Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

There are 20 comments on the Aug 4, 2010, www.cnn.com story titled Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage. In it, www.cnn.com reports that:

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.cnn.com.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#151627 Jul 23, 2012
Boogle Eyed wrote:
Looks like some crazy people need attention more than honeybees need flowers.
I don't know about the folks reading this but myself once someone has been determined and displayed the fact they are mentally unfit I choose not to interact.
Or, you just got ass kicked and stumped by one.

Do you really think you are fooling anyone?

Smile
STFU GLBT

Killeen, TX

#151628 Jul 23, 2012
fudge packing isn't a civil right, it's a mental illness

Since: Apr 11

Santa Monica, CA

#151629 Jul 23, 2012
STFU GLBT wrote:
fudge packing isn't a civil right, it's a mental illness
Most men into anal sex are straight, be sure to let them know that!

Since: Jan 12

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

#151630 Jul 23, 2012
STFU GLBT wrote:
fudge packing isn't a civil right, it's a mental illness
If being gay is a mental illness does that mean I can call into work and tell them I'm sick and come in because I have come down the case of homosexuality?

Since: Apr 11

Santa Monica, CA

#151631 Jul 23, 2012
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
I did counter your argument you idiot. You claimed that because we have not found evidence of God he must not exist. That simply isn't true, and if it were none of the new species we have found over the years would not exist as there was also no proof until they were found.
Again, stupid, it's obvious there can be an animal we don't know about it. But, if an all-knowing, all-powerful, ever-present being who has promised to answer our prayers exists, there would be some evidence...
akpilot wrote:
Why don't you just admit you don't know, none of us do.
I know god doesn't exist. There are testable claims made for god in the Buy-bull. I prayed to have Mt. Everest move to SD, and it's not there.

Since: Apr 11

Santa Monica, CA

#151632 Jul 23, 2012
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Tautology (logic), a technical notion in formal logic, universal unconditioned truth, always valid.
True.
It's clear you copy/pasted that, yet you have no idea what you are pasting about. "Tautology" means circular reasoning. "Survival of the fittest" is circular because you call what ever survives "the fittest".

Since: Apr 11

Santa Monica, CA

#151633 Jul 23, 2012
KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Calm down honey, you are in a major hissy fit, you'll break your wrist twirling like that!
SCOTUS ruled that "Marriage is one of the "basic civil rights of man," fundamental to our very existence and survival...."
Maybe you would like to help explain what they were referring to???
<quoted text>
First you boys have been saying children are NOT a part of the equation. Now you say they are, but CHILDREN are not an important part of marriage???
SCOTUS specifies they are a focal point and exposes you as gay twirling... again...
Looks like it is taking a bunch of you boys to twirl this one...
Smile.
You don't have to be able to reproduce in order to marry.
Next.

Since: Apr 11

Santa Monica, CA

#151634 Jul 23, 2012
Prof Marvel wrote:
<quoted text>
Your thesis is that the Founding Fathers meant homosexuals should have the right to same sex marriage.
My thesis is that the Founding Fathers never in their wildest dreams imagined the day when their words would be interpreted to mean same sex marriage.
At least admit I'm right and you're wrong on this point.
My theory is fk what the Founding Fathers meant, they included men who owned slaves and didn't want women to vote.
A hundred or so years after the last founding father died, we were all given equal protection of the law.

We should all have equal protection under the law.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#151635 Jul 23, 2012
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
It's clear you copy/pasted that, yet you have no idea what you are pasting about. "Tautology" means circular reasoning. "Survival of the fittest" is circular because you call what ever survives "the fittest".
You are wrong on all counts (again).

I did copy and paste. From the definition. It means what I pasted, especially applied to evolution determining that a mother and father are the best method to parent. Hardly circular reasoning.

Your 'opinions' reveal more about you than they do about truth and reality.

Since: Apr 11

Santa Monica, CA

#151637 Jul 23, 2012
califdune wrote:
<quoted text>
If there wasnt a more hidden agenda by the gay community they would of accepted civil unions which gave them everything they were asking for. Since they would rather tear down something which had been established by people who may not of agreed with the gay community it had to go. its not about marriage. never was.
Is there some law against you con dumbs learning the difference between "it's" and "its"?
Anyway, if gay people wanted to see marriage torn down, they could just sit back and watch you con dumbs do it! What's Rush Limpaugh on, his 4th marriage?

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#151639 Jul 23, 2012
califdune wrote:
<quoted text>
If there wasnt a more hidden agenda by the gay community they would of accepted civil unions which gave them everything they were asking for. Since they would rather tear down something which had been established by people who may not of agreed with the gay community it had to go. its not about marriage. never was.
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Is there some law against you con dumbs learning the difference between "it's" and "its"?
Anyway, if gay people wanted to see marriage torn down, they could just sit back and watch you con dumbs do it! What's Rush Limpaugh on, his 4th marriage?
Deep comeback! Corrected the grammar.

A Ho defending gays. I guess it's the best they can do...

Damn, I hope I got it right.

Smile.

Since: Apr 11

Santa Monica, CA

#151640 Jul 23, 2012
Prof Marvel wrote:
<quoted text>
And ...?
And you lied when you claimed he only said that marriage was between man and woman. He also made a very homophobic comment.
Prof Marvel wrote:
I confess that wasn't in the article I read, but assuming it's true, why does the LGBT object to God's judgment?
What's becoming clear is acceptance of homosexuality means rejection of religion.
Not true, there are many religions that have no problem with homosexuality.
Prof Marvel wrote:
The LGBT no longer pretends there's a way of believing them and the Bible.
The Gay "pride" parade in Chicago is a good example of this. The Catholic Church called it a anti-God, celebration of hedonism and got an injunction against it passing their churches on Sunday. The LGBT called the Church "homophobic."
If the shoe fits.
Prof Marvel wrote:
Absent from the LGBT response is any mention of the specific charges the church made; specifically, "celebration of hedonism."
If giant penis floats and men in penis suits aren't a celebration of hedonism I don't know what is.
You're really into those penis suits...
Prof Marvel wrote:
Don't you agree...?
If not, tell us exactly what they're a celebration of.
Humor.

Since: Apr 11

Santa Monica, CA

#151641 Jul 23, 2012
Prof Marvel wrote:
<quoted text>
Give homosexual men unfettered access to boys and they'll molest them;
That's a lie.
Prof Marvel wrote:
that's the lesson we learn from the Catholic priest scandal.
There is no evidence those priests were gay.
Prof Marvel wrote:
Conversely, give heterosexual men unfettered aces to girls they'll molest them.
Really?
Prof Marvel wrote:
Here's the disconnect: we all accept the latter as a truism, but the LGBT wants us to reject the former.
And that's the problem the LGBT: they deal in misdirection, not truth.
LOL. Go back to daydreaming about penis suits.

“Facts”

Since: May 08

Puerto Vallarta, Mexico

#151642 Jul 23, 2012
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
That's a lie.
<quoted text>
There is no evidence those priests were gay.
<quoted text>
Really?
<quoted text>
LOL. Go back to daydreaming about penis suits.
The priest proved by having sex with a person of the same sex.........ROTFLMAO
Buddy

Anonymous Proxy

#151643 Jul 23, 2012
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
There is no evidence those priests were gay.
They molested boys, they're gay - END OF STORY.

Next.

Since: Apr 11

Santa Monica, CA

#151644 Jul 23, 2012
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
If you
believe denying marriage to a relationship
will prevent love
Love is a non issue.
Marriage is a legal contract. You can enter into a contract with someone regardless of how you feel with them.
KiMare wrote:
If you
demand any committed relationship
has to be called marriage
No, don't. I don't demand the contract between Kobe and the Lakers be called a marriage.
KiMare wrote:
If you
claim rights and benefits can only be acquired
by a imposition on marriage
How can you impose on marriage?
KiMare wrote:
If you
equate the diversity of two genders
with the redundancy of same genders
Did you suckle that off of Brian_G's pap? It's meaningless.
KiMare wrote:
If you
desecrate the sacred tradition of all major religions
and violate the historic practice of every single culture in
Gay marriage doesn't desecrate anything.
KiMare wrote:
If you
believe a fundamental change to the building block of society
will have absolutely no affect
Drama queen, tell us a single possible bad effect gay marriage could have.
:::crickets chirping:::
KiMare wrote:
If you
think a law can change
the reality of crucial distinctions in relationships
If you
pretend duplicating sexuality
is the same as blending masculinity and femininity
If you
condemn some children to parents of only one gender
and deliberately deny some children one natural parent
Rose's Law:
Morons with no real argument scream, "But what about the children!?"
No matter how you feel about gay couples raising children, it's a separate issue. You can marry without raising kids, and raise kids without getting married.
KiMare wrote:
If you
ignore the design of sexual union
to manipulate a harmful act
If you
violate evolution's law of reproduction
to equate a genetic dead end
If gay marriage would prevent people from reproducing, you'd have a point.
KiMare wrote:
If you
risk the healthiest human relationship
to include one of the unhealthiest
If you
parallel the sole birthplace of every other relationship
with one that can reproduce none
Stupid, marriage ISN'T the birth place of every other relationships. You don't have to be married to give birth!
And you can marry even if you're sterile.
KiMare wrote:
If you
dilute all these things
down to just 'a committed relationship of two people'
Then, and only then, can you equate same-sex unions with marriage.
Pure babble.
Marriage is a right.
We should have equal rights.
It's unAmerican to be against equal rights, why are you?
Guess you hate what America stands for.

“Facts”

Since: May 08

Puerto Vallarta, Mexico

#151645 Jul 23, 2012
Buddy wrote:
<quoted text>
They molested boys, they're gay - END OF STORY.
Next.
Watch as he comes back and will tell you they are not gay........

Just like he says nambla is not a gay organization.....
Patrick

Poland

#151646 Jul 23, 2012
Does NoHo actually think anyone bothers to read these long-winded, repetitive, asinine posts of his?

I know I sure as hell don't!
Pucker brands

San Dimas, CA

#151647 Jul 23, 2012
Newer ones are coming soon.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#151648 Jul 23, 2012
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Love is a non issue.
Marriage is a legal contract. You can enter into a contract with someone regardless of how you feel with them.
<quoted text>
No, don't. I don't demand the contract between Kobe and the Lakers be called a marriage.
<quoted text>
How can you impose on marriage?
<quoted text>
Did you suckle that off of Brian_G's pap? It's meaningless.
<quoted text>
Gay marriage doesn't desecrate anything.
<quoted text>
Drama queen, tell us a single possible bad effect gay marriage could have.
:::crickets chirping:::
<quoted text>
Rose's Law:
Morons with no real argument scream, "But what about the children!?"
No matter how you feel about gay couples raising children, it's a separate issue. You can marry without raising kids, and raise kids without getting married.
<quoted text>
If gay marriage would prevent people from reproducing, you'd have a point.
<quoted text>
Stupid, marriage ISN'T the birth place of every other relationships. You don't have to be married to give birth!
And you can marry even if you're sterile.
<quoted text>
Pure babble.
Marriage is a right.
We should have equal rights.
It's unAmerican to be against equal rights, why are you?
Guess you hate what America stands for.
Ho, to respond you have to understand what is being said.

You obviously don't.

Smile.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Redwood City Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Council approves tentative minimum-wage plan 2 hr Hmm 2
Catalytic Converter Theft. Toyota Truck/SUV own... (May '07) 6 hr Jinlonh 953
News Silicon Valley, Bay Area see huge rise in binge... Fri John Colby PhDud 2
My Teen Verbally Abuses Me (Feb '09) Apr 21 Matthew_1 115
yellow cab 650---254----1230 24hr open (Jan '09) Apr 19 jie 22
News Pinay nanny wins slavery case in Canada Apr 7 Jennifer LaSalle 1
does anyone need a good dog walker (May '07) Mar '15 chicagodawg 46
More from around the web

Redwood City People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]