|
“Facts”
Since: May 08
Puerto Vallarta, Mexico
|
Please wait...
ELH wrote: [QUOTE who="Here Is One."]<quoted text> ... then they ate morons as a marriage is a type of a civil union So to define a civil union by pointing to a very specific civil union type would onl..."
There are words written in a series resembling sentences, so unless you have had a stroke, you I are TRYING to say something... water is a little rough and I am using a phone But I did re post it for you
|
|
ELH
Vancouver, WA
|
KiMare wrote: <quoted text> You confuse distinguish with discriminate just like you do marriage with gay unions. Its far better to be (temporary) confused that to be an outright liar or a passive aggressive psycho or BOTH. Middle finger ;0
|
|
“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”
Since: Nov 10
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
Cheyenne277 wrote: <quoted text> Now explain why you don't "distinguish" between your marriage and those of all others with "genetic defects". That's easy. The straight man in me wanted to, and the lesbian in me had to submit being the woman.
|
|
ELH
Vancouver, WA
|
Cheyenne277 wrote: <quoted text> Care to finish? Finish? I was hoping she/he would start over and post in English this time.
|
|
ELH
Vancouver, WA
|
Where KiMare with those links to the sad infertile heterosexual couples who have to wait YEARS to adopt? And why does KiMare keep reminding me of an another sad troll who stopped posts just around the time she/he showed up? Vomit :<0~~~~~~
|
|
protest billboard
Union City, TN
|
Need help protesting a billboard. Look on the Union City, Tennessee topix forum.
|
|
“Does not play well ”
Since: Nov 07
Salina, KS
|
Please wait...
KiMare wrote: You begin with, "And you dig in with more childish insults and non-responsive responses. You really are a pathetic excuse for a human being." Then you proceed to spend your whole time with more childish insults and non-responsive responses. You really are a pathetic excuse for a human being. Smile. Oh so clever and yet you fail to identify a single childish insult you allege I made. Telling. Except obviously to you. The reality is sweetheart, you are clueless, you prove that each time you try to rationalize your irrational arguments. You are free to respond to this if you want, but as far as I'm concerned, you have relegated yourself to annoying background noise of anti-Gay blithering that contains absolutely nothing more worth responding to. You're dismissed.
|
|
ELH
Vancouver, WA
|
Silent_______Assassin wrote: Paraphilia blah, blah, blah..."homosexuality may represent developmental error" A new name and location then the same tired old anal sex obsessed cut and paste claptrap.
|
|
|
|
Since: Oct 11
Beggs, OK
|
Please wait...
Here Is One wrote: <quoted text> once again you prove you don't understand what you read Lime is to citrus as marriage is to civil union..........ROTFLMAO Wrong. There are several kinds of marriages including gay marriage. Civil union is an ignorant term you came up with.
|
|
ELH
Vancouver, WA
|
Rick in Kansas wrote: You're dismissed. Rick, Narcissists like kiMare don't like to be dismissed but if you want to get rid of him/her (or any other passive aggressive nut) just call her on one of the 'facts' she pulls out of the "data base" he/she keeps up his/her tight azz and she will ignore you forever.
|
|
Since: Oct 11
Beggs, OK
|
Please wait...
thisGuy wrote: <quoted text> Confused queers confuse even themselves...ROFL We've had the ability to accurately and affordably test people's $exuality in a lab setting since the 1950s. And in all that time, not one person has ever been able to show that their $exuality changed during the course of their lifetime. Not from gay to straight, not from straight to gay, not even from gay to bi$exual. Not through theraputic means and not through religious means. Also, there have been tons of studies done on homo$exuality - if it was a choice there would be precursors to that choice leading someone to want to be attracted to the same gender or leading them to actually having attraction for the same gender - yet not one study has ever found any precursor or cause.
|
|
Since: Oct 11
Beggs, OK
|
Please wait...
Here Is One wrote: <quoted text> lime describes a sweet orange to someone that did not know what a orange was???? Your statement is moronic I'm not talking about describing the taste. I'm talking about the general description of citrus as a tropical plant that produces an acidic fruit. You really don't get that?
|
|
Since: Oct 11
Beggs, OK
|
Please wait...
Here Is One wrote: <quoted text> I am left handed and I need to buy special rifles and golf clubs as I can't use the normal ones So you're defective. Nice.
|
|
Since: Oct 11
Beggs, OK
|
Please wait...
KiMare wrote: <quoted text> That's easy. The straight man in me wanted to, and the lesbian in me had to submit being the woman. So you're admitting you're bisexual? Did you know 90% of women have no attraction whatsoever to the same sex?
|
|
Since: Oct 11
Beggs, OK
|
Please wait...
Sir Doctor 3 wrote: <quoted text>Cool, we just got back. Lots of videos of normal typical gay perverse behavior. Sucking in the streets. Chap butt screwing. The police raided 1,100 cars with gays have pubic sex in public....they said that it was light this year. There were gay men with dolls looking like their female version. Same sex dogs trembling, not a cat in sight. The wrestle the pig booth had a line two blocks long, while pigs were squealing and dying of a heart attack in fear of their fate. The booth with the 10 block long line was a video booth, the gays were drooling, condoms already on, pricks out and lesbians with tongues out....the video was a video of a children's nursery. Wow. You should write fiction.
|
|
Bruno
Lomita, CA
|
The Feds are convinces that SSM couples will not get the much sought after benefits that queers are demanding, so deal with it
|
|
“Does not play well ”
Since: Nov 07
Salina, KS
|
Please wait...
ELH wrote: Rick, Narcissists like kiMare don't like to be dismissed but if you want to get rid of him/her (or any other passive aggressive nut) just call her on one of the 'facts' she pulls out of the "data base" he/she keeps up his/her tight azz and she will ignore you forever. I've been challenging him on her facts, or in his case, lack thereof, but she is completely oblivious. He is pretending that she actually has a clue what he is talking about, she doesn't. Just another passive-aggressive mean-spirited "christian". I was hoping he was capable of intelligent and rational discussion, boy did she ever dash those hopes quickly.
|
|
“Does not play well ”
Since: Nov 07
Salina, KS
|
Please wait...
Bruno wrote: The Feds are convinces that SSM couples will not get the much sought after benefits that queers are demanding, so deal with it What planet have you been hanging out on? The "Feds" have been convinced for more than a year now that DOMA is unconstitutional to the point that it is a complete waste of time trying to defend it. They have been working on plans to ensure that same sex couples will receive all of the federal rights, benefits, protections etc to which they are entitled and they will roll out in very short order once that silly law is finally declared dead.
|
|
Bill Of Rights
Livermore, CA
|
ELH wrote: <quoted text> A new name and location then the same tired old anal sex obsessed cut and paste claptrap. But ELH,Don't you recognize the sock puppet of our dear old Doctor Douche! You should see "IT" in all her glory in the "Prove there's a god" thread! Can't you just feel his Christian love? Just like the love of the good Reverend Phelps! LOL
|
|
“All things considered”
Since: Jun 12
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
KiMare wrote: <quoted text> See my response to Quest about placing children. Why would you use a extremes? Again, your bias shows. You again post a summary of studies that I will not accept. It even includes peer reviews that call into question the methods, as I stated; "Three researchers critiqued the effort; their comments appear in the same issue of the journal. Lisa Strohschein of the University of Alberta in Canada takes issue with the review's attempts to "tease out the effects of the parent's gender" from an array of variables." Once again, post a specific study that compares biological parents with male and female homosexual couples parenting. You really are claiming that blood is not thicker than water? That the average non-related person will care better for a child than the average biological parent??? If you have children, make sure they know you believe that... You might look up the 'Cinderella Effect' by the way. you made a blanket statement claiming children would be best with thier biological parents. i effectively debunked it. there is nothing more to say given you still have not proven your position.
|
|
Tell me when this thread is updated:
(Registration is not required)
Add to my Tracker
Send me an email
|