citizen and who is not, and it sure looks like they've determined that native-born citizens, regardless to the status of their parents, are citizens.
A really interesting point is brought up in the discussion of "Miller v. Albright". Not so much the specifics of that case, but in the fact that had the child (a bastard) been born of an American mother and a foreign father (as opposed to the other way around), she would have been deemed a native-born citizen.
http://www.richw.org/dualcit/cases.html#Mille...

Does anyone read this insane blather? I sure don't.

Frank Rizzo wrote:

Rittardo,
Please read the seventh paragraph in the following article and assure me your candidate couldn't possible be that stupid....
http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-pn-ro...
Who vetted this idiot!?

I'm sure he'll get right on it and then report back as ordered jackass.

Rose_NoHo wrote:

<quoted text>
?

I heard you've got a huge, 14" pen!s and only 1 testicle.

LMFAO

Rose_NoHo wrote:

<quoted text>
Speaking of evasion, why didn't you deal with my question?
Why are so many fundies, including you, racists? Don't you believe god created us all?

Rose_NoHo.

Yes. As many times as I answer your questions, my answers either go over your head, or otherwise, you just ignore them. According to the instruction book:

"Ye shall keep my statutes. Thou shalt not let thy cattle gender with a diverse kind: thou shalt not sow thy field with mingled seed: neither shall a garment mingled of linen and woollen come upon thee.(Leviticus 19:19)

"And the whole earth was of one language, and of one speech." (Genesis 11:1)

"And it came to pass, as they journeyed from the east, that they found a plain in the land of Shinar; and they dwelt there." (Genesis 11:2)

"And they said one to another, Go to, let us make brick, and burn them throughly. And they had brick for stone, and slime had they for morter." (Genesis 11:3)

"And they said, Go to, let us build us a city and a tower, whose top may reach unto heaven; and let us make us a name, lest we be scattered abroad upon the face of the whole earth." (Genesis 11:4)

"And the LORD came down to see the city and the tower, which the children of men builded." (Genesis 11:5)

"And the LORD said, Behold, the people is one, and they have all one language; and this they begin to do: and now nothing will be restrained from them, which they have imagined to do." (Genesis 11:6)

"Go to, let us go down, and there confound their language, that they may not understand one another's speech." (Genesis 11:7)

"So the LORD scattered them abroad from thence upon the face of all the earth: and they left off to build the city." (Genesis 11:8)

"Therefore is the name of it called Babel; because the LORD did there confound the language of all the earth: and from thence did the LORD scatter them abroad upon the face of all the earth." (Genesis 11:9)

Ronald

Mike DiRucci wrote:

<quoted text>
I'm sure he'll get right on it and then report back as ordered jackass.

Ooo! Someone has appeared out of nowwhere, posted all of three times, and two of them are directed to me, and in a manner to "dismiss" my post as meaningless....

I have a stalker.....

Aldous Huxley wrote:

<quoted text>
Well Jesus H. Titty F-ing Christ! LOL,Does this mean that my great,great,great,great,great, great,great,great Grandfather didn't actually walk with the Dinosaurs? Geez,well who knew? Wink,wink,wink! ;)

Yeah, it does.

Frank Rizzo wrote:

<quoted text>
Ooo! Someone has appeared out of nowwhere, posted all of three times, and two of them are directed to me, and in a manner to "dismiss" my post as meaningless....
I have a stalker.....

You probably have a boner too sizzletits. No one cares.

Jethro wrote:

<quoted text>I heard you've got a huge, 14" pen!s and only 1 testicle.
LMFAO

Fido, if I were a man, I wouldn't consider being told I have a 14 incher an insult.
Do you consider it an insult because your mom would tell you when you came home crying, "They just make fun of your tiny thing because they are jealous."?

Such a sad state of affairs, haveing a talking sawdust head like Wilard Mitt Romney speaking at will.

Ronald wrote:

<quoted text>
Rose_NoHo.
Yes. As many times as I answer your questions, my answers either go over your head, or otherwise, you just ignore them. According to the instruction book:
...Buy-bull crap...

I wanted an answer to my questions, not fashion tips about what kind of fabrics not to wear.

Why are so many fundies, including you, racists? Don't you believe god created us all?

That last question is a simple yes or no question.

Rose_NoHo wrote:

<quoted text>
Fido, if I were a man, I wouldn't consider being told I have a 14 incher an insult.
Do you consider it an insult because your mom would tell you when you came home crying, "They just make fun of your tiny thing because they are jealous."?

Nice legs for a black tranny:)

Just kidding, they look like pygmy legs!!!

LMFAO

SpongeBob wrote:

<quoted text>
The Dems you mention aren't running for the Presidency. Who in Congress releases their tax records?
Obama has already been elected; why should he be questioned NOW? BTW, do you think "W" graduated "honestly" from Yale and Harvard? The U.S. elected a "dry drunk" and we've paid for it dearly....

It was Reid that has been crying about it, maybe he should release them. Obama has been a failure the past 4 years, are you overlooking that? We still don't know his college records, what is he hiding?

Frank Rizzo wrote:

Rittardo,
Please read the seventh paragraph in the following article and assure me your candidate couldn't possible be that stupid....
http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-pn-ro...
Who vetted this idiot!?

who cares, I could play a pissing game about what biden and obama have said, should I play his 57 state comment, people say silly things when they are exhausted. What matters are actions, let's not forget what Obama has done to the middle east and this country the past 4 years. Whether you know it or not, the attacks on 9/11 in Libya and Egypt were carefully planned by the Islamists who were helped into power by Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton and George Soros’s money.

KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Please give me a specific study with the study methods detailed that verify your claim.
The Regnerus is the most detailed, long term study to date.

RnL2008 wrote:

<quoted text>
And that study has severe flaws in it.......besides, giving you a study won't matter unless it's by someone you agree with.
Go search the topix threads......it was mentioned a few months back.
Remember that in order for a study to be understood, one must know the methodology that was used otherwise the percentages aren't real.
Here is an interesting article that shows that marriage is good for the health:
http://www.365reasons.com/health.htm
Here's one I'm certain you will like because of how it starts out:
http://www.apa.org/about/gr/issues/lgbt/marri...
Here's another one......maybe if these negative factors were eliminated.......but in my opinion.......marriage is good for all couples regardless of sexual orientation:
http://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/topicsobjec...
And one more for ya:
http://www.philly.com/philly/blogs/public_hea...
I'm certain you will draw your own conclusions from them.......I don't expect you to appreciate them or agree with them.

How childish! You can't produce a specific study with methods, so you slander me with a lie?

Do you really think it is not obvious what you are doing?

Do you really think your cause is validated by the necessity to be dishonest?

You can't produce a honest study to validate your lies, so you disparage a good study and lie about my response.

All you do is prove my point. Your gay 'marriage' is bogus.

Bazinga!

SpongeBob wrote:

<quoted text>
O.k., name a few "deceptive and unscientific studies"
Bet you can't...
The adoption and foster care process often includes a home visit and evaluation of the parents' abilities to raise children well. Even in states with laws that prohibit discrimination, gay couples still may fail evaluations for inexplicable reasons.
Why would gay people be complaining if it weren't happening?

STUDY OF LESBIAN 'FAMILIES' with reviews

http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content...

Alex I. Kartashov, biostatistician
Policy Analysis Inc., Brookline, MA
Dear colleagues,
I have read the article of Nanette Gartrell and Henny Bos "US National Longitudinal Lesbian Family Study: Psychological Adjustment of 17-Year-Old Adolescents".
I am surprised with the lack of any attepmt of the authors to address the very important factors in the study.
As it can be easily seen from Table 1, the populations in comparison are very different in race composition, socio-economic status of participants, and region of the country. The population of chidren from the conventional sample (Achenbach Normative CBCL Sample) has many times more minorities and many more children from the South.
It was shown not once that the outcomes of the study are strongly dependent on the above mentioned factors, and exactly in the direction that the study reveals.
Only gender and group (NLLFS vs.Achenbach Normative CBCL Sample) were used as predictors. I can not understand wny the authors did not make proper adjustments for other factors. They do mention it as one of the limitations of the study. It would be very easy to match the study population with the appropriate control population. Other way to treat the problem would be to adjust for the factors of race, region and socio- economic status within the MANOVA analysis (although the sample size becomes critical in this case).
Also, I am surprised that the editorial board and reviewers did not pay attention to such an obvious deficiency of the study.
In my opinion, above mentioned creates a strong doubt in the conclusions of the study.
Respectfully, Alex I. Kartashov, Ph.D.

http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/authored_new...

"Oxford, June 10, 2012 - Despite considerable research showing that children of same-sex parents fare just as well as children with heterosexual parents, two papers - a review of existing studies and a new study - published today in Elsevier’s Social Science Research, find insufficient data to draw any definitive conclusions.

Dr. Marks reviewed studies published between 1980 and 2005 cited by the 2005 official APA brief which asserted that:“Not a single study has found children of lesbian or gay parents to be disadvantaged in any significant respect relative to children of heterosexual parents.”

“The jury is still out on whether being raised by same-sex parents disadvantages children”, explains Marks.“However, the available data on which the APA draws its conclusions, derived primarily from small convenience samples, are insufficient to support a strong generalized claim either way.”

Of the 59 studies referenced in the APA brief, more than three-quarters were based on small, non-representative, non-random samples that did not include any minority individuals or families; nearly half lacked a heterosexual comparison group; and few examined outcomes that extend beyond childhood such as intergenerational poverty, educational attainment, and criminality, which are a key focus of studies on children of divorce, remarriage, and cohabitation. In other words, "A lack of high quality data leaves the most significant questions unaddressed and unanswered," concludes Marks."

KiMare wrote:

How childish! You can't produce a specific study with methods, so you slander me with a lie?
Do you really think it is not obvious what you are doing?
Do you really think your cause is validated by the necessity to be dishonest?
You can't produce a honest study to validate your lies, so you disparage a good study and lie about my response.
All you do is prove my point. Your gay 'marriage' is bogus.
Bazinga!

I gave ya at least 3 studies.....so, what's the problem with them?

No one is being dishonest here except for maybe you and some of those like you!!!

Again.....regardless of what you say, think or disagree with......my marriage is NOT bogus and is as legal today as it was 4 years ago:-)