Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Aug 4, 2010 Full story: www.cnn.com 201,791

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Read more
Reality

Madison, WI

#151910 Jul 25, 2012
Marcia_Marcia_Marcia wrote:
<quoted text>
I did not identify anything... It just proves that you can turn anything into what you think is right to prove your theory. You can say the same thing for the straight sex cult or Christian cult. So I will stop replying to you because you can not argue with someone who refuses to see past their own prejudices to even consider any other possibilities that exist.
Damn fine post Marcia, damn fine. Its a shame the Professor is to damn stupid to understand a word of it.
Reality

Madison, WI

#151911 Jul 25, 2012
Prof Marvel wrote:
<quoted text>
You have exactly the same rights everyone else has.
You want those rights PLUS the right to marry same sex.
Answer me this, Brainiac: should heteros have the right to marry same sex too?
You are a complete idiot!

"Answer me this, Brainiac: should heteros have the right to marry same sex too?"
If you find two heterosexuals of the same sex who want to marry each other, tell them to come out of the closet.

“IT'S TIME TO ELIMINATE”

Since: Mar 11

PROP 8 AND DOMA!!!

#151912 Jul 25, 2012
Prof Marvel wrote:
<quoted text>
You have exactly the same rights everyone else has.
You want those rights PLUS the right to marry same sex.
Answer me this, Brainiac: should heteros have the right to marry same sex too?
Absolutely.......if that's what they want to do:-)
Girl

Delano, CA

#151913 Jul 25, 2012
So what's going to happen?
Boy

Covina, CA

#151914 Jul 25, 2012
So now that there are enough of what's.

Since: Apr 11

Santa Monica, CA

#151915 Jul 25, 2012
Prof Marvel wrote:
<quoted text>
Your argument is that homosexuals should be treated as a minority.
Not all all. How far up your backside did you have to reach to get that?
Prof Marvel wrote:
Fine.
Now give us your rationale.
And don't waste your time with that "born this way" load of crap.
Sexual orientation isn't part of my argument. It's based on gender.
1. A man has the right to marry a woman, a woman should have that same right.
2. A woman has the right to marry a man, a man should have that same right.

Since: Apr 11

Santa Monica, CA

#151916 Jul 25, 2012
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
You have "faith" Rose, nothing more- nothing less.
LOL. Then how can we "know" anything?

Since: Apr 11

Santa Monica, CA

#151917 Jul 25, 2012
ARGUING with IDIOTS wrote:
<quoted text>
Really? So women's sporting events should be eliminated and engage the opposite sex in professional sports? Football, Boxing?
You also against "saving women and children first"?
Damn, you are funny.
The subject is the law...not what they yell in bad movies.

Since: Apr 11

Santa Monica, CA

#151918 Jul 25, 2012
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
How can men and women be treated equally, they are distinct genders that in every dimension of their being are different? No wonder you confuse gay unions with marriage!
LOL. Why are you fundies so fixated on the idea of men and women being so different? Garden of Eden or something like that? I keep asking you fundies to mention one specific real difference between men and women, despite the obvious physically ones, and so far...
:::crickets chirping:::

Why are you against all US citizens getting equal protection under the law?

Since: Apr 11

Santa Monica, CA

#151919 Jul 25, 2012
James Laase wrote:
People neglect the damage to be done on the minds and upbringing of children ...
Rose's Law:
Morons with no real argument scream, "But what about the children!?"
James Laase wrote:
the promise of gay relations will result in national termoil God Help America
Exactly how would that work?

Since: Apr 11

Santa Monica, CA

#151920 Jul 25, 2012
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
It is not a matter of 'believing' anything. Your relationship simply is not marriage. They are two clearly distinct relationships.
No one except gay couples who are incapable of procreating together are saying marriage 'requires' children. But the do occur 96% of the time in marriages. 0% of the time in gay unions. See the difference?
You don't have to be able to procreate in order to marry, so there is no difference.
Montie

Covina, CA

#151921 Jul 25, 2012
So goes the song.

“Facts”

Since: May 08

Puerto Vallarta, Mexico

#151922 Jul 25, 2012
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Not all all. How far up your backside did you have to reach to get that?
<quoted text>
Sexual orientation isn't part of my argument. It's based on gender.
1. A man has the right to marry a woman, a woman should have that same right.
2. A woman has the right to marry a man, a man should have that same right.
Those are special rights that you are asking for..........

Every man straight or gay can marry any straight or gay woman........Period.......

Why should perverts like you get special rights???

“Facts”

Since: May 08

Puerto Vallarta, Mexico

#151923 Jul 25, 2012
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Damn, you are funny.
The subject is the law...not what they yell in bad movies.
Gays have the same rights under the law to marry someone of the opposite sex.......

If you finish your surgery you could also marry a man under that law.....

“Facts”

Since: May 08

Puerto Vallarta, Mexico

#151924 Jul 25, 2012
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Rose's Law:
Morons with no real argument scream, "But what about the children!?"
<quoted text>
Exactly how would that work?
There is no such thing as a ho law.......
Bill Of Rights

Beacon, NY

#151925 Jul 25, 2012
Here Is One wrote:
<quoted text>
Gays have the same rights under the law to marry someone of the opposite sex.......
If you finish your surgery you could also marry a man under that law.....
And here is a perfect example of what a human piece of shyte says! Pay particular attention to "IT's" deep psychosis! Not special rights,the very same one's you enjoy to marry the person of your choosing! So,how are you today Mr. charter member of NAMBLA? LOL,See if you say it,it must be true! And if you could by a soul you might be human! The god's truth is that Rose is a middle aged nice looking liberal black lady so get over it and STOP lying if that's even possible!LOL

Since: Apr 11

Santa Monica, CA

#151926 Jul 25, 2012
Brian_G wrote:
<quoted text>Most inmate relationships aren't consensual.
Assuming that's true, what does that have to do with gay marriage?
Brian_G wrote:
Down with antidemocratic judges ignorant of law and precedent.
?
Try Chewing

Covina, CA

#151927 Jul 25, 2012
Pigs knuckles, they would fit our palet and mouth.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#151928 Jul 25, 2012
Reality wrote:
<quoted text>In other words, you have no rebuttal at all. Thanks for posting a non response, yours is an easy game to play. Just change topic and hope that no one notices. Simply add the following statement " What about the children"
In other words, you want to define reality with a minute distinction while denying the substance of marriage.

The joke is your relationship and neighbors represent the basis of your logic.

What is not funny is your last line, "Simply add the following statement " What about the children"". Simply? Do you understand what that exposes about you?

Gay twirl at it's terminal speed.

Since: Apr 11

Santa Monica, CA

#151929 Jul 25, 2012
Brian_G wrote:
<quoted text>No, gay people have always married under the same laws as everyone else. Changing the definition of marriage that it includes two men will cause some prison cells to become honeymoon suites for common law marriage.
LOL! Seriously, WTF!?
You can't force someone into a common law marriage. The couple has to live together as spouses for some time. Rape in a prison cell wouldn't count.
(sheeesh...)
Brian_G wrote:
Think through the consequences of your new laws, they are mostly very bad.
What's bad about equal rights?

.
Brian_G wrote:
<quoted text>Law that 'protects mascot victim groups' at the loss of law, democratic institutions and precedent harm society. Stop courts from writing marriage law, stop your legislatures too.
Stop legislatures from writing laws?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Redwood City Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
hi Wed SURAJ 9867221101 1
News Soledad Canyon a " California Mar 25 Ravenite Coffee 2
does anyone need a good dog walker (May '07) Mar 25 chicagodawg 46
Review: Cathy Jean Shoes (Jan '09) Mar 23 Shoe Collector 84
Rogue Topix Moderators Mar 23 WTSenior 7
News Talking with ... One of the nation's leading di... Mar 23 Controversy 1
News Belmont outlines accomplishments: City Council ... Mar 21 Schmones 1
Redwood City Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Redwood City People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]