We are discussing matters of law and civil rights. It is illogical to hold the colonists liable for colonial law, since they were effectively under British law. If we were having a rational conversation about the laws of the United States, then your math is plainly wrongIf you wish to erase the colonies and when America was settled, because you think that it is based on barbarism instead of ciivlized then we would have to extend that until 1965 when the Civil Rights Amendment was passed.
Uhm. Same sex marriage seeks equal protection for two people, not greater protection for three. What difficulty do people who advance this argument have counting?Your argument against polygamy marriage is that two people deserve protection but three do not. Wow, April Fools. Why are all the bigoted supporters of same sex marriage, are selfish and exclude all similar groups such as polygamist since polyamory is not illegal.
Incestuous marriage has already been dealt with as a matter of law. That would not change if same sex marriage were adopted, nor is there any legitimate attempt to do so, even in the jurisdictions where same sex marriage is legal. It appears you are advancing, yet another bogus argument.You are very scattered, incest marriage has as much validity as same sex marriage and incest marriage has only been addressed as a matter of procreation and deformity of children, when same sex incest marriage does not present that issue. So, please present your argument against it since your argument against incest marriage.
Sorry Charlie. In every jurisdiction where marriage equality has come to pass, the existing (or yet to be performed) traditional marriages are as strong as they ever were. Feel free to give concrete proof to the contrary. You canít, you never give specifics on anything, and when you do, theyíre wrong.There is not movement for same sex marriage, but to undo marriage as between only a man and a woman. YThat in of it self is a movement for polygamy marriage.
Read the US Constitution, 14th Amendment, Section 1. Equal protection is already a part of the highest law of the land. It is you who are arguing to prevent equal protection.You totally lack the competence and education to present any facts. You need to learn matters of law, you are attempted to change the law, we are not trying to ban same sex marriage, because it has to exist in order to be banned.
Do you ever stop to read your posts in order to prevent yourself from saying something foolish? Has Sharia law ever existed in Oklahoma, because they absolutely passed a ban on Sharia law within the past few years? You see, something need not ever have been in existence to be banned by law.Just because you are foolish and believe the sound bites about banning gay marriages, it does not mean that the intelligent people think this. Do you even understand the definition of ban? We have never had same sex marriages and we have always defined marriage as being one man and one woman, so we do not have to prove anything. We already proved it, when we made it the marriage law of the land, common marial laws of all states, and the common international marriage law of all countries, from decade, centuries and forever.
It appears that even the most basic logic escapes you. The funny part is, you think that others are ignorant.