A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.Read more
#149316 Jul 7, 2012
Barney Frank gets married. Anybody want to kiss t bride? Dance witht he groom?
#149317 Jul 7, 2012
President OBAMA IS THE SMARTEST MOST ACTIVE, PEOPLE PERSON, PRESIDENT I'D EVER SEEN.
President OBAMA IN HIS SHORT TIME IN OFFICE HAS TURN THINGS THAT WERE HEADING FOR COMPLETE FALIURE AROUND.
HE IMPLEMENTS THINGS THATS GOOD FOR ALL PEOPLE.
NO SPECIAL RACE, NOR NATIONALITY.
THATS THE WAY A REAL PRESIDENT FOR ALL THE PEOPLE SHOULD BE.
#149318 Jul 7, 2012
WTF ? do you mean you moron
#149319 Jul 7, 2012
You know nothing about this subject joanah you queer go to bed
#149320 Jul 7, 2012
I already answered this, but let me simplify my answer so even you can understand. I don't support pedophiles (or murderers, or rapists, or church burners or even convenience store robbers., I just reserve judgment on people accused of a crime until they are (at least) charged with one. Clear enough for you.
Now let me ask a question. You have been posting pretty much none stop for the past eight + hours. I'm at work and we have only had three patients all day...why have you (and you "exit only" butt) been trolling gay issue thread all day? Are you "in call" for Professor Doctor while he is attending Gay Pride Parades searching for new material for his rants?
#149321 Jul 7, 2012
Oh it's you again ... They finally let you out of jail ... Why would I want to get out of the way you moronic queer
#149324 Jul 7, 2012
Well, as I recall YOU posted:
Then I asked:
MEANWHILE... YOU posted this hissy fit:
Meaning I didn't 'change my "lie" to a joke 2. I know all the time and 3. Your are too up tight to get the joke(s)
Now FULL CIRCLE!!!!
Which is especially funny considering that you just asked me if my other posts were just jokes...
So you see, a PERFECT example of what a humorless tightass you are!
Now, do go and Google "steerage" and HOPEFULLY you will get the joke (because it is actually VERY funny). Then get back to me about exactly who's the moron here. TTFN!
and to make it EASY for you:
(edited) "The food, which is miserable, is dealt out of huge kettles into the dinner pails provided by the steamship company. When it is distributed, the stronger push and crowd, so that meals are anything but orderly procedures. On the whole, the STEERAGE of the modern ship ought to be condemned as unfit for the transportation of human beings...Take for example, the SECOND CLASS cabin which costs about twice as much as the steerage (and sometimes not twice so much) yet a SECOND CLASS cabin passenger has six times as much deck room, much better located and well protected against inclement weather. Two to four sleep in one cabin, which is well and comfortably furnished; while in the STEERAGE from 200 to 400 sleep in one compartment on bunks, one above the other, with little light and no comforts...In the SECOND CLASS cabin the food is excellent, is partaken of in a luxuriantly appointed dining-room, is well cooked and well served; while in the STEERAGE the unsavory rations are not served, but doled out, with less courtesy than one would find in a charity soup kitchen"...
See... Steerage looks UP to (and even envies) Second class. Get it now? Funny right?
#149325 Jul 7, 2012
No content with monitoring other peoples sex lives you want to control their BED TIMES too? You tea bagging republicans are all alike!
Butt, which of the subjects you have been posting about all day are you referring too?
You "exit only" butt? Same sex marriage?
Trust me when I say that NO ONE wants to hear any more about you butt then we already been subjected too. And SSM is something you, being ""normal", know less about that anyone here with the possible exception of Brian G...I'll get back to abut steerage after I stop laughing.
#149328 Jul 7, 2012
So you don't get crushed by the march of PROGRESS?
#149330 Jul 7, 2012
Hey Bruno! Did you take your own advice and go to bed? Bruno... Dude, where'd you go? Bruno? Bruno? BRUNO!
#149336 Jul 7, 2012
"Chaps and butts hanging out...old gay sugar butt" daddies...You know, if your mane wasn't "Judge Moiters" I'd swear that you're "Professor Marvelous" or "Doctor Rentboy"...Butt, butt, butt, butt..I know! You're just a "normal guy" who is trolling topix for gay threads at midnight...
"little" Judge is getting anxious and according to Professor Marvelous the really hot rent boys are hard to book this late at night...so you'd better be getting back to your porn.
#149338 Jul 8, 2012
"Guarantee"? Are you sure? I have has several single men hire surrogates to carry their genetic offspring but have NEVER met a straight single guy that wanted to adopt.
That aside, the fact is that there is no difference in how agencies treat potential parents who are single. On the other hand, your personal sexual fantasies aside, the laws for Lesbian/Gay adoption vary greatly from state to state. Some states allow second-parent adoptions by the unmarried partner of an existing legal parent. Some states allow a SINGLE LGBT to adopt but NOT LGBT couples.
Oh dear...You're WRONG!
Despite your (written) "guarantee" the facts turned the EXACT OPPOSITE of what you posted. Wow, I bet NO ONE saw THAT coming!
And you're WRONG again! http://www.youtube.com/watch...
Though the co leader has to be female men can become Girl Scout (and Brownie) leaders...and oh dear...
so can lesbians.
And it's THREE for THREE on the professor Marvelous bullshit parade!
Wrong!Wrong! Wrong! http://www.youtube.com/watch...
It turns out that the BSA charter (or some such crap) does not allow gay men to become a BOY SCOUT LEADER...or for that matter, allow an openly gay youth to stay in scouting.
And (in the interest of important "christian" values like fairness and equality) lesbians have been kicked out as cub scout leaders as well. Even in a case like this one where the parents of the boys in the den did not care:
I wouldn't trust a suspect organization like BSA to teach my boys ethics or values.
#149339 Jul 8, 2012
As I have already stated you are THREE for THREE on this episode of 'Professor Marvelous's bullshit parade'
So professor...What do Joe Gibson, St. Petersburg, Florida- Martin Turner, Texas-David McDonald Rankin,College Park, Maryland- Gary Lee Gephart, Oceanside, California- Howard W. Curtis,Haverhill, Massachusetts- James Hiatt, Texas- Brad Stowell Blackfoot, Idaho- Gary Wade Brown, Orem, Utah- Charles Donald Corley, Birmingham, Alabama and James Molyneaux, Portville, New York have in Common?
It turns out that they are all HETEROSEXUAL scout masters who have been convicted of molesting boy scouts.
Imagine that! Men sexually attracted to boys getting leadership/control positions in a organization for BOYS. Go figure.
And it seems that are even confirmed cases where the BSA leadership looked the other way when they should have been PROTECTING the kids they are supposed to be serving:
Richard Turley was convicted of kidnapping and sexually assaulting an 11-year-old Canadian scout. After 18 months, he was released from a mental institution he volunteer work at a California scout camp.
Where he assaulted three more boys.
Upon learning this, BSA told Turley to return to Canada, but did not warn Canada Scouts about Turley’s criminal behavior.
In 1996, Turley went on to assault three more scouts, in Victoria, BS. He was sentenced to seven years in prison and was released in 2002. In a 2011 interview Turley said,“If I was a parent, I would never put my kids in Scouts.”
Yep, BSA actually protected Turley from the authorities. After all it's not as if he's GAY or anything WEIRD like that.
Hey "professor"Just how do you manage to pack so much bullshit into ONE post?
#149341 Jul 8, 2012
Fox radio's Todd Starnes is a very good Christian heterosexual bachelor who has a very big problem with gays who, he believes, are trying to take over good Christian American with their "militant" gay agenda. And to fight against this nefarious evil, he has taken on the task of exposing this pernicious plot by reporting bogus affronts, by the gay community, towards "God-loving Americans" and tweeting homophobic bullshit like how someday traditional marriage will be a hate crime and "militant" gays are taking over the public school system. And in his quest to reveal the horrors that the LGBT community is unleashing on real Americans, Todd is willing to go into the belly of the beast and expose his very heterosexual self to the Brooklyn gay pride parade. It was a tough job but Todd had to do it. And in so doing, he was quite observant.
Among his tweets which mocked the participants he noticed "lots of male thongs and leather chaps." Hmmmm....
“The Great and Wonderful Marvel”
Since: Aug 09
#149345 Jul 8, 2012
Good point -- religion and homosexuality can't coexist.
Which brings up the question YOU should answer -- your support of homosexuality requires you to reject the teachings of every known religion.
Why do you think the LGBT is right and all known religions wrong?
“The Great and Wonderful Marvel”
Since: Aug 09
#149346 Jul 8, 2012
Of course she can get married in North Carolina like everyone else can.
Here are the requirements:
#149348 Jul 8, 2012
EVERY known religion? Aside from Episcopalians. And Unitarians. And Reformed and Reconstructionist Judaism. And all sects of Hinduism. I couod go on but since it only took ONE to DISPROVE your claim why bother?
Well, at least you didn't give the "guarantee" you posted when you claimed that "any straight male who presents himself to an adoption agency requesting a cute little girl will be turned away. Meanwhile, a gay couple can walk in and walk out with a DOZEN cute little boys".
Do you have a filter on your computer that prevents you for accessing any information that was written after 1966? I would advise you to make the necessary adjustments because the crap you are posting is making you look like an ignorant asshat.
“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”
Since: Nov 10
#149349 Jul 8, 2012
You are slow...
DOMA was simply keeping the definition from changing.
Gays wouldn't be excluded from marriage if the definition already allowed them...
This isn't even kindergarten logic...
Perfect example of gay twirling in the face of a blatant schooling...
-"Gays marry all over the world"
No, they 'marry' in a handful of nations. "all over the world" gay 'marriage' is rejected. In fact, there are more countries that jail and kill gays than allow 'gay marriage'.
-"Not a damn thing you can do about it."
Sorry, but I can and am doing something about it. That is precisely why you are having a hissy rant. And there is not a damn thing you can do about it.
-"So you just keep whining about your made up "redefinitions"!!! LOL!!"
Wrong, I'm the one that posted actual definitions, YOU are the one who made them up. LOL!!!
#149350 Jul 8, 2012
Wondering what you going to do now that you have been made aware that not ALL KNOWN RELIGIONS agree with your OPINION?
My vote is that you crawl back under that rock where you were spawned and stay there.
BTW how was the parade? Did you get to see as many gyrating bare bottoms and assless chaps as you'd hope too? How about penis costumes, penis balloons and (of course) GIANT paper mache penises?
“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”
Since: Nov 10
#149351 Jul 8, 2012
Frantic gay twirl...
"I am a Canadian economist who has worked on family issues in Canada and the U.S. for the past 26 years. Although I’ve mostly studied matters of divorce, custody, child support, and the general institution of marriage, for the past few years I’ve been working on series of empirical projects related to same-sex marriage. I’ve been using a special data set in Canada that is large (over 300,000 individuals) and random (with weights), that directly identifies sexual orientation, and that was designed by Statistics Canada. In the process of working on same-sex marriage I have read almost every study conducted on same-sex parenting. I say all of this because, unlike most people who have commented on the recent Regnerus study, I’m a qualified outsider to the U.S. debate and perhaps can provide some (relatively) neutral assessment.
The study published by Professor Mark Regnerus this week certainly has some flaws, and many of the comments made about it have some merit. However, as a matter of intellectual honesty, it needs to be recognized that virtually all the studies of same-sex parenting that have been conducted thus far fall far short of any standard of scientific testing."
The rest of the article explains why. Read it and flail...
Add your comments below
|Vacaville schools official: Measure A projects ...||38 min||Latricia||2|
|The Corner Coffee Shop: The new NOTHING Thread (Jan '08)||45 min||hamilton snark||6,780|
|White Guys: Would you date a black girl? Elaborate (Nov '07)||Fri||Taylor||5,297|
|Folsom High Student's Body Found Hanging From Tree (Mar '07)||Mar 25||JavaGal||23|
|Varekai from Cirque du Soleil is coming to town...||Mar 24||malloryciliberti||1|
|Review: CheerXperience||Feb 28||mary s||4|
|Review: Resolute Security Group (Jun '14)||Feb '15||whatajoke||5|
Find what you want!
Search Rancho Cordova Forum Now
Copyright © 2015 Topix LLC