Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Bill Of Rights wrote:

<quoted text>
Marxist? Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! YOU are an F-ing imbecile! Just the fact that you'd maker such a laughable statement shows what dum fuque you truly are! Marxist! hahahahahahaha,Next you'll be calling him a Muslim and say he was born in Kenya!LOL, Please stick to see dick and Jane,it's what you're best at you phony Christian hater! Moron! Ha! Ha! Ha! You're the one slumbering!

His actions speak louder then his fancy speeches. Are you ignoring the fact he has surrounded himself with communists his whole life? Why do u think his college papers are hidden? But the fact is that Barrack Obama is presiding over the most corrupt administration in this country's history. are you aware of just how extensive the corruption was when the great obama turned stimulus money into a slush fund for his political fundraisers and corporate cronies, pushing "green energy" projects like Solyndra that line the pockets of his crony capitalist contributors at the expense of American taxpayers? Have u heard of "fast and furious"? "czars"? George Soros? Are u aware that obama deprived stockholders of their investments in GM and Chrysler? I could go on and on, but I know u are a brainwashed idiot.

Winston Smith wrote:

<quoted text>
Corrupt like the Bush/Cheney administration lining their own pockets? Or should I say the Enron/Haliburton administration?
You keep watching O'Really, Lamebrow, and Beckypoo. There's some reliable entertainment for you. Fair and balanced! Bwahahahahahahahaha! I prefer Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert. At least they each have a sense of humor. And in spite of them being satire they manage to hit the nail on the head more often than Faux News. And they're not afraid to take a swing at people on either side of the aisle.
As far as the OWS group is concerned, you may want to look at the demographics before you condemn them all.
Education:
College grads 60.7%, Grad school 29.4%, High school grad 9.9%
Employment:
Full time 47%, Part time 19.9%, Unemployed 12.3%, Other 10.7% Full time student 10%
Income:
<25K 46.5%, >/=50K 30.1%, 25-49,999 23.3%
Age:
25-44 44.5%, over 45 32%, </=24 23.5%
Gender:
male 61%, female 37.5%, other 1.5%
Ethnicity:
white 81.2%, other 7.6%, Hispanic/Latino 6.8%, Asian 2.8%, Black/African American 2.8%
Politics:
Independent/other 70.2%, Democrat 27.4%, Republican 2.4%(must be the smart ones)

Once again, this election has NOTHING to do with Bush. I noticed u didn't provide a link to ur facts. If we are going by stats, I bet the tea party is even more educated. But let the actions speak and look at the OWS rallies, the violence, the vandalism, the arrests. The OWS was a union obama backed rally to combat the tea party. It failed. I knew you lied when u were acting like u were a fair person on elections, now we know u are an obama fan.

Prof Marvel wrote:

Cut the LGBT obfuscation.

You say that is as if you had proved that there was actually "LGBT obfuscation" (whatever in the hell that is) in my post. I posted the facts that I found out about the case after I read your link. If that is what you mean by "LGBT obfuscation", I can see why you would want them cut. The facts of this case really do get in the way of a really good anti-Gay freakout by MassResistance.

Prof Marvel wrote:

You wanted an example of gay adults abusing access to schools and I gave it to you. That said, your point that one incident doesn't indict everybody is valid.

Too bad you didn't bother to think about the validity of that argument before you posted a link to a factually challenged article about a factually challenged letter, claiming a widespread pattern of abuse at this one school affiliated program (which didn't actually happen). A story which really doesn't prove that gay adults are abusing access to schools but that horny teenagers will sometimes be really stupid horny teenagers (hardly a problem unique to to Lesbian and Gay young people).

Prof Marvel wrote:

How many incidents do you need to finally admit those Straight-Gay clubs in high schools are just a way for adult gay males to hook up with young boys?

I guess if this is what you are going to pass off as "logic", you may have a point, but keep in mind, by the same "logic", I can ask how many incidents do you need to finally admit that those confessional booths in Catholic churches are just there so heterosexuals can have a quickie?

http://edition.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/europe/06/0...

And my isolated incident is more than a year more current than the one you lobbed out here and unlike the one you're hanging your hopes on, my link factually supports what I say it does.

Prof Marvel wrote:

How many?
Give it a number.

Considering that you haven't gotten anywhere close to even offering a single case in which a "Straight-Gay clubs in high schools (were) just a way for adult gay males to hook up with young boys", let's start with just one and see what happens. If you're wanting to establish that some sort of pattern might actually exist, you're going to need at least two and hope you can somehow relate them to your hypothesis. As for actually proving your hypothesis, don't worry hon, but you're still a long, long, loooooooonnnnnng way off.

Boogle Eyed wrote:

<quoted text>
I undressed a Barbie one time wanting to see her junk.
Highly disapointed I was ready to sue Hasbro or whoever makes that little plastic tease.

I could image your disappointment.......so sorry.......lol!!!

Prof Marvel wrote:

<quoted text>
So you're against homosexual fisting and pee play?
And try and give us a straight answer on this one, OK?

For one dumbfuck you never asked a question.

For two you only made a claim.

Help?

LOL!

RiccardoFire wrote:

<quoted text>Once again, this election has NOTHING to do with Bush. I noticed u didn't provide a link to ur facts. If we are going by stats, I bet the tea party is even more educated. But let the actions speak and look at the OWS rallies, the violence, the vandalism, the arrests. The OWS was a union obama backed rally to combat the tea party. It failed. I knew you lied when u were acting like u were a fair person on elections, now we know u are an obama fan.

The question I have is how does asshats lie you assume one will vote for Obama simply because we support gay marriage?

Do you not think this a simpleton thought process?

-----Sorry....I asked a simpleton.

LOL!!!

RnL2008 wrote:

<quoted text>
I could image your disappointment.......so sorry.......lol!!!

Curiosity can kill the cat, no doubt.

I actually did this when I was about 8. In fact I was so brain dead at the time I had to take a second look to make sure I didn't miss something.

LOL!!!

RiccardoFire wrote:

<quoted text>Once again, this election has NOTHING to do with Bush. I noticed u didn't provide a link to ur facts. If we are going by stats, I bet the tea party is even more educated. But let the actions speak and look at the OWS rallies, the violence, the vandalism, the arrests. The OWS was a union obama backed rally to combat the tea party. It failed. I knew you lied when u were acting like u were a fair person on elections, now we know u are an obama fan.

Wow, you truly aren't the sharpest knife in the drawer, are you?

Did the economic policies of the former administration directly lead the ability of the banks to totally tank the economy in 2008? If you say no, then you are a greater imbecile than I have given you credit for.

Two unfunded wars, deregulation, tax cuts, and deficit spending during an economic boom directly led us to the mess we are in. Any marginally intelligent elementary school student could see as much, and could understand that the economic mess we are currently in is the direct result of 8 years of enormously irresponsible behavior by the former administration.

Then again, a marginally intelligent grade school student could also stay on topic, which seems to be a specific challenge for you.

Prof Marvel wrote:

<quoted text>
More rumors of non-existent studies that support your LGBT claptrap.
If I had a nickel for every bullshit claim you fellows make around here I'd be as rich as Rockefeller.

Gotta love this.

Anything that goes against your messed up version of the wsorld are "rumors" or "non-existant studies"...LOL!!!!

It's a wonder how your no doubt dumbass momma kept her even dumber son from drinking Prestone thinking it was a refreshing fruit drink when you were little other than your even more stupid father probably thought the urine off a Friday night binge night of drinking from the poker table used it as a replacement in whatever P.O.S. vehicle got your family to the grocery store each week.

LOL!!!

RnL2008 wrote:

<quoted text>
Professors I know, who all have Doctorate degrees and teach Gender differences for starters.....but here ya go:
"There is no support for the idea that any behavior will 'cause' sexual preference to move one direction or another," says child development specialist Judith Myers-Walls, an associate professor at Purdue University in Indiana. "Sexual preference seems to be determined independently of actions or experiences."
Myers-Walls points out that behaviors such as playing with dolls or playing house do not cause a boy to become gay, just as those same activities do not cause a girl to become heterosexual. "In most cases, it is not possible to tell a child's sexual orientation until at least adolescence."
Pollack stresses that a boy playing with dolls is "absolutely normal." And even if the boy would rather play with Barbie over GI Joe regularly, it's still normal.
http://abcnews.go.com/Health/story...
I'm sure you'll find some source that will disagree with this....but then, that's nothing new!!!

Here's the link again:
http://abcnews.go.com/Health/story...

This TOPIX topic has gone downhill ever since the first "Nasty or Us" postings first appeared!

Boogle Eyed wrote:

<quoted text>
Gotta love this.
Anything that goes against your messed up version of the wsorld are "rumors" or "non-existant studies"...LOL!!!!
It's a wonder how your no doubt dumbass momma kept her even dumber son from drinking Prestone thinking it was a refreshing fruit drink when you were little other than your even more stupid father probably thought the urine off a Friday night binge night of drinking from the poker table used it as a replacement in whatever P.O.S. vehicle got your family to the grocery store each week.
LOL!!!

Sometimes the truth hurts. Poor Gary is stuck in the closet. He cant admit his sexuality due to the impending fundie criticism. Lets pray for Gary, lets pray that he comes out of the closet and gets laied by the guy next door. The poor guy dreams of anal intercourse all day long.

Boogle Eyed wrote:

<quoted text>
Curiosity can kill the cat, no doubt.
I actually did this when I was about 8. In fact I was so brain dead at the time I had to take a second look to make sure I didn't miss something.
LOL!!!

I can remember the conversations the first time a little boy doll was made anatomically correct(like in the late 70's)......parents were outraged over it.......they didn't want their little girls seeing something like that.......it didn't last long!!!

Archie Bunker wrote:

<quoted text>
The majority of the voters in California, voted for the ban on same sex marriage.
Then some liberal, left wing judge, from the 9th Circuit Court decides to strike it down.
Wrong - Wrong - Wrong. GOD IS GONNA CUT YOU DOWN!!!!!!!!!!
Edith agrees.

Actually only 52% a very small majority. only 4% over the 'majority' who voted for it.

Boogle Eyed wrote:

<quoted text>
For one dumbfuck you never asked a question.
For two you only made a claim.
Help?
LOL!

Let's try it again, Brainiac:

Are you or aren't you for the homosexual practices listed in The Little Black Book?
http://www.massresistance.org/docs/issues/bla...

Boogle Eyed wrote:

<quoted text>
Gotta love this.
Anything that goes against your messed up version of the wsorld are "rumors" or "non-existant studies"...LOL!!!!
It's a wonder how your no doubt dumbass momma kept her even dumber son from drinking Prestone thinking it was a refreshing fruit drink when you were little other than your even more stupid father probably thought the urine off a Friday night binge night of drinking from the poker table used it as a replacement in whatever P.O.S. vehicle got your family to the grocery store each week.
LOL!!!

Speaking of parents and kids, Boogle Eyed, is it correct to conclude you're telling your kids you approve of the homosexual sex guide "The Little Black Book"?

Prof Marvel wrote:

<quoted text>
Speaking of parents and kids, Boogle Eyed, is it correct to conclude you're telling your kids you approve of the homosexual sex guide "The Little Black Book"?

Prof the problem with you and I say this ever single time you come back is you always talk about Bath houses you always talk about that little black book. Will you ever shut up. Question for you how can you be stuck on the same issue for over a year now? Grow the hell up and move on dude. we're here we're queer get over it. You can keep talking about the bath houses untill you blue in the face and that little black book as well it not going to change you do not have a right to teach 1 type of sex in school and not the other. You do not have the right to say who can marry someone and who cant you do not have the right to think because you a dumb ass that can only talk about 2 god damn subjects stfu already and move the hell on.

Prof Marvel wrote:

<quoted text>
Let's try it again, Brainiac:
Are you or aren't you for the homosexual practices listed in The Little Black Book?
http://www.massresistance.org/docs/issues/bla...

You never asked this question of me - dumbfuck.

And no, I don't believe in the "practices" in your link.

RnL2008 wrote:

<quoted text>
I can remember the conversations the first time a little boy doll was made anatomically correct(like in the late 70's)......parents were outraged over it.......they didn't want their little girls seeing something like that.......it didn't last long!!!

I remember when I was given to you as a gift. You lifted my checked skirt and rubbed me. Then that evening you took me to bed with you and scissored with me.
I now wear turtlenecks and Birkenstocks and largeframed eyeglasses.

Prof Marvel wrote:

<quoted text>
Speaking of parents and kids, Boogle Eyed, is it correct to conclude you're telling your kids you approve of the homosexual sex guide "The Little Black Book"?

Who says homosexuals put it together.

Given it was an isolated incident in 2005 reported by an obvious biased source against gays and to which no gay yet has laid claim they support this pamphlet might this just be a fabrication put together to damage the gay movement to marry?

Very likely given this bullshit book never appeared anywhere else and no homosexual community is supporting it or distributing it.

Start thinking on your own fuckwad because a lot of us are tired of doing it for you.