Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Judged:

5

5

5

Rose_NoHo wrote:

<quoted text>
Thanks.:)
What I really don't get is why Fido thinks that if i were a man, I'd consider being told I have a huge member an insult.

Judged:

5

5

5

Pam Jordan wrote:

<quoted text>
I called the book weird liar, no mention was made in accordance to sex.
And that little book probably demonstrates what homosexual sex is like about as much as a book on sado-masochism outlines what heterosexual sex is like.
In other words it's a bullshit claim.

Judged:

5

5

5

Prof Marvel wrote:

<quoted text>
You called it weird, offensive, and, as we see directly above, continue to doubt its a faithful depiction of the homosexual lifestyle.
Earlier you said the name of the gay-run organizations printed on its pages had to be a plant to discredit these organizations. In other words, your reaction speaks for itself -- you are repulsed by the booklet, so repulsed you find it difficult to believe gays had anything to do with it.
All you're doing now is trying to mislead us about your initial reaction. You want us to believe you weren't talking about the content when you called it offensive, that you were talking about the conspiracy of homophobes who must be behind it.
But there was no conspiracy of homophobes behind this publication as a little honest research will show you. To date, not one gay-run non-profit associated with The Little Black Book has denied their association with it.
Everyone here knows this, Pam; the point is old hat.
But continue along this vein if you wish. It too makes my point about straight morons who support same sex marriage -- you're in denial about the LGBT community.
Better yet, find one gay person in this forum who'll tell you the practices in the booklet are weird or offensive to him. None has come forth yet to say this; none will.
And that's because it faithfully depicts the gay male lifestyle -- at least in the gay publishers of this piece of filth.
You can't have it both ways, Pam.
You can't call the practices weird and offensive then tell us the people who engage in these practices don't engage in weird and offensive sex practices.
Not the way it works, I'm afraid.

Judged:

5

4

4

Prof Marvel wrote:

I try to avoid responding to your claptrap, ELH, because it gives the impression I consider you my intellectual equal.

Judged:

5

5

5

Franz wrote:

<quoted text>
Anybody who would click on that link, look at the book they were handing out to middle school children and then say they support it has to be sick in the head. And most likely a pedophile.

Judged:

5

5

5

Prof Marvel wrote:

<quoted text>
You can't have it both ways.

Judged:

5

5

5

Prof Marvel wrote:

The Little Black Book! gays.
"Queer Youth"... "queer" or "gay" at least 20 times:"queer" or "gay""queer " or "gay""queer " or "gay" "queer" or "gay""queer " or "gay""queer " or "gay""queer " or "gay""queer " or "gay""queer " or "gay""queer " or "gay""queer " or "gay"throughout its pages....The Little Black Book!
"Mutual jerking off is hot fun!" and "rimming -- butt licking" "queer" The Little Black Book!...gay bar bathhouse..."for the younger, leather queer crowd."homosexual guide"... The Little Black Book! gay-run organization gay activist... pornographic...gay lifestyle...Gays gay bars and bathhouses...The Little Black Book! The Little Black Book! The Little Black Book!

Judged:

5

5

5

Rose_NoHo wrote:

I don't see anything wrong with the book. Can you point out anything in it that isn't factually accurate?

Judged:

5

5

5

ELH wrote:

<quoted text>
Yes, you "avoid" responding to me about a dozen times a day.
"intellectual equal"...yea right.
http://www.youtube.com/watch...

Judged:

5

5

5

Rose_NoHo wrote:

<quoted text>
Obama passes gas that is smarter than you. Loose cannon? LOL! He even had the VP test the waters first.

Judged:

5

5

5

Pam Jordan wrote:

Just don't be expected to be taken seriously.
K???

Judged:

5

5

5

Prof Marvel wrote:

<quoted text>
You called it weird, offensive, and, as we see directly above, continue to doubt its a faithful depiction of the homosexual lifestyle.
Earlier you said the name of the gay-run organizations printed on its pages had to be a plant to discredit these organizations. In other words, your reaction speaks for itself -- you are repulsed by the booklet, so repulsed you find it difficult to believe gays had anything to do with it.
All you're doing now is trying to mislead us about your initial reaction. You want us to believe you weren't talking about the content when you called it offensive, that you were talking about the conspiracy of homophobes who must be behind it.
But there was no conspiracy of homophobes behind this publication as a little honest research will show you. To date, not one gay-run non-profit associated with The Little Black Book has denied their association with it.
Everyone here knows this, Pam; the point is old hat.
But continue along this vein if you wish. It too makes my point about straight morons who support same sex marriage -- you're in denial about the LGBT community.
Better yet, find one gay person in this forum who'll tell you the practices in the booklet are weird or offensive to him. None has come forth yet to say this; none will.
And that's because it faithfully depicts the gay male lifestyle -- at least in the gay publishers of this piece of filth.
You can't have it both ways, Pam.
You can't call the practices weird and offensive then tell us the people who engage in these practices don't engage in weird and offensive sex practices.
Not the way it works, I'm afraid.

Judged:

7

7

6

Prof Dingleberry wrote:

More lies and ranting from failed author Gary Lloyd.....
<quoted text>
Yes, they sponsored the event Gary. However, as previously noted, they did not BRING this material nor did they DISTRIBUTE this material. And this material was NEVER handed out. Yet another complete lie from you and massrisistence. There were a handful of these booklets, they were placed on a vendor table belonging to Fenway Community Health. The president and CEO of Fenway Community Health, Stephen Boswell, apologized for the error, and the principal of the school where the event was held has publically stated that he doesn't even believe that any student actually picked up a copy of the booklet.
But don't let facts get in the way of your decietful shilling you lying piece of shit!!! Enjoy hell Gary!
<quoted text>
Why is it "also worth noting" what a man who thinks he wears magical underwear thinks Gary? Romney, like you, thinks there is a "gay lifestyle". Pretty much proving he's as big a moron as you are. The booklet was not intended for young children, and quite frankly you can't prove that it ever did find its way int othe hands of a young child.
But don't let facts get in the way of your deceitful posts Gary. We all know its all you've got loser.
<quoted text>
I never said the booklet had nothing to do with gays you stupid moron.
<quoted text>
There are no bathhouses listed in it, and it was never distributed to children. That's just more of your lying. Lying is all you do, because you are incapable of supporting yourself using truthful information.
<quoted text>
Gary, please don't use words you don't know what they mean. You wouldn't recognize honesty if it bit you on the hand.
<quoted text>
Who said the booklet was intended for straights? Let us know when you have an answer dumbass.
<quoted text>
Nope, I sure don't Gary. It's difficult to see when all you present is fabricated lies, obfuscation and nonsense.
<quoted text>
I've made perfect sense. And I've demonstrated what lying sack of shit you are at the same time.
Have a nice day Gary.

Judged:

7

7

6

Rose_NoHo wrote:

<quoted text>
Even the homophobic group "Mass Resistance" says the book was handed out at "Brookline High School".(Don't know what middle school age kids would be doing there, but as long as someone has finished puberty, they should have access to accurate info about sex.)
http://www.massresistance.org/docs/issues/bla...
I don't see anything wrong with the book. Can you point out anything in it that isn't factually accurate?

Judged:

5

5

5

Prof Marvel wrote:

<quoted text>
So now we learn the gay symbol for "frivolity" is the phallic symbol.
Is that what you fellows are teaching kids in Boston area schools, Dingleberry?
And what about the half-nude bottom boys wearing chaps exposing their bare-buttocks while being led down the street by their Tops?
What do you tell kids that's a symbol of?

Judged:

6

6

6

Pam Jordan wrote:

<quoted text>
You're becoming as strange as this little book you keep touting around by the way.
If you want to believe that represents homosexuals or that they engage in devil worship or whatever lost thought you can add to that pile of bullshit thought then by all means....it's your opinion.
Just don't be expected to be taken seriously.
K???

Judged:

5

5

5

Prof Marvel wrote:

<quoted text>
You need to pick one lie and stick with it.

Judged:

5

5

5

Prof Marvel wrote:

<quoted text>
All I want is for straight morons like you to learn something about the gay lifestyle before you expose children to it.
You call the practices in the booklet "weird" and "offensive" yet don't make the connection between the behavior and the people engaging in the behavior.
People who engage in rimming, pee play, and fisting should not be allowed to adopt kids -- will you at least agree to that?