Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

thisGuy wrote:

<quoted text>
LOL I also take you are one of those straights who also support pedophilia, bestiality, polygamy, etc., too, eh? Because afterall, the 'giblets'(aka the GLBT) are always promoting "love without boundaries" & "love has no gender". And since you support their cause, I take it won't be long until you support the pedophile, zoophiles, & polygamists' causes as well.
You should really check your history on what homosexuals have done in the past & learn from it. In Ancient Rome, they would sell,buy, & trade children in the bathhouses. Many high-ranking Nazis were homosexuals, in fact, the entire Nazi party was founded in a homosexual bar. 90% of the priests who were caught molesting children were active homosexuals. And many leaders of the 'giblets', were active pedophiles, like Larry Brinkin. Why don't you try googling what really goes on inside those "gay" pride parades? I'm sure the results will give you a giant fucking wake up call & make you want to reach the nearest barf bag ASAP.
Homosexuals are perverts. End of story

Your ignorance knows NO bounds! Everything you just stated is utter and total bull shyte! Kind of like your soul! How the hell do you make it through the day being so damn ignorant and plain old stupidity? LOLOLOL

Spike wrote:

just the normal low brow posters posting.

Yep, and you're living proof!

TheTroll Stopper wrote:

<quoted text>
Yep, and you're living proof!

You'd be of better use to this thread, Troll Stopper....
if you kept your phaggett mouth devoted solely to the 37 guys who are busy giving you a bukkake.

Spike wrote:

In Canada, to speak against gay marriage or homosexuality is considered hate speech and is subject to a fine of up to $7,000.

It's actually hate in reverse to those that believe the Bible. Believe in the Bible = hate crime. Wake up America! We are not very far removed geographically from Canada and some of our very own government officials have such a twisted view of our own First Amendment that they believe religious freedom should take a back seat to “equality.” We would be naive to believe that what just happened in Canada will not find its way into our own system of law. Especially considering the penchant some of our courts have for looking to international law to justify their decisions.

RnL2008 wrote:

<quoted text>
Then we SHOULDN'T allow heterosexual couples to adopt either......I mean what will they teach those children!!!!
Until you get the concept that straights participate in rimming, fisting, golden showers and even scat.....then you have NO VALID ARGUMENT.....unless you apply the same requirements to straight folks, because I FRUCKING GUARANTEE YOU THAT NOT ALL GAYS DO THESE THINGS and you keep making it sound as if they do!!!

Do you prefer burros as part of a threesome, or petting zoo donkeys? I think you are very considerate to give your "wife" the occasional burro/donkey tube steak as a change of pace from your usual fish box offering.

thisGuy wrote:

<quoted text>
Sexual orientation isn't a race/ethnicity.

Figured that out all on your own did you?

Lunkhead Nol wrote:

<quoted text>
Do you prefer burros as yap yap blah blah...

Sorry dude, we're not the slightest bit interested in any of your sexual fantasies. I'm sure you've got plenty of barnyard critters that you can masturbate to yourself.

URJudged wrote:

<quoted text>
Your ignorance knows NO bounds! Everything you just stated is utter and total bull shyte! Kind of like your soul! How the hell do you make it through the day being so damn ignorant and plain old stupidity? LOLOLOL

Either "this guy" just cut and pasted this from his "I heart Professor Marvel" dairy or someone forget to change nics...

ELH wrote:

<quoted text>
Either "this guy" just cut and pasted this from his "I heart Professor Marvel" dairy or someone forget to change nics...

You talk too much. STFU.

In Summary ...

I derived no pleasure from eviscerating our latest refugee from whatever teenage chat room she came from. She entered this forum spouting all the stock LGBT homilies, cliches, arguments, and dogma we've heard a thousand times over the years.

Apparently, she was Queen of the Walk in the teenage chatroom she came from. Incredibly, she thought she could achieve that same distinction here.

Nobody this was Prof. Marvel's forum.

It was immediately clear to me she knew nothing about the gay community save the pablum the LGBT pumps out 25-7. Gay writers like Randy Shilts and Gabriel Rotello meant nothing to her -- she hadn't read their books nor even knew their names.

She was also blissfully unaware of CDC Surveillance Reports, MassResisteance, the man-boy sex industry, and of course, "The Little Black Book." She knew noting of these people, organizations, studies, literature --nada, zero, zilch.

And yet she held herself forth as a walking encyclopedia of all things homosexual.

She didn't hesitate a heartbeat to support, advocate, and demand every line of the LGBT agenda -- from drag queen school teachers to adoption rights for men who wear penis suits in gay pride parades -- she wanted it all.

Ignorance?

No.

The word ignorance doesn't by itself describe unholy stupidity like hers. What single word describes the dismal cognitive ability of someone who when shown the facts even a child would know to be true, continues to insist are wrong?

This monstrously stupid woman continued to insist gays had nothing to do with the publication of The Little Black Book.

Denial?

No, that wasn't denial. That was something far more pathological than anything Freud ever named.

And yet this woman's complete mental break-down was illustrative and educational.

It gave us a peek into the mind of straights who support same-sex marriage. It allowed us to see -- as the corpse of a dissected frog allows us to see -- the inner workings of their desperately stupid thought process.

Mind you, this essay isn't meant as a humorous piece or a vehicle to display my considerable writing skills. Stupidity like Pam Jordon's is no joke and we shouldn't treat it as such.

Stupidity like Pam Jordan's places children in households like Larry Brinkin's -- who is, incidentally, yet another person Ms. Jordan has never heard of.

Straights like Pam Jordan worship ignorance the way Catholic priests worship blond-haired choir boys.

Pam Jordan wants all debates to be about Civil Rights vs Hate. She wants to evoke the legacy of Martin Luther King and thinks of herself as Coretta Scott King leading the March on Washington while God smiles down on her fat, fried-chicken eating ass from up above.

Yes, Pam Jordan is that stupid.

Spike wrote:

In Canada, to speak against gay marriage or homosexuality is considered hate speech and is subject to a fine of up to $7,000.

I guess some should be happy they live in the United States then!!!

Prof Marvel wrote:

Hell, YOU know nothing about the GLBTQI Community except what MassResistance tells you.......and you call someone else stupid.......that's just pathetic on your part!!!!

By the way.....did ya ever find anything about that supposed "Little Black Book" from any other site that WASN'T considered ANTI-GAY AND BIASED?

RnL2008 wrote:

<quoted text>
Hell, YOU know nothing about the GLBTQI Community except what MassResistance tells you.......and you call someone else stupid.......that's just pathetic on your part!!!!
By the way.....did ya ever find anything about that supposed "Little Black Book" from any other site that WASN'T considered ANTI-GAY AND BIASED?

I'm trying to learn and understand GLBT. Why do lesbians who like other women try to look like men?

Prof Marvel wrote:

In Summary ...
I derived no pleasure from eviscerating our latest refugee from whatever teenage chat room she came from. She entered this forum spouting all the stock LGBT homilies, cliches, arguments, and dogma we've heard a thousand times over the years.
Apparently, she was Queen of the Walk in the teenage chatroom she came from. Incredibly, she thought she could achieve that same distinction here.
Nobody this was Prof. Marvel's forum.
It was immediately clear to me she knew nothing about the gay community save the pablum the LGBT pumps out 25-7. Gay writers like Randy Shilts and Gabriel Rotello meant nothing to her -- she hadn't read their books nor even knew their names.
She was also blissfully unaware of CDC Surveillance Reports, MassResisteance, the man-boy sex industry, and of course, "The Little Black Book." She knew noting of these people, organizations, studies, literature --nada, zero, zilch.
And yet she held herself forth as a walking encyclopedia of all things homosexual.
She didn't hesitate a heartbeat to support, advocate, and demand every line of the LGBT agenda -- from drag queen school teachers to adoption rights for men who wear penis suits in gay pride parades -- she wanted it all.
Ignorance?
No.
The word ignorance doesn't by itself describe unholy stupidity like hers. What single word describes the dismal cognitive ability of someone who when shown the facts even a child would know to be true, continues to insist are wrong?
This monstrously stupid woman continued to insist gays had nothing to do with the publication of The Little Black Book.
Denial?
No, that wasn't denial. That was something far more pathological than anything Freud ever named.
And yet this woman's complete mental break-down was illustrative and educational.
It gave us a peek into the mind of straights who support same-sex marriage. It allowed us to see -- as the corpse of a dissected frog allows us to see -- the inner workings of their desperately stupid thought process.
Mind you, this essay isn't meant as a humorous piece or a vehicle to display my considerable writing skills. Stupidity like Pam Jordon's is no joke and we shouldn't treat it as such.
Stupidity like Pam Jordan's places children in households like Larry Brinkin's -- who is, incidentally, yet another person Ms. Jordan has never heard of.
Straights like Pam Jordan worship ignorance the way Catholic priests worship blond-haired choir boys.
Pam Jordan wants all debates to be about Civil Rights vs Hate. She wants to evoke the legacy of Martin Luther King and thinks of herself as Coretta Scott King leading the March on Washington while God smiles down on her fat, fried-chicken eating ass from up above.
Yes, Pam Jordan is that stupid.

brilliant

This was day I respect USA country.

This like watch "Kerri Strug" defeat Russia with broken leg.

KiMare wrote:

<quoted text>
I'm trying to learn and understand GLBT. Why do lesbians who like other women try to look like men?

I don't believe you are......what I believe is you would like us to believe you are trying to understand, all while making asinine stereotype comments about what you THINK Lesbians try and do........some women who happen to be Lesbians have a natural masculine appearance, while other Lesbians look just like women, that you wouldn't know they were Lesbians until they told you.........why do some straight men look feminine? Just because they do. Why do people look as they do.....mostly just because of their make-up!!!

The LGBT Brain Trust ...?

Anyone else wondering who is the LGBT Brain Trust?

Who are these people who promulgate all these screwball ideas that are supposed to make the world a better place?

How do they know transvestite school teachers won't have an affect on Little Johnny's sexual orientation?

Why are they so certain gay Boy Scout leaders won't molest their charges?

What's their educational background? Criminal background, if any? How do they support themselves?

Will someone in this forum tell us?

Who are these people?

Speaking of Gay Boy Scout Leaders ...

Does anyone doubt that if we put hetero men in charge of 14,15,and 16 year-old girls there'd be a lot of hanky-panky going on in the tents at night?

Why then are we to believe nothing of the sort would happen between gay Boy Scout leaders and boys?

Can someone break it down for me?

Prof Marvel wrote:

Speaking of Gay Boy Scout Leaders ...
Does anyone doubt that if we put hetero men in charge of 14,15,and 16 year-old girls there'd be a lot of hanky-panky going on in the tents at night?
Why then are we to believe nothing of the sort would happen between gay Boy Scout leaders and boys?
Can someone break it down for me?

You have some real issues with sex. Not all men, gay or straight are like you. The vast majority of us are very much capable of controlling our selves around children. In fact the vast majority of us don't even think about having sex with underage kids. When I see girls 14,15 or 16 years old I don't think, boy I sure would like to get some of that.

I see why you spent time in jail, you are sick, seek help.

Reality wrote:

<quoted text>You have some real issues with sex. Not all men, gay or straight are like you. The vast majority of us are very much capable of controlling our selves around children. In fact the vast majority of us don't even think about having sex with underage kids. When I see girls 14,15 or 16 years old I don't think, boy I sure would like to get some of that.
I see why you spent time in jail, you are sick, seek help.

You're welcome to continue living in your world of make-believe but I would remind you had the Catholic Church erred on the side of caution thousands of young men would not be scarred by the ordeal of homosexual child molestation.

The fact is, you people have a history of throwing caution to the wind. You did it 30 years ago when you were warned using bathhouses as floating orgies was a bad idea. Now you're doing it with your insistence homosexuals like Larry Brinkin are completely harmless and should be allowed to become Boy Scout leaders.

Oh, wait a minute, I forgot ...

Long-time San Francisco homosexual activist Larry Brinkin can no longer be classified as a homosexual because he's a pedophile.

Yeah, right.

It's a new day and the same dull tools are posting their racists views and comments here again!